BNP lecturer behind Muslim heroin leaflet cleared of inciting religious hatred

Anthony Bamber, 54, a BNP activist, told a jury his intention was to create a debate about the ''crime against humanity'' that was the flow of the drug on to Britain's streets.

He was responsible for heading a campaign which sent up to 30,000 of the leaflets by hand or post to targeted areas and individuals throughout the north of England over a 12-month period.....

His aim was to create curiosity and interest which would then lead to a debate, he said.

''If I wanted to stir up religious hatred I would have aimed at a different group,'' said the former part-time lecturer of politics and economics at the University of Central Lancashire in Preston."

(Not) So full article on this LINK


Now take a look at the full article written on the Lancashire Constabulary website here

You will have noticed that there are two very significant paragraphs missing (as below) from the Telegraph report........Why?

1)"Notwithstanding today's decision we condemn the contents of the leaflets and their distribution which we are concerned has the potential to damage community cohesion.

2)"We continue to work very closely with all our communities and partner agencies around community cohesion issues and we will take positive action against others who engage in such activity."

WE MUST BE GEETING CLOSE TO THE TARGET.;

We must be getting near to the target.
The Equalities commission have asked for our leader to be jailed for among other reasons they were unable to find the new constitution on our website.
This site had been sabotaged by Simon Bennett just before the election and possibly weeks before and they knew it.

They could have had a copy if they'd asked.
I believe that although Nick Griffin was mandated to amend the constitution and he did just that when told to do so by the judge, they did not expect this and thus are having another try to close us down by means of financial ruin caused by large legal fees.
The contrast between this action and the Government's kow towing to the members of Sinn Fein who spread their influence by means of murder.

The action thus has nothing to do with race but I believe our actions against the "New World Order" much favoured by the elite in government.
I do not remember any action against that murderous group to try to bankrupt or otherwise destroy it. Of course they could not bankrupt the IRA as it was bankrolled by its friends in the USA prior to 9/11, and then,

The USA finally understood the reality of terrorism and stopped funding it.

That was the reason for the cessation of support for the IRA and it led to the "Good Friday" agreement. It would never have happened but for 9/11. Tony Blair had nothing to do with it.

So our chairman faces jail for stating a political point of view even though he campaigns through a legitimate party while terrorist murderers who promote their cause through the barrel of a gun get their way.

We have opened our constitution to minorities as directed but now they say they don't like some of our policies. Pure Stalinist dictatorship.

Our Nationalism and patriotism will NOT die. Even if the Party was bankrupted we would rise phoenix like in another form to campaign for our rights in our country by all democratic ways.

Unfortunately it seems at present the only way to get justice is by violence, judging by recent history.

That is not our way Phillips and you know it. However when people are driven into a corner they react.

Let's hope it does not come to that.

Just leave us alone

BOYCOTT THE JOHN BULL, WEIND, WIGAN.

After yesterdays dismal performance by ENGLAND, our Secretary decided, that after a bit oF shopping, he would call into the JOHN BULL CHOPHOUSE, Weind, Wigan, ON THE WAY HOME.
As soon as our Secretary asked for a pint he was told by the barman (Phil) that he would have to speak to the Landlord (Peter) and that he was not going to serve him (time approx 4.30pm). (Peter would be on at 8.00PM or later)
Our Secretary asked why this was ? to be told that " You were outside here last week and Pete is not happy. (Our Secretary did walk past and stopped for a chat last Saturday , but a regular to the John Bull statred shouting that the BNP candidate was here. Nothing happened except for people being interested in what he had to say).
He asked what it was the Pete was not happy about?
Only to be told it's because he is the BNP and his POLITICAL ALLEGIANCES and he would NOT be served.

Then One of the regulars, with the aide of the Phil (John Bull bar statff) started the old ENGLISH PATRIOT, BRITISH NATIONALIST are RACIST.
The main instigator proclaimed his patriotism to IRELAND and the FEINIANS.
This comes from a man who declares his patriotism to FEINIAN IRELAND and the IRA , and a total IGNORAMUS who has seen on the internet "three BNP members? beating up three asians".
I just wondered did the three "BNP" members hold their membership cards upto the camera first ?
Phil even said that " They are now banned from BNP membersip"
For a man so IGNORANT to deny a PATRIOT a PINT in the TREASONUS JOHN BULL, WIGAN, WEIND because he disagrees with our Secretarys POLITICAL BELIEFS and what he sees on UTUBE as the TRUTH is TREASONUS REPRESSION.

BOYCOTT THE JOHN BULL, WIGAN.

BRITISH NATIONALISTS AND ENGLISH PATRIOTS NOT WELCOME !

THE FARM

mORG
.

THE SETTING UP OF AN ISLAMIC STATE IN BRITAIN ?

The Mohammedans in Britain, as we know, are operating a system of "Religious and Islamic Political Law" today in OUR COUNTRY.
This is legally binding, according to "British Law".
But how can a "Foreign system of Law" be allowed to practice independently of BRITISH LAWS ?
Far from "INTERGRATING FOREIGN FAITHS" into OUR system, OUR beliefs, OUR ways, we are being FORCED in to theirs.
Who allows this ?
Who asked the ABORIGINES of BRITAIN if their country can be overrun and undermined by complete FOREIGNERS ?
If things carry on the way they are then we as an INDIGENOUS PEOPLE will be consumed and annihilated into a coffee coloured NON-INDIGENOUS, ANTI-ABORIGINAL country inflicted with RACE WARS or IMMIGRANT TRIBAL WARS.

"New Report by One Law for All

“Sharia Law in Britain: A Threat to One Law for All and Equal Rights”

A new report by One Law for All has found Sharia Councils and Muslim Arbitration Tribunals to be in violation of UK law, public policy and human rights

The report is being launched to coincide with a 20 June 2010 rally on the issue of Sharia law.

Based on an 8 March 2010 Seminar on Sharia Law, research, interviews, and One Law for All case files, the report has identified a number of problem areas:

- Sharia law’s civil code is arbitrary and discriminatory against women and children in particular. With the rise in the acceptance of Sharia courts, discrimination is being further institutionalised with some UK law firms additionally offering clients advice on Sharia law and the use of collaborative law.

- Sharia law is practiced in Britain primarily by Sharia Councils and Muslims Arbitration Tribunals. Both operate on religious principles and are harmful to women although Muslim Arbitration Tribunals are wrongly regarded as being of more concern because they operate as tribunals under the Arbitration Act 1996, making their rulings binding in law.

- Sharia Councils, on the other hand, claim to mediate on family issues but in practice often this differs little from arbitration: they frequently ask those appearing before them to sign an agreement to abide by their decisions; they call themselves courts, and the presiding imams, judges. Their decisions are then imposed and regarded as having the weight of legal judgements.

- There is neither control over the appointment of “judges” in Sharia Councils or Tribunals nor an independent mechanism for monitoring them. Clients often do not have access to legal advice and representation. The proceedings are not recorded, nor are there any searchable legal judgements, nor any real right of appeal.

- Sharia law cannot be compared to secular legal systems because it is considered sacred law that cannot be challenged. There is no scope to look at the interests of the individuals involved, as required by UK family law.

- These legal processes ignore both common law and due process, far less Human Rights, and provide little protection and safety for women in violent situations.

- There is a general assumption that those who attend Sharia courts do so voluntarily and that unfair decisions can be challenged in a British court. Many of the principles of Sharia law are contrary to British law and public policy, and would in theory therefore be unlikely to be upheld in a British court. In reality, however, women are often pressured by their families into going to these courts and adhering to unfair decisions, and may lack knowledge of English and their rights under British law. Moreover, refusal to settle a dispute in a Sharia court can give rise to threats and intimidation, or at best being ostracised.

According to Maryam Namazie, spokesperson of the One Law for All Campaign and an author of the report, “The existence of a parallel legal system that is denying a large section of the British population their fundamental human rights is scandalous. Our findings show that it is essential to abolish all religious courts in the UK. Their very existence and legitimisation puts pressure on vulnerable women not to assert their civil rights in a British court. As long as Sharia Councils and Tribunals are allowed to continue to make rulings on issues of family law, women will be pressured into accepting decisions which are prejudicial to them and their children.”

The report recommends that Sharia courts be closed on the grounds that they work against rather than for equality, and are incompatible with human rights. Recommendations include:

1. initiating a Human Rights challenge to Muslim Arbitration Tribunals and/or Sharia Councils
2. amending the Arbitration Act under which the Muslim Arbitration Tribunals operate in a similar way to which the Canadian equivalent of the Arbitration Act was amended in 2005 to exclude religious arbitration
3. launching a major and nationwide helpline and information campaign to inform people of their rights under British law
4. proposing legislation under the EU Citizens Rights Initiative to address the issue EU-wide, and
5. strengthening secularism and the separation of religion from the state, the judicial system and education, in order to more fully protect citizenship rights."

http://www.onelawforall.org.uk/new-report-sharia-law-in-britain-a-threat-to-one-law-for-all-and-equal-rights/

It's up to US the INDIGENOUS PEOPLE to stop this TREASONUS, ANTI-BRITISH GENOCIDE.

WHAT IS A MOSQUE ?

An Ex-Muslim explains what a MOSQUE really is.
Have you ever wondered where the Mohammedans have their Town halls, Places of Government ?



Thanks to vladtepesblogdotcom

LACK OF EQUIPMENT HAMPERS THE BRITISH ARMY IN AFGHANISTAN

Politically correct ?

NONSENSE.