EXPERTS WRONG AGAIN.

The news today that Government debt in August rose to record levels does not surprise me, even though the recent financial disasters seem to have surprised the "experts".
One reason given for this is that the government tax take has been less than expected. Taxes may have to rise it is said or QE (printing money).
All this rubbish shows how incompetent those in power are.

One thing I agree with Vince Cable about is that we are entering the financial equivalent of a war.
So how do we get this ever increasing debt burden reduced? It is so obvious.

Spend less.

Now that does not mean cutting essential services nor pushing people into poverty It just means spending on things and goods which give us a return.

Thus the money wasted on "Human Rights" could be stopped. Gypsies could be ejected from their illegal sites without vast expenditure. Illegal immigrants, especially those who have committed criminal acts could be instantly deported and the doors closed to ALL further immigration.
Legal aid and translation services for foreigners could be STOPPED as could all benefits and medical treatment.
Foreign wars should cease.
The EU should be exited.
Spending on non essential council and government services should be stopped.
Equalities legislation should be abolished.
The Global Warming scam should be ignored, reducing fuel prices and the burden it places on our industries.
Foreign aid should be STOPPED.

A recent survey showed that the per capita GDP in Britain was lower than other Western countries. That does not mean that the average worker does not work as hard or is more unproductive than his foreign counterparts. It just means that there are too many useless jobs which we could do without but which are paid for out of the productive workers on whom our national wellbeing depends.

I was recently in Germany, a country with a high standard of living and contrary to what we are told they do not work harder. They just have to carry fewer government paid parasites and thus more of their national effort goes into productive work.
They also have little vandalism and a patriotic outlook and buy German products when possible, creating a virtuous circle of industry and prosperity.

There are far too many non essential positions whose absence we would not miss. We could have the same standard of living with less work if that work had a tangible benefit.

I believe the government should thus take the measures outlined above and kick start the economy by large infrastructure projects, transport, construction, sea defences etc which would with a multiplier effect create millions of jobs (and a larger tax take).
Our coal industry could be resurrected and our power generation brought back under British NATIONAL ownership.

We would also get something back for our money in an improved environment, unlike the many PC jobs which are a cost with no return.

Will they implement some or any of these proposals? Not yet, but they will have to do something when the Euro goes down and the s**t really does hit the fan.

I am thus pessimistic in the short term but in the long term I am guardedly optimistic as even the ignorant unscientific morons now in control will be forced to do the right thing by our country and people, but I hope it will not be too late.

And then--

WE MAY BE ABLE TO RETIRE AT 65.

UNEQUAL EQUALITY

The shambles at the attempted eviction of the "travellers" from the illegal Dale Farm site says much about what's wrong with our society.

Like many of those groups who seem to have preference in our society they want it both ways.
They want and are given ethnic minority status, in itself a scam perpetrated by the equality industry which far from promoting equality gives these groups preference.
Hardly equality.
They are not even an identifiable ethnic group. They are a bunch of Irish people, who in their wish to benefit from a tax free life roam OUR countryside doing jobs cash in hand.
They are also non travelling travellers, who it seems do not want to travel but to settle down in permanent houses, a contradiction I think. In any case for people whose way of life is travelling it is strange and ironic that they own valuable properties in Ireland.

Whe I went to Ireland 35 years ago there were many travellers there who occupied various bits of unused land. Each different group had a speciality. Some of these untidy encampments specialised in wheels, others in machinery and others in scrap iron etc, a difficult thing to do if you are travelling.

Nowadays there is little evidence of travellers infesting Ireland. The Irish government became fed up with them and legislated against them and that country became a lot tidier as a result, but the trash which inhabited them came to Britain.

Now we have a plague in our land, unwanted by 99% of the people, fed up of the filth left behind when they do travel and are moved on and the thieving which occurs when they are in the vicinity.
Local people are threatened with violence when they protest.

The main reason that this has become a problem apart from idiotic PC laws giving them preference is the indolence of local authorities.
The travellers know the law, even though they do not abide by it. They set up camp on playing fields on a Friday night knowing that no one from the local authority will be on duty to eject them until Monday and that they will be given notice at great cost in legal fees (to the council)

Afterwards when they have moved on the local authority is faced with the filth they have left behind and must pay extra bonuses to workers to clean it up.

The farce at Dale Farm and the alleged 10 million it has so far cost is down to incompetence and lawyers fat fees.
The council should have gone in hard quickly and stopped this unauthorised camp and bulldozed the buildings. Electricity and water should have been cut off (do they pay for this?).

Even this week the council gave notice of the time the bailiffs were to go in, giving the pikeys time to prepare and to invite the scum of the earth to assist them.
If they had gone in sooner as soon as the order had been given it would have all been over now.

I have been involved twice with the stopping of illegal travellers and know of others.
The way to get them off, within hours is to go in hard and let them know that they will not see the night out on that field. When they see you mean business they move off quickly, but then the local authorities are too indolent and PC and thus we the taxpayers are left with astronomic bills.

I believe this rabble should have their vehicles confiscated to pay for the costs of their removal and this would be a deterrant to other such scum from trying these tactics elsewhere.
AND if thay really need somewhere to park their caravans I am sure that wealthy communists such as Vanessa Redgrave have land to where they could be relocated.

NOW TO THE ANARCHISTS.

Anarchists by definition believe in the law. They are however keen to use it at the slightist opportunity to protest at (police brutality) again having it both ways.
If you want the protection of the law you should abide by it.
If you, being an anarchist and thus not believing in the law ,you in my opinion put yourself outside the law and anything you get you have brought on yourselves.

So they should all be arrested and locked up for aiding an illegal act and their dole stopped as they have no intention of working.

The above is just an isolated if large incident of similar ones all over the country.
Think how much money could be saved if the authorities acted.

Some local communities have acted directly and stopped this scourge.
They have shown how it can be done.

Now it's up to the councils.

P.S Remember Codnor? We were only allowed six caravans on a field over a mile from the village for our RWB weekend fest. Any more and the police would have moved in immediately.
We were not even allowed to have an unamplified guitar solo 600 yards from the next building and the country lane.The police and council officials came in at 10 pm and stopped it.

SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS and it's not us.

BRITISH HISTORY TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS - A THING OF THE PAST.

The continual erosion of the British identity started by the traitorous New Labour still continues under the ConDem(ned) govt.

When will our children be taught about their country and it's people, past and identity? A lack of historical knowledge about ones own country and culture leaves a gaping hole which can be filled with new immigrant history and culture at the sake of ones own identity. As can be seen with our History now being taught with Geography/Humanities as a combined subject.

"Research shows that rising numbers of pupils are receiving just two years of compulsory lessons during secondary education instead of the recommended three because of pressure on school timetables.

According to figures, many schools fail to offer history as a discreet subject at all – often merging it with geography to form generic “humanities” lessons.

It also emerged that some head teachers ban pupils from choosing history at GCSE-level amid fears they will fail to gain good grades – damaging schools’ league table rankings.

The disclosure is made in a study by the Historical Association that will raise fresh fears over the future of the subject in English state schools.

It follows the publication of separate figures this summer showing that the overall proportion of pupils studying the subject in state comprehensives dropped by almost a fifth under Labour.

The Coalition is attempting to reverse the decline by introducing the controversial “English Baccalaureate” – a school leaving certificate that rewards pupils who gain good GCSEs in traditional academic disciplines. To qualify, teenagers must score C grades in five subjects, including history or geography.

But the latest study suggests the reforms have made “little impression so far”.

The Historical Association surveyed teachers in 403 secondary schools and colleges as part of an annual poll.

Currently, pupils are supposed to take history throughout Key Stage 3 – the first three years of secondary education – before being allowed to drop it at GCSE aged around 14.

But the study found 11.7 per cent of schools now squeezed Key Stage 3 into just two years to give pupils more time on their GCSE studies. This compares with 10.5 per cent a year earlier.

Researchers said almost a quarter of schools failed to teach history as a separate subject at all. In many cases, schools offered it as part of combined humanities classes, alongside geography.

One-in-five schools also said the amount of history taught to first year pupils had been cut this year compared with 2010.

In a further conclusion, some 16 per cent of schools said they put “restrictions” on the number of pupils who could study GCSEs in history, with poor performers often pushed onto alternative courses or vocational qualifications.

“In some cases, the cut-off was defined in statistical terms, with the lowest ability group being barred or only the top sets offered the opportunity,” said the study."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8774758/History-lessons-squeezed-out-of-crowded-timetables.html

I AM THE INFIDEL YOUR (IMAM WARNED ABOUT)

I AM THE INFIDEL YOUR (IMAM WARNED ABOUT) - Joe Dan Gorman

LIVE TO DIE (FOR VIRGINS IN THE SKY)

LIVE TO DIE (FOR VIRGINS IN THE SKY) - Joe Dan Gorman

THE FUTURE FOR NATIONALISM

With the turmoil in the country with riots perpetrated , mainly by blacks with some help from the white underclass, and increasing unemployment and the prospects of a financial meltdown one could ask why the support for the "main" parties remaines solid.

The Tories, or true consevatives do not like Cameron who is seen as a weak elitist with no notion of the meaning of conservativism. He is presiding over the destruction of our society as did his predecessor Brown, and conserving nothing.

Labour still has many staunch adherents (for traditional reasons) in spite of that party betraying the grass roots of the founding members with their getting into bed with millionaires and wealthy bankers, and allowing millions of immigrants to take priority in jobs and housing.
Their leader is uncharismatic and trusted by no one.

The Lib Dems hardly warrant comment having few policies apart from their pro Euro and immigrant stance and their leader will in all likelyhood lose his seat at the next election for betraying his constituents.

So come an election what are the many who despair of our country and the betrayal by the major parties to do?
Few are satisfied by these parties and vote for them because they see no alternative.

Some speak of Farage and his tin pot UKIP which although supposedly anti EU has no other policies. Farage himself has an irritating demeanour which annoys people and puts them off voting for him

That leaves us, as an alternative vehicle with policies which DO resonate with voters.

So why do they not vote for us?

One reason is that they see the chaos in our party and think if we are not able to run a small organisation such as ours efficiently we are not fit to run the country. There is a logic to this opinion.

But FAR more serious is the fact that many say they would vote for us with another leader.

THEY DO NOT LIKE NICK GRIFFIN and he is thus an impediment on our progress.
As a person I like him in spite of his renaging on past promises and his over ruling of the Party's democratic decisions. He has done a lot for our party but he should see if he has any political instinct that it is time for him to step down.
I am sure he has that instinct and knows that his continual clinging on to power is in his own interests and not those of nationalism.
Thus , in spite of what he has done he is hastening the Party's demise.

He should remember however that for all he has achieved for nationalism he has not done it alone. To negate the hard work of hundreds of dedicated workers is inexcusable.
Yes he has built the Party up, but it does not belong to him and he should remember that and resign in the interests of both party and country.

We should be making big strides now. All the indications are in our favour, but we are becoming sidelined and IGNORED.
Our bye election results are abysmal when we should be progressing strongly.

Perhaps he does not know it, beingsurrounded by sychophants whose position depends on saying the right things to him, but he should be made to realise the true collapse of the Party.

The time is ripe for a nationalist resurgence. Many people wish to join, but again and again they say they will not join if Nick is the leader.

In Wigan we have twenty people who wish to join but are waiting for a new leader and a clean hierarchy. These people, many of them potential activists will not join as yet.
I am sure this situation is replicated across the country.

The people NEED a voice. We should be providing it and we are not.
Our party with its present set up is letting our country down, but we will not grow as we should until the management and leadership is rectified.

Individually there is only a little each of us can do. We are the small fry, but Nick Griffin could save our party by stepping down.

Then all those expelled (the best in the Party) would come back and form a nucleus around which all those who seek a patriotic political home can gather and I believe the sky would be the limit.

At present our party has become a laughing stock at best and at worst ignored.

We have the potential. The people need us.

All we need is a new management and leader.

For our country's sake, PLEASE LET US HAVE IT!

RETIRE AT 67, NOT A GOOD IDEA.

About forty years ago when I was a young councillor after meetings we discussed the future.
At that time in a period of full employment but rapidly increasing automation the topic was what would happen if/when millions of people were displaced from their work in the manufacturing industries we then had.

Some would be taken up it was considered by shortening the working week, sharing out the work and allowing people more leisure.

This to a degree has happened. The average working week has been reduced from Forty nine hours a week to less than forty (for manual workers).
Kids of today can not believe that Saturday morning working was the norm.

Since then we have lost millions of jobs in mining, manufacturing shipbuilding, fishing, steel and farming as well as many other productive industries.
In addition computers arrived which supposedly reduced the requirement for office workers, although their benefits in this respect are debatable.

Where did all these jobs go? I realise that thanks to the greedy globalist bankers and City types much of manufacturing has been outsourced to countries of the Far East, so where do those displaced from useful work now find employment.

Well, some in service industries such as restaurants but even these types of jobs have been to a degree lost because of foreign travel (think Blackpool boarding house owners and the closure of small shops as a result of supermarkets))

Many have been recruited into the plethora of government non jobs such as diversity officers and outreach co ordinators and paid for by the taxpayer. This put an additional burden on the remaining productive industries, undermining their competitiveness and hastening their demise.

Thus we have had for thirty years an accelerating reduction in productive capacity, growing unemployment and millions of new alien people many of whom do not work.

I now come to the point of this little diatribe.

WE are now told that the retirement age will be increased to 67, in stages as people are living longer. I do of course accept this last fact.

However if people have worked hard all their lives I believe they are entitled to some leisure at the end of it.

Also, if people are expected to work two extra years (women seven) it should be asked in what capacity these people to be employed?
Most manufacturing processes not outsourced are comprehensively automated and increasingly so, thus requiring few extra workers.
We could of course bring back to our country much of the heavy manufacturing industry we GAVE away and although a good idea that has not been mentioned as a solution.

So what are we left with to employ people for another two years?
All I can see is ticking boxes in an overblown non productive State sector as other jobs are not there. As well as that there are over two million young people who have been poorly educated in the wrong subjects languishing on the dole who would be admirably suited to this important function if required.

But that is not the main reason for this brilliant idea.
Pensions pay more than unemployment benefit so those who would today be classed as pensioners would be reclassified as unemployed and thus cheaper. There would be no more people in work than there are now, it would just mean that the unemployed would cost less, but not that much less as dole is still a cost to the State.

Everyone accepts that the huge demographic problem of a naging population must mean a different solution to that of the past. Is there an answer?
Yes I believe there is.

Most of our daily needs can be provided with a fraction of the work than was necessary in the pre computer and automated days, and can be provided for by a better allocation of resources.

We should exit the EU, control our fisheries, halt immigration and handouts to so called asylum seekers, halt foreign aid and wars. These measures would pay for people's retirement several times over. Remember those now of retirement age paid their taxes which have been wasted by government extravagence.

There should be no need in a modern industrialised country for people to work until they drop.

There is more to life than toil and in any case after fifty years of work a few years of rest have been well earned.

Until we get a competent and honest government and an electorate which can see through the garbage peddled by it we will have to suffer these fools.

However big changes are afoot and the people will become increasingly restive all over Europe as evidenced by the panic by the incompetent thieves as yet in control at the implications of the inevitable Greek default.

THERE IS STILL HOPE.