STARVE THE BANKERS.

The recent American and European financial crises have not reached their final conclusion and the signs are that they are going to get much worse.

"Trillions" borrowed. It is impossible to get your mind round these vast sums, suffice it to say that the amount owed over the world is several times greater than the combined global assets such as property, infrastructure and savings etc.

So who is all this money owed to? Yes I know countries such as China, Japan and Germany have surpluses but these no where equate to the sum of this so called debt.

No the debt is owed to the banks which have created it out of thin air with the connivance of national governments, and the interest payments are a drain on the standard of living of millions of people.
They are also a drain on our productive industries.

How did this come about? In many ways.

Below are just a few methods which at first sight seem innocuous.

THE SALE OF COUNCIL HOUSES under Thatcher.

At first glance it seemed a good idea. People could have pride in home ownership and would take care of the properties they owned.

HOWEVER They would have to take out a mortgage to purchase and thus become in hock to the building societies or banks, i e in debt. They would be obliged to pay interest.
They would then try to improve their houses by taking out loans, again from the banks.

In the end they would have a weight of debt around their necks and possibly pay at least double for their assets.
This indebitedness was encouraged and provided more profits for the banks.

FREEING OF CREDIT was encouraged. Anybody, however poor their credit rating could obtain credit at often extortionate interest rates.
Who benefitted? Again the banks.People could never get out of the banks clutches.

PENSION SCHEMES. Even before Gordon Brown robbed them they were not as good as portrayed. Yes Civil Service pensions were good as they were index linked and the employer paid a large proportion of the cost.

BUT The cost of administering these schemes, even the best is astronomical, sometimes coming as high as 1.5% of the asset. Therefore even though some have done well for the pension holder the majority of the benefit has gone to the banks and financial "industry". That's where they get their bonuses from, our pockets.

Those with private schemes are worst off. Yes contributions are tax free and the employer pays a contribution but the return is paltry in comparison to the amount the advisors make.

In spite of this these schemes are pushed by the government and institutions.
My 20 year old grandson was advised to top up his pension.I had to tell him that in 45 years there would not be a pile of money waiting for him. It would have all been swallowed up in administrative costs (the banks), and payouts now.

The pension I now receive is not paid out of what I paid in. That has long since been paid out. My pension is being paid out of the contributions of those now working.

In effect it is a gigantic "Ponzi scheme"

STUDENT FEES. The people who decided that university students should pay fees had their own fees paid for them and were not then thrust into the world of work saddled with debt.

Admittedly at leas 50% of so called university students should not be there in the first place as their courses are worthless and looked on with contempt by prospective employers.

BUT having "graduated" with a degree in "film studies" or "dance" they leave university in debt.
They don't have to pay until they are on £21,000 per year but then they will be expected to repay the debt and interest even if in another job. Inflation will make sure they are soon paying for their worthless qualifications.

At the same time they will be encouraged to take out a pension and pay as much as possible. More money for the bankers but poorer prospect for the young people.

Buying a house is impossible because of the high prices caused by faulty building society lending practices and immigration.

These are just a FEW of the ways the lower income families suffer from the present iniquitous financial regime. I am talking here about the ambitious people, the tryers who are the backbone of our country and these people are being disadvantaged.

No wonder they are not starting families, they can't afford to, and these are our best young people.
The only people who can are the "underclass" who have multiple children out of wedlock with multiple partners and get housing and benefits. This group is augmented by those who have no right to be here at all, the uninvited dross of the world.


There are many other undercover ways in which the financial leeches are undermining our society but the above are illustrations.

HOW TO GET OUT OF IT? Very hard as the financial institutions hold the levers of power through their association with the major political parties.

I have been lucky, having a good job, but all can do it in their own way.

1 SAVE as much as possible. If you cant afford it, do without. If you borrow for things you pay twice as much in the end.

2 DO NOT GET INTO DEBT, apart from mortgage. Pay this off as soon as possible. Do without holidays for a few years to do it quicker and get them off your back.

3 DO NOT ENHANCE YOUR PENSION SCHEME. Put your money in a good interest bearing account.It may not pay as much but you will not be paying administration costs.
Keep control of your own money.

4 IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH Invest in THINGS WHICH HOLD THEIR VALUE, but do not borrow to do so.

AND STOP FEEDING THE BANKING BEAST.

An old saying is "The money I have is the money I have not spent".
NOT QUITE TRUE. The money I have is more than twice I would have had if I had not waited until I could afford it.

IN A WORD THRIFT.

Our forebears knew the value of this even though not well off.

The bankers tell us we must keep spending(and borrowing)

DO YOU THINK IT IS FOR OUR SAKE?

NO THEY WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY TO SERVE THEIR GLOBALIST GREED.

DON'T LET THEM!

Swedish man arrested after trying to split atoms in his kitchen

Richard Handl said that he had the radioactive elements radium, americium and uranium in his apartment in southern Sweden when police showed up and arrested him on charges of unauthorised possession of nuclear material.

Handl, 31, said he had tried for months to set up a nuclear reactor at home and kept a blog about his experiments, describing how he created a small meltdown on his stove.

Only later did he realise it might not be legal and sent a question to Sweden’s Radiation Authority, which answered by sending the police.

“I have always been interested in physics and chemistry,” Handl said, adding he just wanted to “see if it’s possible to split atoms at home”.

The police raid took place in late July, but police have refused to comment. If convicted, Handl could face fines or up to two years in prison.

Although he says police didn’t detect dangerous levels of radiation in his apartment, he now acknowledges the project wasn’t such a good idea.

“From now on, I will stick to the theory,” he said.

---------------------

It kept him busy I suppose !

POLICE CORRUPTION AT SENIOR LEVELS......NEVER !

Sean Price, the chief constable of Cleveland Police, and Derek Bonnard, the deputy chief constable, were arrested this morning and questioned by detectives.

The inquiry is being conducted after Her Majestey’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) asked Warwickshire police to investigate allegations of corruption at the Cleveland force.

The investigation centres around business practices of the Cleveland Police Authority, the force’s governing body. Contracts awarded by the authority are being scrutinised.

Another allegation is that Mr Price used “undue influence” to get a job for the daughter of Dave McLuckie, the then chairman of the police authority.

That is being investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and Mr Price refutes the allegation.

It is understood, however, that Mr Price’s arrest does not relate specifically to the awarding of contracts or the allegation that he used his position to get someone a job.

He and his deputy have been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office, fraud by abuse of position and corrupt practice.

The arrests of Mr Price and Mr Bonnard are the fourth in the inquiry, which is being overseen by Warwickshire chief constable Keith Bristow but investigated by a team from North Yorkshire police.

A woman was also arrested today. Police are refusing to confirm her identity or her age however it is understood she is a member of police staff.

A man has previously been arrested, It is understood he is not linked to Cleveland Police or the Police authority.

The investigation into the force began two months ago. Within days of its commencement Mr McLuckie resigned.

Following his resignation it emerged that he was also consultant of a heating firm that won an £87,000 contract with Cleveland Police.

Sources confirmed that the awarding of this contract formed part of the police investigation, but it is not linked to this morning’s arrest.

Mr McLuckie says he took no part in the contract negotiations and denied any wrongdoing.

A spokesman for Warwickshire Police said: “Police officers conducting a criminal investigation into a number of people with current or past associations with Cleveland Police Authority and the manner in which the authority may have conducted some of its business have this morning arrested three people on suspicion of misconduct in a public office, fraud by abuse of position and corrupt practice.

“Two men and a woman were arrested and have been taken to a police station in North Yorkshire where they will be interviewed later today. A number of premises are being searched in connection with these arrests.”

-----------------------------

This could be interesting.
I wonder where it could lead ?
That most Police Forces are now Privately owned ?
I wonder what these two have really done to upset the totally CORRUPT Police FORCE and their owners ?

Or

Could this be to make way for the new "ELECTED" Police Commissioners ?

UK Police Tells Public To Report Anti-Government Beliefs As Terrorism

The London Metropolitan Police is encouraging businesses and the general public to immediately report anyone who holds anti-government political beliefs to the authorities as terrorists, calling on people to become volunteer informants as the state prepares for widespread social unrest.

“This was the surprising injunction from the Metropolitan Police issued to businesses and members of the public in Westminster last week,” reports the London Guardian. “There was no warning about other political groups, but next to an image of the anarchist emblem, the City of Westminster police’s “counter terrorist focus desk” called for anti-anarchist whistleblowers stating: “Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy. Any information relating to anarchists should be reported to your local police.”

In also calling on people to report Al-Qaeda paraphernalia to police, the briefing conflates “anarchists” with terrorists.

“It unfairly implies that anyone involved in anarchism should be known to the police and is involved in an dangerous activity,” said Jason Sands, an anarchist from South London. “There is nothing inherently criminal about political philosophy whatever it is. The police work under the convention on human rights which disallows discrimination against people because of their political beliefs and even the request for information would seem to be in breach of that.”

Of course, the “anarchist” label could apply to a whole range of political beliefs, but the fact that the state is now openly criminalizing anti-government sentiment and encouraging people to report on their neighbors for expressing dissent or displaying any sign of their political philosophy is a clear indication of how paranoid the British government has become of its own citizens.

As anarchist Sean Smith told the Guardian, “It’s pretty absurd, but not surprising, when the state seeks to criminalise ideas it deems to be dangerous to its own survival.”

Indeed, if you want an insight into where the British government thinks this is all heading, look no further than a 2007 Ministry of Defence report which foresaw “the middle classes becoming revolutionary” and “taking on the role of Marx’s proletariat” within three decades.

“The world’s middle classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest,” warns the report, predicting mass unrest and social dislocation.

This is why the authorities are already putting the squeeze on any kind of political beliefs that could be construed as anti-government. They are aware of the fact that the increasingly dangerous, unjust and economically deprived post-industrial revolution now being used to eviscerate the middle class in the west will provoke a hostile and radical reaction.

Encouraging people to report on each other for political beliefs deemed undesirable by the state is precisely what happened in Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany.

One common misconception about Nazi Germany was that the police state was solely a creation of the authorities and that the citizens were merely victims. On the contrary, Gestapo files show that 80% of all Gestapo investigations were started in response to information provided by denunciations by “ordinary” Germans.

“There were relatively few secret police, and most were just processing the information coming in. I had found a shocking fact. It wasn’t the secret police who were doing this wide-scale surveillance and hiding on every street corner. It was the ordinary German people who were informing on their neighbors,” wrote Robert Gellately of Florida State University.

Gellately discovered that the people who informed on their neighbors were motivated primarily by banal factors – “greed, jealousy, and petty differences,” and not by a genuine concern about crime or insecurity.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.

A nod to http://boltonbnp.blogspot.com/2011/08/uk-police-tells-public-to-report-anti.html

------------------

1984 ?

A DIFFERENT NATIONALISM

During the last year the nationalist movement has become fragmented and now with the demise of the BNP as a credible political force we must ponder on what to do now.

The BNP has been ruined by incompetent management, internal arguments and too many gaffes.
Many members have left or been expelled and many of them have joined new splinter parties.It shows people's desperation to find a vehicle in which to express their views.
In addition many people in our country are increasingly worried about the change caused by the lax or intended immigration policies of the main parties.

So what is the way forward?

First I believe we must stop the arguments between the varying brands of nationalsm such as "ethno nationalism" or "civic" nationalism.

These titles may be important to us but they do not concern the voters and if they do they put them off voting for us.

ETHNONATIONALISM.

I think this term should be dropped as a policy.
Yes we all agree that it would be nice to go back 50 years when we were a homogenious people but that will never happen.
If we are to continue to stress this form of nationalism we will be tarred by the racist brush, a term which our people have been indoctrinated to believe is anathema.

If we continue along this path we will never gain power and lose all, our influence,society and country.

We have to make the best of a bad job.

CIVIC NATIONALISM.

I can not understand this term. There is no such thing. You can not as an alien become a British nationalist by virtue of a British passport.

Nationalism is a feeling of community and a belief in a certain way of life, a patriotism.
By definition (from the Latin "Patria" meaning native land)it is not acquired by obtaining a passport and citizenship. It is like the tribalism which the "lefties" consider so important in other countries.
People are tied to their kin all over the world. It is a natural instinct, and inimicable to multiculturalism which does not and never has existed.
People of different cultures and races may live side by side but they never in large numbers live together. Rather they live in ethnic or tribal ghettos not trusting those from neighbouring groups but living in good times in an uneasy truce.

I read in the paper today that many Libyans living in Manchester have gone "home" to fight for their tribes in that country showing where their allegiences lie. It certainly is not to Britain.

SO WHAT DO WE DO.

Politics is about image and I believe we can achieve our goals without mentioning ethno nationalism, thus deflecting the racist epithet directed against us by the media.

WE SHOULD CALL OURSELVES ECONOMIC NATIONALISTS.

Times may be harder for many but before long they will become considerably worse.
We should promote the economic aspects of our policies.

IMMIGRATION--- can't afford it. We are too crowded.
ASYLUM--- no such thing. They have crossed several countries to get here.
TRANSLATORS -- not needed. Not our problem.
LAWYERS,--- can't afford them
FOREIGN AID --can't afford it. Let China give. They are not in debt.
HUMAN RIGHTS ---only apply to British people.
ILLEGALS ALREADY HERE --send them back. If we can't put a camp on a Scottish island in the rain until they said where they came from. Why should they live in our big cities. Somalian refugees in Kenya don't live in Nairobi.
NO MORE GRANTING OF CITIZENSHIP --we can't afford the extra numbers.
NO JOBS GIVEN TO FOREIGNERS--- We cant afford to have British people on the dole.
STOP FAMILY ALLOWANCES FOR MORE THAN TWO CHILDREN to avoid overpopulation.
NO SOCIAL HOUSING FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS ALREADY HERE.---we have not enough housing for our own people.
REVOKE CITIZENSHIP FOR CRIMINAL LEGAL IMMIGRANTS ALREADY HERE and send them back with their families. We have enough home grown criminals and can not afford more.
STOP POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION--it's racist and un British
ABOLISH THE EQUALITIES COMMISSION--can't afford it.
CLAMP DOWN ON ISLAMIC ACTIVISM--not compatible with the British way of life.Can't afford it.
All this of course in addition to nationalist policies in industry, ownership EU policies and foreign wars.

These measures I think would stop the inevitable replacement of our people.
We could avoid the "racist" tag as they would apply to all equally.

Unfortunately I think we would have to accept those who have been here many years and are second generation, but they would have to show they adapted to our ways.

IN OTHER WORDS THEY WOULD HAVE TO SHOW THEIR ALLEGIENCE TO BRITAIN, as the price of us accepting them.

I believe it is is the only way to save our country.
We are where we are and if the above measures were enacted they would afford us a chance for our futures. I don't necessarily like it but facts are facts.

AND MOST IMPORTANT WE MUST UNITE ALL NATIONALSTS IN ONE PARTY,and portray ourselves as a defensive movement, which in effect we are.

IT'S NO GOOD BEING A PURIST AND LOSING, WE MUST BE RATIONAL AND WIN.

BUT WE MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT.

The next years will be hard for our people and hit them in their pockets.

WE MUST SHOW WEARE ON THEIR SIDE AND WILL DEFEND THEM and

THEY WILL VOTE FOR US.

THE SCIENTISTS? OF GLOBAL WARMING.

This week we have been honoured by the great climate change/global warming expert Dr Rajendra Pachuri. He FLEW in to among other things to be delicately interviewed by the BBC and other organisations to answer questions re the falsified evidence of Global Warming such as the retreat of Himalayan glaciers (not true) and the alteration of data to prove the AGW theory.

The irony of FLYING round the world to prove this increasingly discredited theory is perhaps lost on him. After all he is a railway engineer and he must think that makes him an expert on environmental matters.

Also this week I read that a Mr (or Monseur?) Monnet has been suspended from his job in the climate change industry. He has been found exterpolating global changes from casual observations.

This scientist? flew over a part of the Arctic Ocean and saw four dead polar bears floating. From this observation he calculated that there was proof of global warming and an imminent extinction of that species.

He did not take into account that the polar bear populations have greatly increased.
NO he had seen four dead polar bears, which died from unknown causes and took it to mean that an environmentally disasterous global warming episode was imminent.

His cause was taken up by the great global warming crusader Al Gore,(what are his scientific credentials?) who has made millions out of the campaign.

These millions have enabled him to build himself a luxurious seaside house in the Carolinas. Strange that if global warming and sea rises are so imminent that he would decide to build at the side of the sea.

He obviously knows things we don't.

He has possibly seen the data from NASA that the CO2 in the atmosphere does not trap as much heat as previously thought.

Now back to Dr Pachuri.
I was privelidged? to see him share the podium in Brussels with that well known scientific expert Sir Paul McCartney who had FLOWN in to promote his vegetarian philosophy in order to cut emissions emitted by animals.

We have our "experts" in government also.
Chris Huhne, he of the speeding points shambles (high spped driving uses more fuel) FLEW to a conerence in Cancun last year to think of ways of preventing excessive flying, preferably by higher taxes.

A week later after coming home he took his attractive (there's no explanation for taste) ex lesbian partner back to the Carribean for a well deserved holiday.

Two trans Atlantic return trips for Mr Huhne

More recently he has been instrumental in subsidising "renewable energy" with money raised from increasing electricity prices which could cause death from hypothermia in winter.

In addition the Carbon Credit scam has put our industry at a disadvantage in respect to countries such as Dr Pachuri's India and caused the loss of among other things the Redcar steel works.

Possibly they have some connections to the Carbon Trading industry, I don't know.
What I do know is that it is having a devastating effect on our beleaguered industries, but no matter their wealth does not depend on that.

How fortunate we are to have these hypocritical "experts" (not a scientist among them) to fly all over the world to think of ways to stop us flying and heating our homes.

It would be poetic justice if these wealthy people were made to live with the consequences of their arrogance and ignorance.

It would be nice to bring them down to earth from their private jets.

BRITISH JUSTICE?

It is becoming ever more evident that the running of the recent leadership election was flawed and in some cases fraudulent.

Voting members were not sent voting forms to my knowledge by the membership secretary Mrs Mathys. There may have been a valid reason for this such as the incompetence for which she is well known.

There was also a climate of fear among the more timid members when they realised that they and the way they voted could be easily ascertained with sanctions implemented against them. This means to me that they would have voted Brons if they had dared.
I do not know what sanctions they feared, but it does show a climate of fear entirely inappropriate in a political party.

Suspensions and expulsions also helped the "Griffinite" side, and Eddy Butler did the Brons cause no good by encouraging members to leave the party.

Eddy on his blog of yesterday is thus disingenuous by saying he held fire in order to avoid hurting the Brons campaign.
He also says the BNP is a toxic brand but yet he attempted to lead it last year, raher a contradiction I think, and not what he said at the meeting in Dewsbury which I attended and which got me in trouble earlier this year.

He tells us what he now thinks is wrong with the party and in a future post he will inform us of his answers. It's getting like an Agatha Christie plot, hopefully with no murder later in the story.

It is always interesting to read these blogs and sometimes they throw a new aspect one has not thought of before, even though there is sometimes much to disagree with.

I WILL NOW SAY WHY I HAVE LOST FAITH WITH THE PRESENT SET UP.

I have been a member for nearly 9 years and know about "The Decembrists" incident.
There was fault on both sides. It was started by Nick Griffin and one thing led to another with attack and counter attack until the inexcusible "nuclear" option of the membership leak occurred,causing much damage to our party and some members.

I don't want to go into all the details, suffice it to say I know all of them.

The point I make is it could have been avoided with sense on BOTH sides.

So the rebels fell by the wayside and though wounded we got back to business and put the incident out of our mind, and began to make good progress.
We were on a roll, but a series of gaffes exploited by a hostile press undermined our image and political progress.
Again these could have been avoided. We supplied the ammunition.

Internally hints of financial irregularity surfaced and the party became involved in unneccessary legal cases at further cost. Accounts were submitted late and bills not paid.
We asked for financial transparency but were not given it, but I hung on in spite of ever poorer electoral results, hoping for a turnround and a revival.

I PUT MY DOUBTS BEHIND ME especially as Nick Griffin had PROMISED to retire from the leadership in 2014 with the generous pension he sneaked through at the Codnor meeting.

I was uneasy at the conference when he said that he would offer 20% payment of all bills owing, take it or leave it.
I thought it unfair to the small businessmen who had helped us to be treated so shabbily, especially as the party had crowed that we had had £1.6 million in donations.

We asked where the money had gone. Just give us the accounts, all to no avail.

Even then I was a supporter of the leadership, I had nowhere else to go.

At the conference last December a motion for a democratic structure taking power back from the Chairman and put forward by Arthur Kemp was almost unanimously passed.

Clive Jefferson was one of the few who opposed it.

I knew it would take some time (possibly 2/3 months) to be implemented, but when I found out in February that it would not come to pass because of objections from the Chairman that was the last straw for me. It was what finally removed the blinkers from my eyes and I began to search other avenues.

All this time our region was collapsing under the dictatorial methods of Clive Jefferson and I realised that to carry on in the same way we risked oblivion.

Then we learnt that Nick ("in response to popular demand", don't make me laugh) had decided to go for another term, this time for 4 years, an idea that was explicitly rejected at Codnor 3 years ago (before the era of proxy votes)

Nationalism is the only hope for our country but I believe we are failing to engage the voters because of wrong tactics, emphasis and those who are implementing them.

Internal party finances and democracy are matters of little consequence to the voting public but deficiencies in these have had a devastating effect on activist morale. It is no good pretending all is well when it is obvious we are going downhill.

We must change our methods, internally and externally and perhaps senior personnel if we are to survive.

WE CAN AND WILL SURVIVE as a movement,but--

We I think will have to change our name.

How about BRITISH JUSTICE?