The Archbishop of Canterbury has been dispensing his pearls of wisdom again.
This so called defender of the Christian faith and advocate of Sharia law has advised people not to vote BNP.
This leader of a rapidly declining church would be better concentrating on healing the disunity in his church and stemming the decline of his incresingly out of touch institution.
He does not seem concerned at the closure of churches and their conversion into mosques, but he should be or within three decades the Christian churches will be banned as infidel institutions owing to muslim demographics. He should also be more vocal at the persecution of Christians in muslim countries.
As I have said before I am a pessimist but I predict that on June 4th we will obtain far more people voting for us than he has in his congregations. Will he then accept our right to interfere in ecclesiastical affairs?
Of course he won't, so he should keep his nose out of domestic politics lest his church sinks without trace.
The final insult is that he is aided and abetted by the Archbishop of York. Now I have nothing against him but I do feel that this refugee from a racist dictatorship should show a little less arrogance and permit native British people to vote how they please and cease proffering his biased one sided advice.
He should try to see things from our point of view but then immigrants seem incapable of doing so.
My advice, and it is just as valid as theirs is ignore them and VOTE BNP for all our sakes, not least the churches.
Monday, 25 May 2009
Sunday, 24 May 2009
THE RESIGNATION OF MC CARTNEY
I am disappointed that Ian Mc Cartney has decided to retire "on health grounds" It can ONLY be co incidental that this announcement was made in the middle of the expenses scandle in which he of course not involved in spite of paying money back he had erroneously claimed.
I wanted to stand against him on a Real Wiganer ticket who would stick up for the people of Wigan and ensure we got what we needed and deserved.
What have we got while Mc Cartney has been the Makerfield MP? Zilch.
He has been the holder of one of the safest seats and thus had no real incentive to push hard for the people of Wigan. Yes he has opened a few health centres and such like but the big schemes which could bring so much prosperity to Wigan have been shelved.
He did not stop the Bickershaw/Golborne pit complex being closed. He promised Billinge Hospital would not be closed not long before it was and sold off for housing thus a good building with land to expand was lost, against the wishes of the people.
From his point of view promotion to the cabinet has been more important than kicking up against the party line for his adopted town. He voted against disclosure of MPs expenses,for the Iraq war and toed the party line on the vast majority of issues. Just lobby fodder.
A Labour robot would have been just as effective and at the end of this illustrious career he leaves with a large pension and a cushy job advising on de commissioning Sellafield nuclear plant on £114,000 per year.
Does anybody think he knows the first thing about this task? Does anybody think he would have got the job if he had no contacts with people in government?
Does anybody think he will give up that job "for health reasons"?--not likely.
When he first became MP there was a Tory government but they would always ignore Wigan as a Labour town.
What these feather bedded MPs fail to understand is that they are supposed to be our servants and represent US and not their party. Government should be bottom up, not top down and an MP who believed that would have fought our corner harder.
What we need in Wigan (and Makerfield and Leigh) are MPs who will fight our corner even against their party and to do that the MP must not just pretend to represent the town he happens to end up in but a man who lives and breaths the place and whose loyalty to the town trancends all other considerations.
The town must be like a religion to him and he must not have his interests deflected by third world issues such as schools in India, nor cushy non jobs in industry. In other words he must be a Wiganer first and a party member second and work at it full time.
Hopefully we will get somebody of better calibre now, but unfortunately he or she will be from the same incompetent sleazy party, although with people at last seeing through them by a much reduced majority.
Perhaps then even a Labour MP will represent local people with more vigour.
I wanted to stand against him on a Real Wiganer ticket who would stick up for the people of Wigan and ensure we got what we needed and deserved.
What have we got while Mc Cartney has been the Makerfield MP? Zilch.
He has been the holder of one of the safest seats and thus had no real incentive to push hard for the people of Wigan. Yes he has opened a few health centres and such like but the big schemes which could bring so much prosperity to Wigan have been shelved.
He did not stop the Bickershaw/Golborne pit complex being closed. He promised Billinge Hospital would not be closed not long before it was and sold off for housing thus a good building with land to expand was lost, against the wishes of the people.
From his point of view promotion to the cabinet has been more important than kicking up against the party line for his adopted town. He voted against disclosure of MPs expenses,for the Iraq war and toed the party line on the vast majority of issues. Just lobby fodder.
A Labour robot would have been just as effective and at the end of this illustrious career he leaves with a large pension and a cushy job advising on de commissioning Sellafield nuclear plant on £114,000 per year.
Does anybody think he knows the first thing about this task? Does anybody think he would have got the job if he had no contacts with people in government?
Does anybody think he will give up that job "for health reasons"?--not likely.
When he first became MP there was a Tory government but they would always ignore Wigan as a Labour town.
What these feather bedded MPs fail to understand is that they are supposed to be our servants and represent US and not their party. Government should be bottom up, not top down and an MP who believed that would have fought our corner harder.
What we need in Wigan (and Makerfield and Leigh) are MPs who will fight our corner even against their party and to do that the MP must not just pretend to represent the town he happens to end up in but a man who lives and breaths the place and whose loyalty to the town trancends all other considerations.
The town must be like a religion to him and he must not have his interests deflected by third world issues such as schools in India, nor cushy non jobs in industry. In other words he must be a Wiganer first and a party member second and work at it full time.
Hopefully we will get somebody of better calibre now, but unfortunately he or she will be from the same incompetent sleazy party, although with people at last seeing through them by a much reduced majority.
Perhaps then even a Labour MP will represent local people with more vigour.
Saturday, 23 May 2009
IAN McCARTNEY
Standing down at the next election due to "ill health".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/23/police-labour
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/23/police-labour
MORE FROM THE COAL FACE
Another hectic day. Much of mine was spent in planning and distribution while teams of leafletters were out in the local areas to a generally enthusiastic response.
There was one incident when a young helper was punched in the face by an opponent, presumably of the fascist left.
The incident of course has been reported to the police as the boy has neck pains and was shaken by the incident. We know the name and address of the perpetrator, and hopefully will see her in court.
The reaction of this attacker shows the lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy reminiscent of the Stalinist states these people so admire.
I can understand that she may not agree with our policies but we are entitled to promote them.
I find the way the big three parties have sold our country off while feathering their own nests very offensive but I would never dream of violently assaulting someone distributing their literature, and nor would any of our members.
When you have lost the argument--lash out, that's the tactic of the Left.
They must be really fearful of the voters verdict.
On a more positive note here's the link to our EU broadcast as shown on Channel 5 last night. I can add nothing to it. It says it all and shows the reason why we are the only hope for our country.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f8lprxiOFc&feature=email
There was one incident when a young helper was punched in the face by an opponent, presumably of the fascist left.
The incident of course has been reported to the police as the boy has neck pains and was shaken by the incident. We know the name and address of the perpetrator, and hopefully will see her in court.
The reaction of this attacker shows the lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy reminiscent of the Stalinist states these people so admire.
I can understand that she may not agree with our policies but we are entitled to promote them.
I find the way the big three parties have sold our country off while feathering their own nests very offensive but I would never dream of violently assaulting someone distributing their literature, and nor would any of our members.
When you have lost the argument--lash out, that's the tactic of the Left.
They must be really fearful of the voters verdict.
On a more positive note here's the link to our EU broadcast as shown on Channel 5 last night. I can add nothing to it. It says it all and shows the reason why we are the only hope for our country.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f8lprxiOFc&feature=email
Friday, 22 May 2009
MASSIVE INCREASE IN SUPPORT.
An excellent inspiring EU broadcast by Nick Griffin tonight put our party's case to the voters. It nailed the lie that we are racist and demonstrated the truth that we are in effect a conservative party (with a little c).
The party with the big C has shown no interest in conserving anything British, while the much hyped UKIP has foreign candidates, so not much British sentiment there. Labour is of course engaged in securing the immigrant vote.
We want to preserve our country, its culture and freedoms from foreign invaders and influences such as the EU. Our forebears fought ruthless European tyrants twice in the last century to preserve our independence and freedom and our party will not stand by and see them given away.
I attended a meeting last night with Nick Griffin as guest speaker. The main topic was the incredible response we had had to our campaigning and leaflets, far in excess of what we expected. I knew the broadcast would be good as I was present at one of the early planning stages, but our new call centre specially set up to deal with new enquiries has struggled to cope (32,000 calls in 2 days)
We have of course been helped by the expenses scandles of MPs which lays bare their contempt for the people who so foolishly elected them.
This week our advertising hoardings have been put up, to the expected dismay of the other parties who will use every trick in the book to have them taken down.
It does not seem to occur to them that just as they are entitled to advertise, so are we. Any attempt to stifle our adverts shows their fascist methods and portrays us as victims of injustice, thus shooting themselves in the foot and gaining votes for us.
Predictably in "enriched" areas there has been trouble, with muslims in Luton protesting and threatening to burn them. The police respond that we should take them down to avoid trouble. So much for democratic debate.
What they can object to is beyond me as the adverts only say "British Jobs for British Workers" but evidently these people do not consider themselves as British. It also shows their lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy and the increasing threat to our freedoms by the continuing immigration of people who do not respect our values.
Activists in all areas speak of a surge in support for us.
I hope it translates into votes.
For a DVD of Nick Griffin's talk on our progress please ring me on the above phone numbers.
The party with the big C has shown no interest in conserving anything British, while the much hyped UKIP has foreign candidates, so not much British sentiment there. Labour is of course engaged in securing the immigrant vote.
We want to preserve our country, its culture and freedoms from foreign invaders and influences such as the EU. Our forebears fought ruthless European tyrants twice in the last century to preserve our independence and freedom and our party will not stand by and see them given away.
I attended a meeting last night with Nick Griffin as guest speaker. The main topic was the incredible response we had had to our campaigning and leaflets, far in excess of what we expected. I knew the broadcast would be good as I was present at one of the early planning stages, but our new call centre specially set up to deal with new enquiries has struggled to cope (32,000 calls in 2 days)
We have of course been helped by the expenses scandles of MPs which lays bare their contempt for the people who so foolishly elected them.
This week our advertising hoardings have been put up, to the expected dismay of the other parties who will use every trick in the book to have them taken down.
It does not seem to occur to them that just as they are entitled to advertise, so are we. Any attempt to stifle our adverts shows their fascist methods and portrays us as victims of injustice, thus shooting themselves in the foot and gaining votes for us.
Predictably in "enriched" areas there has been trouble, with muslims in Luton protesting and threatening to burn them. The police respond that we should take them down to avoid trouble. So much for democratic debate.
What they can object to is beyond me as the adverts only say "British Jobs for British Workers" but evidently these people do not consider themselves as British. It also shows their lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy and the increasing threat to our freedoms by the continuing immigration of people who do not respect our values.
Activists in all areas speak of a surge in support for us.
I hope it translates into votes.
For a DVD of Nick Griffin's talk on our progress please ring me on the above phone numbers.
Thursday, 21 May 2009
IMMIGRATION AND INTELLIGENCE - AN OXYMORON
Now if you aren't already aware of the internal intricacies of our wonderful Borders and Immigration Agency, let me enlighten you. In summary - the agency is not fit for fucking purpose. Having worked there (and resigned in disgust) I can give you a tour de force of the colossal shortcomings and mind numbing idiocracy that it is.
…
Many of these people have been able to extend their stay for a sufficient period of time to apply for citizenship. All on the basis of some incredibly shoddy fraudulent documents.
And it only takes one batch of these documents to get you in. After that, you're laughing.
As the Times articles details, one of the hucksters who set up one of these institutions wrote letters and documents to give himself qualifications. Its even more of a breeze to write fake attendance records and glowing references for your pals from Swat Valley.
Oh, didn't I mention that bit? That's right, through this secure system of assessment hundreds of applicants have arrived, and remained, in the UK who originated in the Taleban and Al Queda hotbeds of North Western Pakistan. And these are just hundreds from this one network of scams that the Times has exposed.
So here's one of the points I really really want to drive home: These kind of institutions, scams and applications were (and probably still are) the norm at the Home Office.
…
I don't think many people (especially those mentalist "no borders" people) really, truly, realise just how utterly shoddy and mind numbingly incompetent the nation's border control is. I laughed hard when I realised that many people labour under the illusion that the Home Office keeps track of all these applicants. It doesn't. Very often no one even realises someone has overstayed unless that put in a fresh application.
…
That's right folks. For years and years, the number of dodgy institutions providing a magic carpet for equally dodgy individuals to fly into the country has been approximately 13,460.
Thirteen thousand, four hundred and sixty!!
Go read it all and get angry:
http://i-squared.blogspot.com/2009/05/immigration-and-intelligence-view-from.html
Then consider who is doing the vetting at the Borders agency … and know you that these days it’s not usually Saxons or Celts.
Arrived at passport control at Heathrow Terminal Three in recent years? (which is only the outward face of a huge Home Office Immigration bureaucracy – and who’s been getting all those hidden bureaucratic jobs? Can you guess?)
Give it a try sometime. Last time my brother came visiting from Australia only one control desk had a whitey on it. And as he used one of the other desks, he couldn’t even be sure that at least that one whitey was a natural Briton.
Morg
.
…
Many of these people have been able to extend their stay for a sufficient period of time to apply for citizenship. All on the basis of some incredibly shoddy fraudulent documents.
And it only takes one batch of these documents to get you in. After that, you're laughing.
As the Times articles details, one of the hucksters who set up one of these institutions wrote letters and documents to give himself qualifications. Its even more of a breeze to write fake attendance records and glowing references for your pals from Swat Valley.
Oh, didn't I mention that bit? That's right, through this secure system of assessment hundreds of applicants have arrived, and remained, in the UK who originated in the Taleban and Al Queda hotbeds of North Western Pakistan. And these are just hundreds from this one network of scams that the Times has exposed.
So here's one of the points I really really want to drive home: These kind of institutions, scams and applications were (and probably still are) the norm at the Home Office.
…
I don't think many people (especially those mentalist "no borders" people) really, truly, realise just how utterly shoddy and mind numbingly incompetent the nation's border control is. I laughed hard when I realised that many people labour under the illusion that the Home Office keeps track of all these applicants. It doesn't. Very often no one even realises someone has overstayed unless that put in a fresh application.
…
That's right folks. For years and years, the number of dodgy institutions providing a magic carpet for equally dodgy individuals to fly into the country has been approximately 13,460.
Thirteen thousand, four hundred and sixty!!
Go read it all and get angry:
http://i-squared.blogspot.com/2009/05/immigration-and-intelligence-view-from.html
Then consider who is doing the vetting at the Borders agency … and know you that these days it’s not usually Saxons or Celts.
Arrived at passport control at Heathrow Terminal Three in recent years? (which is only the outward face of a huge Home Office Immigration bureaucracy – and who’s been getting all those hidden bureaucratic jobs? Can you guess?)
Give it a try sometime. Last time my brother came visiting from Australia only one control desk had a whitey on it. And as he used one of the other desks, he couldn’t even be sure that at least that one whitey was a natural Briton.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)