Coalition should be even tougher on immigration, says poll

Taken from todays Telegraph -

The majority of the public backed the Government's pledge to bring net migration down to the tens of thousands but believe it should go even further, according to the study for the think-tank Migrationwatch.

A cap on migrant workers will limit the number of foreign staff arriving in the UK to 21,700 a year and a review of student visas is expected to cut those numbers by the tens of thousands.

The aim is to bring net migration, the difference between those arriving and those leaving, from around 200,000 to the "tens of thousands".

The latest poll found 81 per cent were in favour of such a move, including 79 per cent of Liberal Democrat voters who were asked.

However, seven in ten people thought the numbers should be at the most 50,000 or lower.

The poll also revealed almost three quarters of the public are concerned over recent reports that white Britons could be in a minority by 2066.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said, "These results are a strong vote of confidence in the government’s recent measures to control economic migration.

"But they are also warning that the public, who would like to see even lower levels of immigration, are very unhappy about the long-term consequences of immigration for the make-up of our society.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8168259/Coalition-should-be-even-tougher-on-immigration-says-poll.html

Migration Watch report -

Changing Primary Schools in England: 1998 - 2010

1. This paper examines the impact that immigration, much of it from non English speaking countries, has had on our primary schools in the period 1998 to 2010.

2. It examines England as a whole, individual regions, and three groups of Local Education Authorities (LEAs) - London Boroughs, the largest urban boroughs outside London, and the remaining LEAs in England. It also projects the numbers to 2018.

3. The following are the main findings:

a) In total, between 1991 and 2008, there was a net increase of over 2.5 million in long-term immigrants arriving in the UK from non English speaking countries, mostly to settle. There was a net inflow of 2 million of them between 1998 and 2008.

b) The effect has been intensified by the rapid increase in the number of foreign born women of reproductive age. In 2007 this total was nearly 43% higher than in 2001. In contrast, the number of UK born woman of reproductive age was nearly 3% lower in the same period.

c) In the period 1994 to 2009 the proportion of births to foreign born women rose from 14% to 25%.

d) In the period 1998 to 2010, the proportion of children in primary schools in England for whom English was not the mother tongue nearly doubled to 16%, or over half a million out of 3.2 million children.

e) In inner London in 2010 55% of all primary school pupils did not have English as their first language.

f) In outer London the proportion of pupils without English as a mother tongue almost doubled from 22% to 39%.

g) In six out of the nine regions and in England as a whole, the percentage of children without English as a mother tongue almost doubled from 8.5% to 16%.

h) Our projection suggests that the percentage of primary school children in England without English as a mother tongue will increase to 22.7% in 2018, or almost 830,000 - a 60% increase on current numbers.

Introduction

4. Net immigration into the UK from overseas increased very significantly with the election of the Labour Government in May 1997. In the seven years from 1991 to 1997, it averaged around 41,000 each year; thereafter, in the eleven years to 2008 it averaged around 180,000.

5. Most of this net immigration came from countries where the predominant language is other than English – the European Union (excluding the Irish Republic), ‘New Commonwealth’ countries in Africa and Asia, and other countries outside Europe with few historical or cultural links to the UK – for example, the Democratic Republic of Congo. In the seven years from 1991 to 1997 such net immigration averaged almost 60,000 each year, but in 1998 and thereafter it increased over threefold, averaging almost 200,000 each year to 2008. In total, between 1991 and 2008, there was a net increase of over 2.5 million long term immigrants from non – English speaking countries arriving in the UK, mostly to settle. Figure 1 below shows the approximate trend of net migration from Non-English Speaking Countries between 1991 and 2008.

Read the rest here -

http://www.migrationwatchuk.com/briefingPaper/document/210

VICTORIAN BRITAIN

For those of us who see politics as the only way of change, and if you missed this last night like I did I suggest you click on the link to the BBCi webplayer.
As someone who studied Mid-Victorian Britain with the OU (Open University) this sort of documentary fascinates me.
I hope it does the same for you.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00wh73v/Ian_Hislops_Age_of_the_DoGooders_Britains_Moral_Makeover/

Ps.
I am at a loss for why the BBC have made a programme which is dominated by an HISTORICAL Mono-Culture, which Victorian Britain was, and like all the other eras of Britain before was not and would never consider a Multi-Cultural Britain.
The only thing I can think of is it is trying to restore some Morals into OUR Britain today ?

We can take comfort from this programme in that it shows that WE CAN make a difference.

Our VOICE OF FREEDOM should be to POLITICS TODAY what the LANCET was to VICTORIAN SURGERY and todays Medical proffesion.
Todays POLITICS and POLITICIANS should be as much under scrutiny as the HEALTH PROFFESIONALS were in VICTORIAN BRITAIN.

Look to the past for the reformation of OUR FUTURE. Learn from the past.

Watch carefully, maybe you can see similar problems today that were in evidence then.

Though the Civil Service today are against NATIONALISM (blame the COMMUNIST/MARXIST UNIONS), through those who see NATIONALISTS as an enemy to the COMMUNISM/MARXISM which is rife in todays CIVIL SERVICE, even though the CIVIL SERVICE CODE dictates that they SHOULD be above POLITICS.

Today in Britain, our Victorian past is more than evident as we now have an underclass such as their was in VICTRIAN BRITAIN.
Or Politicians are in it for themselves and not for US.
Should we change it ?
The Victorians did.

I'm up for it..are YOU ?

Are you willing to ask the questions that need to be asked ?
If you are please use the following message, you may edit it as you wish, as certain emails with the exat same message can be classed as JUNK MAIL.

Please use the following message as your template -

The Cost of Equality & Diversity

It has come to my notice that YOUR COUNCIL District Council has a section totally devoted to the promotion of equality and diversity. I don’t understand why we need people employed in such an activity, as it certainly has no relevance for the people of YOUR TOWN and serves no useful purpose.

Folk generally feel that Equality & Diversity means the promotion of alien cultures and religions, at the expense of the demeaning and belittling of all indigenous British values and traditions. It is also believed that positive discrimination, or affirmative action, is used to promote ethnic minorities into positions within local government at the expense of superior qualified indigenous Britons – in particular white heterosexual indigenous males. Whether or not these concerns are true or false, there can be no doubt that the promotion of Equality & Diversity does nothing to improve relations between different cultures; in fact imposing it on the indigenous population can only aggravate the situation. The Anglo-Celtic peoples of these islands should not have to change their culture, traditions and values to appease immigrants - it is the duty of the immigrant to abide by the mores and practices of the British people. If immigrants don’t like it, then they should be encouraged to leave the UK!

We are living in a time of austerity where every person and organization has to reduce their spending, including YOUR COUNCIL District Council - and to most folk’s way of thinking Equality & Diversity is an unnecessary burden imposed on an already impoverished Council Tax payer.

As a Consequence of my concerns, I would be pleased if you can provide me with the following information under the terms and rights allowed under the Freedom of Information Act:

1. Details of all personnel employed by YOUR COUNCIL District Council associated with Equality & Diversity including:

• Job Title

• A brief description of their duties

• Their annual salary

2. The total costs to the local Council Tax payer for implementing Equality & Diversity practices within YOUR COUNCIL District Council over the past year.

3. A brief description of tasks undertaken with regards to Equality & Diversity by YOUR COUNCIL District Council over the past year.

I look forward to receiving your answers within the twenty working days stipulated by the Act.

Yours Sincerely,

YOUR NAME -

Please use the LINK below to find your MP -

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/

Hat tip to http://southwestnationalists.blogspot.com/

"WHOEVER SAID THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD OBVIOUSLY NEVER ENCOUNTERED AUTOMATIC WEAPONS"

Morg.
.

AN EARLY CHRISTMAS PRESENT - ENJOY

HOSPITAL JIHAD ?

The Dr Foster Hospital report has revealed that at least 19 Hospitals have a higher than average death rate.
With Foreign Doctors, Surgeons, Anesthetists, Nurses etc being overly represented in British Hospitals is it any surprise at the high death rate ?
Those who have been trained as Doctors, Surgeons, Anesthetists Nurses etc abroad, can we have any faith that these Doctors, Surgeons, Anesthetists, Nurses etc are up to the job of keeping those who are in Hospital alive ?
Could many of these deaths have been avoided ?
Are some or all of these deaths deliberate, with many of the higher echelons within the Health Service being predominantly not Indigenous British nor Christian?
How many foreign Doctors, Surgeons, Anesthetists, Nurses etc are purposefully neglecting their British patients or just not able to give the care and services that Britains NHS needs ?

Death rates at 19 NHS hospital trusts in England were alarmingly high last year, according to an influential report.

Two of these trusts - Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust - as well as two others also recorded a high number of deaths after surgery, the Dr Foster Hospital Guide found.

The measures are intended to act as a "smoke alarm" for where problems with care might exist.

Hospitals recorded 62,800 adverse medical events, with 30,500 patients developing avoidable blood clots, more than 13,000 mothers suffering obstetric tears during childbirth, nearly 10,000 accidental lacerations or puncture, about 6,000 patients with pressure sores, more than 2,000 post-operative haemorrhages and 1,300 cases of post-operative blood poisoning.

Trusts also reported 56 incidents of "wrong site" surgery and 150 "foreign objects" left inside patients after an operation.

Researchers said many trusts were not accurately recording incidents of harm to patients, making it harder to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

Roger Taylor, director of research at Dr Foster said: "It is concerning that no hospital in the country can accurately assess the level of adverse events compared with the best achievable rates.

"Blood clots kill more people than superbugs every year - and yet the reporting of blood clots is just not always sufficient to identify and address the problem.

"Dr Foster is asking the Department of Health to review the way this information is recorded and we hope to revisit this topic next year and be able to identify trusts and their rates."

The risk of patients developing a blood clot is increased by most surgical and some medical treatments and conditions. But hospitals can take measures to reduce the risk.

You may also want to follow the following link which is a Freedom Of Information (FOI) request to the General Medical Council (GMC) in regards to ALL HEALTH PROFESSIONS who have been STRUCK OFF (removed) from the GMC Register in the last 5 years 2005-present.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/disciplinary_investigations#incoming-113565

Somethings going so wrong in our Hospitals that Patients are Dying needlessly.
Makes you wonder if it is Hospital Jihad and purposeful negligence in some sort of Racial/Religeous attacks within our Health Service aimed at Patients.
But you can bet your bottom dollar that these questions will not even arise in case of the real Racists screaming racism and discrimination.
The FOI speaks for itself.