NEW LABOUR STILL SUPPORTING THE MINORITY OVER THE MAJORITY.

NEC chair’s letter to PLP chair

PLP chair Tony Lloyd has this evening emailed all Labour MPs attaching a letter to him from Ann Black, chair of Labour’s ruling national executive committee.

In it, she reports “widespread concern among party members that this leadership election should allow the broadest possible debate”.

This will add to pressure on the 44 Labour MPs yet to declare to nominate Diane Abbott, and on John McDonnell to stand aside in her favour. The deadline for nominations is 1230 tomorrow (Wednesday).

This is the full text of Ann Black’s letter to Tony Lloyd:

To Tony Lloyd MP

Chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party

4 June 2010

Leadership Election

Dear Tony

I am writing to pass on widespread concern among party members that this leadership election should allow the broadest possible debate. This is not just about choosing an individual. It is about the flavour of the contest, and the opportunity to debate the full range of ideas, policies and directions for the future, before thousands of members and millions of affiliated trade unionists cast their votes.

If the choice is between three or four white male ex-ministers in their 40s, however able, it will be seen as lacking the full range of diversity which Labour seeks to reflect. If, however, it is extended in terms of gender, race, political perspective, the hustings through the summer will generate greater interest and engagement from party members, supporters and voters. And whoever emerges as the winner will have a far stronger mandate to lead than if the system can be portrayed as rigged in their favour.

My correspondents are not from any particular “camp” and many are likely in fact to vote for one of the current front-runners. They are mainly interested in the health of the party as a whole, and in avoiding the difficulties which followed 2007, where many believe that the leader’s position would have been reinforced if he had taken on opposing arguments in an open contest and won through in a ballot.

I have explained the rules to all of them. I do not think the threshold of one-eighth of all Labour MPs is unreasonable, and in 2007 the same threshold produced a deputy leadership election with six validly nominated candidates. In any case it is for Conference, not the NEC, to change the party rulebook.

So the decision on who goes forward to the hustings and the ballot is now entirely in the hands of Labour MPs. It has been made clear that MPs who nominate a particular candidate are not bound to vote for that candidate in the second stage, and I hope that you will all give serious consideration to the groundswell of feeling from members and affiliates in the country in deciding whether to extend or to limit their choice.

Yours sincerely

Ann Black

Chair, National Executive Committee

And they still plot to destroy OUR COUNTRY even further.

RATS DESERTING A SINKING SHIP

Today" Ex-City minister Lord Myners has attacked the former Labour government in which he served over its response to the economic crisis."

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Labours-Economic-Record-Attacked-By-Lord-Myners-Former-City-Minister-Slams-Flawed-Thinking/Article/201006215646027?lpos=Politics_First_Poilitics_Article_Teaser_Regi_0&lid=ARTICLE_15646027_Labours_Economic_Record_A

Ed Balls the Ex Minister for Child Propaganda, sorry, Education has stated that Immigration (Only from Europe) was wrong.
"The old Politburo leader is barely in his grave and already his loyal sidekick Ed Balls, previously the people’s commissar for educational equality, is denouncing his former boss." "There have been real economic gains from the arrival of young, hard-working migrants from eastern Europe over the past six years."

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100042424/ed-balls-claims-gordon-brown-got-it-wrong-on-immigration-but-his-target-is-misplaced/

He was also against the Iraq War (But forgot to tell anyone)
"He was speaking after two Labour leadership contenders condemned Britain's decision to join the invasion of Iraq.Ed Balls was the first former cabinet minister to declare outright that it was "wrong", while Ed Miliband said the decision had been "catastrophic" for Labour support."

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Ed-Balls-Say-Iraq-Invasion-Was-Wrong-As-Fellow-Labour-Leadership-Runner-Ed-Miliband-Raises-It-Too/Article/201005415636415?f=rss

We couldn't trust them to tell the truth whilst in office, what makes you think their telling the truth now. Or have they just found their Morals and Principles now they've been kicked out of power ?

No, they're just telling the Electorate what they think they want to hear and that it will make them more electable in the future.

LIES, DAMN LIES AND NEW LABOUR POLITICIANS.

There will be plenty more lies to come out of the mouths of this SCUM to try and distance themselves from the TREASON THEY PLAYED THEIR PART IN.

ENGLAND is for LIFE......NOT JUST for FOOTBALL

New England Campaign Leaflet

St Georges Day Petition

Please click on the above links to print, display and distribute and collect signatures!

Cheers Clive Cumbrian Patriots and James

MORGAN, WHERE ARE YOU?

Morgan, where are you?
We have not heard for you for two weeks.
Are you OK.

If you are can you contact me urgently.

Charles.

But, If the Brits Hold Steady and Let It Happen Then....

Cheers Rugfish.....

Yvonne Fovargue - New labour MP for Makerfield.

On Fri 4th June Makerfields New New labour (Have they dropped the New yet?) held her first constituency surgery.
A few questions were asked in regards to Makerfield and Wigan as a whole.

Ms ? Fovargue was asked what the voters of Wigan should expect in regards to the massive cuts due to New labours TREACHERY. The reply was typical and not unexpected, 'We have not been told by the other partys what cuts and how deep are coming, so nothing to do with me guv, 'onest'

(paraphrased).

If the MPs of the party, now the Official Opposition, that have BANKRUPTED US will not even hazard a guess, nor make an attempt to throw a bit of mud at the CONDEMS over the massive cuts expected to come, then maybe she's too scared to reveal anything about the state of our finances that her TRAITORUS PARTY caused or she's burying her head in the sand ?
Have the Official opposition not been asking questions about how deep the cuts are going to be due to their DELIBERATE ACTS OF TREASON ?
Do they not know nor care about what they have done to our Country ?

Well guess what WE WANT TO KNOW AND WE CARE !

Another quick question was about PR or Proportional Representation.
Would she support PR in Local Government if it was what the people wanted ?
Answer NO!
Do you support DEMOCRACY for the voters of Wigan ?
Answer Yes.
So why would you not support PR in Wigan ?
Answer Because it's "NOT MY TYPE OF DEMOCRACY" ! (Paraphrased)

Now ..
What type of Democracy is their ?

She did say that she supports AV or Alternative Voting, which is not PR but another way of the ruling elite to keep it's grubby bloodstained hands on the levers of power.
And that she prefers the Ward system ?
We can still have wards under PR.
And she likes constituencies.
Though that's only because of the ability to gerrymander for political ends.
So to try and expose our Ignorance of who our MEP was after being elected through PR she asked who our MEP was.
And was told it was Nick Griffin.
Only to be told in no uncertain terms that "Nick Griffin is an MEP for Yorkshire."
Wow, New Labour got good at boundary changes and gerrymandering but I didn't think they could move whole counties ?
Then the penny dropped for her.
At which she and her aide arose and went to leave the room. (We shall see in the future if she is willing to treat all her constituents as equals and with impartiality).

So, in general terms, on National issues what will affect her constituents and constituency ='Dunno' ?
In terms of changing the broken electoral system and restoring Democracy to the voters of Wigan = Only if it's thier (New TREASONUS Labours) kind of Democracy and not the Democracy the people want. (Paraphrased)

THEY WORK FOR US AND WE WANT ANSWERS !

NANNY (NICE) KNOWS BEST

I see "NICE" the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, in between restricting drugs which are available to cancer sufferers abroad, from patients here on the grounds they are not "cost effective" has found anothert hobby horse.
I did not realise that the more money you have the better you can take your alcohol, but that is the case if NICE is to be believed.
It wants a minimum price for alcohol, possibly doubling the cost in order to stop drunkenness and associated health problems caused by excessive drinking. They obviously come to this conclusion as a result of controlled surveys which demonstrate their thesis.


Wealthier middle and upper classes would not be affected by the rise in alcohol price and would be able to continue their pleasures as before knowing that their livers are made of sterner stuff.
The poorer parts of society having weaker livers would be hard hit, but then when did their simple pleasures bother this self styled elite. I'm sure Prince Harry or Fergie will not have to cut down their drinking (but then they've got stronger livers as well as deeper pockets).

I agree that binge drinking is a problem but why penalise all because of the behaviour of the few.
Far better to punish those who cause trouble in the street while drunk. Alcopops and strong lager sales in supermarkets could be controlled while normal weaker beer bought on pubs could be taxed less, and thus help to preserve a national institution.

Of course this is not just about excessive drinking it is about control of the people with pseudo independent organisations such as NICE in the vanguard of these Stazi like proposals.

In a free society people should do as they wish without government sponsored busybodies trying to think up new rules to impose on us. So long as they do not affect anybody else and face the consequencies of their behaviour it's got b***er all to do with NICE or the State.