TWO POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO THE ISLAM PROBLEM.

I prefer the first of the two ... given that the second isn't going to happen.

But as long as we are a part of the EU, that isn't going to happen either. So that must be our first order of business when we are eventually elected to government - leave the EU; no negotiation and no warning. We just announce we are no longer a part of their stupid game, reclaim our fisheries and seal our borders (while we still have the remnants of an army, a navy, and an air force). We might care to ask them what they plan to do about that given that they've repeatedly failed to defeat us over the past thousand years. Also announce that any trawler caught fishing in our waters will be immedately sunk.

Then we can get on with deporting all Moslems back to their countries of family origin. Any native Brit converts can have a choice ... they can find a Moslem country that will accept them, or they can live out the remainder of their lives on St Kilda. We'll provide a permanent naval patrol to ... er ... ensure nobody hurts them.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018805.html

What Pakistan tells us about the Islam problem, and its solution

The second Pakistani government official in two months has been assassinated for opposing his country's death-for-blasphemy law. This hideous news clarifies the ineluctable logic of the Islam problem, which not a single person occupying a responsible public position in the West is capable of understanding:

1. According to Islam, if you insult Islam, you must die.
2. This Islamic law, so horrible and anti-human, is a scandal to the conscience of humanity, and both non-Muslims and some Muslims naturally get the idea of reforming Islam, so that it will no longer require the death penalty for insulting Islam.
3. But as soon as any Muslim speaks up against the Islamic law that requires death for insulting Islam, he is killed by his fellow Muslims. In one form or another, the same event has recurred repeatedly throughout the history of Islam: when anyone tries to reform or humanize the religion, he is killed.
4. Therefore no reform of Islam is possible.

This is the reality that not a single person in a responsible public position in the West is yet capable of understanding. However, though no reform of Islam is possible, this doesn't mean that no solution to the Islam problem is possible. In fact, there are two, and only two, possible solutions to the Islam problem, one from the non-Muslim point of view, the other from the Muslim point of view.
From the non-Muslim point of view, the only possible solution to the Islam problem is that Islam be segregated and quarantined from the non-Muslim world, so that Islam cannot work its evil and threatening influence on non-Muslim countries.
From the Muslim point of view, the only possible solution to the Islam problem is that Islam cease to exist, meaning that Muslims renounce Islam so that the religion no longer has any influence over them as individuals and as societies.
I realize that this sounds hopelessly extreme. But our current situation is hopelessly extreme, and no one says that therefore it can't be true! If our current, hopelessly extreme situation can exist, then its opposite can also exist.
Currently the two dominant belief systems in the world are liberalism (in the West) and Islam (in the 57 Muslim-majority countries plus the virulent Muslim outgrowths in non-Muslim countries). A world cumulatively dominated by liberalism and Islam is a world spiraling toward a horrible end, with each downward swoop of the spiral more horrible than the last. If the world is to be saved, both liberalism and Islam must be defeated, or at least disempowered, so that other, more sane and viable, belief systems take their place as the dominant belief systems.

* * * Here is the article about the latest Islamic assassination in Pakistan, in the March 3 issue of The Independent:

Pakistan was reeling last night from the second assassination in as many months of a high-profile politician who spoke out against the country's draconian blasphemy laws that impose the death penalty for insulting Islam. Gunmen ambushed Shahbaz Bhatti, the only Christian government minister, outside his mother's home in Islamabad and sprayed his car with at least 10 bullets, killing him instantly. The assassination was chillingly similar in execution to that of Salmaan Taseer, the Governor of Punjab, who was slain by his own bodyguard in January.
The assassination was claimed by "the al-Qa'ida organisation and the Punjabi Taliban". Before speeding away, the killers left behind pamphlets boasting of their act. "The only punishment for blasphemy against the Prophet is death," the pamphlet in Urdu said.
"A white car stopped near us at a crossing," Mr Bhatti's driver Gul Sher, who was slightly injured, told reporters. "Four people were sitting in the car. One of them got out with a Kalashnikov ... He came in front of the car and opened fire. I ducked. Minister died on the spot."
The killing has plunged Pakistan's long-suffering minorities into deeper despair, yet again raising the question of whether they can afford to continue living in the country. Mr Bhatti and Mr Taseer's attempts to review the draconian blasphemy laws, which have been responsible for persecuting minorities, were cast as an act of blasphemy.
Mr Bhatti, the Minorities Minister, had been receiving threats from militant groups for some time. In a video broadcast on the BBC and Al Jazeera before his death, he said: "The forces of violence, militant banned organisations, the Taliban and al-Qa'ida, want to impose the radical philosophy in Pakistan. Whoever stands against their radical philosophy, they threaten them."
Pakistan's Christians came on to the streets. "We've been attacked many, many times in our history," said Shimon Gill, a member of the All Pakistan Minority Alliance. "But now we have been orphaned. Who will speak up for us now?" In Mr Bhatti's village, Christians torched tyres, beat their chest in protest and denounced the killers.
Mr Bhatti had no guards to protect him. The Pakistan government claims that after Mr Taseer's assassination by a member of the police team supposed to be guarding him, Mr Bhatti had refused to have bodyguards. But Mr Bhatti's associates said that he was denied the security he asked for, and was not provided with a bulletproof vehicle.
Threats against Mr Bhatti escalated after he joined Mr Taseer and liberal parliamentarian Sherry Rehman in calling for a review of blasphemy laws. The three politicians were among the few prepared to call attention to the fate of Aasia Noreen, a 45-year-old Christian farmhand sentenced to death for alleged blasphemy. Her supporters dismissed the allegations and said charge stemmed from a falling out with a village elder.
Mr Bhatti, a Roman Catholic member of the ruling Pakistan People's Party, told friends he was prepared to die in pursuit of rights for his community. "These threats ... cannot change my opinion and principles," he said. "I would prefer to die for my principles, and for the justice of my community, rather than compromise on these threats."
Human rights groups said the assassination laid bare the government's policy of appeasement towards extremists.
Since Mr Taseer's assassination, the religious right has gone from strength to strength, mounting huge demonstrations in support of blasphemy laws and exalting his assassin. In recent weeks, they have added to their cause demands that Raymond Davis, a CIA contractor who killed two Pakistani men in Lahore last month, be hanged. Washington is demanding Mr Davis be released.
[end of article]

- end of initial entry - Gintas writes:

From our point of view Islam is a problem, but from our ruling elite's point of view it's a solution--a solution to the "problem" of Western Civilization. They want to smash us into submission (perhaps even oblivion), and what better tool than the religion that means "submit"? As Orwell said in 1984, "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever." I think that image truly thrills our ruling elite.

Morg
.

INQUEST ON TWO BI ELECTIONS

First of all congratulations to Enis Dalton on her election result in Barnsley and saving her deposit.
The result however was a big disappointment in that we were trounced by UKIP and which was not unexpected.
Although Enis saved her deposit her percentage of the vote was down by 2.9%
The question we have to answer is why?

Well at our conference in Leigh Nick Griffin gave the result of a survey where people were given certain names and asked what was the first word that came into their head. He told us that when the words BNP was said they answered without thinking "Nick Griffin"

In other words our party's image is "Nick Griffin".
It follows therefore that our decreasing support must in at least part be due to the negative image rightly or wrongly associated with him, just as Labour won 3 elections not on policies but on the positive image of Tony Blair however unjustified this image was.

Therefore while Nick was prepared to use what he hoped was a positive image in his favour he must now accept that his continuing presence as a leader is putting the brakes on our progress.

We have policies with which most people agree but they still don't vote for us in sufficient numbers.
We like UKIP are for withdrawal from the EU but unlike them we have many other policies to solve our national problems.
They (UKIP) are as much in the pockets of the banking and hedge fund thieves as the other parties and other than their anti EU stance are little different. In a working class area like Barnsley if our ideas had been put well and if voters had trusted us we would have done much better.


We forget that people are more interested and motivated to vote by things that matter to them personally in their locality and we should have concentrated on these matters more. This is the result of decisions made "on high" and not locally and it is localism which will win us power.
Halal meat, troops home and even immigration though important to us are less so in some areas than pensions,student fees and jobs.


After election defeats other parties accept the need for a change in strategy and possibly a new leader.
Unfortunately our party and its leadership has not learned this old lesson but it must do if we are to survive as a force in British politics.
Or perhaps the leadership does not want to learn and keep its senior positions in a rapidly decreasing group of followers.

The bi election in Walkden was not much better. I know the lads there worked hard but were beaten by the English Democrats.
What does this party stand for. A vague form of nationalism maybe but what are its other policies. Who is their leader. God knows And still they beat us.

It must or should tell us something when hard working activists and a good candidate is beaten by a party whose policies are unknown.

Again it is the image of our party and I am afraid that with the present leadership and officials we will get nowhere.

If they REALLY believe in the interests of OUR party (it belongs to all its members) they should do the decent thing , step down and let others more acceptible to the electorate take their place.

We also need to reunite with all the good nationalists who have been driven from our ranks into one party which stresses what unites us rather than where we differ as has happened so often in the past.
If we could manage this we would be a powerful force for good in the country.

I shall not be holding my breath that the leadership will allow this to happen, but by their actions I and many other members will judge them.

SIGN THE HALAL PETITION

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST HALAL FOOD

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Halal petition

I hereby register my support for the Operation Nehemiah halal campaign.

• I support the freedom of religious groups to access food and other products that meet the requirements of their faith
• I am however concerned about the massive growth of sharia-compliant products for everyone whatever their faith, often without consumers, parents of school children and others being informed or consulted
• I do not want to pay for halal products when a proportion of my money will go to an Islamic agency for halal certification
• I am concerned about non-labelling of halal foods and products and call upon government agencies and the food industry to label halal products clearly
• I am concerned about the lack of informed choice for consumers in supermarkets, restaurants etc and call upon the food industry to ensure that halal does not become the general default option in non-Muslim countries

CLICK ON THIS LINK TO SIGN THE PETITION -
https://barnabasfund.org/Halal-petition/?m=10%2523245%2523445%2523522

DRIVERS WHO SMOKE AT THE WHEEL TARGETED BY THE POLICE

Britain is no longer a FREE COUNTRY.

The Smoking Ban for Pubs, Resturants, Public Buildings etc is aimed at disrupting people socialising and talking about politics, the countrys problems etc in the Pub.
The Pub is probably the only place where people from the communities around the Pub/s can discuss the problems of our country.
Most Political parties have garnered support or lost support by people discussing Britains problems in smoke filled back rooms in the Pub.

And don't forget that Islamists CAN SMOKE in their own public buildings.

But this is different, this is part of the quasi STASI POLICE STATE BRITAIN.

"Council wardens and Essex Police will carry out random inspections across the county to look for evidence of illicit cigarette use.

They will even hunt for cigarette butts in the ashtrays and smell the air inside the vehicles in order to clamp down on the outlawed practice.

Workers were banned from smoking in their company cars as part of the Health Act introduced in 2006.

The law made it illegal in all vehicles used primarily for business purposes by more than one person.

Anyone caught breaking the law faces a £50 fixed penalty fine or a possible court conviction, which carries a £200 fine.

The culprits’ employers will also be informed and also be heavily fined.

Chris Kitchen, acting head of environmental services at Tendring District Council in Essex said: “Police together with council officers will be stopping business vehicles and public transport vehicles on the highway.

"We have noticed that people are smoking in commercial vehicles where in fact it's banned and we will be looking for evidence that people have been smoking.

He added: "We will be looking for ashtrays and whether the vehicle smells of smoke."

Ian Wilkins, environmental officer at Tendring District Council, explained that the scheme was intended to raise awareness of the law.

He said: "When the new legislation came into force on July 1 2007, it became illegal to smoke in virtually all enclosed public places and public and work vehicles.

"I think it is fair to say that most people understood the rules when it came to public buildings, but there was some confusion over the rules about smoking in vehicles.

"We will use the month of March to carry out inspections, offer advice and generally try and make sure people are aware of and compliant with the legislation.

"This is primarily about raising awareness but, if we feel the case is appropriate, we will take action where contraventions are observed."

The scheme which is being carried out throughout March has been organised to coincide with National No Smoking Day which takes place on March 9.

The culprits’ employers will also be informed and also be heavily fined.

Chris Kitchen, acting head of environmental services at Tendring District Council in Essex said: “Police together with council officers will be stopping business vehicles and public transport vehicles on the highway.

"We have noticed that people are smoking in commercial vehicles where in fact it's banned and we will be looking for evidence that people have been smoking.

He added: "We will be looking for ashtrays and whether the vehicle smells of smoke."

Ian Wilkins, environmental officer at Tendring District Council, explained that the scheme was intended to raise awareness of the law.

He said: "When the new legislation came into force on July 1 2007, it became illegal to smoke in virtually all enclosed public places and public and work vehicles.

"I think it is fair to say that most people understood the rules when it came to public buildings, but there was some confusion over the rules about smoking in vehicles.

"We will use the month of March to carry out inspections, offer advice and generally try and make sure people are aware of and compliant with the legislation.

"This is primarily about raising awareness but, if we feel the case is appropriate, we will take action where contraventions are observed."

The scheme which is being carried out throughout March has been organised to coincide with National No Smoking Day which takes place on March 9. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/8355435/Roadblocks-set-up-to-catch-drivers-smoking.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't think this will only apply to Commercial vehicles it's only the start, next it will be NO SMOKING IN ALL VEHICLES be they PRIVATELY OWNED or COMMERCIAL .

And why are the Police concentrating on Smoking Drivers. Have they not enough to solve and have to target the motorist instead. Shouldn't they be investing Islamic PAEDOPHILE PRACTICES, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, DRUG and GUN GANGS ?

I can think of a lot more but this will suffice.

THE EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION EXPLAINED

This is an 8-part vid. You'll need a slight (very slight) academic bent to understand it all - but do watch all eight parts ... especially catch the parts about population growth. They're all on the sidebar.

Click the 'Youtube' button (bottom right) to get the right sidebar for all eight parts.

Morg
.

TRY CONVINCING ME HE'S WRONG:

Morg
.

ISLAMIC VALENTINE

Over the transom of the WRSA International desk comes this thought-provoking essay. Note that for young people or other folks not steeped in wonderfully-diverse and equally-valid cultures from around the world, some of the following content may be disturbing:

Pssst…that catchy title was just to grab your attention. This letter is meant for you infidel men.

You infidel women, please click back to fuzzy bunnies and unicorns. I’ll wait.

[Dum-dee-dum dum…]

All men now? Good.

Don’t worry, this isn’t about flowers, candy or cards. Of course the very idea is ridiculous. Valentine’s Day is an infidel holiday celebrating lewd, immoral and licentious behavior typical to your fallen religions. Trust me when I say we have nothing like Valentine’s Day in the one true religion of peace.

And men, isn’t it better for us that we don’t have it in our religion? No need to buy your wife flowers, candies or even a card on Valentine’s or any other day. This is just one small example of why the one true religion is better for men, and why you should seriously consider switching over while we’re still taking volunteers.

And it’s really easy to join. Just say one prayer, and you’re in for life.

Here’s another good reason to switch. Say you don’t feel like showing tender affection to your wife. You don’t have to! In fact, if she burns dinner, doesn’t clean the house, or pisses you off in any way you can just back-hand her, (as long as you don’t break any bones or mark her face.) In fact, it’s okay for you to give her a good thrashing now and then to get her back into line. Why? Because it says it’s okay in the holy books of the one true religion of peace, that’s why.

Don’t worry, the bruises covering the rest of her body won’t show, because (isn’t this great!) a wife can never leave the house while showing one square centimeter of bare uncovered skin that’s not between her eyes and her chin. Which is mighty handy, in case she’s still covered with bruises from her last few disciplinary sessions. And as long as you are careful not to beat her face in, she can still go out in public to do your shopping, (while properly attired, of course).

Here’s another reason why the one true religion is better for us men. Maybe your wife just doesn’t have the old sex-appeal any more. The thrill is gone. No problem! You can remarry, and bring a second, third or a fourth wife home. You don’t have to even ask the old bat’s permission. Whom you marry is up to you and you alone in the one true religion, because you are a man! If wife-number-one doesn’t want you bringing that pretty little thing home to your bed, well too bad for wife-number-one. She has no say in the matter. You may do what you want, because you are a man!

Now, my infidel friend and prospective member of the one true religion of peace, maybe you’re not such a handsome young stud yourself any more. You’re over forty, and you haven’t exactly been working out and keeping buff. Don’t worry, that’s not a problem. Let’s say your brother has a cute little daughter, Fatima. She’s going to be turning thirteen soon. For the first eleven or twelve years of her life she was allowed the run of the block like a free-spirited little sprite. Uncovered, just as cute as a button, and sure to be one hot number once she passes through puberty.

And as luck would have it, you also have a daughter of fourteen or so (perhaps from your second wife) who is not exactly getting any younger and you want her out of the house. Perhaps she is not as pretty as Fatima, but don’t worry, your brother is not as picky as you are. That’s right! You can trade your adolescent daughter to your brother, and he can reciprocate with Fatima. What a great deal this is for us men, under the rules of the one true religion of peace. In this way, you can keep a fresh stock of nubile teenage girls in your bed until you’re too old to want them any longer. And nobody can say a word against this excellent practice, because the prophet of the one true religion explicitly condones and encourages it as one of the very best ways to find a good wife. In fact, this is how the prophet found his favorite wife of all.

But what if your bubbly thirteen-year-old niece—excuse me—bride—objects to having sex with you, simply because you are forty-five and have a gray beard down to your big stomach? Ha-ha-ha! As if what she wants matters! Trust me, she has no say in the matter, none. If you and your brother like the idea of swapping teenage daughters for child brides, that’s all there is to it, it’s settled. (Some Western so-called scientists claim that all of this marrying of close relatives has caused so-called genetic problems, but what do they know? “Genetics” are not mentioned anywhere in our holy books, so they have no importance to members of the one true religion of peace.)

And if you like the girls really young, the one true religion is definitely for you. Even nine years old is plenty old enough for marriage and full marital relations. This was old enough for the Prophet and his very favorite young niece-bride, so don’t worry about catching any flak from other members of the one true religion. If a nine-year-old bride was old enough for the prophet (when he was in his fifties), it is old enough for any male member of the one true religion of peace.

But what if that hot new child bride is not in the mood to satisfy your male needs? Those teenagers (and preteens) can be quite a handful, as we all know. Well, she’d better get in the mood, if she doesn’t want a good thrashing! Our holy books are very clear on this. But what if she still won’t receive your overtures when you want to lay a little loving on her? You have even beaten her black and blue (except on her face), but to no avail. She’s lost that loving feeling, or maybe she never had it in the first place. Some teenage brides are just like that.

Men, this part is great, you will just love it. And this goes for any of your wives, from your oldest to your youngest. Just divorce them, by saying “I divorce thee!” That’s it! No lawyers, no paperwork, no alimony. After this legally-binding divorce occurs she’s thrown out on the street, penniless and rejected by society. The witch will soon be begging on a corner. She’s not exactly a pretty sight, but lucky for us men we don’t have to see her, since she’s just a lump in a burqa, squatting on the sidewalk with only her begging cup showing. Her pitiful example will also do wonders to encourage your other wives to please you better.

Isn’t that great, men? Truly, the one true religion of peace is perfect for us.

Of course we men all understand that women are the morally weaker half of humanity. According to our holy books their inborn tendency is toward sensuality and sin. This is why we have their clitorises surgically removed when they are children. (Well, the “surgery” is usually just performed with an ordinary razor, without anesthesia while the screaming girl is held down, but you know what I mean. And they get over it pretty soon.)

Without those little sensuality-seeking pleasure spots, wives are a lot less likely to step out on their husbands. And I am very happy to report that Egypt leads the entire world in conducting this procedure, with over ninety percent of our girls prevented from experiencing unnecessary sexual pleasure due to the excision of their disgusting little pleasure-seekers. (Hmmm…why did a perfect god put these little mistakes on girls in the first place? Never mind.)

Now, some of you infidels might mention those year-by-year pictures of the graduating classes of Cairo University, with the female grads posing shamelessly uncovered until fairly recently. Long, flowing hair, right down past their shoulders! Shocking! Disgusting! But today, I am happy to report, 100% of the female graduates of Cairo U. are now wearing the hijab scarf or even the full face-covering veil. This shows that we are making true progress at containing women’s baser instincts to constantly charm, bewitch and seduce pious men.

In recent years our local women seem to have all received the message, and their lust-stoking female hair is no longer seen in public in Cairo where I live. (A little hydrochloric acid splashed in the faces of uncovered women also goes a long way toward encouraging the rest of them to understand the importance of female modesty in the one true religion of peace. Just a few burned and scarred examples will usually do the trick.)

This brings us at last to the case of Lara Logan. It was our holy day when the dictator fled and naturally the crowds on the square were in a celebratory mood. Spirits were running high. And right there in the middle was that infamous Western whore, strutting among the valiant crowds of pious men, shamelessly displaying all of her long blond hair to countless thousands of practitioners of the one true religion of peace. Why, the brazen hussy even dared to show her bare neck clear down past her collar bones!

Of course this would inflame any crowd of normal men who were pious followers of the one true religion. Long gorgeous flowing blond hair, a bare neck showing pure white skin, and bare naked collar bones! Even my grandmother understood what would happen. “Bare meat,” she would call an uncovered Western whore like Lara Logan. What else do you expect from devout practitioners of the one true religion of peace when they see “bare meat” than to try to grab some of it for themselves? After all, that’s only normal male human nature, as explained in our holy books.

(And if Lara Logan wasn’t actually a Jew, she sure was acting and dressing like one.)

Men, women are eternally devious little temptresses. It’s their fallen nature, as members of the weaker sex. Temptation can even happen at work. Suppose you see a brazen female co-worker slutting it around the office, showing her unrestrained hair, perhaps wearing a shape-revealing blouse, or tight jeans or an immodest (non-floor-length) skirt. She’s just asking for sex, dressing like that! A loose woman like that has already lost her chastity, so she is there for the taking. Bare meat, on a plate!

Maybe you are alone with her in the stock room for a while. Well, take her! She is advertising to the world that she is an immoral whore and not a properly chaste member of the one true religion of peace, so why not? And don’t worry about being charged with the Western crime of rape. Were there four male witnesses to the act? I didn’t think so! That is why you cornered her in the stock room in the first place.

In the unlikely event that she dares to bring a charge of rape without the required four male witnesses, you can just say that it was her idea to conduct an adulterous liaison, and she seduced you with her female charms. Perfectly understandable! In the one true religion of peace, a man’s testimony counts twice a woman’s, so you win! Every time!

And do you know what the penalty for her adultery will be? Being stoned to death, while buried up to her shoulders in the ground. That little possibility sure keeps the frequency of rape charges way down, so don’t worry about grabbing a piece of strange if and when the opportunity presents itself. You always win, she always loses.

Yes, it is certainly great to be a man in the one true religion of peace. My infidel friend, give it another look, while we’re still taking volunteers. Think it over, carefully. If we have to wait too long to hear from you, you might not get the same great deal. And don’t worry about consulting your wife in making your decision. Her opinion is irrelevant.

See, you are liking the idea better already.

Sincerely,

Abdul al-Anonymo
Dar al-Islam

A faithful adherent of the one true religion of peace,
given to us in perfect completion by the most perfect man in history.

And a good Pat Condell vid to watch and listen to (scroll down):

http://westernrifleshooters.blogspot.com/2011/02/from-overseas-reader-islamic-valentine.html

Morg
.