ONWARD AND UPWARD

We had an excellent meeting last night to discuss the recent election and discuss future plans.
We did not follow the usual format of a speaker detailing political thoughts and policies, but more of a debrief of our election experiences and a discussion of ideas for the future campaign.
Our country is in uncharted political waters and nobody knows how things will turn out or whether this coalition of the unlikely bedfellows of Cameron and Clegg (I mean this in the nicest possible way, but then they were public schoolboys) will work.

Many of their policies are miles apart and we face the disasterous economic situation bequeathed by Brown, so the question must be asked . How long will this power hungry marriage of convenience last when exposed to the harsh realities they face?
I'll give it two years in spite of what they say about fixed term Parliaments.

We need to be ready to accept the challenge when the inevitable break up occurrs.

AND WE ARE.

A member who is a statistician has found that our group had the greatest percentage increase of any group or branch in the country. I did not know that and I am indebted to him for bringing it to my notice.

Also it seems that Ken Haslam had the third highest BNP vote in the Parliamentary elections in the country.
Not bad when we lost our deposit in Makerfield five years ago.

So much for Furher Peter Franzen and his fascist mob's belief that we were driven out of Wigan and Leigh by his "peaceful" claw hammer wielding mob.

As former President Reagan said,

YOU AINT SEEN NOTHING YET!

A TALE OF TWO FLAGS

Last week the Greater Manchester Police flew the flag of the Gay, Lesbian and Transgender over their headquarters. Is there a flag to celebrate the majority of people who do not fall into these categories whithout whom the human race would not exist and to whom all those "celebrated" on this mediocre symbol owe their existance?
I think not. I have never heard of one.

One flag I HAVE heard of is the Cross of St George.

This flag, a symbol of our English nationality, it has been decreed by the Stalinsts of Wigan Metro, can not be displayed in any form on taxis licenced by them. Displaying it even as a statement of support for our football team could result with the driver losing his licence and thus his livelihood.

The contempt these PC drones hold our people and nationality is despicable.
How could displaying our national flag be offensive to any one but an alien or a traitor?
Am I allowed to be offended? Well allowed or not I AM offended.

I am offended at the continual downplaying of my culture and flag and the promotion of causes with which I have no empathy.
It is said that offensive behaviour can cause anger and retaliation. Well that can cut both ways and someday we will be able to display the depth of our offence, If this destruction of our identity is not reversed the English people's anger and retaliation against those responsible will not be containable.
I don't want this but--YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Mohammed

Morg
.

FREE AND FAIR VOTE RIGGED ELECTIONS 4

THIRD WORLD ELECTION FRAUD PRACTICES FACILITATED BY NEW LABOUR AND IT'S TAKE OVER OF LONDON BY MILITANT MOHAMMEDANS.

"At the European elections, less than a year ago, the electoral roll of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets contained 148,970 names. By January this year, it had shot up to 160,278. And in the past month alone, a further 5,000 new names have mysteriously appeared on the voting lists.

There are only two possibilities here. Either Tower Hamlets is growing twice as fast as the fastest-growing city in China, or it is the target of massive and systematic electoral fraud. We can have a guess at the answer from the fact that some three-bedroom flats in the borough appear to have 12 adults on the roll. The real occupants, when approached on the doorstep, have never heard of their 10 new flatmates.

Elections in Tower Hamlets have always been a scandal. In 2006, an entire tower block had its postal votes stolen. But this time it's more serious. In a close election, Tower Hamlets – and other places like it – could help tip the balance of power. And there are now rather too many other places like it, with dozens of police inquiries under way in inner-city seats across the country. At the time of writing, I don't know how Britain has voted. But under some scenarios, the real and frightening possibility is that this election was decided by fraud.

There are local factors, too. As the Telegraph has documented, the Islamic Forum of Europe, a radical Islamist group based at the hardline East London Mosque, has been accused of secretly infiltrating the Tower Hamlets Labour Party – and is seeking to consolidate its control by having the borough run by a directly elected mayor. A referendum on the mayoral proposal was also held yesterday.

I have no evidence that the IFE is behind the fraud in Tower Hamlets. But its favoured candidates have done remarkably well lately. At the last London mayoral election, Ken Livingstone, for whom leading members of the IFE vigorously campaigned, saw his share of the vote in one ward rise from 29.6 per cent to a rather improbable 68.1 per cent.

The problem is simple. Panicked by falling turnout, Labour allowed postal voting on demand. But a postal vote is a thousand times easier to rig than a vote cast in person. At a polling station, you need a different body for each fake voter. With a postal vote, all you need is a different envelope, and perhaps not even that.

Non-existent electors are only the half of it. By all but abolishing the secrecy of the ballot, postal voting opens the door to threats, pressure and outright vote-buying. If you vote in a polling station, nobody can make you show them your ballot paper. Nobody can know if you've obeyed orders or not.

Worst of all, though, is that the authorities don't seem to care. Police inquiries seldom get anywhere. After the 2006 scandals, one minister said that allegations of electoral fraud risked "undermining confidence". In the most dishonest press release I have ever seen, the Islamist-influenced Tower Hamlets council claimed that an election tribunal had found "no evidence of electoral fraud in Tower Hamlets". Actually, the judge ruled that there was "clear, prima facie evidence" for it.

Our rulers have tiptoed round this subject because voting fraud is mostly a problem – for now – in Asian areas. But what they're actually saying, if you think about it, is that it's all right for Asians to have their votes stolen – not a view that most Asian voters would share.

To avoid "undermining confidence" in democracy itself, we need change. For future elections, postal voting on demand should be suspended in Tower Hamlets, in Birmingham, in the Northern mill towns and anywhere else where problems arise. Nobody in these places is more than a short walk from a polling station. If we do not act, we are effectively in league with the
vote-stealers."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7687416/By-permitting-fraud-we-betray-democracy.html

DO YOU REALLY THINK New Labour WON THE LOCAL ELECTION IN WIGAN ON THE STRENGTH OF A LEGITIMATE VOTE ?

Postal vote fraud: 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid fears bogus voters could swing election

Voter fraud could determine the outcome of the general election as evidence emerges of massive postal vote rigging.

Police have launched 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid widespread cases of electoral rolls being packed with ‘bogus’ voters.

Officials report a flood of postal vote applications in marginal seats. With the outcome of the closest election in a generation hanging in the balance, a few thousand ‘stolen’ votes there could determine who wins the keys to Downing Street.

"‘We are facing a situation where we can no longer trust the integrity of our electoral system. It was a huge mistake to extend the postal vote. It opened up our system to all kinds of frauds." Martin Bell.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html

Arrest after alleged voting fraud in Peterborough

A Conservative activist in Peterborough has been arrested after alleged incidents of postal voting fraud.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/england/8662814.stm

Click on text to view original News sources.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

We speak and behave as if we are the only people in Europe who has problems with the Human Rights Act. We also speak and act as if we are the only country in Europe that has problems with the E.U. In fact, all individual European countries have E.U. etc. related problems. We only talk about the problems we have, so we tend to think it's always us against 26 other countries. Other countries talk and behave the same way - they each only discuss their own problems, and so tend to think it is THEIR country against 26 others (and in those cases we are one of the 26 ... if you see what I mean). See how the E.U. institutions have all the European countries divided up on the "Divide and Rule" principle? It really does work, but only where a compliant media is with the E.U. right across Europe. Contrary to popular opinion, the media DOES discuss problems (occasionally) relating to the idea of a united Europe, but they are very careful to discuss those problems in ways that makes it seem as if the rest of Europe is united on something, and that it's WE who are the awkward sods. The media in all E.U. countries does this - speak as if only THEIR country is the one with problems.

Take the Human Rights Act - given the current furore about the Paki terrorists recently released without even supervision, and not even deported because some silly bugger in a wig says it will violate their "human rights" if they are deported. Makes it sound as if only WE have problems over this Act. Not so! Have you read about this problem with the Human Rights Act that they have in Germany in any of your newspapers? Or heard it discussed on the lobotomy box?

Have a read - two pages of discussion on a German problem over it that you wont read or hear about in anything other than the German media. See how the "divide and rule" principle works? Click the blue for the article.

Read how countries tie themselves up in knots adjusting their domestic legislation in order for it to comply with E.U. legislation. We do it too - indeed, all 27 E.U members do it without ever getting together and discussing how the E.U. legislation itself can be adjusted to save all that individual-nation trouble - the same trouble everyone else has too. And maybe just do the job once, instead of doing the same job 27 times. But that would be far too sensible wouldn't it ... and the E.U. doesn't work like that. "Sensible" is not a concept on the E.U.'s radar screen.

So no great discussion about this Act in the E.U. parliament because everyone thinks that it's only THEIR country that has a problem, and no one wants to appear to be the awkward sod who is out of line with everyone else. This happens over almost everything E.U.-related you can think of ... no one wants to think their country is being the awkward one who will ruin harmony if they speak out.

So, serious problems that all countries share in one way or another never get discussed because of this divide and rule principle. And the E.U (not the same as "Europe") just sails on without a care in the world.

Do you think we're the only country with a mass immigration problem? Or at least the only country with a COST of mass immigration problem? We talk about it as if it's only us. I'll take a look at the Dutch experience next post.

Think about it.

Morg
.

NEW LABOUR FINANCES - SCORCHED EARTH POLICY

If the idiots in the press had been doing their job then all this would have been made public at the time. But instead they followed the greasy pole of least resistance, just in case New Labour won. But New Labour never wanted to win.

NEW LABOUR ARE GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST THE STATE !

"One former adviser to the schools department said there was a deliberate policy of “scorched earth”. “The atmosphere was ‘pull up all the railways, burn the grain stores, leave nothing for the Tories’,” he added." [...]

"Many ministers are spending this weekend going through their red boxes trying to understand the scale of the budgetary black holes facing their departments. [...]

"- A series of defence contracts signed shortly before the election, including a £13 billion tanker aircraft programme whose cost has “astonished and baffled” ministers." [...]

- The troubled £1.2 billion “e-borders” IT project for the immigration service, which, sources say, is running even later and more over-budget than Labour ministers had admitted. [...]

Gerald Howarth, the new Tory minister for defence procurement, disclosed that the financial pressures on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) were even graver than he had been expecting. “The appetite for new programmes exceeded the capacity of the MoD’s stomach, particularly in the run-up to the election,” he said. “In the past few months there was a rush of new orders. What we are going to have to do is ensure the equipment programme matches the military need.”

Defence sources say the military has been using the urgent operational requirement (UOR) to borrow money from the Treasury to fund equipment for Afghanistan that the MoD could not afford to buy. “They’ve been using the UOR system like a credit card,” one source said, “and they’ve been maxing out on the card to the point where they’re around £700m over the limit. It’s all got to be paid back.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7127819.ece

The only consolation in all this is that within the next five years New labour will not exist.

It's MPs and Members will be arrested and charged with TREASON AGAINST THE STATE and WAR CRIMES !

Nationalism is on the rise, a year on year increase on our membership and Voter base in the General and Local Elections is something that has become unstoppable..

If the Newspapers won't tell us the truth we need to tell it ourselves - to everyone that will listen - and with the blinkers now removed and real Victorian austerity for decades to come ready to kick in the British people will need a new form Politics.

Harsh measures for our very survival as a free and functioning Nation need to be taken. With all Non-Essential spending ended.

No more £9 Billion and counting Foreign Aid budget.

No more £Billions to the EU single state.

All benefits and citizenship to be withdrawn from vast swathes of the mass colonisers.

All essential utilities must be brought back into public ownership.

WE HAVE BEEN BETRAYED.

The damage runs deep and only by learning from our past will we realise that control of a united and centralised europe was last defeated in 1945. In 1914- 19, the Napoleonic wars before that, The Spanish and French and German dynastys have tried many times in the pastto control and create a single state europe.

Who do you think stopped them?

Why did we stop them ?

Why are we allowing it now?

Were the sacrifices of our War dead in vain ?

Under New Labour we have lived under the cloak of tyranny.

Ours Rights and Ancient Christian Laws usurped.

Our Freedoms curtailed.

Foreigners given the right of voting in our elections, against the will of the INDIGENOUS POPULATION,Without our consent they have been making and controlling British Laws and Policies.

NO OTHER GOVERNMENT in the world has ever done so much destruction to our STATE and NATION, and in a time of peace, that no war has ever been able to manage.

Our ARMED FORCES have been sent to die in War Zones in Europe, The Middle East, Asia and not one of these conflicts had anything to do with us nor were they ever threatening OUR nation.

We need to end this madness and take Control of our future.

We need to re-establish TRUTH and HONESTY and ACCOUNTABILITY in British Politics

Don't sit at home moaning about this,

Join the ONLY resistance to the deliberate destruction of our Land and People.

FIGHT BACK !

JOIN THE BNP !

If not the least you can do is vote for us.

How else can you look your children and grand-children in the eye and say I tried to do something ?

ENGLAND HATH MADE A SHAMEFUL CONQUEST OF ITSELF.

England flags cut down

The St George's Cross flags were put up by grandmother Doreen Carnelley ahead of the World Cup which starts in South Africa on June 11.

The 74-year-old said she had flown the 27 flag across Sturgeon Avenue in Clifton, Nottingham, during the last six World Cups and European football finals without any problems.

But today she woke up to find the flags dumped on her hedge after being cut down by council workers.

Nottingham City Council stood by its decision to cut the flags down.

A spokesman for the authority said: ''It is illegal to attach items to lamp columns without authorisation from the council, so the items were removed.

''There are also health and safety implications of attaching loose items to lamp columns and we had received several complaints from concerned members of the public.

''The flags were also hanging across the carriageway, which can be a danger for motorists.''

CLICK ON THE ABOVE FOR THE WHOLE STORY.