JUST CLICK ON THE LINK
http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2009/04/depressed-you-will-be-in-couple-of.html
June 4th:
VOTE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY
Morg
.
UPDATE
Watch this one too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkS7uRkJJa0&feature=related
June 4th
VOTE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY
Morg
.
Sunday, 26 April 2009
Friday, 24 April 2009
CELEBRATING ST GEORGE.
It is great to see that St Georges Day has been celebrated all over the country this last week and especially on the 23rd.
A few years ago this saints day was ignored by most people but I have always sported a red rose for the occasion wherever I have been.
Thirty years ago I was attending a course in London on St Georges Day and sporting my usual red rose.I was the only person wearing a rose and bowler hatted city gents came up to me and congratulated me on my patriotism.
A few years ago this saints day was ignored by most people but I have always sported a red rose for the occasion wherever I have been.
Thirty years ago I was attending a course in London on St Georges Day and sporting my usual red rose.I was the only person wearing a rose and bowler hatted city gents came up to me and congratulated me on my patriotism.
It is all so different today. Flags are everywhere and many towns and villages are urged to celebrate, and reclaim the day from the "Far Right" by politicians such as Boris Johnson (the advocate of amnesty for illegal immigrants) and immigrant clerics such as the Archbishop of York.
There are two points to make here.
Politicians have only been stimulated into celebrating our day by their fear of the BNP. They would not have needed to "reclaim" the flag if they had not discarded it into the gutter. We rescued it and now they want it back. If they were so keen on it they should not have discarded it.
Secondly we don't need advice from immigrants on what is Englishness nor how we should celebrate it, however good their intentions may be.
It is our flag and our day and we celebrate it as we want. We know who we are and ---
WE ARE THE ENGLISH and we will continue to do it OUR way as it belongs to US.
STOP PRESS: SHOUTY SLAPPER GETS SLAPPED
What IS going on?
Sure, with events as described below by Lanky, and what I’m being told about events in Liverpool yesterday, the police are not exactly flavour of the month with our local and nearby BNPers. But let’s be honest here shall we? The police don’t want to do this stuff; at least, the constables out there on the street don’t. They’ve got better things to do with their time and they know it.
No, it’s not them – it’s a combination of local (and national) politicians and council (Common Purpose?) officials putting pressure on the senior police officers, to send their constables to disrupt BNP election activity. Being a uniformed service, they generally obey the orders given by their senior officers, on pain - so they are threatened anyway - of losing their jobs if they don’t. They know they have more important real-world things to do but, well, ‘orders is orders’.
I’ve been a member of a uniformed armed service, so I can fully understand that (though bear in mind that holding the Office of Constable allows a lot more leeway to the individual concerned than does being a soldier, sailor, airman or marine. Individual constables ought to have a serious think about that). Even the armed forces are able to refuse unlawful or just plain wrong orders – it should be, and is, a lot easier for a constable. In the army, so the story amongst the enlisted men goes, the first duty of the platoon sergeant, on contact with the enemy, is to keep as many of his men alive as possible by immediately shooting the lieutenant. Make of that what you like.
So remember folks, don’t lash out blindly in the blame game: target the original source of the problem.
Now then, let’s get on with what I really wanted this post to be about …
Couple of weeks ago a shouty slapper in London got a bit of a … er … well … a slapping, actually, for being just that little bit too shouty with a man who was at the end of his tether. Consequences of that? Acres and acres of newsprint, videos everywhere you looked (and still happening); lead stories on al-Beebeecera and other television channels and radio stations.
All par for the course, of course.
Last week, in Newham in London, Police Constable Gary Toms was killed – murdered – trying to arrest robbery suspects. Heard about it? Has it been all over the papers, telly, radio? Seriously, I’m genuinely asking here – did you even know about this?
It HAS been reported, but hardly at all, and certainly given no prominence whatsoever. Surely I’m not the only person here who can remember the days – and it isn’t THAT many years ago – when the killing of a constable was a shocking event, all the media was plastered with it until the inevitable national manhunt, with all police and all members of the public keeping an eye out for the suspected perpetrator, was concluded with the arrest of the suspect? Nowadays, barely a mention anywhere and hardly a ripple across the public consciousness. However, a shouty slapper getting a slap is “News” you just can’t get away from.
Google (pages from UK only) ‘constable Gary Toms’, the conscientious constable murdered in the line of duty and you get 66,900 hits. That sounds like respectable coverage doesn’t it? Well, it does until you:
Google (pages from UK only) ‘Nichola Fisher’, the shouty slapper who got the slapping she was begging for and you get 403,000 hits.
What is going on?
I think the media – all of it, no exceptions – is suffering from an advanced case of priority disconnect. For every story of a conscientious constable murdered on duty, there are SIX stories of a shouty slapper getting slapped. And it’s not just numbers of stories alone: it’s the prominence given to each. Cops must be feeling the frustration and resentment BNPers feel in this respect. For the cops it’s what I just described; for BNPers it’s white-on-non-white crime given widespread prominence in the media, whereas non-white-on-white (overwhelmingly more frequent) crime is barely mentioned and soon slips from the news.
And showing that it's not just the British media suffering from this priority disconnect, do those same Google searches worldwide:
Police Constable Toms - 239,000 hits
Nichola Fisher - 3,350,000 hits.
So here we get a 14/1 disparity in coverage.
All par for the course, of course.
What IS going on?
As a final word, let’s talk about the Office of Constable.
Constable. Sergeant. Inspector. Chief Superintendent. Chief Constable of Manchester.
To me, and to the law itself, they all have IDENTICAL STATUS. There is no such thing as the “Office of Chief Constable”, or whatever: there is only the “Office of Constable”. All hold identical Office. In law, and to any member of the public, all are equal. You should all bear in mind that that man over there in some very comfortable chair behind a desk – the Chief Constable – and that newly qualified policewoman passing you in the street, ARE EXACTLY THE SAME THING – “CONSTABLE”.
The public should bear this in mind at all times. As should all Constables when given what are obviously wrong or stupid orders by what is only another Constable. He or she may wear fancier badges on their epaulettes, or scrambled egg on their hat peaks, and maybe even carry a small baton, or as I prefer - stick (that makes me laugh so much) – but they are still only Constables, exactly – EXACTLY – the same as you. Holding the “Office of Constable” gives you the power to use your own discretion. USE IT! Do not allow the politicians and senior officers (also politicians – they stopped being cops when they became Inspectors – most of them anyway – and morphed into managers. By the time those managers – most of them anyway - became Chief Superintendents, they stopped being managers and morphed into politicians. And somewhere along the way many of them became Common Purpose graduates; a sinister organisation with an agenda all of its own. You know it, and although you may not realise it, we know it too. Use your discretion as constables because apart from your Sergeants, there aren’t many real cops up there telling you what to do) to lead you away from the right to use your discretion, and that vital connection to the public.
Read this:
http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/policeman-killed-no-story-woman-slapped-big-story/
And this is from Australia: watch it. Exactly this happens here too every day, somewhere. Constables – set your own priorities – use your discretion:
http://bfbwwiii.blogspot.com/2009/04/horrific-racist-attack-in-australia.html
And do I really need to reiterate the Peelian Principles? Here they are anyway:
Peelian Principles describes the philosophy that Robert Peel developed to define an ethical police force. The principles traditionally ascribed to Peel state that:
Every police officer should be issued a badge number, to assure accountability for his actions.
Whether the police are effective is not measured on the number of arrests, but on the lack of crime.
Above all else, an effective authority figure knows trust and accountability are paramount.
Hence, Peel's most often quoted principle: The police are the public and the public are the police.
Police Principles
The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.
Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.
Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peelian_Principles
Does it really take a thick knuckledragging fascist racist BNP nazi scum scrote like me to tell you, public AND police, all this?
Morg
.
Sure, with events as described below by Lanky, and what I’m being told about events in Liverpool yesterday, the police are not exactly flavour of the month with our local and nearby BNPers. But let’s be honest here shall we? The police don’t want to do this stuff; at least, the constables out there on the street don’t. They’ve got better things to do with their time and they know it.
No, it’s not them – it’s a combination of local (and national) politicians and council (Common Purpose?) officials putting pressure on the senior police officers, to send their constables to disrupt BNP election activity. Being a uniformed service, they generally obey the orders given by their senior officers, on pain - so they are threatened anyway - of losing their jobs if they don’t. They know they have more important real-world things to do but, well, ‘orders is orders’.
I’ve been a member of a uniformed armed service, so I can fully understand that (though bear in mind that holding the Office of Constable allows a lot more leeway to the individual concerned than does being a soldier, sailor, airman or marine. Individual constables ought to have a serious think about that). Even the armed forces are able to refuse unlawful or just plain wrong orders – it should be, and is, a lot easier for a constable. In the army, so the story amongst the enlisted men goes, the first duty of the platoon sergeant, on contact with the enemy, is to keep as many of his men alive as possible by immediately shooting the lieutenant. Make of that what you like.
So remember folks, don’t lash out blindly in the blame game: target the original source of the problem.
Now then, let’s get on with what I really wanted this post to be about …
Couple of weeks ago a shouty slapper in London got a bit of a … er … well … a slapping, actually, for being just that little bit too shouty with a man who was at the end of his tether. Consequences of that? Acres and acres of newsprint, videos everywhere you looked (and still happening); lead stories on al-Beebeecera and other television channels and radio stations.
All par for the course, of course.
Last week, in Newham in London, Police Constable Gary Toms was killed – murdered – trying to arrest robbery suspects. Heard about it? Has it been all over the papers, telly, radio? Seriously, I’m genuinely asking here – did you even know about this?
It HAS been reported, but hardly at all, and certainly given no prominence whatsoever. Surely I’m not the only person here who can remember the days – and it isn’t THAT many years ago – when the killing of a constable was a shocking event, all the media was plastered with it until the inevitable national manhunt, with all police and all members of the public keeping an eye out for the suspected perpetrator, was concluded with the arrest of the suspect? Nowadays, barely a mention anywhere and hardly a ripple across the public consciousness. However, a shouty slapper getting a slap is “News” you just can’t get away from.
Google (pages from UK only) ‘constable Gary Toms’, the conscientious constable murdered in the line of duty and you get 66,900 hits. That sounds like respectable coverage doesn’t it? Well, it does until you:
Google (pages from UK only) ‘Nichola Fisher’, the shouty slapper who got the slapping she was begging for and you get 403,000 hits.
What is going on?
I think the media – all of it, no exceptions – is suffering from an advanced case of priority disconnect. For every story of a conscientious constable murdered on duty, there are SIX stories of a shouty slapper getting slapped. And it’s not just numbers of stories alone: it’s the prominence given to each. Cops must be feeling the frustration and resentment BNPers feel in this respect. For the cops it’s what I just described; for BNPers it’s white-on-non-white crime given widespread prominence in the media, whereas non-white-on-white (overwhelmingly more frequent) crime is barely mentioned and soon slips from the news.
And showing that it's not just the British media suffering from this priority disconnect, do those same Google searches worldwide:
Police Constable Toms - 239,000 hits
Nichola Fisher - 3,350,000 hits.
So here we get a 14/1 disparity in coverage.
All par for the course, of course.
What IS going on?
As a final word, let’s talk about the Office of Constable.
Constable. Sergeant. Inspector. Chief Superintendent. Chief Constable of Manchester.
To me, and to the law itself, they all have IDENTICAL STATUS. There is no such thing as the “Office of Chief Constable”, or whatever: there is only the “Office of Constable”. All hold identical Office. In law, and to any member of the public, all are equal. You should all bear in mind that that man over there in some very comfortable chair behind a desk – the Chief Constable – and that newly qualified policewoman passing you in the street, ARE EXACTLY THE SAME THING – “CONSTABLE”.
The public should bear this in mind at all times. As should all Constables when given what are obviously wrong or stupid orders by what is only another Constable. He or she may wear fancier badges on their epaulettes, or scrambled egg on their hat peaks, and maybe even carry a small baton, or as I prefer - stick (that makes me laugh so much) – but they are still only Constables, exactly – EXACTLY – the same as you. Holding the “Office of Constable” gives you the power to use your own discretion. USE IT! Do not allow the politicians and senior officers (also politicians – they stopped being cops when they became Inspectors – most of them anyway – and morphed into managers. By the time those managers – most of them anyway - became Chief Superintendents, they stopped being managers and morphed into politicians. And somewhere along the way many of them became Common Purpose graduates; a sinister organisation with an agenda all of its own. You know it, and although you may not realise it, we know it too. Use your discretion as constables because apart from your Sergeants, there aren’t many real cops up there telling you what to do) to lead you away from the right to use your discretion, and that vital connection to the public.
Read this:
http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/policeman-killed-no-story-woman-slapped-big-story/
And this is from Australia: watch it. Exactly this happens here too every day, somewhere. Constables – set your own priorities – use your discretion:
http://bfbwwiii.blogspot.com/2009/04/horrific-racist-attack-in-australia.html
And do I really need to reiterate the Peelian Principles? Here they are anyway:
Peelian Principles describes the philosophy that Robert Peel developed to define an ethical police force. The principles traditionally ascribed to Peel state that:
Every police officer should be issued a badge number, to assure accountability for his actions.
Whether the police are effective is not measured on the number of arrests, but on the lack of crime.
Above all else, an effective authority figure knows trust and accountability are paramount.
Hence, Peel's most often quoted principle: The police are the public and the public are the police.
Police Principles
The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.
Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.
Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peelian_Principles
Does it really take a thick knuckledragging fascist racist BNP nazi scum scrote like me to tell you, public AND police, all this?
Morg
.
Thursday, 23 April 2009
FUN AND GAMES IN ST HELENS
An interesting and successful day in St Helens yesterday.
We decided to have a day of action there (I couldn't publicise it so we would catch them out)
A stall was set up near the parish church and leaflets were being handed out.
Before long the council officials were out to see if any by laws were being broken(they weren't) but it was surprising that so many people could be spared from the busy town hall to monitor a leafletting campaign. They must have had a slack work day. Keep paying your council tax. You know it is being put to good use.
A bearded man (he looked like a social worker) started handing out "Searchlies" pamphlets out and was generally ignored.
Tony Ward, our hero of Leigh was filming the street and was told by a cop to stop filming and he replied "no", so another cop came and said the same and he again refused saying it was not against the law unless he was a suspected terrorist. If they thought he was a terrorist they would have to arrest him. After conferring they decided to go. He asked them if he could carry on filming and one cop said "please yourself".
It just shows they dont know the law and were sent by their PC bosses to hassle us.
In another amusing incident Paul Rimmer was being abused by the self styled "anti fascists" and he retaliated by singing the national anthem. At this they walked away but he followed them singing "Jerusalem". This seemed to frighten them and they had to get a cop to stop Paul singing as it was disturbing them.
WHAT A STATE WE ARE IN when singing "Jerusalem" is considered offensive.
Clive Jefferson in the loudspeaker car was threatened with arrest for noise pollution. He said if it is too loud ask me to turn it down. At the time the speakers were off so how they could assess it I don't know.
I heard a cop talking on his radio asking whether anything racist had been said but could not get this confirmed.
Clive was made to move his car, fair enough and he parked across the road. We were talking, in this quiet street and Nick arrived. I was amazed by the reaction for with only one exception people on recognising him were supportive and asked for leaflets.
After further leafletting we went to a pub where to a full house a soldier told of his betrayal by the government. He is a broken man but has little recompense, has to pay all his bills, unlike the immigrants. We were nearly moved to tears by his story.
This was followed by a Q and A session by Nick.
Today I visited a fantastic new venue where we will be having a special meeting in May.
It's all looking good with new enquiries coming in thick and fast.
I'm almost sorry I'll be off after tomorrow. The adrenaline is high and the response from the people is fantastic.
No wonder the corrupt politicians of the other parties are frightened.
The people are fed up of their lies and deceit and seeing the truth that--
The BNP is the ONLY way forward.
We decided to have a day of action there (I couldn't publicise it so we would catch them out)
A stall was set up near the parish church and leaflets were being handed out.
Before long the council officials were out to see if any by laws were being broken(they weren't) but it was surprising that so many people could be spared from the busy town hall to monitor a leafletting campaign. They must have had a slack work day. Keep paying your council tax. You know it is being put to good use.
A bearded man (he looked like a social worker) started handing out "Searchlies" pamphlets out and was generally ignored.
Tony Ward, our hero of Leigh was filming the street and was told by a cop to stop filming and he replied "no", so another cop came and said the same and he again refused saying it was not against the law unless he was a suspected terrorist. If they thought he was a terrorist they would have to arrest him. After conferring they decided to go. He asked them if he could carry on filming and one cop said "please yourself".
It just shows they dont know the law and were sent by their PC bosses to hassle us.
In another amusing incident Paul Rimmer was being abused by the self styled "anti fascists" and he retaliated by singing the national anthem. At this they walked away but he followed them singing "Jerusalem". This seemed to frighten them and they had to get a cop to stop Paul singing as it was disturbing them.
WHAT A STATE WE ARE IN when singing "Jerusalem" is considered offensive.
Clive Jefferson in the loudspeaker car was threatened with arrest for noise pollution. He said if it is too loud ask me to turn it down. At the time the speakers were off so how they could assess it I don't know.
I heard a cop talking on his radio asking whether anything racist had been said but could not get this confirmed.
Clive was made to move his car, fair enough and he parked across the road. We were talking, in this quiet street and Nick arrived. I was amazed by the reaction for with only one exception people on recognising him were supportive and asked for leaflets.
After further leafletting we went to a pub where to a full house a soldier told of his betrayal by the government. He is a broken man but has little recompense, has to pay all his bills, unlike the immigrants. We were nearly moved to tears by his story.
This was followed by a Q and A session by Nick.
Today I visited a fantastic new venue where we will be having a special meeting in May.
It's all looking good with new enquiries coming in thick and fast.
I'm almost sorry I'll be off after tomorrow. The adrenaline is high and the response from the people is fantastic.
No wonder the corrupt politicians of the other parties are frightened.
The people are fed up of their lies and deceit and seeing the truth that--
The BNP is the ONLY way forward.
EAT YOUR HEART OUT SIMON DARBY
Let’s take a little break from politics. Just for a change ... and see if we can’t make Simon a little envious …
It wouldn’t surprise me if not many of you know what this beautiful creature is. And even fewer will have seen one. I’d bet a lifetime’s pay that Simon Darby knows though. But have you ever seen one in the wild Simon? And from a distance of only about ten feet? And if you haven’t, wouldn’t you just love to – even if for only a few seconds?
I don’t know if this picture is of a Welsh one (I doubt it), or from some other population. It has recently been discovered that the Welsh Pine Martin forms a distinct genetic population, of probably no more than 50 individuals. And I’ve seen one of them close up!
It was from the time I lived in a house some 1800 or so ft up in the hills near Bala. We had no road to the house, only a track. One day I was walking along this track to walk the six miles or so to the town …
It is a peculiarity of mine that, particularly when out in the country, I move silently. I don’t do it consciously – it just happens. This is most likely a product of my rural Anglesey upbringing and the games we played and things we did. So, walking silently along this track, I was topping out over a rise … only my head was over it and there, about 10ft in front of me was a Pine Martin, crossing the track, and about half way over. It hadn’t heard me coming. I instantly stopped, and so did the martin. I looked at it, and it looked at me. For about six or seven seconds we both just froze in position staring at each other. Electrifying. What a privilege. The throat was far creamier than the white in this picture.
Like you Simon, I have an enormous, if informal, interest in the wildlife of our country. Most people, when they think of wildlife tend to think of Polar Bears, Lions, Tigers etc. without a thought for the rich variety of quite magnificent creatures here in Britain. It doesn’t have to be big to be magnificent. When’s Attenborough going to do one of his series again – but this time exclusively on OUR wildlife?
Anyway, after six or seven seconds it ran off into the trees. Never seen one before that, or since.
Saw a Hoopoe bird once too, at that house – honestly, I do know a Hoopoe bird when I see one. It set itself down on our living-room window sill. A strange sounding, as well as looking, bird. But that was nothing compared to the martin. I wont ever forget it.
Go on then Simon, black cat that. Because I’ve got an even blacker cat waiting in the wings ... from the South-east corner of Anglesey.
I’m the bloke you showed how to switch on my (my brothers actually – long term loan. Hah! - he wont see that again) camcorder at the Liverpool mass leafleting in response to the arrest of our Liverpool people the week before. At the war memorial.
It wouldn’t surprise me if not many of you know what this beautiful creature is. And even fewer will have seen one. I’d bet a lifetime’s pay that Simon Darby knows though. But have you ever seen one in the wild Simon? And from a distance of only about ten feet? And if you haven’t, wouldn’t you just love to – even if for only a few seconds?
I don’t know if this picture is of a Welsh one (I doubt it), or from some other population. It has recently been discovered that the Welsh Pine Martin forms a distinct genetic population, of probably no more than 50 individuals. And I’ve seen one of them close up!
It was from the time I lived in a house some 1800 or so ft up in the hills near Bala. We had no road to the house, only a track. One day I was walking along this track to walk the six miles or so to the town …
It is a peculiarity of mine that, particularly when out in the country, I move silently. I don’t do it consciously – it just happens. This is most likely a product of my rural Anglesey upbringing and the games we played and things we did. So, walking silently along this track, I was topping out over a rise … only my head was over it and there, about 10ft in front of me was a Pine Martin, crossing the track, and about half way over. It hadn’t heard me coming. I instantly stopped, and so did the martin. I looked at it, and it looked at me. For about six or seven seconds we both just froze in position staring at each other. Electrifying. What a privilege. The throat was far creamier than the white in this picture.
Like you Simon, I have an enormous, if informal, interest in the wildlife of our country. Most people, when they think of wildlife tend to think of Polar Bears, Lions, Tigers etc. without a thought for the rich variety of quite magnificent creatures here in Britain. It doesn’t have to be big to be magnificent. When’s Attenborough going to do one of his series again – but this time exclusively on OUR wildlife?
Anyway, after six or seven seconds it ran off into the trees. Never seen one before that, or since.
Saw a Hoopoe bird once too, at that house – honestly, I do know a Hoopoe bird when I see one. It set itself down on our living-room window sill. A strange sounding, as well as looking, bird. But that was nothing compared to the martin. I wont ever forget it.
Go on then Simon, black cat that. Because I’ve got an even blacker cat waiting in the wings ... from the South-east corner of Anglesey.
I’m the bloke you showed how to switch on my (my brothers actually – long term loan. Hah! - he wont see that again) camcorder at the Liverpool mass leafleting in response to the arrest of our Liverpool people the week before. At the war memorial.
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
TOTALITARIAN THOUGHT-POLICE STATE BRITAIN
Do you remember this young woman? Codie Stott is her name, and she features in this article. Do remind yourselves of what happened to her.
I have added a pair of photographs of the headmaster concerned, at the end of this post.
BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely.
There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.
Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.
The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".
In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.
Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.
Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."
A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boy a "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."
Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.
Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.
A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function.
A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.
Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.
There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse.
A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.
Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.
This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.
Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.
You can find the original article here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25361297-7583,00.html
And here’s Anthony Edkins, Codie Stott’s headmaster at the time.
Well stone the crows, who would have ever thunk it?
They try to tell you, in their many and varied not very polite ways, that we in the BNP are totalitarians who would make this country a living hell. Will we? Really? Could we possibly better the living hell it already is for so many of our people, including our children?
This is Britain. We are the British.
Vote BNP at any and every opportunity.
Bring this dystopian nightmare to an end.
Next post - probably tomorrow - will be titled "Eat your heart out Simon Darby".
And if he can better the tale I have to tell, then I can come back with an even blacker cat he will never beat as long as he lives.
Morg
.
I have added a pair of photographs of the headmaster concerned, at the end of this post.
BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely.
There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.
Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.
The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".
In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.
Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.
Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."
A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boy a "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."
Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.
Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.
A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function.
A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.
Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.
There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse.
A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.
Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.
This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.
Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.
You can find the original article here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25361297-7583,00.html
And here’s Anthony Edkins, Codie Stott’s headmaster at the time.
Well stone the crows, who would have ever thunk it?
They try to tell you, in their many and varied not very polite ways, that we in the BNP are totalitarians who would make this country a living hell. Will we? Really? Could we possibly better the living hell it already is for so many of our people, including our children?
This is Britain. We are the British.
Vote BNP at any and every opportunity.
Bring this dystopian nightmare to an end.
Next post - probably tomorrow - will be titled "Eat your heart out Simon Darby".
And if he can better the tale I have to tell, then I can come back with an even blacker cat he will never beat as long as he lives.
Morg
.
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
THE WHEREABOUTS OF HELEN MC COURT
I well remember the night of Helen Mc Court's murder.
I was at that time a GP and I had a late call on that Tuesday night. I remember the weather was foul, wet and very windy and as I passed the shops opposite the pub at about 8 pm looked to see if any young people were out on such a night. There were a few but not many.
On the following Thursday the police were asking for help. I went to Billinge school, now the Eddleston Centre where an incident room had been set up.
At the time there was an opencast site at the top of my drive and the access was there with a turning radius to the road. The coal had been worked right up to the radius and the hole was guarded by a rail about 2 ft tall. Three feet behind it was the drop, about 20 ft into the hole which was being filled up at the time.
About 15 yards away was the top of the tipping place where it was easy to get down to the bottom of the hole.
It would have been simple park a car, lift the body over the 2 ft rail,move it 3 ft and throw it down the hole and go round and cover it up. At 7 am the following morning before daylight work restarted filling the hole in at 500 tons per hour, and a body would have been soon covered in hundreds of tons of spoil.
I went to the police and told them this but was dismissed in a peremptory way by them saying they would check the following week.
They did not seem at all anxious to check immediately in spite of what I told them.
I therefore washed my hands of it.
I was told a forensic policeman was convinced she was buried there and all the other people in the area at the time will back up this version.
I think the police felt it too expensive to stop the opencast job and re excavate the hole so put on a show of trying to find her elsewhere.
I feel sure I could pin point the site of the body to 10 yards but since then a large gas main has been laid over it and there is no chance now.
All this does not help the poor girl, nor her mother but I think these facts should be made public as I and others have attempted in the past before the advent of blogs.
As for Ian Simms, he may not have killed her but I believe he knows who did it and that he was involved.
I think he is frightened to say more,as his life could be in danger if he did.
He must feel safer in jail.
I was at that time a GP and I had a late call on that Tuesday night. I remember the weather was foul, wet and very windy and as I passed the shops opposite the pub at about 8 pm looked to see if any young people were out on such a night. There were a few but not many.
On the following Thursday the police were asking for help. I went to Billinge school, now the Eddleston Centre where an incident room had been set up.
At the time there was an opencast site at the top of my drive and the access was there with a turning radius to the road. The coal had been worked right up to the radius and the hole was guarded by a rail about 2 ft tall. Three feet behind it was the drop, about 20 ft into the hole which was being filled up at the time.
About 15 yards away was the top of the tipping place where it was easy to get down to the bottom of the hole.
It would have been simple park a car, lift the body over the 2 ft rail,move it 3 ft and throw it down the hole and go round and cover it up. At 7 am the following morning before daylight work restarted filling the hole in at 500 tons per hour, and a body would have been soon covered in hundreds of tons of spoil.
I went to the police and told them this but was dismissed in a peremptory way by them saying they would check the following week.
They did not seem at all anxious to check immediately in spite of what I told them.
I therefore washed my hands of it.
I was told a forensic policeman was convinced she was buried there and all the other people in the area at the time will back up this version.
I think the police felt it too expensive to stop the opencast job and re excavate the hole so put on a show of trying to find her elsewhere.
I feel sure I could pin point the site of the body to 10 yards but since then a large gas main has been laid over it and there is no chance now.
All this does not help the poor girl, nor her mother but I think these facts should be made public as I and others have attempted in the past before the advent of blogs.
As for Ian Simms, he may not have killed her but I believe he knows who did it and that he was involved.
I think he is frightened to say more,as his life could be in danger if he did.
He must feel safer in jail.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)