Saturday, 9 July 2011
THIS IS WHERE OUR "SECURITY EXPERTS" WERE WIPED OUT AND TREASON TO BEGIN
The pilots were accused of gross negligence after 29 people died on the flight from Belfast to Inverness when it crashed on the Mull of Kintyre 17 years ago.
Campaigners fought for nearly two decades for Flt Lt Jonathan Tapper and Flt Lt Richard Cook to be cleared of blame.
Liam Fox, the defence secretary, ordered a review into the cause of the 1994 crash in September last year,
The independent report, chaired by Lord Philip, a retired judge, is understood to say that the pilots should not have been accused of gross negligence.
The Chinook, carrying 25 of Britain’s most senior intelligence experts and four special forces crew, crashed in thick fog on 2 June 1994, in what was the RAF’s worst peacetime accident.
Two RAF Air Marshals concluded that the pilots were guilty of gross negligence but their findings have been disputed by campaigners ever since.
Despite the long campaign by the pilots’ supporters, successive defence secretaries have refused to overturn the Marshals’ conclusions.
But now, after a nine-month inquiry, Lord Philip’s recommendations have been submitted to Mr Fox, who is due to make a statement to MPs on the findings next week.
Campaigners hope that the defence secretary will posthumously clear the pilots of blame.
In April this year, newly discovered Ministry of Defence documents cast doubt on the original explanation for the Chinook crash, suggesting that official concerns had been expressed over the airworthiness of the RAF’s fleet of Chinooks two years earlier.
It is understood the documents were never shown to the officer in charge of signing off the aircraft’s airworthiness.
------------------------------------
The above crash killed the most senior security experts that Britain had.
With the death of these men and the knowledge that they took with them to the grave allowed the treasonus destruction of Britain and the creation of the EU to begin.
The Heads of Britains Security Services were never allowed to travel together to protect them from such disasters, yet they were ALL allowed to travel together in this Chinook. Something that they would never normally do. So why did they ?
When you ask yourself how we have gotten ourselves into this position with a foreign enemy invited to live amongst us, the 25 men mentioned above would never have allowed this to happen.
When they went to their deaths it was hoped that we, as a nation and a people would follow suit. Tony Bliar and his TREASONUS CRONIES would never have been allowed to come to power under the guidance and direction of our Security Services led by the men who were more than probably murdered in the Mull of Kintyre air crash.
SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
Enough for a while of this navel gazing!
There will be few nationalists who do not feel a little schadenfreude at the closure of the News of The World.
The owner, ruthless global capitalist Murdoch is finally getting a few of his just desserts. His paper's underhand and criminal tactics to sensationalise and libel innocent people who can not afford legal redress have been long notorious.
Our party has often been libelled by his publications, mainly I believe on account of our opposition to his capitalist creed which puts the interests of the wealthy above the people of our country.
Of course he has no allegience to Britain. He is an Aussie living in the USA and his media empire with its near stranglehold on news represents a danger to democracy.
He has far too much power and political influence for one who has not been elected, and the courting of him and subaservience to him by our political leaders shows their contempt for us and their cowardice.
As has been said before "absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Fortunately he has been shown that he does not have absolute power and it is to be hoped that he is to be cut down to size.
Not that the other press barons are much better. The press is controlled by less than a dozen powerful men, all biased against the British people and our party.
The internet is giving us an opportunity to counter this democratic deficit but the press still remains powerful.
That's why the demise or rebranding of VoF is such a disappointment. Formerly it was printed on newsprint and was informative and well edited and people asked for it.
The new version looks like a leaflet which in effect it is with little to stimulate the reader.
The reason for this change was said to be to improve it, but I have been told it was because we had not paid for the printing of previous editions.
Whatever the reason there is little demand for it, and we still in spite of the internet need a newspaper vehicle to promote our policies.
Who decided to change the format and the reason I can only have an educated guess, another reason for openness in our party.
Be that as it may, PLEASE BRING BACK VOF
There will be few nationalists who do not feel a little schadenfreude at the closure of the News of The World.
The owner, ruthless global capitalist Murdoch is finally getting a few of his just desserts. His paper's underhand and criminal tactics to sensationalise and libel innocent people who can not afford legal redress have been long notorious.
Our party has often been libelled by his publications, mainly I believe on account of our opposition to his capitalist creed which puts the interests of the wealthy above the people of our country.
Of course he has no allegience to Britain. He is an Aussie living in the USA and his media empire with its near stranglehold on news represents a danger to democracy.
He has far too much power and political influence for one who has not been elected, and the courting of him and subaservience to him by our political leaders shows their contempt for us and their cowardice.
As has been said before "absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Fortunately he has been shown that he does not have absolute power and it is to be hoped that he is to be cut down to size.
Not that the other press barons are much better. The press is controlled by less than a dozen powerful men, all biased against the British people and our party.
The internet is giving us an opportunity to counter this democratic deficit but the press still remains powerful.
That's why the demise or rebranding of VoF is such a disappointment. Formerly it was printed on newsprint and was informative and well edited and people asked for it.
The new version looks like a leaflet which in effect it is with little to stimulate the reader.
The reason for this change was said to be to improve it, but I have been told it was because we had not paid for the printing of previous editions.
Whatever the reason there is little demand for it, and we still in spite of the internet need a newspaper vehicle to promote our policies.
Who decided to change the format and the reason I can only have an educated guess, another reason for openness in our party.
Be that as it may, PLEASE BRING BACK VOF
HOT UNDER THE COLLAR
We received our booklet from supporters of Andrew Brons this morning.
It is dynamite and exposes in a clear and concise form some of the shady practices and corruption employed by the leadership of the party.
It charts in detail the decline in our party fortunes over the last two years with the numbers of council seats lost and our proportion of the vote going down.
Any leader who was interested in the future of our party and country would have done the decent thing and resigned as he promised.
Yes Nick Griffin has done great things in the past but it is time for him to go before he does more damage.
The booklet has got them rattled and contain the allegations of "lies".I have had a text and e mail asking me to complain about the leaflet.
If so let the party sue, after all Griffin seems to spend much of his time in court at great cost to the membership.
Let him prove the so called lies, an accusation he frequently uses without any proof.
It is alleged that the leaflet has been put out by Butler.That is not true.
Although I have had no part in it I know who has put it out . It was put out by Party members and thus not third parties as alleged.It was not put out by Andrew Brons nor I believe with his knowledge.
It was put out in an attempt to clear away the deceit and chicanery of the present leadership and tell the truth openly, and hopefully save our party from its downward spiral.
It is said to be illegal.
No it is not. It is only illegal according to the rules made up by Griffin to consolidate his advantage.
Some will have to wait until Monday as the letter was sent second class.
I was unable to attend the hustings last night but have been told that Brons was accused of wishing to bring Sadie Graham back in.
Completely untrue.
Also Clive Jefferson kept butting in with accusations that Brons owed the party money including £500 for the use of a table at the annual conference which he did not ask for.
I was at the conference and the question must be asked why the use of a table whether oredered or not justifies the cost of £500.
The same accusation was made in Liverpool I believe.
It is evident that Andrew is the man of integrity and refuses to divert EU funds illegally, a misdemeanour for which the party is now being charged by the EU.
I suppose by putting my views on this blog I will be considered a third party.
No I am not.
I am a long standing member and refuse to be denied my say, and I say that if (when) Griffin wins the party will rapidly decline into obscurity.
The sad thing is that it was all so unnecessary.
A democratic party devoid of expulsions for asking questions and openness over financial matters could have prevented all this.
All we get are allegations of lieing.
To sort it out once and for all--PUBLISH THE ACCOUNTS AND MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS and refute the allegations.
It is dynamite and exposes in a clear and concise form some of the shady practices and corruption employed by the leadership of the party.
It charts in detail the decline in our party fortunes over the last two years with the numbers of council seats lost and our proportion of the vote going down.
Any leader who was interested in the future of our party and country would have done the decent thing and resigned as he promised.
Yes Nick Griffin has done great things in the past but it is time for him to go before he does more damage.
The booklet has got them rattled and contain the allegations of "lies".I have had a text and e mail asking me to complain about the leaflet.
If so let the party sue, after all Griffin seems to spend much of his time in court at great cost to the membership.
Let him prove the so called lies, an accusation he frequently uses without any proof.
It is alleged that the leaflet has been put out by Butler.That is not true.
Although I have had no part in it I know who has put it out . It was put out by Party members and thus not third parties as alleged.It was not put out by Andrew Brons nor I believe with his knowledge.
It was put out in an attempt to clear away the deceit and chicanery of the present leadership and tell the truth openly, and hopefully save our party from its downward spiral.
It is said to be illegal.
No it is not. It is only illegal according to the rules made up by Griffin to consolidate his advantage.
Some will have to wait until Monday as the letter was sent second class.
I was unable to attend the hustings last night but have been told that Brons was accused of wishing to bring Sadie Graham back in.
Completely untrue.
Also Clive Jefferson kept butting in with accusations that Brons owed the party money including £500 for the use of a table at the annual conference which he did not ask for.
I was at the conference and the question must be asked why the use of a table whether oredered or not justifies the cost of £500.
The same accusation was made in Liverpool I believe.
It is evident that Andrew is the man of integrity and refuses to divert EU funds illegally, a misdemeanour for which the party is now being charged by the EU.
I suppose by putting my views on this blog I will be considered a third party.
No I am not.
I am a long standing member and refuse to be denied my say, and I say that if (when) Griffin wins the party will rapidly decline into obscurity.
The sad thing is that it was all so unnecessary.
A democratic party devoid of expulsions for asking questions and openness over financial matters could have prevented all this.
All we get are allegations of lieing.
To sort it out once and for all--PUBLISH THE ACCOUNTS AND MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS and refute the allegations.
Friday, 8 July 2011
THE CONTEST GETTING NASTY
The leadership contest is hotting upand getting nasty.
On the official website the two candidates give their 500 word statements, provoking a barrage of comments 95% of which attack Brons and praise Griffin.
This seems strange and not in keeping with what people are telling me.
I believe Griffin's attack dogs have been loosed from their not very tight leashes.
Many of the statements they make are patent lies. It is a pity that they seem incapable of civilised discussion without resorting to untruths.
Today there are two NW "hustings", one at 5 pm in Salford and one later in Liverpool.
The fact that there are two on the same day with the first being so early (and inconvenient for workers), and at such short notice demonstrates the underhand tactics of our present leader.
Who decided the times of these hustings and the short notice? The same person who dropped the proxy votes on the GMM two weeks ago. Mr Nick Griffin.
I note in his election leaflet his present jobs are MEP, Director of Publicity and editor of VoF and Party Leader.
I would not have thought he would have had time to be editor of our paper and am still puzzled why Martin Wingfield an experienced journalist has been replaced.
It is evident that he has in the poor quality nowadays of what was a well written and intersting publication.
It is as if Nick Griffin does not trust anybody to work for the party except his family and the recent sycophants who have hitched their waggon to his and thus depend on him.
All the senior members who ran the party when I joined 8 years ago have now been replaced, expelled or left in disgust, including long standing members and councillors and activists.
The ones in control now are recent members, ill suited to their positions.
So it is evident that Griffin is not a unity candidate. He has presided over a mass exodus of talent and replaced that talent with mediocrity.
He says the party is growing now but gives no actual figures. I know many who after years of work have given up on the party and many are just hanging on in order to vote for a new leader.
This fact is not shown in the moderated comments on the main website.
We need to join together and Brons is the man to do it.
Too much venom has been spouted. It is time for an amnesty for all those driven away by the high handed actions of our present leader and join together as a strong political force.
Unfortunately those now outside the party will not come back to work with us unless we have a new leader.
If Brons is elected he will only be leader for a year until a new constitution is formulated.
If Griffin wins we are stuck with him in the downward spiral for another 4 years by which time there will be no effective party left.
An often forgotten decision taken at Codnor 3 years ago at the time when we voted for yearly elections was a generous pension for Griffin paid for out of party funds of if my memory serves me right of over £20,000 per year.
I wonder if he has changed this decision like he changed the one year rule for elections?
I am sure he will have tucked away somewhere,the obligation for the party to fund a generous retirement for him.
One last thing.
He says he is campaigning for a referendum on leaving the EU.
Good, we are all in favour of that.
BUT, When is the next batch of the "Bring our Boys Home" petitions to be handed in.
The first 10,000 were handed in amid much publicity and it was stated that others would be delivered later.
Have they been delivered ?
I'll not hold my breath.
On the official website the two candidates give their 500 word statements, provoking a barrage of comments 95% of which attack Brons and praise Griffin.
This seems strange and not in keeping with what people are telling me.
I believe Griffin's attack dogs have been loosed from their not very tight leashes.
Many of the statements they make are patent lies. It is a pity that they seem incapable of civilised discussion without resorting to untruths.
Today there are two NW "hustings", one at 5 pm in Salford and one later in Liverpool.
The fact that there are two on the same day with the first being so early (and inconvenient for workers), and at such short notice demonstrates the underhand tactics of our present leader.
Who decided the times of these hustings and the short notice? The same person who dropped the proxy votes on the GMM two weeks ago. Mr Nick Griffin.
I note in his election leaflet his present jobs are MEP, Director of Publicity and editor of VoF and Party Leader.
I would not have thought he would have had time to be editor of our paper and am still puzzled why Martin Wingfield an experienced journalist has been replaced.
It is evident that he has in the poor quality nowadays of what was a well written and intersting publication.
It is as if Nick Griffin does not trust anybody to work for the party except his family and the recent sycophants who have hitched their waggon to his and thus depend on him.
All the senior members who ran the party when I joined 8 years ago have now been replaced, expelled or left in disgust, including long standing members and councillors and activists.
The ones in control now are recent members, ill suited to their positions.
So it is evident that Griffin is not a unity candidate. He has presided over a mass exodus of talent and replaced that talent with mediocrity.
He says the party is growing now but gives no actual figures. I know many who after years of work have given up on the party and many are just hanging on in order to vote for a new leader.
This fact is not shown in the moderated comments on the main website.
We need to join together and Brons is the man to do it.
Too much venom has been spouted. It is time for an amnesty for all those driven away by the high handed actions of our present leader and join together as a strong political force.
Unfortunately those now outside the party will not come back to work with us unless we have a new leader.
If Brons is elected he will only be leader for a year until a new constitution is formulated.
If Griffin wins we are stuck with him in the downward spiral for another 4 years by which time there will be no effective party left.
An often forgotten decision taken at Codnor 3 years ago at the time when we voted for yearly elections was a generous pension for Griffin paid for out of party funds of if my memory serves me right of over £20,000 per year.
I wonder if he has changed this decision like he changed the one year rule for elections?
I am sure he will have tucked away somewhere,the obligation for the party to fund a generous retirement for him.
One last thing.
He says he is campaigning for a referendum on leaving the EU.
Good, we are all in favour of that.
BUT, When is the next batch of the "Bring our Boys Home" petitions to be handed in.
The first 10,000 were handed in amid much publicity and it was stated that others would be delivered later.
Have they been delivered ?
I'll not hold my breath.
Thursday, 7 July 2011
MORE RUBBISH FROM THE TOP
Today the ballot papers have been delivered and we can choose our candidate for leader.
Also there has been an article on the official website urging us to vote in a democratic way and not "destabilise the democratic process"
They say that they are expecting some third party interference who are seeking to destroy our party and they do not have the interests of our party and country at heart.
WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH!
Who are these third party people.
There are only two candidates so how can pushing the merits of one candidate destabilise the democratic process or how by voting for the challenger Andrew Brons MEP have we not the interests of our country at heart.
It seems that Nick Griffin, even though surrounded by sycophants can see the opposition to his dictatorial rule and financial incompetence is gaining strength.
The fact that most activists (those who know what is going on) have deserted his camp (or been expelled) must have finally got through to him.
Just what are they on about.
There are only two candidates for God's sake.
The new "revised" constitution is mentioned setting out permissible means of communication is mentioned.
Who voted for this constitution. Nobody. It was made up by Griffin.
He has become a dictator using subterfuge and chicanery to consolidate his position, which position he fears losing.
In spite of his claim to have our country's interest at heart he has shown by his recent actions to have only his own and his family's interests (and those of his sycophantic officials) at heart.
Nick Griffin has become a toxic brand. If we are to survive as a party and movement we must vote him out.
Irrespective of his blunders, financial and poitical and his deviousness --
HE IS AN ELECTORAL LIABILITY.
WE WILL NEVER PROGRESS WITH HIM AS LEADER.
If you believe in our country, YOU MUST VOTE ANDREW BRONS.
I am aware that for writing this piece I will probably be disciplined.
If I am it will only show the democratic deficit in our party and the reason we must change.
If sanctions are invoked against me it would be indeed ironic in that I support the principles of the party and am only promoting one of the two candidates in the election, one who I believe can and will heal the wounds and unite the disparate nationalist strands which have been created as a result of the appalling dictatorship of Nick Griffin
I will keep this blog posted on any repercussions to this article which if they occur would demonstrate the validity of the above arguments.
Also there has been an article on the official website urging us to vote in a democratic way and not "destabilise the democratic process"
They say that they are expecting some third party interference who are seeking to destroy our party and they do not have the interests of our party and country at heart.
WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH!
Who are these third party people.
There are only two candidates so how can pushing the merits of one candidate destabilise the democratic process or how by voting for the challenger Andrew Brons MEP have we not the interests of our country at heart.
It seems that Nick Griffin, even though surrounded by sycophants can see the opposition to his dictatorial rule and financial incompetence is gaining strength.
The fact that most activists (those who know what is going on) have deserted his camp (or been expelled) must have finally got through to him.
Just what are they on about.
There are only two candidates for God's sake.
The new "revised" constitution is mentioned setting out permissible means of communication is mentioned.
Who voted for this constitution. Nobody. It was made up by Griffin.
He has become a dictator using subterfuge and chicanery to consolidate his position, which position he fears losing.
In spite of his claim to have our country's interest at heart he has shown by his recent actions to have only his own and his family's interests (and those of his sycophantic officials) at heart.
Nick Griffin has become a toxic brand. If we are to survive as a party and movement we must vote him out.
Irrespective of his blunders, financial and poitical and his deviousness --
HE IS AN ELECTORAL LIABILITY.
WE WILL NEVER PROGRESS WITH HIM AS LEADER.
If you believe in our country, YOU MUST VOTE ANDREW BRONS.
I am aware that for writing this piece I will probably be disciplined.
If I am it will only show the democratic deficit in our party and the reason we must change.
If sanctions are invoked against me it would be indeed ironic in that I support the principles of the party and am only promoting one of the two candidates in the election, one who I believe can and will heal the wounds and unite the disparate nationalist strands which have been created as a result of the appalling dictatorship of Nick Griffin
I will keep this blog posted on any repercussions to this article which if they occur would demonstrate the validity of the above arguments.
Tuesday, 5 July 2011
A PRETEND DEMOCRACY?
So now it is official. A leadership challenge by Andrew Brons.
On the official website the announcement is titled "Democracy in Action", but as with many matters in the party further probing shows that all is not what it seems.
A rule stating that all campaigning must be conducted through "official channels" gives the lie to the previous statement.
Who controls these channels? Who has an inbuilt advantage as a result of being leader and thus better known to "armchair" voting members unaware of the virtues of the contender?
You guessed it. Nick Griffin.
I could be breaking the rules by this blog, just stating my opinion as an ordinary member.
That's democracy Griffin style, pretend democracy, as in the use of proxy votes to carry resolutions favouring the leader and cooked up by him, sidestepping the will of the party as expressed at EGMs and in conference resolutions.
Stifle the opposition from making their case while using the power of the official website to promote the leader.
Nick Griffin uses his position as leader to make the rules up as he goes on and of course he makes them up to favour himself.`
He needs to win a new spell as leader as he knows he has no chance of getting another term as an MEP so he has broken his promise to stand down in order to protect his future and that of his daughter and son in law on the payroll.
I know I am to an extent washing dirty linen in public but what other options have I got?.
As stated above camaigning in favour of candidates is forbidden and the rules changed to suit the interests of the leader at the whim of the leader and not put to a fair vote.
All this is un necessary. The Party is being split asunder, good nationalists expelled, splinter parties formed and membership going down. This at a time when the country is going to pot, jobs are being lost, taxes going up and we are being invaded by aliens.
WE SHOULD BE GAINING INFLUENCE NOW. All the conditions are right.
WHY IS OUR INFLUENCE GOING DOWN?
We should be united as nationalists, but it seems nationalism has been put second to the interests of the Griffin family and clique.
I joined our party, inspired by Nick Griffin but his recent blunders and avarice have set our cause back.
It is no good saying he built the party up. Yes he did but then after inspiring hard work and progress it does not give him the right to undo our work.
Since he has been leader all other parties have changed leader several times. If he carries on he will have been leader longer than Gadaffi!
So Nick. Thanks for what you have done (with our help) but now is the time to step down gracefully as you promised.
We need a new leader who can heal the wounds, many of which have been caused by you.
Our cause is more than any individual and Andrew Brons would heal these wounds and hopefully bind the disparate nationalist elements into a strong patriotic force.
Let's pull together. But I am afraid it is not possible under the present leadership.
P.S I shall continue in my support for the contender and although it may seem that I have been breaking the rules there is much more that I could say but for now I will keep silent on these matters.
On the official website the announcement is titled "Democracy in Action", but as with many matters in the party further probing shows that all is not what it seems.
A rule stating that all campaigning must be conducted through "official channels" gives the lie to the previous statement.
Who controls these channels? Who has an inbuilt advantage as a result of being leader and thus better known to "armchair" voting members unaware of the virtues of the contender?
You guessed it. Nick Griffin.
I could be breaking the rules by this blog, just stating my opinion as an ordinary member.
That's democracy Griffin style, pretend democracy, as in the use of proxy votes to carry resolutions favouring the leader and cooked up by him, sidestepping the will of the party as expressed at EGMs and in conference resolutions.
Stifle the opposition from making their case while using the power of the official website to promote the leader.
Nick Griffin uses his position as leader to make the rules up as he goes on and of course he makes them up to favour himself.`
He needs to win a new spell as leader as he knows he has no chance of getting another term as an MEP so he has broken his promise to stand down in order to protect his future and that of his daughter and son in law on the payroll.
I know I am to an extent washing dirty linen in public but what other options have I got?.
As stated above camaigning in favour of candidates is forbidden and the rules changed to suit the interests of the leader at the whim of the leader and not put to a fair vote.
All this is un necessary. The Party is being split asunder, good nationalists expelled, splinter parties formed and membership going down. This at a time when the country is going to pot, jobs are being lost, taxes going up and we are being invaded by aliens.
WE SHOULD BE GAINING INFLUENCE NOW. All the conditions are right.
WHY IS OUR INFLUENCE GOING DOWN?
We should be united as nationalists, but it seems nationalism has been put second to the interests of the Griffin family and clique.
I joined our party, inspired by Nick Griffin but his recent blunders and avarice have set our cause back.
It is no good saying he built the party up. Yes he did but then after inspiring hard work and progress it does not give him the right to undo our work.
Since he has been leader all other parties have changed leader several times. If he carries on he will have been leader longer than Gadaffi!
So Nick. Thanks for what you have done (with our help) but now is the time to step down gracefully as you promised.
We need a new leader who can heal the wounds, many of which have been caused by you.
Our cause is more than any individual and Andrew Brons would heal these wounds and hopefully bind the disparate nationalist elements into a strong patriotic force.
Let's pull together. But I am afraid it is not possible under the present leadership.
P.S I shall continue in my support for the contender and although it may seem that I have been breaking the rules there is much more that I could say but for now I will keep silent on these matters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)