ISLAMIC LAW V FREE SPEECH - IT'S WAR.

Islamic Law Vs. Free Speech: It's War

While Islamic suprmeacist groups like unindicted co-conspirator CAIR is relentlessly trying to destroy our unalienable right of free speech in America and impose sharia (Islamic) law, the global offensive on Western civilization is further along in Europe.

Ayn Rand said,

Once a country accepts censorship of the press and of speech, then nothing can be won without violence. Therefore, so long as you have free speech, protect it. This is the life-and-death issue in this country: do not give up the freedom of the press -- of newspapers, books, magazines, television, radios, movies, and every other form of presenting ideas. So long as that's free, a peaceful intellectual turn is possible.

Free speech is what separates us form the fascists, the totalitarians, the savages. I posted a clip of the Vilks attack when this story broke last week, but Answering Muslims posted the Vilks assault along with subtitles. It's much more frightening than the original clip that went out. Nabeel posted it here:

The Next 10 Years of Free Speech in a 10 Minute Microcosm

I'm calling it now. Unless we actually stand up for free speech and enforce it, we will see this 10 minute video played out in our lives over the next 10 years.

*Note: Some of the images in this video are mildly offensive, and the language used by the Muslims is filthy. You may have to sign into YouTube to watch this.

1 - Lars Vilks attempts to show a film (yes, it was offensive; no, it wasn't pornography)

2 - 20 seconds into the film, a Muslim yells "Stop the Film!"

3 - 8 seconds later, some kid flies over the desk and attacks Vilks

4- All chaos breaks loose, greeted by Muslims cheering "Allahu Akbar!"

5 - At the 3:55 mark, a man says "I said 'stop the film', and you didn't stop it!"

6 - Muslims greet this by cheering "Muhammad! Muhammad!"

7 - At 5 minutes, the man is still asking "Why didn't you stop the film?" to which the cop responds "I'll explain that later"

8 - At 5:20, the Muslims start saying "We pay taxes, Sweden is our country, why didn't you stop the film? If you stopped the film, this wouldn't have happened!"

9 - At the 6 minute mark, Muslims start saying to security "If you draw your gun, we'll report you!" People continue yelling insults and being aggressive towards the security.

10 - At the 7:20 mark, the first and only rational Muslim voice speaks up and says "No aggression towards the police, respect the cops, they are here to do their jobs.

11 - At the 8:45 mark, an official gets up and says they will stop showing the film due to security reasons.

12 - Muslims burst into celebration over their victory

13 - At 9:15, a lone voice speaks up and says to the crowd that they are compromising free speech

14 - Immediately, the Muslim crowd is riled up in anger over this proclamation

15 - Everyone is dismissed

16 - People exit the room amidst chants of the Shahada.

I want to call your attention to some of the things that happened here. First, note how the Muslim man in the audience think his voice is enough to dictate what everyone else does. He thinks simply by saying "Stop the film!" the whole auditorium should fall in line with his sentiment. This is exactly what we see in the world; a handful of Muslims would seek to change the practices of a nation, and they really feel like it's their God-given right, completely ignoring the fact that their whims are not any more important than anyone else's.

Then, violence and chaos break out, and the Muslims are ecstatic that they were able to interrupt the film by one means or another. This is what happened with the Danish cartoonists a few years ago, it's what is happened with Theo Van Gogh, it's what they're trying to do to Molly Norris, and it's what they're doing to Lars Vilks.

Not too long after, the Muslims start saying "This is our country - you must listen to us!" Yes, you've come to the country, but as long as you keep fighting the principles it stands for (i.e. free speech), then it's not your country. No one there should listen to you.

Another scary parallel, the Muslims then say "If you had listened to us", that is, if the security had appeased them by caving in and cutting off the film, "If you had listened to us, this wouldn't have happened!" Notice, the Muslims are blaming their insufferable actions of violence and chaosmongering on someone else, namely security. They know what they've done is bad, they just transpose the blame onto someone else. That's exactly how the Muslim world intimidates others into changing their behavior: "If you don't change, the death of those who receive our wrath will be your fault!" It's like they're the school bullies, pushing people around to boost their egos and their power.

Then, to further bully the security, a man says "If you draw your gun, I'll report you!" Notice again how blame is being shifted on others, people who are trying to keep the peace. That is exactly what happens when I, or David, or any other poster on this blog tries to point out what the Muslims are doing. The Muslims respond by saying we are the ones to blame! The same goes for Geert Wilders, Pam Gellar, [sic] Robert Spencer, and anyone who tries to stand in the way of Muslims who go too far - they all get called out as if they are the bad guys.

Thanks to ATLAS SHRUGS

Read the rest at Answering Muslims:

We need to have VOCAL MAJORITY VOICE - To SILENCE the NON-INDIGENOUS MINORITY VOICE of those who have only hatred for us. They show this by demanding with VIOLENCE the SILENCE of any voice that is critical about Mohammedanism and revealing it's TRUE FACE. Mohammedans wear VIOLENCE like Mohammedan women wear burqas. And like the burqa it masks the identity of those wearing it.

Should WE respond in SAME ?

If Mohammedans demands are met due to their Viloent tendancies, then should the MAJORITY DEMANDS be backed up with the same ? An Eye-For-An-Eye ?

We can start by stopping ALL Welfare payments to ALL MOHAMMEDANS given residency and passports and the freedom to harrass us openly and with IMPUNITY within the last 15 yrs. We'll see how fond of Britain they are when we stop paying for their Homes, Food, Heating, Lighting, Cars, Housing benefit, Income Support, Working Tax Credit, Family Tax Credit, Multiple Child Benefit Claims, Multiple-Residencys claims (due to the large size of Mohammedan familys where one house is not big enough)

Massive cuts to OUR welfare system will have to happen.

We have to LOOK AFTER OUR OWN.

A simple adage - PENSIONERS BEFORE IMMIGRANTS !

(A quick thought)

If New Labour deliberately tried to change the INDIGENOUS GENETIC IDENTITY of our INDIGENOUS POPULATION, then are they NOT GUILTY of RACISM towards US ?

Even "GENOCIDE" ?

Are ALL RACE LAWS now UNWORKABLE due to their ANTI-INDIGENOUS POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES bound in ANTI-INDIGENOUS, PRO-IMMIGRANT MINORITY "RACE" LAWS and QUANGOS enacted and enabled by NEW LABOUR ?