MORG LIKES MULTICULTURALISM

I was born into a multicultural country, and I'd like it to stay that way.

It's all a matter of definitions though. The multiculturalism I have in mind consists of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish cultures.

That's quite multicultural enough for me thank you very much; and for you too I shouldn't wonder.

We are all very close to having the same cultures anyway, and even though we have been united for hundreds of years now, we're still a bit iffy about each other. So how the hell do these stupid politicians think they can import millions of entirely alien people and expect us all to get on like a house on fire? And talking of houses on fire - I'm Welsh so I'm familiar with the concept. Oh yes indeedy. So I predict that there's a lot of that to come within all our cities. And it wont be the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish doing it to each other.

English, Welsh, Scots and Irish. Multiculturalism at its best. The REAL British.

Morg
.

A HOUSING POLICY CHANGE WHY?

The fact that we are are a small party can sometimes make us despondant. Persecuted by the media and the Tory backed communist UAF (why did they change their name from ANaL?) it is easy to believe that we have an impossible goal, but then little snippets of news come out.
I read in Simon Darby's blog where he quotes the Telegraph stating that local councils are to be given permission to give some priority to local residents in housing allocation.

Until now need has been the deciding factor so that when an immigrant family arrived in a district with perhaps 5 children they jumped the queue over those who had paid into the system and had waited years for adequate accomodation.
What has caused this drastic change of policy I wonder?

The explanation is unequivocal "The rise of the BNP" as stated by the minister. Labour is haemorrhaging votes to the BNP and it is frightening the Labour Party.
So, small as we are and lacking the backing of millionaires like the other parties we are making an impression and frightening them.
Former Labour voters are tired of being betrayed by the party they once thought represented their interests.
Former Tory voters and members are joining us, tired of the broken promise of a referendum on the EU and that party's support for the war in Afganistan etc etc.

What goes round comes round.
Many years ago I was elected to our local UDC on the platform that our area was being taken over by outsiders who ran the council under the "Ratepayer" banner.
I stood as Independent for the interests of the local (indigenous?) people and got 80% of the vote. The Ratepayer group never won a seat again.

I was asked to join the Labour Group next year and I did and became chairman of housing.
One of the complaints of local people was that people were coming from outside and jumping the council housing queue leaving locals having to wait for 14 years for a house.
I got that stopped in the now Labour controlled council (they did represent the people then) and unless a person had been born in the village they had to live here for 10 years before they joined the housing queue, at the bottom of course.
This meant that local families could stick together and the community sense was strengthened.

At the next election I again topped the poll. People seemed pleased with the arrangement.
Later the government made this system illegal as it was considered racist and unfair to newcomers.
BUT THE LOCAL VOTERS LIKED IT!

And Labour wonder why the BNP is taking support from them and why our sense of community is dying.
They seem to be taking a new tack because of their fear of us, but don't be deceived.
If the BNP were not there it would be business as usual with our people still at the back of the queue.
A BNP vote is still worth 10 times as much as a vote for any other party.

BUNGLING LEIGH MP ANDY "BURN EM' ALL" BURNHAM TIPPED AS BROWN'S SUCCESSOR?

Oh! How I laughed when I read this story on the Wigantoday website.

Our very own MP for Leigh Andy Burnham is being tipped to succeed Calamity Brown for the PM's job!

Mascara wearing Burnham the toffee nosed - bungling toffee man and one who purports to being a true Leyther, although the chap was brought up in upper class Cheshire:(not like most of us Lancastrians around here who were dragged up)! Is tipped to succeed Mr Brown!

I say, " bring it on" !

Here is the cretin just a few days ago, using his governments mind-control tactics to scaremonger the populace to the ever diminishing threat of the "Climate Change" syndrome. Surely only a fool and his dog can believe this ludicrous nonsense?

A VISIT TO THE HEART OF THE BEAST

Apologies for the absence of comment over the last few days. This was on account of a trip to Brussels on an official BNP trip to get a feel of the working of that undemocratic, unnecessary and expensive beast.

It was a tiring but worthwhile trip entailing only one night's sleep in 3 days.

Before we went to Brussels we visited the cemetries at Paschendale which commemorate the thousansds who died. The graves alone must cover 10 acres and the walls contain the names of 50,000 young lads slaughtered for what? The names on the gravestones brought a tear to my eyes, thinking of the mothers wives and chidren who lost their loved ones in this pointless war.

Soldiers from Lancashire regiments were prominent among the names and I thought of these poor lads from God's own county leaving to fight for what they had been told were their country's interests only to be mown down in this senseless slaughter.

Later after a short rest and meal we visited the Menin Gate where another 30,000 people were commemorated and the "Last Post" ceremony is still commemorated every night by British servicemen, a very moving occasion for all of us and pleasing to know their sacrifice has not been forgotten even after all these years.

I just hope their sacrifice has not been in vain but looking at our country now I wonder.

The names on the wall were overwhelminglyBritish and commonwealth people but to give them their due there were a few Indians who paid the ultimate price but these were outnumbered a thousand to one by British names.

The trip was an opportunity to meet with members from other areas and socialise with them which was very enjoyable, people from all over our country, united in love for country. The next day we visited the heart of the EU beast and were met by Andrew Brons who gave us a talk on the workings of the EU and giving examples of its undemocratic methods.

He explained that although we had only two members they had managed to make their presence felt by shrewd tactics and their ability to capitalise on the lazyness of EU members of other parties who often did not attend meetings. How he and Nick manage the schedule and keep in touch with their constituents I do not know, but they do which must be unique among other party's members.

They act as an irritant to the self centred "elite", a piece of grit in the oyster and have much more influence than their numbers would predict.

Nick appeared for a swift chat but had to rush off to speak against the "Climate Change expert" Paul Mc Cartney who we had seen entering the centre to give his views on the effects of eating meat on global warming (and no doubt promote the feminising soya based protein on which his late wife built a profitable business ). The fact that this non scientist was invited to address the EU Parliament shows how far from reality and sunk in mediocrity that organisation is. I trained in science and reckon I know a bit about it but I would not presume to advise him on song writing.

Why do these media stars imagine their views on scientific matters have any special credibility astounds me. They are so self important they do not realise the very limited knowledge. We did see a vegetarian Indian advocating that if his diet was adopted the world could feed 4 billion people extra. If he was so interested in the man made climate change theory he would have been better employed advocating population control for his country and Sir Paul would be better cutting down his own emissions by flying less. The general thrust seemed to be we forgo a beef buttie so that they can continue flying and breeding.

We had to miss seeing this rather pointless debate with, it seemed most of the delegates absent (in the overheated building) and go for lunch and then home.

Before we went there was time for a photo opportunity and a informative talk by Andrew where he explained the waste (and carbon emissions) in moving the Parliament to Strasbourg once a month to suit the French and the fuel used by flying delegates from all over Europe for often very brief meetings which solve nothing.

After a meal of fish and chips (not as good as my wife's) we boarded the coach for a 12 hour journey home.

Tired though we are our thanks go to those who organised the trip which has enabled us to see first hand the idiocy of the EU and the exraordinary amount of work Nick and Andrew do both in the Parliament and their arduous journeys there to make our case for a free and democratic country.

That they have the time and energy to come to our local events amazes me.

We are truly fortunate in having the interests of our Party and country served by these two titans of the political class.

WE'RE LED BY DONKEYS

I subscribe to an online email service. The service provider has said to me that he has the same attitude to information that I have - it doesn't matter how people get the information, just so long as they do get it (he said that as far as he's aware, I'm the only BNP person to be on his subscription list - and no, he is not one of our supporters).

It's called "Not Born Yesterday" (nby); and he said this means it is fine for me to re-post what he writes with appropriate accreditation. His name is John Ward and he was the original publisher of the story about McBroon taking serious anti-depression drugs. His writing appears occasionally in the msm. The following item is in the latest email I got today.

THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE IS HERE.

All those of you who know me are fully aware of my attitude towards Islam. This puts my attitude into writing far better than I'm able to do. I'm making no threat, but rather a prophecy when I say that war is coming, and if only our stupid elites weren't so blinded by their ideology they'd see it as clear as day.

Here's the web page that is associated with the email service. I recommend bookmarking, regular reading, and a root through the archives. This man may not be one of our supporters, but he's certainly a realist:

http://www.notbornyesterday.org/

The article (emphases mine):

The problem our leaders never foresaw is about to go ballistic. And they still don't get it.

Some thirty years ago I was trying to get a new ad agency off the ground with four partners. As always at this stage of a company's development, new business was paramount. So we were delighted when into our offices walked the marketing director of a large paperware company.

We got the business, and during a celebratory lunch soon afterwards (in those days, lunch was code for 'the rest of the day') the new client explained his view of the future. I can't remember why he chose to do this, although I recall very well thinking 'Oh my God, here we go'. But rather than talking about his vision of paperware in 1990, this chap treated us to a succinct and chilling prediction about expansionist Islam.

We all thought he was off his trolley to be honest. However, almost everything he said has come to pass. After 9/11, I began to take his outlook more seriously; today, I'm convinced he was absolutely right.

Islam's intolerance of other viewpoints is about to go head to head with intolerance of Islam. And this is happening on four fronts.

As we predicted here earlier this year (although far from exclusively) Iran has played the Atomic Energy Commission, the EU, the UN and Uncle Tom whatnot and all along - but in the end, not only told the infidel to stuff it, but also forged ahead with an expansionist uranium enrichment programme. This the Middle East nuclear dimension.

Dubai has as near as damn it reneged on its loan commitment, thus handing the trump cards to neighbouring Abu Dhabi. The latter will now become the dominant partner: and lest you're unsure about it, let me tell you that Abu Dhabi is considerably more Islamist than Dubai. This is the financial dimension.

In Switzerland, a right-wing law has unexpectedly won sweeping approval. It states categorically that no more minarets may be constructed in that country. In France, religious jewellery and burkhas are banned from educational establishments. In the Balkans, old emnities have been open sores for a decade or more. In the UK, research shows an increasing antipathy towards the Muslim minority. This is the Euro-backlash dimension.

And last but not least, among the NATO allies patience with Pakistan's yes-and-no approach to Al Q'eida has finally run out. There's no sign that Obama and Brown understand how stretched Pakistan is already: only signs that while more troops are being committed by these two bewildered men, from the other side of the mouth they talk about disengagement from the conflict. This is the military dimension. 

There is also a Chinese/African dimension, but this is (I suspect) further down the road. In the meantime, let's take each aspect of the existing problem in turn. 

In Tehran, Ahmadinnejad must know by now that, unlike Hitler, he won't be allowed to keep on pretending what a nice chap he is. Being intelligent but full of himself (and underestimating mixed signals from the West) he may not as yet know that retribution is coming. But there is a more than outside chance he fancies himself in the martyr role - only ultimately, using the nuclear solution to take the impure infidel with him. He must be destabilised and/or removed as a matter of great urgency.

When it comes to Dubai, for once Western business is genuinely between a rock and a hard place: we can't afford - morally or financially - to reward mendacity. But equally, we can't stand by as a rich Islamic State gets even richer by taking over. It goes without saying that - the quarterly results mentality now holding sway among the globalists - we will choose the former, easier way out. But we will be storing up problems for the future in the region: for Abu Dhabi will be more than happy to arm Islamists of every shape and hue.

The European dimension at first sight looks like little more than a long-awaited realisation by the West that (at least on home ground) the age of appeasement must end. It's what follows that worries me. Although I do not doubt that the mad folks would brand nby Islamaphobic, I have no phobia about Islam: rather, I have an awareness of Islam, and where its own blindness will lead. The Islamic reaction to being told they can't have all those religious rights after all will not be temperate - few Muslim reactions ever are. This will hand more votes to the BNP and other Parties of the Euro-Right: but it's what the poor working class will do of their own accord that should concern us. 

There is an elitist middle-class Left-leaning view that the downtrodden in society are noble - but stupid, and therefore open to the infernal arguments of those nasty racists. The poor are, in my experience, neither noble nor stupid: they know a threat when they see one, and they will show no mercy to those whom (they already feel) have enjoyed privileges at their expense.

The non-nuclear military dimension is the one that really worries me, because it is the area where we have given the most confusing signals to the Deluded Ones. From applauding televised confessions to emotional incontinence about those who have died, we have looked decadent - and yet at the same time, shown the awesome power of our misguided revenge. To the average Mid-Eastern Muslim, the US/EU/UK alliance probably comes across as a self-obsessed weakling given the power of Armageddon for his birthday by a false prophet. There are few spectres more effective than that at recruiting martyrs.

We in the UK are going to fail this last test, because in the age of easy solutions it seems almost 'a no-brainer' to simply retreat back behind our own borders - where a series of increasingly draconian anti-terrorist laws will remove the very libertarian democracy Islam wants to see the back of anyway.

The most newsworthy of these facets right now is the Dubai thing. If ever there was a situation where denial and lack of foresight clouded the issue for those intimately involved, then this is it. The Financial Times unconsciously gave this away when it wrote on the 27th November:

'As always, the problem in Dubai is that no one had all the facts, and perhaps some in the financial community had made all the wrong assumptions'

Right then, apart from making assumptions based on trusting the innately untrustworthy, where exactly did we go wrong here? In most circumstances it would be truly laughable; but in our current position, it will surely make a final, tragic showdown inevitable. 

Morg

.

THAT SWISS REFERENDUM

Do we all agree on congratulations to the Swiss for stopping the building of any more minarets? Would we like a similar referendum here? Would it produce the same result?

You betcha! ... AND WE ARE NOT ALONE

Approximately 75% of all European peoples polled feel the same. Look at the polling results.

I said it before a few posts back: if I was a Mohammedan, I'd give some serious thought to getting out of Britain and Europe while the getting is still good. Seems the whole of Europe has had it with Islam, not just us.

WE DON'T WANT IT HERE, same as the rest of Europe don't want it there.

But do we think the righteous will take the blindest bit of notice?

If you want change instead of the guff we've been hearing for years, vote BNP.

Morg
.

NOT MAD IN THE SLIGHTEST

.

PRESIDENT Obama last night unveiled plans to send an extra 30,000 troops to Afghanistan after confusing it with a country that is not completely insane.

Mr Obama insisted the troop surge would eliminate Al-Qaeda, Contain the Taleban and help Afghanistan achieve stability during a speech that, according to some analysts, suggests he may be insane too.


Roy Hobbs, professor of Afghan history at Reading University, said: "Mr Obama seems to think Afghanistan is a place where people will, if given the choice, behave normally. That would suggest some sort of chemical imbalance in his brain.


"What Afghanistan actually is, is a place where 50,000 different tribes all want to kill each other all the time and then feast on each other's testicles while killing anyone who gets in the way of their unquenchable desire to kill.


"Anyone left alive at the end of this process has to live in a mud hut eating their own shit and will be stoned to death for humming.


"Many people have asked why they do this and the answer always comes back the same - they're out of their fucking minds."


Professor Hobbs added: "Having devoted my career to studying Afghanistan, I am now absolutely certain we should construct a 50ft high wall around the place, wait until everyone's dead and then build some really nice, upmarket golf courses."


Omar Kalifi, a Taleban fighter in Helmand province, welcomed Mr Obama's announcement, adding, 'ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH' before sawing his own head off with a penknife.


His colleague, Mohammed Akra, picked up Mr Kalifi's severed head, attached a leather strap to it and is now wearing it as a hat.

Lifted wholesale from here.

Morg
.