SO WHAT IS THE COMMON PURPOSE OF COMMON PURPOSE?

 NEW CARE SYSTEM ABUSE SENSATION: HOW EXACTLY WOULD VETTING & BARRING HAVE CAUGHT THIS MAN, MR BALLS?

The Slog has argued for over a year now that Britain's Care System is compromised by paedophiles already in it. Over that time, Liverpool, Staffordshire and Plymouth have been identified as areas where it is felt to be rife.

While the madness of 12 million citizens being vetted and barred continues, a new case in Liverpool suggests yet again that dangerous predators are already in the system.

Matthew Byrne faces 32 charges of rape, assault by penetration and false imprisonment.

He is accused of sex attacks on seven different women, and in some cases is alleged to have beaten the women with a cane, gagged, and throttled them for sexual pleasure - says the Liverpool Echo.

Byrne ran the Young Person’s Advisory Service, working with children as young as 10, and was an area organizer for the shadowy organization Common Purpose. CP hastily removed Mr Byrne’s name from their list of area organizers once the charges were announced.

Byrne is another potential case of a senior care-system position being used to indulge in various perverted practices. He is also a classic case in having high connections:

Heseltine and Cameron (above) with Big Cheese

This is how it happens, Ed Balls. Secretive Courts, secretive organisations, gagging orders and cover-ups. Please, please close down your Twitter account, get off your ample bottom - and do something. A lot less V & B security blankets, and a lot more real police work, if you please.

The Slog has devoted many articles over time to this problem. While some conspiracy theories in this area are lunatic fringe to say the least, the history of false imprisonment and trumped up charges against parents is a long one.

Related archive articles: Harman & Balls, the Do-nothing Ministers, Ed Balls, highly-paid Twitter Twit. 

Original article here:


http://nbyslog.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-care-system-abuse-sensation-how.html 

Morg
.

MARGARET HODGE MP .

I was going to write something about Margaret Hodge, the New Labour candidate and incumbent MP and the Islisngton Paedophile Ring which flourished under MARGARET HODGES CARE.

But I came across this article and it tells it better than I could.
I hope you don't mind

http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/how-fabian-and-trotskyite-neo-fascists-took-over-western-communities-britain-60-minutes/


Margaret Hodge MP.
http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/?p=167

Member of Parliament for Barking.

WANTS YOUR VOTE.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Another minister under fire: call for Hodge to quit over child abuse scandal

Minister for Children admits a ‘lack of understanding’ when she was a council leader but denies ignoring pleas for help

By Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor

Tuesday, 1 July 2003

Independent Minds

The Tories called for the resignation of Margaret Hodge, the minister for Children, last night after social workers accused her of failing to confront one of Britain’s worst child abuse scandals when she was leader of Islington council.

The Tories called for the resignation of Margaret Hodge, the minister for Children, last night after social workers accused her of failing to confront one of Britain’s worst child abuse scandals when she was leader of Islington council.

Two former officials at the London borough have claimed publicly for the first time that Mrs Hodge failed to back them over allegations that youngsters in care had been subjected to sex abuse. The scandal was first exposed by the London Evening Standard.

Mrs Hodge admitted yesterday that she had shown a “deep lack of understanding” of what was happening in children’s homes run by Islington.

But she insisted she had never ignored a single allegation of abuse against a child and her experience in Islington made her “well equipped” to learn the lessons of past mistakes and apply them to her new post.

Yesterday, the Evening Standard printed a memo from Mrs Hodge rejecting a request for extra staff from the local office running an investigation into abuse. She also criticised social workers for alerting parents to the allegations at a public meeting.

The fresh allegations prompted Eleanor Laing, the new shadow minister for Children, to attack Tony Blair for appointing one of his close friends to such a sensitive post.

“I don’t see how anyone can have faith in Margaret Hodge to do this vitally important job properly. The allegations made today by the two senior Islington social workers are shocking. Islington council failed to protect children in its care from paedophiles, Margaret Hodge was leader of that council,” Ms Laing said.

“She herself has accepted some responsibility for the dreadful things that happened. She let down those vulnerable, innocent children. Why has Tony Blair chosen her to speak for children now? There are hundreds of other Labour MPs; couldn’t he have given this responsibility to someone who has shown themselves worthy of it?”

One paedophile, Roy Caterer, a sports instructor at a boarding school used by Islington, was sent to prison for seven and a half years for abusing seven boys and two girls. In 1995, an independent investigation strongly criticised the “chaotic” organisation of the council and its “conditions for dangerous and negligent professional practices in relation to child care”.

When the Evening Standard first exposed the scandal, Mrs Hodge, who led Islington from 1982 to 1992, originally attacked it for “gutter journalism”. But by 1995, she said: “I accept responsibility. I was leader of the council at the time.”

Yesterday the newspaper identified the two whistleblowers who revealed the failures at Islington, as well as one of the victims of sex abuse.

Michael Fitch, who was subjected to abuse by Caterer while in Islington’s care, also called on Mrs Hodge to quit. “That woman. Get her out of there. She shouldn’t be minister for Children. I’d like to tell her to her face,” he said.

Mrs Hodge, whose new ministerial role gives her sweeping powers over child policy, including abuse cases, yesterday said that she “deeply regretted” the abuse of children by her staff. “I’ve had 12 years to think about those issues, to read about them, to talk to people about them, to learn about them,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“I think that equips me better than most, having been through that experience, in thinking about how we now create a safe environment for those children at risk, and really put the children at the heart of all the policies and the structures that we develop.

“There were terrible things happening in children’s homes, and I deeply, deeply, deeply regret it. Never a month goes by when I don’t think about it.”

But she added: “Of course it was happening in Islington, but there were 500 investigations going on into children’s homes across the country. I think there was a deep lack of understanding, by myself, by the social services, by policy makers, by all of us as to actually the state of what was happening in children’s homes.”

Mrs Hodge stressed that whenever an allegation was brought to her attention, the council investigated it and in some cases called in the police. “We can’t find an easy quick fix to these issues. But have I learnt? Of course I have. And I’ll bring that experience to bear in how we now take forward those services for children,” she said.

Mr Fitch, who was identified as “Dean” in the original Standard stories, was in care from the age of nine to 19, the latter half during Mrs Hodge’s reign. He twice tried to tell Islington social services that he was being abused by Caterer at Shepall Manor Special School in Stevenage. “Caterer took me to the woods at the back of the school one lunchtime and had sex with me,” Mr Fitch said. “Afterwards, he showed me a nine-foot pit he had dug and told me, ‘If you tell anybody I’ll bury you alive’. I was terrified.” Despite the threats, he went to the headteacher but was ignored. When back in Islington in the school holidays, he “begged” social workers not to send him back. “But nothing was done.”

Even after he left the school and went to a care home in Islington, Caterer continued to visit him. Again, he told social workers he was being abused and again they “did nothing”.

“Nothing I told them seemed to make an impression. I realised that to them I was meaningless. That’s when I started to cut my arm with a knife,” Mr Fitch said. Mr Fitch’s eight-year-old brother, Doug, was subsequently harassed by Caterer. Mr Fitch now takes antidepressants, is plagued by gender confusion, panic attacks and insomnia. He has tried to commit suicide more than a dozen times.

THE ISLINGTON SCANDAL

1982 Margaret Hodge becomes Islington council leader. Forms friendship with Tony Blair, at one stage living a few doors away.

February 1990 Liz Davies and David Cofie, senior social workers, discover evidence of sex abuse of children and report it to a residents’ meeting attended by Mrs Hodge.

May 1990 Mr Cofie and Ms Davies are told by Lyn Cusack, assistant director of social services, to stop interviewing children about the claims.

1991 Roy Caterer, a sports instructor at a boarding school used by Islington, arrested on suspicion of sexually abusing seven boys and two girls.

October 1992 Mrs Hodge steps down as council leader.

February 1994 Mrs Hodge accepts there was abuse, blaming her initial response on officials’ “misleading information”.

May 1995 Report says Islington’s ideological policies stopped complaints being investigated. Mrs Hodge says: “Of course I accept responsibility. I was leader of the council at the time.”

1 May 1997 Tony Blair moves from Islington to Downing Street.

June 2003 Mrs Hodge made minister for Children.

Jason Swift

In 1985, 14-year-old Jason Swift was killed by a child-abuse gang.

Jason is believed to have lived in Islington council’s Conewood Street children’s home, in London. (Jersey child abuse link to Islington, London)

Sidney Cooke, Leslie Bailey, Robert Oliver, and Lennie Smith, were imprisoned in 1989 for the manslaughter of Jason Swift.

Cooke and his gang had sexually tortured and prostituted a number of boys.

The gang is believed to have killed at least nine children.[2]

Cooke was sentenced to 19 years in prison.

In 1998, Cooke was let out of prison eight years early.

There have been allegations that very powerful people have been involved in a child-abuse ring connected to Islington children’s homes. ( Jersey child abuse link to Islington, London)

In 1982 Margaret Hodge (nee Oppenheimer) became Islington council leader.

She became a close friend of Tony Blair, who lived in Islington, a few doors away from Hodge.

In February 1990 Liz Davies and David Cofie, senior social workers, discovered evidence of sex abuse of children and reported it to a residents’ meeting attended by Mrs Hodge.

In May 1990 Mr Cofie and Ms Davies were told by Lyn Cusack, assistant director of social services, to stop interviewing children about the abuse claims.

On 1 May 1997 Tony Blair moved from Islington to Downing Street.

In June 2003 Mrs Hodge was made minister for Children. (Another minister under fire: call for Hodge to quit over child …)

http://pierrejoubert.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html

SUCH LOVELY PEOPLE STALK WESTMINSTER ………….."


NICK GRIFFIN V MARGARET HODGE (nee OPPENHEIMER)
If you scratch under the surface the people who rule us are often NOT INDIGENOUS English/British.They have the gall to shout Racists and Nazis at BNP Members and Supporters for wanting to be Patriotic Britons in Britain..

New Labour are teaching little kiddies about sex.
Margaret Hodge, New Labour Minister, LEADER OF ISLINGTON COUNCIL, presided over a large Peadophile ring within Islington Councils "CARE HOMES". With individuals who were dangerous to Children when left alone with them.

Would you trust your kids in this NEW LABOUR womans "SOCIAL CARE" ?

VOTE BNP...IT MAY SAVE YOUR CHILD FROM SYSTEMIC AND ORGANISED ABUSE OF CHILDREN UNDER NEW LABOUR.

PANIC IN BARKING

Nick Griffin's decision to stand against Margaret Hodge really seems to have ruffled her feathers.
She is now to some degree copying BNP policies which she has up to now deemed racist, and recognising the resentment of voters in the unfettered immigration policies of her government and their treatment of British people as seciond class citizens.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248364/Margaret-Hodge-says-migrants-EARN-benefits-takes-BNP.html

She says it is time "to lance the boil" of growing discontent over the wave of economic migrants entering our country.
No Margaret it is time to "lance the boil" of New Labour your corrupt party which has presided over the most disastrous demographic changes in 10,000 years of British history for purely party reasons, not to mention bankrupting the country while borrowing £billions to give away in foreign aid and the EU.


If you did not see this self inflicted disaster you should have, or were you shielded from people's views by your draconian PC speech laws which prevented people from speaking out for fear of being criminalised for being "racist"?
To paraphrase Nick Griffin "you can prevent us from speaking out but you can not control the way we think"
Your "vibrant, diverse multicultural society" is turning to bite you on your fat bottom which has been thus far shielded from reality by your champagne socialist lifestyle paid for by us.


You had no mandate to impose these changes on us and have sought to silence us by dubious legal practices and depriving us of our historical right to free speech.
Now you and your slimy party will reap the whirlwind and slither into oblivion.
It seems however you may just survive as the Tories have offered you a lifeline (how ironic a loony lefty like you being offered help by the Tories) It just shows how alike, treacherous and anti British both your parties are.


After the next election and the Tories get in they will be no better as their policies are identical to yours and our support will grow as a result.
The following election will be our BIG breakthrough when we will be able to begin the task of rebuilding our country culturally and financially.

The danger is that civil unrest will lead to conflict between the multiple groups and allegiances you have encouraged here, as you can't have a united and a diverse country at the same time. They are incompatible at opposite ends of the spectrum.

Let's hope the people have enough patience to go through the coming hard times until a party,the BNP which has the interests of the British people as a priority comes to power.

In the meantime, even without MPs we are having an influence on government thinking even if it is only an attempt to save their subsidised skins.

A BNP vote is thus proved again to be worth more than a vote for any other party as it really makes them sit up even if we do not get in.

LOOK WHAT LABOUR HAS STOLEN FROM YOU, AND THE LIES IT HAS TOLD YOU

.

THE RIGHTS THAT LABOUR HAS STOLEN FROM YOU. YOU HAD THESE AS PART OF YOUR BIRTHRIGHT WHEN YOU WERE BORN. NOW? ... ALL GONE

You can add the right to protection from Double-Jeopardy to that.

All gone.

And while we're here, lets take a look at Labour's 1997 promises, shall we?

We will increase the powers and responsibilities of parents.

We will promote personal prosperity for all

too much economic instability, with wild swings from boom to bust

The level of public spending is no longer the best measure of the effectiveness of government action in the public interest. It is what money is actually spent on that counts more than how much money is spent.

New Labour will be wise spenders, not big spenders

Save to invest is our approach, not tax and spend.

The promises we make we will keep.

To be fair and be seen to be fair.

New Labour is not about high taxes on ordinary families. It is about social justice and a fair deal.

We will ensure that - over the economic cycle - public debt as a proportion of national income is at a stable and prudent level.

Stop the growth of an 'underclass' in Britain

Every 16 and 17 year-old on the road to a proper qualification by the year 2000

We will be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime

We will tackle the unacceptable level of anti-social behaviour and crime on our streets

I can't do anymore without a valve bursting. Get stuck in to Labour's 1997 Manifesto, then we can start lynching the bastards. Print this off and stick it near the front door. If a Labour canvasser appears over the next few months(you may have to go out and find one), ram it up their arse.

Half-inched from here:

http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2010/02/labour-manifesto-1997.html 

Plenty more of these lies to be found.

Morg

.

INTERNET UPRISING

.
The state of South Australia has a new election law that went into effect January 6, and its effect was shocking: anonymous political speech on the Internet was simply destroyed.

The law required anyone posting a political comment online during an election period to supply their real name and address or face a fine of up to AUS$1,250. The measure was grossly discriminatory—it applied only to bloggers and commenters, not to online "journals" (newspapers or magazine which are written by Real Journalists).

Politicians had apparently developed a thin skin to anonymous commentary, some of which no doubt did devolve into rank defamation, but Australia already has defamation laws that could be used against truly egregious material. Ending online anonymous speech was an extreme solution, one not appreciated by the targets of the law.

The law was backed by South Australia's Attorney General, Michael Atkinson. Atkinson took the radio yesterday to defend the new rule, saying that anonymity was being used by political opponents to attack him in secret.

Fornarino, the man who doesn't exist
"I'll give you an example: repeatedly in the AdelaideNow website one will see commentary from Aaron Fornarino of West Croydon. That person doesn't exist," Atkinson said on the air. "That name has been created by the Liberal Party in order to run Liberal Party commentary."

This morning, AdelaideNow took great delight in posting a picture of Fornarino posing with a Mac and his young daughter. He's a second-year law student who moved to the area last year and "lives in a flat on Port Rd, about 500m from Mr. Atkinson's electorate office."

The cries of the outraged citizenry have had an effect. While defending the new rules as recently as yesterday, Atkinson suddenly backed off from them today. He sent a statement to AdelaideNow, one remarkable for its candor.

"From the feedback we've received through AdelaideNow, the blogging generation believes that the law supported by all MPs and all political parties is unduly restrictive. I have listened. I will immediately after the election move to repeal the law retrospectively... It may be humiliating for me, but that's politics in a democracy and I'll take my lumps."

Please go and read it all:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/internet-uprising-overturns-australian-censorship-law.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging


So USE the internet. See, it CAN work.


Of course, that does require you to have democratically-minded politicians in the first place. Something New-Liebour, LibDims and the Cameroids all  lack.


Morg
.

PS As it happens I already use my real, legal, name. There are a few of you who have seen the proof of this in my passport.

INTERESTED IN MANCHESTER UNITED AND ITS FUTURE?

.
http://nbyslog.blogspot.com/2010/02/while-club-has-secured-500m-798m.html

Morg
.

ENGLAND IS A 'CESSPIT' OF EXTREMISM

A Nobel prizewinning author has accused England of being a “cesspit” that nurtures terrorism.

Wole Soyinka 76, who was born in Nigeria and studied at Leeds University in the 1950s, said: “England is a cesspit. England is the breeding ground of fundamentalist Muslims.”

Wole Soyinka: Wikipedia