SHARIA LAW (a video Muslims don’t want seen)

ALLAH THE MERCIFUL -



It's the loonys that follow him that aren't.

BE CAREFUL

Today, I came across this place

Sounds good, doesn't it. But it does sound a bit Americanish for someone who claims to have lived in Wigan for some years (easy to track back on IP numbers and instantly adjust text according to where your IP mumber is ... so whoever or whatever is responsible for that has probably not even heard of Wigan, never mind lived here).

Anyhow, I followed a couple of the links in that blog And in each case this is where I ended up.

Sounds great doesn't it? Hmmm - good job I'm in a grumpy mood today. Try reading that and look at the imprint on the cheque picture (Our government tends to use Giro). Nah, something not quite kosher about this lot.It all sounds too good to be true. I mean, who gives away free money that easily? I know we've had that appalling government for the past thirteen years ... but ... nah, can't be right.

Look what I found.(also scroll down and sample the comments).

And this too.

It gets stranger and stranger. Definitely an American use of language - But look where you end up if you search a bit on the company name provided.

Definitely something to steer well clear of - nothing more than a phishing site trying to get hold of your financial details so they can rip money out of your credit card or bank account. The internet is heaving with people like this... most of them don't set the scam up quite this cleverly though. If they weren't so pig-ignorant about English language, currency etc.  they might have pulled a few suckers here.

Be careful of anything on the internet that offers you money for nothing. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is (definitely is in this case). Got to admit, if I was new to computers I might have been sucked in by it.

Do not enter any info, and don't follow any of the deeper links.

Scams aren't all by email. y'know.

Scams like this can also be used to insert Trojans into your machine and suck out any personal info you might have in there - for later use in plundering your bank account.

Morg
.

ISLAMIC LAW V FREE SPEECH - IT'S WAR.

Islamic Law Vs. Free Speech: It's War

While Islamic suprmeacist groups like unindicted co-conspirator CAIR is relentlessly trying to destroy our unalienable right of free speech in America and impose sharia (Islamic) law, the global offensive on Western civilization is further along in Europe.

Ayn Rand said,

Once a country accepts censorship of the press and of speech, then nothing can be won without violence. Therefore, so long as you have free speech, protect it. This is the life-and-death issue in this country: do not give up the freedom of the press -- of newspapers, books, magazines, television, radios, movies, and every other form of presenting ideas. So long as that's free, a peaceful intellectual turn is possible.

Free speech is what separates us form the fascists, the totalitarians, the savages. I posted a clip of the Vilks attack when this story broke last week, but Answering Muslims posted the Vilks assault along with subtitles. It's much more frightening than the original clip that went out. Nabeel posted it here:

The Next 10 Years of Free Speech in a 10 Minute Microcosm

I'm calling it now. Unless we actually stand up for free speech and enforce it, we will see this 10 minute video played out in our lives over the next 10 years.

*Note: Some of the images in this video are mildly offensive, and the language used by the Muslims is filthy. You may have to sign into YouTube to watch this.

1 - Lars Vilks attempts to show a film (yes, it was offensive; no, it wasn't pornography)

2 - 20 seconds into the film, a Muslim yells "Stop the Film!"

3 - 8 seconds later, some kid flies over the desk and attacks Vilks

4- All chaos breaks loose, greeted by Muslims cheering "Allahu Akbar!"

5 - At the 3:55 mark, a man says "I said 'stop the film', and you didn't stop it!"

6 - Muslims greet this by cheering "Muhammad! Muhammad!"

7 - At 5 minutes, the man is still asking "Why didn't you stop the film?" to which the cop responds "I'll explain that later"

8 - At 5:20, the Muslims start saying "We pay taxes, Sweden is our country, why didn't you stop the film? If you stopped the film, this wouldn't have happened!"

9 - At the 6 minute mark, Muslims start saying to security "If you draw your gun, we'll report you!" People continue yelling insults and being aggressive towards the security.

10 - At the 7:20 mark, the first and only rational Muslim voice speaks up and says "No aggression towards the police, respect the cops, they are here to do their jobs.

11 - At the 8:45 mark, an official gets up and says they will stop showing the film due to security reasons.

12 - Muslims burst into celebration over their victory

13 - At 9:15, a lone voice speaks up and says to the crowd that they are compromising free speech

14 - Immediately, the Muslim crowd is riled up in anger over this proclamation

15 - Everyone is dismissed

16 - People exit the room amidst chants of the Shahada.

I want to call your attention to some of the things that happened here. First, note how the Muslim man in the audience think his voice is enough to dictate what everyone else does. He thinks simply by saying "Stop the film!" the whole auditorium should fall in line with his sentiment. This is exactly what we see in the world; a handful of Muslims would seek to change the practices of a nation, and they really feel like it's their God-given right, completely ignoring the fact that their whims are not any more important than anyone else's.

Then, violence and chaos break out, and the Muslims are ecstatic that they were able to interrupt the film by one means or another. This is what happened with the Danish cartoonists a few years ago, it's what is happened with Theo Van Gogh, it's what they're trying to do to Molly Norris, and it's what they're doing to Lars Vilks.

Not too long after, the Muslims start saying "This is our country - you must listen to us!" Yes, you've come to the country, but as long as you keep fighting the principles it stands for (i.e. free speech), then it's not your country. No one there should listen to you.

Another scary parallel, the Muslims then say "If you had listened to us", that is, if the security had appeased them by caving in and cutting off the film, "If you had listened to us, this wouldn't have happened!" Notice, the Muslims are blaming their insufferable actions of violence and chaosmongering on someone else, namely security. They know what they've done is bad, they just transpose the blame onto someone else. That's exactly how the Muslim world intimidates others into changing their behavior: "If you don't change, the death of those who receive our wrath will be your fault!" It's like they're the school bullies, pushing people around to boost their egos and their power.

Then, to further bully the security, a man says "If you draw your gun, I'll report you!" Notice again how blame is being shifted on others, people who are trying to keep the peace. That is exactly what happens when I, or David, or any other poster on this blog tries to point out what the Muslims are doing. The Muslims respond by saying we are the ones to blame! The same goes for Geert Wilders, Pam Gellar, [sic] Robert Spencer, and anyone who tries to stand in the way of Muslims who go too far - they all get called out as if they are the bad guys.

Thanks to ATLAS SHRUGS

Read the rest at Answering Muslims:

We need to have VOCAL MAJORITY VOICE - To SILENCE the NON-INDIGENOUS MINORITY VOICE of those who have only hatred for us. They show this by demanding with VIOLENCE the SILENCE of any voice that is critical about Mohammedanism and revealing it's TRUE FACE. Mohammedans wear VIOLENCE like Mohammedan women wear burqas. And like the burqa it masks the identity of those wearing it.

Should WE respond in SAME ?

If Mohammedans demands are met due to their Viloent tendancies, then should the MAJORITY DEMANDS be backed up with the same ? An Eye-For-An-Eye ?

We can start by stopping ALL Welfare payments to ALL MOHAMMEDANS given residency and passports and the freedom to harrass us openly and with IMPUNITY within the last 15 yrs. We'll see how fond of Britain they are when we stop paying for their Homes, Food, Heating, Lighting, Cars, Housing benefit, Income Support, Working Tax Credit, Family Tax Credit, Multiple Child Benefit Claims, Multiple-Residencys claims (due to the large size of Mohammedan familys where one house is not big enough)

Massive cuts to OUR welfare system will have to happen.

We have to LOOK AFTER OUR OWN.

A simple adage - PENSIONERS BEFORE IMMIGRANTS !

(A quick thought)

If New Labour deliberately tried to change the INDIGENOUS GENETIC IDENTITY of our INDIGENOUS POPULATION, then are they NOT GUILTY of RACISM towards US ?

Even "GENOCIDE" ?

Are ALL RACE LAWS now UNWORKABLE due to their ANTI-INDIGENOUS POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES bound in ANTI-INDIGENOUS, PRO-IMMIGRANT MINORITY "RACE" LAWS and QUANGOS enacted and enabled by NEW LABOUR ?

ONWARD AND UPWARD

We had an excellent meeting last night to discuss the recent election and discuss future plans.
We did not follow the usual format of a speaker detailing political thoughts and policies, but more of a debrief of our election experiences and a discussion of ideas for the future campaign.
Our country is in uncharted political waters and nobody knows how things will turn out or whether this coalition of the unlikely bedfellows of Cameron and Clegg (I mean this in the nicest possible way, but then they were public schoolboys) will work.

Many of their policies are miles apart and we face the disasterous economic situation bequeathed by Brown, so the question must be asked . How long will this power hungry marriage of convenience last when exposed to the harsh realities they face?
I'll give it two years in spite of what they say about fixed term Parliaments.

We need to be ready to accept the challenge when the inevitable break up occurrs.

AND WE ARE.

A member who is a statistician has found that our group had the greatest percentage increase of any group or branch in the country. I did not know that and I am indebted to him for bringing it to my notice.

Also it seems that Ken Haslam had the third highest BNP vote in the Parliamentary elections in the country.
Not bad when we lost our deposit in Makerfield five years ago.

So much for Furher Peter Franzen and his fascist mob's belief that we were driven out of Wigan and Leigh by his "peaceful" claw hammer wielding mob.

As former President Reagan said,

YOU AINT SEEN NOTHING YET!

A TALE OF TWO FLAGS

Last week the Greater Manchester Police flew the flag of the Gay, Lesbian and Transgender over their headquarters. Is there a flag to celebrate the majority of people who do not fall into these categories whithout whom the human race would not exist and to whom all those "celebrated" on this mediocre symbol owe their existance?
I think not. I have never heard of one.

One flag I HAVE heard of is the Cross of St George.

This flag, a symbol of our English nationality, it has been decreed by the Stalinsts of Wigan Metro, can not be displayed in any form on taxis licenced by them. Displaying it even as a statement of support for our football team could result with the driver losing his licence and thus his livelihood.

The contempt these PC drones hold our people and nationality is despicable.
How could displaying our national flag be offensive to any one but an alien or a traitor?
Am I allowed to be offended? Well allowed or not I AM offended.

I am offended at the continual downplaying of my culture and flag and the promotion of causes with which I have no empathy.
It is said that offensive behaviour can cause anger and retaliation. Well that can cut both ways and someday we will be able to display the depth of our offence, If this destruction of our identity is not reversed the English people's anger and retaliation against those responsible will not be containable.
I don't want this but--YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Mohammed

Morg
.

FREE AND FAIR VOTE RIGGED ELECTIONS 4

THIRD WORLD ELECTION FRAUD PRACTICES FACILITATED BY NEW LABOUR AND IT'S TAKE OVER OF LONDON BY MILITANT MOHAMMEDANS.

"At the European elections, less than a year ago, the electoral roll of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets contained 148,970 names. By January this year, it had shot up to 160,278. And in the past month alone, a further 5,000 new names have mysteriously appeared on the voting lists.

There are only two possibilities here. Either Tower Hamlets is growing twice as fast as the fastest-growing city in China, or it is the target of massive and systematic electoral fraud. We can have a guess at the answer from the fact that some three-bedroom flats in the borough appear to have 12 adults on the roll. The real occupants, when approached on the doorstep, have never heard of their 10 new flatmates.

Elections in Tower Hamlets have always been a scandal. In 2006, an entire tower block had its postal votes stolen. But this time it's more serious. In a close election, Tower Hamlets – and other places like it – could help tip the balance of power. And there are now rather too many other places like it, with dozens of police inquiries under way in inner-city seats across the country. At the time of writing, I don't know how Britain has voted. But under some scenarios, the real and frightening possibility is that this election was decided by fraud.

There are local factors, too. As the Telegraph has documented, the Islamic Forum of Europe, a radical Islamist group based at the hardline East London Mosque, has been accused of secretly infiltrating the Tower Hamlets Labour Party – and is seeking to consolidate its control by having the borough run by a directly elected mayor. A referendum on the mayoral proposal was also held yesterday.

I have no evidence that the IFE is behind the fraud in Tower Hamlets. But its favoured candidates have done remarkably well lately. At the last London mayoral election, Ken Livingstone, for whom leading members of the IFE vigorously campaigned, saw his share of the vote in one ward rise from 29.6 per cent to a rather improbable 68.1 per cent.

The problem is simple. Panicked by falling turnout, Labour allowed postal voting on demand. But a postal vote is a thousand times easier to rig than a vote cast in person. At a polling station, you need a different body for each fake voter. With a postal vote, all you need is a different envelope, and perhaps not even that.

Non-existent electors are only the half of it. By all but abolishing the secrecy of the ballot, postal voting opens the door to threats, pressure and outright vote-buying. If you vote in a polling station, nobody can make you show them your ballot paper. Nobody can know if you've obeyed orders or not.

Worst of all, though, is that the authorities don't seem to care. Police inquiries seldom get anywhere. After the 2006 scandals, one minister said that allegations of electoral fraud risked "undermining confidence". In the most dishonest press release I have ever seen, the Islamist-influenced Tower Hamlets council claimed that an election tribunal had found "no evidence of electoral fraud in Tower Hamlets". Actually, the judge ruled that there was "clear, prima facie evidence" for it.

Our rulers have tiptoed round this subject because voting fraud is mostly a problem – for now – in Asian areas. But what they're actually saying, if you think about it, is that it's all right for Asians to have their votes stolen – not a view that most Asian voters would share.

To avoid "undermining confidence" in democracy itself, we need change. For future elections, postal voting on demand should be suspended in Tower Hamlets, in Birmingham, in the Northern mill towns and anywhere else where problems arise. Nobody in these places is more than a short walk from a polling station. If we do not act, we are effectively in league with the
vote-stealers."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7687416/By-permitting-fraud-we-betray-democracy.html

DO YOU REALLY THINK New Labour WON THE LOCAL ELECTION IN WIGAN ON THE STRENGTH OF A LEGITIMATE VOTE ?

Postal vote fraud: 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid fears bogus voters could swing election

Voter fraud could determine the outcome of the general election as evidence emerges of massive postal vote rigging.

Police have launched 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid widespread cases of electoral rolls being packed with ‘bogus’ voters.

Officials report a flood of postal vote applications in marginal seats. With the outcome of the closest election in a generation hanging in the balance, a few thousand ‘stolen’ votes there could determine who wins the keys to Downing Street.

"‘We are facing a situation where we can no longer trust the integrity of our electoral system. It was a huge mistake to extend the postal vote. It opened up our system to all kinds of frauds." Martin Bell.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html

Arrest after alleged voting fraud in Peterborough

A Conservative activist in Peterborough has been arrested after alleged incidents of postal voting fraud.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/england/8662814.stm

Click on text to view original News sources.