Saturday, 12 September 2009
WE ALWAYS GET THE BLAME
The recent disturbances in Birmingham and also in Harrow show the frustration of people at the continual islamification of our country which is taking place.
Of course the BNP have been brought into it and UAF have stuck their provocative noses in with their banners blaming us as of course has the media.
We have nothing to do with these disturbances but the muslims and the reds blame us in spite of our Party disowning the British protestors. It is said that their protests were provocative.
Much as I condemn the action of the protestors it was a peaceful demonstration until the muslims and UAF kicked off.
The islamification of Britain is provocative to British people. Where can we make our concerns noted if not in the areas affected?
Significant is the violence shown to the protestors who only seek to voice an opinion.
We, as a party seek to save our country by democratic means through the ballot box, but yet the government tries to destroy us by any means they can find.
The disquiet at our being displaced in our own country will not go away in the unlikely case that we are banned. It will only fester and severe violence will ensue. The will of the people will prevail but we want to do it peacefully and democratically.
The fact that we are dragged into this shows the State fears us more than the demonstrators and that the democratic way is more effective.
However if our rights are taken away we would have nothing to lose and the gloves would be off.
Destroy our party and there will be civil war.We don't want it and always avoid conflict but whatever they do we WILL defend our people and country.
The government say they are going to have a programme to show white working class people that they are not being discriminated against in jobs and housing. So it seems it takes a riot to make them listen.
Once again they use the wrong tactics, persecute those who campaign democratically and reward violence (a bit like the criminal law where the innocent have fewer rights than the criminals.
This to me seems a dangerous course of action and a powder keg is being created.
How do they justify then all ethnic employment policies?
Today in Burnley I was shown a brochure by a firm called "Plumlife" which is putting subsidised 4 and 5 bedroom houses up all with muslim toilets.obviously not for Brits.
Is this not discrimination? On the brochure was featured an Asian family.
So much for equality!
So there you have it, we are blamed when we have nothing to do with it. We can't win against this media bias but in the end WE WILL TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK, hopefully by peaceful means but take it we will.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
26 comments:
A plum life for some. You might think they are all out to create this civil war.
Shouldn't it mean pond life?
Ahmed Choudry has youtubed a video response to the EDL, UAF, Gubmint and the BNP(?)
If the police haven't rounded him up for deportation right now for incitement I'll want to know why.
[Rant on/]
Islam is so perfect:
*You are twice as likely to be a sex offender.
*Twice as likely to be in prison.
*Twice as likely to be unemployed.
*Come from poor scumbag countries due to endemic laziness. They want this country? Believe me. If things get so bad there will be no Mecca, Tehran, nothing. Viral agents will be vented into the air to poison certain genetic traits. This is the Deem they want?
*Bigots R US.
*Oil money literally buys them influential businesses and foreign land. As usual, 'our' Gubmint is sleepwalking into another nightmare.
*They do not understand that the Deem of Mohamed is for the snake to eat its own tale.
*They do not believe in evolution yet they understand with their own eyes God placed the different peoples BY HIS HAND around the Earth. So coming here is spitting on Gods design.
[Rant off/]
I despise and pity these greedy, avaricious and self denigrating losers.
At least the man (I would have like to use the term 'rag head' but I won't because its politically incorrect to do so) in this video is honest about his plan for the future of our country. An Islamic dictatorship!
UAF isn't as honest, but it is obvious that most of its supporters would rather live under an Islamic dictatorship than under a democratic government of the British people.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
From my mail. The lady who sent it me is just Jo public.
Lost Soldiers
HURRAH FOR THE LADY WHO WROTE THIS LETTER, WE ALL THINK THE SAME BUT HAVE NO GUTS TO PUT IN THE PRESS, GOD BLESS HER AND HER GUTS.
This was written by a Canadian woman, but oh how it also applies to the U.S. , U.K. And Australia
THIS ONE PACKS A FIRM PUNCH
Written by a housewife in New Brunswick , to her local newspaper. This is one Ticked off lady..
'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started
By Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and
Have continually threatened to do so since?
Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in
Downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a
Field in Pennsylvania ?
Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning
Or crushing death that day, or didn't they?
And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured
By a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in
A brutal insurgency.
I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for
Incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.
I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring
About the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by
Beheading in Afghanistan .
I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off
Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat..
I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out
And fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in
Mosques.
I'll care when the mindless zealots who blows themselves up in search of
Nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide Bombs.
I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of
Speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the
Ground or their families waiting a home to hear about them when something happens.
In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:
I don't care.
When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to
Move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank ..
I don't care.
When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and
Fed 'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that His holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your Heart of hearts:
I don't care.
And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and
Other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it,
I don't care!!
If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends
Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous Behaviour!
If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you
Choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed
By radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:
'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in
The world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.'
I have another quote that I would like to add, AND.......I hope you forward
All this.
One last thought for the day:
Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The Canadian Soldier.
3. The British Soldier.
4. The US Soldier, and
5. The Australian Soldier
One died for your soul, the other 4 for your freedom..
YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET ALL OF T
Four articles ago now Morg posted a story called "philosophical beliefs and law", that started a very interesting discussion on climate change. However over the lat couple of days (just after my last posting) the thread seems to have gone cold. This is an important subject and deserves a full airing and I'm very anxious to continue the discussion on that thread. Please Morg or Andy (the gentleman who also added to the thread) could you let me have responses to my postings.
The Wigan blog is one of the most open and relevant Nationalist blogs on the web, and I'd like to thank everyone involved in its production.
Thank you Wigan BNP.
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
PS.
I've also taken the liberty of reposting the current Youtube video in your story on the Lancaster blog (accrediting the Wigan blog of course).
It's gone cold Chris because I've got better things to do than argue with someone whose mind wont be changed.
DESPITE the evidence.
I suppose you believe that those two German ships that navigated the North East Passage were the first ships to do so, as the AGW followers would have you believe (evidence of a shrinking ice cap, in AGW eyes)
The North East Passage has been in commercial use since 1935, and it was first navigated - in a WOODEN ship - in 1897.
The press has been running a story that is no more valid than AGW itself.
AGW = Anthropogenic Global Warming. i.e. we humans are doing it. Maybe, maybe not - the jury's still out. Whether followers of the new religion like it or not.
Don't try getting into that argument again because this comment is my last word on what appears to me to be the AGW fraudulent excuse to levy more taxes, and exert more control.
Hi Morg,
You said:
"I've got better things to do than argue with someone whose mind wont be changed. DESPITE the evidence."
I say:
But that's just is, I am prepared to have my mind change, but only by valid evidence. I looked at several articles on that blog, and found that many were simple cut and pasted from other sites. Of the three I chose to examine in detail two turned out not to be doubting Global Warming or that humans were playing at least some significant part in it. The third came to the conclusion that more research was needed to confirm any permanent change.
As for you contention that the news reports on the North-east shipping passage were misleading, that simply isn't true. All the reports I read (including BBC and Telegraph) reported that other specialist vessels had been making the trip (on rare occasions) since the 1930's. The shocking fact is that that sea lane is now safely navigable by commercial vessels.
If you decide to ignore the current thread, it can only be that you can't dispute my analysis of Global Warming. But I'm afraid that Global Warming is too important to ignore.
Keep well.
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Dave Hannam Corporal Fox (original version) PLEASE GOOGLE
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT.
CLIMATE CHANGE ........ NOT A FACTOR
Dear BritishLady (16:37 hrs),
You said:
"THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT.
CLIMATE CHANGE ........ NOT A FACTOR"
I say:
Yes I know, and that is one reason why discussing it on forums like this is so important. Global Warming (which is one manifestation of climate change) is potentially catastrophic for all life on Earth. Morg's point, about human population numbers, is also very relevant as one of the main driving forces behind Global Warming seems to be human CO2 emission (Although that human connection is not 100% proven yet, it does seem almost certain now).
But regardless of the cause we need to start acting on Global warming (and overpopulation) ASAP, any solution to Global Warming that did not contain a mechanism for reducing population would only be short term fix, that is it would be: no solution at all in the long run.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
We need to build more coal fired power stations NOW like the Chinese (one a week) or low lying Bangladesh (with our money) or the lights will go out HERE but remain on in these countries.
Life on Earth will not end if the climate gets hotter. It has been hotter in the past. It may be a bit different but not as bad as us having no power.
Chris Go and talk to China and India.
Anything we do will not make the slightest difference.
I'm not saying anything more about it Chris.
You talk like a religious convert and anything I say will not alter your unreason so I would be wasting my time.
Hi Charles,
The technology now exists to make clean (effectively emission free) coal fired power stations, so I totally agree that given our huge coal resource they are the way forward in the mid term. But don't right off nuclear fusion in the long term (50+years).
China is the most eco-friendly country in the world, simply because of their one child per couple policy (yes I know its had problems, but at least they are acting on overpopulation, unlike the rest of the world). As for India we need to stop taking their manufactured goods until they clean their act up. And reinvigorating our own manufacturing industries wouldn't be a bad idea now would it?
Yes the planet has warmed in the past, and life continued. But the point is that life adapted to those changes and many species were wiped out in the process. The world became an entirely different environment after the warming. If we ignore Global Warming life will indeed continue, but it's unlikely that the human races will be around to see it continue. Not to mention many other higher life forms who played no part in it but will still be eradicated along with humans.
Finally: as for my concern about Global Warming being almost religious in nature, I disagree totally. Religion (of all types) has no supporting evidence for it, and relies on blind unquestioning faith. In the case of Christianity this is based many writings, over thousands of years, by ignorant peasants which was cobbled together in the 4th Century AD into the book we call the Bible. The knowledge (I won't say belief because it is knowledge) of Climate Change comes from the work of many scientist and stands up to the most intense scrutiny. That's the difference between having knowledge and having a religious belief.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Has this guy been arrested yet.?
If not, why not.?
Phoenix
Unless it's for having nationalist ideas, people aren't arrested for having different ideas. Given jackets with extra-long sleeves that fasten at the back - maybe if the ideas are weird enough; stored in rooms with soft walls maybe, but not arrested.
Chris
The two German ships needed a Russian icebreaker each. Did they tell you that in the papers?
And Chris - why will the scientists concerned not release their data sets to other scientists?
Data sets are vital for proper peer review; and peer review is part of the scientific process.
So the 'evidence' you read is not proper scientific evidence.
Chris
But I will concede that we've just gone through one of the top ten warmest summers this century.
wv - muntero
Hi Morg,
You said:
"And Chris - why will the scientists concerned not release their data sets to other scientists"
I say,
I'm sorry but I'm not sure what data your referring to, or which set of scientists your talking about. Its not normal for scientist to release raw data, most peer reviewed papers contain the writers own analysis of that raw data, but rarely if ever a full unedited record of any experimental readings. And yes that does mean that on occasions data can be faked, as was the case a few yeas ago when we had the vaccination scare caused by a paper published in the Lancet.
In some ways we do take a scientist word that his results are genuine, but in the case of climate change there is so much data coming from so many different sources, it's simply inconceivable that any-more than a tiny percentage could be faked. I trust science a million times a day, and I have no reason to doubt it now, quite the opposite in fact. Unless this is a scam that would make the : 9/11; the Kennedy assassination; Holocaust, and the moon landings; combined look likely, Global Warming is a fact!
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Global gross overpopulation is a fact too. Get that sorted out and i might consider taking an interest in climate change. Until then it is utterly pointless.
And of course, once the population is down to a sustainable level (I reckon about 50 million worldwide if we want to maintain a high-tec civilisation) We could all drive around in Humvees and the world wouldn't notice our pollution and emissions.
Ergo - there is no point addressing global warming. Ever.
And data sets ARE handed over when requested for normal peer review. Search it out for yourself - I don't keep files of most of the places I visit.
But data sets are kept secret for the crucial AGW data sets.
WHY?
Hi Morg.
You said:
" Global gross overpopulation is a fact too."
I say:
Yes I've agreed with that multiple times during this thread on climate change, in fact it's almost certainly the major driving force of Global Warming. However to reduce the world population to a desirable 1 billion (early 20th Century level), with a one child per couple rule, would take 2.7 generations (that 25years x 2.7 = 68 years) even if we start today. In fact even that ignores the overlap of older generations still being around long after the stable birth rate is archived, ie. we are talking time lines of well over 100 years before a population of 1 billion could be achieved.
Now OK Global Warming may in fact reduce that time to 30 or 40 years. But at a horrific cost of; Wars; drought, famine; disease etc. Certainly not what either you or I want! Only action now can avoid the worst disaster for 20,000 years.
Finally you still have not provided me with the information I asked for on that withheld data you talked about. I ask again which scientist and what data?
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Chris
These will do to just get you started (and don't absolutely rely on Wikipedia - it's only ever any good as a starting point. Anyone can edit Wiki articles):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1878920/posts
http://papundits.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/james-hansen-nasa-climate-modeler-turns-activist-joins-global-warming-protest-in-uk/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/01/publicly-available-data-being-purged-at-uks-hadley-climate-center/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/29/gop-senator-calls-inquiry-supressed-climate-change-report/
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0905/S00369.htm
That's just a start for you. If you want further info then you can do your own googling at least as well as me and probably better, because I'm not going to waste any more time on this. As far as I'm concerned this is the end of the conversation. I've got better things to do with my time - hell, as far as I'm concerned even a J Arthur would be better use of my time.
Remember - the above links are only starting points. Not that I expect you to do any serious searching because you already have the TRUTH.
Hi Morg,
Once again you seem to be totally ignoring my request for the details of who in your opinion is withholding what information. I list of links websites does not tell me what information you were referring to when you wrote: "But data sets are kept secret for the crucial AGW data set" What does the term AGW data set mean?
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Chris
I gave you a starting point. You can use google every bit as much as I can. You just don't WANT to search for anything that disputes the truth as you believe it to be. Fair enough, but I'm not the slightest bit interested until the human population is under control.
And while you're here, take a look at this. The NorthEast sea route has been REGULARLY used since 1935. The arctic ice cap was bigger in summer this year than last year and last year it was bigger than the year before.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2009/09/coprophagia-watch.html
It would be nice if I could have the last word on my own post!
Dear Morg,
I ask again:
"who in your opinion is withholding what information?"
All that is needed is for you to name of the organisation and data you are referring to. No links, just the name of the institution/organisation and the data you think has been withheld, nothing more.
And why are you refusing to give a straight answer to a straight question?
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
JAMES HANSEN - the godfather of the anthropogenic global warming power-grab.
Try finding all the data for the hockey stick graph.
Chris (I'm still doing your searching for you, note. You'd find this sort of stuff for yourself if you were REALLY interested in seeing both sides of the argument. It's like trying to argue with a Muslim!)
" We requested identification of the splicing sequence, which Mann refused to provide,... "
""Physicist Richard Muller of Berkeley studied our work last year and wrote an article about it:
[The findings] hit me like a bombshell, and I suspect it is having the same effect on many others. Suddenly the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics.
...
With that, the core conclusion, and that also of the IPCC 2001 Report, was completely undermined.
Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of the Royal Meteorological Institute of the Netherlands. He wrote to convey comments he wished to be communicated publicly:
“The IPCC review process is fatally flawed. The behavior of Michael Mann is a disgrace to the profession…The scientific basis for the Kyoto protocol is grossly inadequate.”
Go read it all:
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf
One's a physicist, one's a meteorologist.
I repeat:
"the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics."
"The scientific basis for the Kyoto protocol is grossly inadequate.” "
Don't forget to scroll back to the beginning of that paper before you start reading.
Post a Comment