A GOOD MEETING, PROGRESS MADE

Another successful meeting was held at our usual venue last night with a "full house" in attendance.

A report was given of our recent progress and plans for the future in this critical Euro election year. We are intending icreasing our leafletting operations especially in the areas South of Wigan as we have been getting good feedback in spite of not having concentrating in these areas. People are increasingly fed up of the lies, incompetence and greed of the other parties.
Members were informed of the offer of a large new venue which we will be taking advantage of in the coming weeks.
Credit was given to members who had worked hard leafletting in Leigh and Pemberton while realising much still needs to be done.

The first speaker was Eddie O'Sullivan, Salford organiser who was recently described in a newspaper article as "deceptively friendly". He certainly is friendly but I did not notice any deception in his demeanour.

Eddie explained the depths to which the fascists of the Labour Party were prepared to stoop in order to prevent our lawful leafletting exposing their lies and discrimination against the white unemployed of Manchester.
This included a jobs fair for black and ethnic minorities at Manchester town hall from which white people were excluded.
While leafletting explaining this blatant discrimination they were monitored by over 20 police and a helicopter.

At another public meeting they attended incognito they managed to ask questions of the organisers which the latter were not able to answer. Derek Adams the well known activist was not allowed to enter the meeting.
So much for a public meeting! So much fear of the truth!
Following the interval we were entertained by one of our favourite speakers, Dr Paul Rimmer who spoke movingly of the threat to our society and its' Christian heritage by the rapid influx of people of alien faiths. He said he had nothing against them as people but that the numbers were diluting our heritage and culture, but he saw that people were waking up to the danger and he had faith that our party would soon break through in spite of the obstacles put in our path.

Some new people attended and were favourably impressed, this being one of the objectives of our meetings, to gain new supporters and dispel the false impressions given by the media and other parties whose only defence against our arguments is to vilify us while refusing to debate.
A good collection was held together with a raffle and 5 full penny boxes were returned all of which will go to fighting the Euro elections.

Thanks to all who attended.

MEAN MUMS

I picked this up off the net somewhere. I can't remember where, but it impressed me enough that I filed it.

Mean Mums

Someday when my children are old enough to understand the logic that motivates a parent, I will tell them, as my Mean Mum told me:

I loved you enough . . . to ask where you were going, with whom,and what time you would be home.

I loved you enough to be silent and let you discover that your new best friend was a creep.

I loved you enough to stand over you for two hours while you cleaned your room, a job that should have taken 15 minutes.

I loved you enough to let you see anger, disappointment, and tears in my eyes. Children must learn that their parents aren’t perfect.

I loved you enough to let you assume the responsibility for your actions even when the penalties were so harsh they almost broke my heart.

But most of all, I loved you enough . . . to say NO when I knew you would hate me for it.

Those were the most difficult battles of all. I’m glad I won them, because in the end you won, too. And someday when your children are old enough to understand the logic that motivates parents, you will tell them.

Was your Mum mean? I know mine was. We had the meanest mother in the whole world! While other kids ate candy for breakfast, we had to have cereal, eggs, and toast.

When others had a Pepsi and a Twinkie for lunch, we had to eat sandwiches.

And you can guess our mother fixed us a dinner that was different from what other kids had, too.

Mother insisted on knowing where we were at all times. You’d think we were convicts in a prison. She had to know who our friends were, and what we were doing with them. She insisted that if we said we would be gone for an hour, we would be gone for an hour or less.

We were ashamed to admit it, but she had the nerve to break the Child Labour Laws by making us work. We had to wash the dishes, make the beds, learn to cook, vacuum the floor, do laundry, empty the trash and all sorts of cruel jobs. I think she would lie awake at night thinking of more things for us to do.

She always insisted on us telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. By the time we were teenagers, she could read our minds and had eyes in the back of her head. Then, life was really tough!

Mother wouldn’t let our friends just honk the horn when they drove up. They had to come up to the door so she could meet them. While everyone else could date when they were 12 or 13, we had to wait until we were 16..

Because of our mother we missed out on lots of things other kids experienced. None of us have ever been caught shoplifting, vandalizing others' property or ever arrested for any crime. It was all her fault.

Now that we have left home, we are all educated, honest adults. We are doing our best to be mean parents just like Mum was.

I think that is what’s wrong with the world today. It just doesn’t have enough mean mums!

Morg
.

FEBRUARY MEETING

The February meeting of the Wigan BNP group will take place next Thursday 19/2/09 at the usual venue at 8 PM. The speaker will be Eddie O'Sullivan, organiser Salford BNP.
Please come along and enjoy the company and stimulating discussion .
For further details please ring 07779 321542.
Sorry for the short notice.

WHAT IS ACPO?

The Association Of Chief Police Officers.

What is it? Is it a police organisation? Is it any sort of agency of the state? Anyone know for sure? It certainly SOUNDS official - but is it really?

How about taking on board that it is, actually, a Private Limited Company.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1145581/Body-charge-UK-policing-policy-18m-year-brand-charging-public-70-60p-criminal-records-check.html

Which was lifted almost word for word from

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk

following nearly 2 years of investigative work by Libertarian Party Leader - Ian Parker-Joseph. Our journalists are bone idle and don't even have the decency to give accreditation where it's due.

And if that whets your appetite to find out more, there's plenty here, some of it in very fine detail:

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog?cmd=search&keywords=ACPO

Doesn't this disturb you a little? Who are these people accountable to? Does anyone trust them?

They have real power over you - but they don't even have to answer questions under the Freedom of Information Act. It doesn't apply to them.

UPDATE:

ACPO's members are police officers who hold the rank of Chief Constable, Deputy Chief Constable or Assistant Chief Constable, or their equivalents, in the forty four forces of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, national police agencies and certain other forces in the UK, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands, and certain senior non-police staff. There are presently 280 members of ACPO.

[It would be very interesting to know who “certain other forces” and “certain senior non-police staff” are. Serious question: anyone got any guesses about that? - Morg]

The Statement of Purpose for the Company is:“The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) is an independent, professionally led strategic body. In the public interest and, in equal and active partnership with Government and the Association of Police Authorities, ACPO leads and coordinates the direction and development of the police service in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. In times of national need ACPO, on behalf of all chief officers, coordinates the strategic policing response.”

Got that. In equal and active partnership with Government. A limited company, sitting outside of the terms of the FOI act, acting outside of any judicial oversight, which sets policy and issues directives to the Police forces of the UK equal to Government.

In 1999 it set up a subsidiary company, called ACPO CPI Ltd … ACPO CPI Ltd will be managing the accreditation of private companies under the Community Safety Accreditation Scheme. This is the scheme that has hit the headlines this week with charges of the Home Office creating a Stasi type organisation in the UK.

… It should be clearly understood that ACPO CPI Ltd is not responsible for granting or refusing accreditation. ACPO CPI Ltd undertakes the examination of a company and then makes a recommendation to the Chief Officer responsible in the force area in which the application for accreditation has been made. It is each Chief Officer who individually decides whether to grant approval or not.

But bearing in mind, the same Chief Officers are also owners/ members of the ACPO, and therefore owners of ACPO CPI Ltd, it is unreasonable to assume that they will refuse any application recommended by themselves.

So now we have a situation where Chief Police Officers have formed a limited company, that company sets policy for all the Police Forces of the UK except Scotland, controls the force of PCSO's working alongside sworn police officers, and is now in the process via a subsidiary limited company of setting up private forces via an accreditation scheme sanctioned by the Home Office encapsulated in the Police Reform Act 2002.

Is this the creation of a private policing operation in the UK, completely outside of judicial oversight, whilst our sworn Police Officers are stuck behind desks filling in forms.

To make matters even worse, Chief Officers have completely washed their hands of any responsibility for the conduct of these private companies, the IPPC is excluded, instead, leaving any complaints by members of the public to be dealt with by those private company's own complaints procedures.

The attached document CSAS updated, Private Sector Companies, outlines the powers which are granted to these private operators, including handing out FPN's in contravention of the
Bill of Rights 1689 which guarantees citizens 'that all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures before conviction are illegal and void'.

It is clearly extending and enhancing the role of Big Brother government into the Policing of the UK using what can only be described as a private militia. (again, very illegal).

… So its not about Community Safety (we have police officers for that), it is about the beginning of a private police force, a private militia, a Stasi. But what makes it even worse is that it will all be under the control of Senior Policemen behind a shield of limited companies.

… Reading through these documents, which are all in the public domain, but as the saying goes 'hidden in plain view', it is becoming quite clear that the setting up of a Police State is very well advanced, but in such a way that Politicians and Chief Constables can deny.

By taking the route that the ACPO have, putting everything behind a shield of limited companies, exempt from the Freedom of Information act and operating outside of judicial oversight, we are right to assume that the Police State are the unwritten objectives.

This is what is known as 'Leading beyond Authority', the doctrine taught to so many police and political leaders by Common Purpose. Now you’re seeing it in action, and it's ugly, offensive and dangerous.

… As for the widely held view that Jacqui Smith is setting up a Stasi, which the ACPO deny, it may be worth noting that I have it on good authority that whilst studying for her PPE (Philosophy, Politics and Economics) degree at Hertford College, Oxford it was East German rather than British politics that she concentrated her efforts on.

To close the loop, it appears that the 3rd member of the Triumvate, the Association of Police Authorities (APA) is also a limited company, which means that they also sit outside of the requirements of the FOI Act and any judicial oversight. Their Articles of Association attached.

Or the NPIA who I wrote about in April 07. The NPIA is NOT a Crown body. The NPIA is a non-departmental public body (NDPB) sponsored and funded by the Home Office. The NPIA will have a budget of around £700m in its first year. These are the guys who run all the Databases, the PNC, the DNA database, the Childrens DNA database, the Sex&Violent Offenders Database, IDENT1, the National Fingerprint and Palmprint database etc. In other words party political control of key police functions, because they report to the minister, not the ministry.

… Its easy to see why so many real police men and women, sworn officers, are feeling so hacked off at whats going on, so frustrated. … Please also note that I am detailing primarily the ACPO not Police Forces when I say they are outside of the FOI Act.So, when you are told, nothing to see here, move on, just remember who is telling you that.

Be afraid, very very afraid. Go read it all. It’s a lot of reading, and quite complex, but we really do ALL need to know about this. When I say ALL, I mean everyone, every adult in the entire country. This is well beyond party politics.

READ IT ALL:

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2008/8/29/3859710.html

.





Morg
.

MP Andy "burn em all" Burnham Feels The Local Wrath

I was told a very interesting tale yesterday evening involving a very irate Leyther and that of our very own "gorgeous" Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Andy "burn em all" Burnham.

And this information coming from the lips of a Labour Party member (or now a more likely scenario, an ex-Labour party member!) Initially, the chap in question pulled me over the previous Friday evening to confess that although he was a Labour member, he'd attended the Leigh BNP's meeting the evening before and said he was somewhat astonished at the number of attendee's and that they doubled that of any local Labour Party meeting he'd previously attended and that we seemed more politically astute and approachable than those of a Labour meeting! Shock Horror!

Anyway, I bumped into this same chap again yesterday, and he began to tell me the tale that earlier in the day he and a friend had been in the local "bookies" after finishing work and although in the past couple of weeks there had been a gradual increase in "refugee's" or "immigrant's" frequenting this local bookmakers, yesterday saw an unprecedented influx of these sad, poor and displaced individuals fighting over an electronic casino game in this particular bookies and it is reported that many had been there since the 9am opening. So, this friend of the Labour chap who was utterly disgusted that he had to work all week to indulge in a little gambling to see these individuals cause absolute havoc in what was once a safe environment, finds himself in this melee.

And guess who has an office straight facing this particular bookmakers? None other than 'pretty boy' 'burn em all' Burnham! I kid you not!

Yes, this tale is coming from the lips of a current Labour member, but, I usually have a decent judge of character, so I believed him when he continued to say that "Burnham" was just leaving his Leigh office yesterday afternoon (if anyone can find out if Andy Burnham was in parliament on Friday 13th, I'd appreciate it, and I can rebuff these accounts) when this friend clocked "Burnham" and shot across the road to confront him. Apparently, Mr Burnham froze to the spot when the friend questioned him on why there was so many refugee's or immigrant's who can afford to frequent the bookies when he has to work all week to indulge in a little gambling?

Andy Burnham coughed and spluttered, so his female assistant stepped in and said it was because they worked the night shift! Night shift ! The friend quite correctly told her not to insult his intelligence! She then retorted that maybe their family's were sending them money over!!

As I say, I kid you not! Apparently, his government car then pulled up and Mr Burnham pale faced jumped in with his "blonde" assistant and scurred off into the distance!

THE MODERATE MUSLIM

Bridges TV founder and Chief Executive Muzzammil Hassan founded the TV network in 2004. According to a Reuters story at that time, "his wife came up with the idea in December 2001 while listening to the radio on a road trip.":

"Some derogatory comments were being made about Muslims that offended her," [ oh no, that can't be so. Who ever heard of Mohammedans getting offended?] Hassan told Reuters ahead of Tuesday's launch. "She was seven months pregnant [well there's a surprise], and she thought she didn't want her kids growing up in this environment [a Sharia environment would be such an improvement]."

So he founded Bridges TV to combat negative perceptions of Muslims.

But now that he has beheaded his wife, I'm afraid this prominent moderate Muslim will only be feeding those negative perceptions.

[ ... ]

Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband [my oh my, who would have guessed it - Morg].



So the moderate Mohammedan cut her head off.

Go read it all:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024821.php

I wonder if he'd have gotten the Wilders treatment if he'd turned up at Heathrow a week ago? What with him being a "Moderate Muslim" and all. But then Wilders, so we're told by our lords and masters, is an extremist.

I live on planet Earth. Where do our lords and masters live?

Morg
.

MORE ON Ms SMITH AND Mr MILLIPEDE

By preventing Geert Wilders from entering the country the idiotic and incompetent Jaqui Smith has shot her government in the foot. Her actions were compounded by the statement of Millipede when he likened him to shouting fire in a crowded theatre.

NO IT WAS NOT!
Geert Wilders is like a smoke alarm, warning us of the impending danger. To ignore the alarm is foolish and in the government's case criminal. As Morgan said in his post, islamic extremists can come in almost with impunity and they do not warn of danger, they preach death to the infidels (that's us folks).

I object to the campaigning of people such as "Lord" Kahn and his threats as well as the slimy Keith Vaz to prevent Mr Wilders admission. What right do these people, born abroad have to tell us who we should admit?
The power that these people and their fellow fifth columnists have already shows the danger we face when their numbers increase to form a large proportion of the population.

This inept and corrupt government, in order to gain the muslim vote and secure more time at the trough can only appease these anti British people. The Tories are notable by their silence on this matter, seeking to curry favour with the same groups for similar reasons.

Appeasement does not work as shown before WW2, it shows a weakness that the other side will exploit, and is doing.
We did not ask for this massive influx of people whose values are so alien to us. Some democracy! It has been forced on us and we are prohibited from complaining.

Never mind though. This attempt to stifle free speech and prohibit a patriot from The Netherlands entering the country has resulted in massive publicity and many who would never have heard of the film will now see it in its full horror.
SO THANKS Ms SMITH AND Mr MILLIPEDE.

Below is the link to the film
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2949546475561399959