ACCREDITED WEBSITES

.
Whatever that's supposed to mean in this context ... you know who you are. Is this "accredited" enough for you?

http://wallstreetpit.com/12324-fear-and-loathing-in-global-warming

You can have ONE comment.

Just to give you a start - some short quotes from the CRU emails:

to hide the decline.


we can’t account for the lack of warming


this isn’t about truth


Leave it to you to delete as appropriate!


I will be hiding behind them.


get him ousted.


It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip


cut the last few points off ... as that’s trending down


“it is time to pull the curtain down on this crap and start locking up all of the proponents - starting with AL GORE.”


The assumption of false figures in models in order to boost future projections is fraudulent.

If you want contexts for those, go read the article.

Morg
.
.

The British Nationalist: The BNP are NOT Racial Nationalist

I will apologise profusely in advance to 'The British Nationalist" in extracting the following article from their own tremendous blog and posting it here!

It is an excellent blog entry and expostulates with many of our opponents and/or 'new age fascists' out there.

It brought home some parallels to the discussion I had with a 'friend' of mine the other day and which so happened just a week or so after this 'friend' had tried to interupt the last Wigan and Leigh meeting and who had a totally misconstrued opinion and minset of what the BNP stood for and has to offer at this moment in time.

I hate to have to point this out. The British
National Party (BNP) is not a racial-nationalist party. It is an
ethno-nationalist party. Colonel Buckshot, the eminent Nutzi blogger, gave me a
lesson on the Greek origins of the word ethno, when I informed him that they’re
not the same ideology.

The BNP practises localised politics, most
parties do to some extent, but we make special emphasis on it. The
racial-nationalists are incapable of doing this because their worldview is too
broad, they like to preach about ‘the white race’ and the issues faced by the
nations they consider to be ‘white’. Which means absolutely nothing to the
little old lady who just wants traffic calming on her street.

"Racial nationalism is a movement that seeks to promote and protect the interests of the White Race as collective, regardless of national borders and boundaries and any differences between the ethnic/ tribal / national groups that comprise the white race.

Racial nationalism sees no difference between white people regardless where in the world that they come from. It is a universalistic ideology that denies the individuality of members of the white race in favour of some collective notion of the race itself, and thereby sees the individual as nothing more than a set of genes whose worth is measured solely on the genetic content of their body and not the content of their character, their contribution to the higher evolution of the culture of the white race or their political contribution to the protection and promotion of the white race itself. "

By Lee Barnes

We argue that the British are a people apart. A
distinct ethnic group, which is engaged in the struggle to preserve its unique
culture, heritage and birthplace. We support other indigenous groups in their
struggle against the same forces, regardless of race.

The
racial-nationalists have borrowed heavily from simplistic Nazi racial theory.
The ‘you’re white, and that’s that’ approach, but that doesn’t fit the bill. We
further define our identity by recognising our membership of a national and
cultural group; the observance of its customs, beliefs and language, in other
words, our ethnicity.

Racial nationalism is ideal if you plan on building a
supranational union based on racial bonds. But, the BNP does not support any
overriding power above that of parliament. We believe in self-determination,
rule by our people, of our land. We do not believe that non-British whites – by
virtue of a shared race – can fulfil this role of rule, this is in opposition to
the racial-nationalist school of thought, which says ‘if it’s white, it’s all
right’. If the ruling party of a federated European Union followed the
racial-nationalist ideology, the British racial nationalists would support it
regardless of whether Britain had any representation at the top

Foreign
racial-nationalists forever attempt to meddle with the BNP, they believe that
because they’re white – and incorrectly assuming that we’re white nationalists –
they have permission to lecture us on our political course, one brother to
another. I’m sorry to say that most of them are American Nazi nutters. You don’t
understand our political system, you don’t understand the British people. Just
back off.

KICKOUTWIGANPATRIOT

Here it is:

http://kickoutwiganpatriot.blogspot.com/


It's quite complimentary actually - what little there is of it.

We must be bothering someone. Yeah, way to go!

Kick us out of where? And how?

Morg
.

ICE AGES AND CETERA

Hmmm - apart from between the last ice age and the next one (and there WILL be one - it's aready overdue), i.e now, I don't believe there was a motor industry or a great deal of coal burning during the times referred to here. Or even much in the line of people, come to that (too many cows farting maybe?):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6606227/Antarctic-temperatures-between-ice-ages-6C-warmer-than-today.html

The case for man made global warming is getting shafted by the day.

And what just happened at the University of East Anglia, one of the leading centres pushing this nonsense? And how much in research funds has Phil Jones, the leading climate scientist received?

£13.7 million, that's how much. Of YOUR tax money. What was that about the energy industry funding people fighting against this fraud? £13.7 million - and that was just one man. I'd hate to see the numbers if we started looking into how much all of them have had. And our politicians have KNOWN it was all a fraud, but they saw it as a means by which they could levy more and more taxes. It's all about CONTROL - control of you - by them. And Gore has just announced that NOW is the best time to buy carbon credits ... by which ... errrm ... he and his companies stand to gain Billions.

Here's what happened at the UEA:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6619796/Climate-scientists-accused-of-manipulating-global-warming-data.html

If you want a little more detail, then go here:

http://www.devilskitchen.me.uk/

Standing Orders tell us there is a language warning for this site. Read and scroll, there are at least six items about the scandal coming out of UEA.

Mann's (via Gore) "Hockey Stick"? Try these:

http://www.devilskitchen.me.uk/2009/11/hockey-stick-illusion.html

Follow internal links as required.

You going to give up on it now Chris? Or are you going to keep coming back like a Jehova's Witness? They've got a bit of religion in them too.

Or are you going to give me more and more excuses for bringing this sort of stuff to folks' attention? I've got more if you want ...

Morg
.

SHOULD I BE PROUD OF HER?

I can't believe it. An "Old Girl" of my school has become the EU's foreign minister.


Now many ex pupils of that illustrious school have gone on to great things, University proffessors, engineers lectureres high ranking captains of industry and many more worthwhile if more mundane jobs, but EU foreign minister?
Admittedly the "Baroness" was only one year old when I left but how come in our small community few have heard of her rise to stardom?


The answer of course is that she was mediocre at best.
What has been her career so far? She rose without trace to serve on some charity committee and married a prominent Labour supporter ( though God knows what he saw in her,it certainly was not her beauty).
She may have been good in bed with the lights out, I don't know.

But then what were the qualities which led to her elevation to the Lords?
She has never been elected for any office, not even a lowly district councillor. She has only ever been a quangocrat.

The qualities which led to her preferrment were that she was a PC Labour toady always following the party line.


Otherwise nobody even in her native village had heard of her.
That's how you get to the top in Labour politics, toe the party line, get in with the right people (being elected not essential or even desirable) and annoy the opposition.
She knows nothing about foreign affairs, is inexperienced and totally unsuited to the position, in other words excellent Labour material.

It is said when in the Lords she insisted on protocol and at airports red carpet treatment as befits her position.
A long way from the bike ride I presume she must have made up Winstanley Road to school (it was still a grammar school then) to her exalted position with a £200,000 plus salary with expenses.
How far this stalwart Labour socialist has come.

I find it hard to believe how an ex pupil of my old school could betray her roots and embed herself in this den of thieves.


If I had known at the time I would have knocked her off her bike.

NO COMMENT

.
Terry - don't watch this or you'll have to repair all your ceilings in a straight line up.

When I say "No Comment", I mean no comment from me. I'm so enraged I'm tongue tied. But comments from you all are very welcome. Peter (Franzen): what do YOU think. And Wiganer's opinion would be welcome.



Hat tip Green Arrow.

Morg
.

ARE WE GOING TO SEE JUST A TINY BIT OF JUSTICE?

Files gone to the CPS on charges of false accounting (up to seven years), and maybe - I hope - fraud (up to ten years).

Six of them is precious little. I hope they're not fooling themselves into thinking that by throwing six to the wolves that we'll be content. We want the lot.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/6601023/MPs-expenses-six-MPs-and-peers-face-fraud-charges.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Morg

.