IMF: ‘No More Payments If Greece Disagrees With the Measures’

The IMF are threatening and trying to blackmail Greece if the new Government does not do what they are told to do by the IMF,and probably a few other NGOs as well.

They are threatening and trying to blackmail Greece into submission

Is the IMF so powerful that it can dictate to Governments and countries around the world?

The IMF is threatening Greece that they will stop paying installments if the new government disagrees with the future austerity measures,” reported an IMF official to the Dow Jones news agency.

According to the news agency, the creditors are willing to wait until Greek parties form the new government, but they do not intend to change their plans. On the contrary, they call on Greeks to obey the ‘rules’ and observe the pledges.

The same official stated that the IMF will visit Greece as soon as there will be a new government and they would then be ready to negotiate. Otherwise, they will not give any more loans to Greece.

Another EU official said that Greece cannot escape the Memorandum measures.

Who knows what will happen; new negotiations always bring new results. Taking into account that Greece did not negotiate in the past and just approved of the measures, the IMF and the EU officials have to face a new reality in Greece.

--------------------------------------

Is this the NWO/EU flexing its muscles and throwing its weight around?

The NWO/EU has replaced the Governments in Greece and Italy with puppets from the EU

We can see the unelected EU is placing its own unaccountable shills into Sovereign Governments, taking over as Prime Ministers and Presidents who are unaccountable for their actions, with an army of unaccountable, faceless bureaucrats within the EU, and from NGOs within and without the EU.

The idiots in the EU have replaced the Prime Minister of Greece,with Shills of their own but they failed in their attempts to bring Greece back into line.

Funny how the replacement could/did not change a thing in Greece, but they were being paid substantial amounts of money for looking at the wreckage, they have done nothing to help the situation in Greece and Italy, because of the size of the debt mountain these countries find themselves in.
No amount of bullying, cajoling, blackmailing and threats to these countries will resolve the situation.

Whose Next inline to be threatened and blackmailed by these NGOs ?

A FAIR DEAL FOR BRITISH PEOPLE

Much comment has been in the media in the last few days over the poor turn out in the local elections.

The question that should be answered  but is not asked is Why?

The reason should be obvious.

We have no one to vote for, no one or party which motivates us to vote, no party which represents the policies which matter to the average British citizen.
When people are motivated turn out is higher as in Bradford when Galloway got the alien voters to the polling booths (and many multiple and dubious postal votes) on account of his statements about Palestinian persecution.
Of course these considerations, unjust as they may be are completely irrelevant to British people, but they motivated his non British voters who in a just world should not have had the right  to vote in our country.

What we THE BRITISH PEOPLE  want is a party WHICH REPRESENTS US, our desires and interests and then people will vote and I am sure vote the right way.

The BNP is talked about as a party which is a spent force, correctly I think, an irrelevence owing to the bad management of the leadership.
It is called "extreme right" by the media but on message boards is said to be extreme left.

Nationalism is in my opinion neither and if we can get together a party with a programme which looks after our interests we can progress.

So what are the policies of a "nationalist" party or nationalists?
Are we Left or Right?

I believe we are neither and that is a strength. We can appeal to people from both sides of the political spectrum if we get our act together as a movement.

To believe in our own country, people and culture is considered to be "right", but to believe in national ownership of public utilities and national resources and fair shares for the average person is considered "left".

The government is now trying to rescue its failing popularity by ceasing to promote gay marriage and reform of the House of Lords. Yes gay marriage is an oxymoron and anathema to any moral and civilised person and the House of Lords may need reform, but these issues are not the reason why the Tories were rejected and show how out of touch the posh boys of the Tories are.

These issues are peripheral and did not influence the voting numbers.

People voted as they did (or did not) because there is at present no vehicle which represents their legitimate interests.

As nationalists we believe in our nation, its integrity and right to control our own political and economic interests, democracy in other words. This of course means an exit from the clutches of the undemocratic EU.
We believe that the native people of these islands should have priority in our own and only land.

We believe the financial system should be regulated in the interests of the British people rather than international financiers and bankers.

We believe that our industries (such as we have now left) should remain in British control and that endeavours made to bring back into British control those sold abroad.

We believe we are overpopulated and should halt immigration as we have no room. If we need trained people we should train them ourselves by means of a greatly improved educational system which concentrates on subjects that matter to our future prosperity.

We believe native British people should have priority in housing. IT'S OUR LAND, and they are our houses.

We believe that our laws should take priority over those of foreign entities such as the European Court of Human Rights and we should expel those foreign criminals who abuse our country's hospitality.

We believe we should not become involved in foreign wars which do not concern us.

We as democrats believe in free speech and our right to complain about ANYTHING with which we disagree.

We believe that people who are prepared to work hard are entitled to a decent standard of living and that this should be ensured by the government.

These are just a few core nationalist beliefs which are also held by the majority of the people.
If one of the "main" parties promoted these principles they would win a massive majority, SO WHY DON'T THEY?

BECAUSE THEIR AGENDA IS SHAPED BY THE INTERNATIONAL GLOBALIST BANKERS

OUR POLICIES ARE PORTAYED AS EXTREME (or Fascist or Nazi),  by the state and banker controlled media who have their own anti British agenda.

BUT, if a party could stand on these and other suchlike principles I believe it would gain massive support.
People are fed up of politicians using us for their own ends and promoting the interests of their greedy friends and that is why they do not vote.

If we unite under a banner proclaiming these principles , which are neither Left or Right we can influence the politics of our country for the better.

The people are crying out for it, a fair deal. AND WE CAN DO IT.

These wishes are not extreme are they?

SAVAGES - COMING TO A TOWN LIKE YOURS

The gang of savages in this video beat, rob and strip the WHITE victim, for no other reason but racism
How long before it spreads to this town?
(I know this attack to place in the USA but it will spread like a cancer in our society and already is in some areas of Britain)
London sees Black on White racial crime every day, not to mention the Northern Towns and Cities where racial attacks on the WHITE victims are ignored by the powers that be.

Don't worry though as racial attacks on WHITES in our Town will be seen on CCTV and recorded, to put on youtube to help defend the attacker, and humiliate the Victim, in a court of law, if it would ever get there in the first place.

Remember "KILL THE WHITE BITCH" when a WHITE woman was attacked by 3/4 Somali immigrants, they were never sent to prison for the VIOLENT RACIALLY MOTIVATED ATTACK on a WHITE Woman.

Their excuse was that they were drunk due to never having drank alcohol before and were not used to it, because of their religion.

You go into Wigan Town Center get drunk and start a brawl then blame your violent actions on not being used to drinking due to your Strict Christian upbringing and
you will be arrested, charged and found guilty in court for being Violent, breach of the peace etc.

So, according to the PTB WORDS not VIOLENT actions are more likely get you sent to Prison, especially if the remarks are made by WHITES.

The "MY TRAM EXPERIENCE" or the NON racial words put on twitter by a WHITE MAN in regards to a Black footballer who had collapsed whilst playing a football match, both were sent to Prison,and they never mentioned race or skin colour

Only the WHITES receive Prison sentences for not wanting to be enriched by immigrants placed in their Towns and Cities.

How vibrant, how Enriched we will all be when the Savages kick off.

Sign this e-petition Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK

Sign this e-petition

Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK

Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK

Responsible department: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Under UK law, all farmed animals have to be stunned to render them unconscious before their throats are cut. However, a special legal exemption (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/contents/made#sdiv12) which applies ONLY to Halal and Kosher slaughter, means that animals slaughtered, “by a religious method” for halal or kosher meat - are exempt. We believe that on animal cruelty grounds, that this exemption should be removed. This method has now been found illegal under the legislation but those in power refuse to change the law or press charges.This group is not racist, is not anti Muslim or anti Jewish. It is concerned over animal welfare in the UK. Pre-stunning of animals is not sufficient to render the animal fully unconscious until it is dead.

Sign this petition CLICK HERE

Not received your confirmation email?

Number of signatures:

Sign this petition Click Here

Not received your confirmation email? If you have already signed this petition, but didn't receive an email to confirm your signature, you can request a confirmation to be resent by providing your email address below.

700

Created by:

jen colclough

Closing:

12/08/2012 15:23

ELECTION POST MORTEM

The local election results have as expected been disasterous for the BNP.
In the Wigan area some interesting facts can be gleaned.

First the Tories are even more hated than they were previously and the BNP had some success in beating them.
Congratulations to Morgan in Ince for having well beaten the Tory, and to Dennis Shambley for doing the same in Abram and Steve Bradbury in Hindley.

However the results in this area also show that in spite of it being a Labour stronghold Independents did well as shown by the vote gained by Gary Chadwick and Chris Garfin in Leigh.
Gary almost beat the Tory while Chris easily beat his Tory opponent.
I do not think that Gary and Chris would have gained so many votes if they had stood under the BNP banner, an indication of the toxicity the party has become under the present leadership.

The Community Action Party was well beaten and the odious, uncouth Peter Franzen saw his support drop even further. It is Ironic that a few years it looked and he thought that they would become the largest party in Wigan and the possibility of him becoming mayor.

That he did not was because of our standing a candidate in Douglas ward and in spite of polling few votes it was enough to deprive his party of a majority in Wigan.
Similarly in Golborne I believe in the past we caused his defeat, a defeat from which he has never recovered.
No we did not win in these wards but winning is not always necessary to influence the results.
Another bit of good news was that Franzen's extremist undemocratic friend Stephen Hall was well beaten.

So what is the general verdict?

First, the Tories suffered a disaster, well deserved on account of their incompetence and general lack of  concern for ordinary people.
It made my heart glad to see the glum face of the arrogant and out of touch Cameron.
Perhaps he will now listen to people a bit more.

Secondly, good Independent candidates can beat Labour, even in Wigan.
And thirdly there is still, in spite of the poor leadership of the BNP a resevoir of people who will vote nationalist if a clean and competent party emerges.
Many voters stayed at home having lost interest in the present political system.
We nationalists need to enthuse them, show them that unlike the other parties we are on their side and then reap the reward.

BUT WE CAN'T AND WON'T UNDER GRIFFIN.

His verdict, "we are still here and have spread our word".
Yes maybe but people have not voted for his party and that is what counts.

UKIP, Nationalism lite got 16% where they stood and deprived many Tory councillors of their seats even if they did not themselves get elected.
THEIR INFLUENCE IS INCREASING.
The Tories are frightened of UKIP and their presence will influence government policies.
BUT THEY IGNORE THE BNP.

At a time of recession and general disillusionment with the major parties thje BNP should have massively increased its influence and votes.
The time is ripe.

SO WHY IS IT NOT DOING SO MR GRIFFIN?

COULD YOU BE THE REASON?

When other parties do badly, pressure is exerted on the leader and he is often changed.

IS IT NOT TIME FOR YOU TO GO?

For the sake of our country and movement PLEASE DO.

THE THIN BLUE LINE OF JIHAD - MELANIE PHILLIPS

The Telegraph reports (link) that the National Association of Muslim Police has attacked government policy on countering Islamic extremism. In evidence to a parliamentary committee investigating Islamic extremism, the NAMP attacked

the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy, warning that it is an ‘affront to British values’ which threatens to trigger ethnic unrest... that ministers were wrong to blame Islam for being the ‘driver’ behind recent terrorist attacks. Far-Right extremists were a more dangerous threat to national security... that Muslims were being ‘stigmatised’ by the Government’s attempts to tackle terrorism, which was adding to ‘hatred’ against entire communities.

...The memorandum warned that Muslims were subjected to 'daily abuse' due to the strategy. 'We must not diminish our British values further by continuing to allow such behaviour and policies to continue unchecked.'

This is an extremely alarming development.

First, a general point. The very idea that police officers form themselves into interest groups of any stripe whatever should be anathema to the ethic of policing. That applies equally to Black, Gay, Jewish or One-Legged Transgendered Red-Haired Police associations. Police officers should serve the entire community equally, and should have no agenda but that professional commitment of equal public service to all. The idea that they identify themselves as an interest group is simply wrong, and the police service should never have allowed this to develop.

The memorandum by the National Association of Muslim Police, however, is of a different order of magnitude altogether.

To take their least serious point first: the idea that there is no Islamic threat and that the real threat to Britain comes from the ‘far right’ is demonstrably ludicrous. The ‘far right’ poses no threat to Britain other than some low-level thuggery. The Islamist threat to Britain is very great indeed. Dozens of Islamist plots aimed at murdering thousands of people have been thwarted, and the security service say between 2000 and 4000 British Muslims are radicalised to potential acts of terrorism. This terrorism is part of a global holy war being waged in the name of Islam. While many British Muslims support neither the aims nor the tactics of this holy war, an insupportable number do. For Muslim police officers to deny this is extremely disturbing. It means they have bought into the radical narrative of systematic denial and deceit.

But the NAMP went much, much further than this. They attacked government policy; worse, they attacked government policy aimed at protecting the lives and safety of British citizens; worse still, they suggested that British Muslims should resist that policy, and implicitly threatened disorder if it were not changed.

Let us pinch ourselves: these are British police officers, subject to the same disciplinary and professional codes as any other police officers. Yet their call for action to ‘check’ counter-terrorism policy, and the implicit threat of violence if it is not so checked, suggests that rather than helping form the line of defence against the Islamist threat, these police officers must be considered to be part of that threat.

On its website, moreover, NAMP recommends that British Muslims reporting crimes should also ‘report any such actions to the Islamic Human Rights Commission’. Let’s think about the implications of this for a moment. The IHRC is an extremist organisation with links to Iran. The NAMP is therefore advising British Muslims to use an extreme Iran-linked Islamic jihadi front organisation, which threatens the security of this nation, as a parallel law enforcement mechanism in Britain. The attempt to set up parallel Islamic institutions and jurisdiction in Britain is a core element of the Islamist attempt to suborn and take over this country.

The irony of this frightening situation is extreme. The government has bent over backwards to avoid associating Islam with terrorism. In an attempt to peel moderate Muslims away from the radicals, it has poured more than £140 million a year into ‘moderate’ Muslim groups. It has positively fallen over itself to encourage the recruitment of Muslim police officers in the belief that that this would persuade British Muslims that the government had no problem with them, only with the radicals in their midst. Yet these are precisely the policies which the NAMP claims have led to ‘hatred against Muslims’ which ‘has grown to a level that defies all logic and is an affront to British values’.

Thus the fruits of appeasement. Rather than taming jihadi extremism in Britain, the cowardice of politicians has merely resulted in fracturing the thin blue line that protects us -- and turning it into a potential weapon of the jihad.

DISASTEROUS ELECTION FOR THE BNP

NICK GRIFFIN HAS DONE MORE DAMAGE TO THE BNP AND NATIONALISM IN BRITAIN THAN THE UAF/LIB/LAB/CON COULD EVER HAVE DONE, SO, NOW IT'S TIME TO SAY

NICK GRIFFIN RESIGN NOW AND LEAVE IT TO THOSE WHO WANT TO FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE
YOU HAVE MADE THE BNP A LAUGHING STOCK
THE BNP ARE NOW AN IRRELEVANCE AND UNELECTABLE
IF YOU LOVE OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE THEN DO WHAT IS BEST FOR US AND NOT FOR YOU AND THE REST OF YOUR STATE AGENTS

NICK GRIFFIN RESIGN NOW