Wednesday, 3 February 2010

LOOK WHAT LABOUR HAS STOLEN FROM YOU, AND THE LIES IT HAS TOLD YOU

.

THE RIGHTS THAT LABOUR HAS STOLEN FROM YOU. YOU HAD THESE AS PART OF YOUR BIRTHRIGHT WHEN YOU WERE BORN. NOW? ... ALL GONE

You can add the right to protection from Double-Jeopardy to that.

All gone.

And while we're here, lets take a look at Labour's 1997 promises, shall we?


We will increase the powers and responsibilities of parents.

We will promote personal prosperity for all
too much economic instability, with wild swings from boom to bust
The level of public spending is no longer the best measure of the effectiveness of government action in the public interest. It is what money is actually spent on that counts more than how much money is spent.
New Labour will be wise spenders, not big spenders
Save to invest is our approach, not tax and spend.
The promises we make we will keep.
To be fair and be seen to be fair.

New Labour is not about high taxes on ordinary families. It is about social justice and a fair deal.
We will ensure that - over the economic cycle - public debt as a proportion of national income is at a stable and prudent level.
Stop the growth of an 'underclass' in Britain
Every 16 and 17 year-old on the road to a proper qualification by the year 2000

We will be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime
We will tackle the unacceptable level of anti-social behaviour and crime on our streets


I can't do anymore without a valve bursting. Get stuck in to Labour's 1997 Manifesto, then we can start lynching the bastards. Print this off and stick it near the front door. If a Labour canvasser appears over the next few months(you may have to go out and find one), ram it up their arse.

Half-inched from here:


Plenty more of these lies to be found.

Morg
.


INTERNET UPRISING

.
The state of South Australia has a new election law that went into effect January 6, and its effect was shocking: anonymous political speech on the Internet was simply destroyed.

The law required anyone posting a political comment online during an election period to supply their real name and address or face a fine of up to AUS$1,250. The measure was grossly discriminatory—it applied only to bloggers and commenters, not to online "journals" (newspapers or magazine which are written by Real Journalists).

Politicians had apparently developed a thin skin to anonymous commentary, some of which no doubt did devolve into rank defamation, but Australia already has defamation laws that could be used against truly egregious material. Ending online anonymous speech was an extreme solution, one not appreciated by the targets of the law.

The law was backed by South Australia's Attorney General, Michael Atkinson. Atkinson took the radio yesterday to defend the new rule, saying that anonymity was being used by political opponents to attack him in secret.

Fornarino, the man who doesn't exist
"I'll give you an example: repeatedly in the AdelaideNow website one will see commentary from Aaron Fornarino of West Croydon. That person doesn't exist," Atkinson said on the air. "That name has been created by the Liberal Party in order to run Liberal Party commentary."

This morning, AdelaideNow took great delight in posting a picture of Fornarino posing with a Mac and his young daughter. He's a second-year law student who moved to the area last year and "lives in a flat on Port Rd, about 500m from Mr. Atkinson's electorate office."

The cries of the outraged citizenry have had an effect. While defending the new rules as recently as yesterday, Atkinson suddenly backed off from them today. He sent a statement to AdelaideNow, one remarkable for its candor.

"From the feedback we've received through AdelaideNow, the blogging generation believes that the law supported by all MPs and all political parties is unduly restrictive. I have listened. I will immediately after the election move to repeal the law retrospectively... It may be humiliating for me, but that's politics in a democracy and I'll take my lumps."


Please go and read it all:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/internet-uprising-overturns-australian-censorship-law.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging


So USE the internet. See, it CAN work.


Of course, that does require you to have democratically-minded politicians in the first place. Something New-Liebour, LibDims and the Cameroids all  lack.


Morg
.

PS As it happens I already use my real, legal, name. There are a few of you who have seen the proof of this in my passport.

INTERESTED IN MANCHESTER UNITED AND ITS FUTURE?

.
http://nbyslog.blogspot.com/2010/02/while-club-has-secured-500m-798m.html

Morg
.

Monday, 1 February 2010

Harmans Hatred Hormones Exposed By the Pope.

WE still have a chance yet.
Well Luv A Duk Ooo Errr Get Her !
If this Equality Bill fails, due toHarman wanting all things to be equal and in law that the Muslims could beat the crap out of gays and the Christian Church must take Gay/Lesbian/Bi-Sexual Priests or Vicars. In the name of their right to be able to under religious law and equality of diversity. or something like that.
Our constitution would remain intact.

But have you thought what the Islamists make of this?
This is to Feminise your Moral and Civic leaders.
Rowan must realise he'll be the first in the queue when Islam calls knocking for Sharia Law.
It's Corruption of the Church.
Or you could look at it like this....the Christian Church being Pro-Mohammed = Anti-Christ ?
You won't see Immams or mosques being forced to accept gay/lesbian or bisexuals as their Religious and Civic Leaders.
New Labour have really thought out how to do away with us the INDIGENOUS POPULATION.
Corruption.
Treason.
Subversion of Christian Morals and Teachings.
Christian Rights Eroded.
Minority'sPromoted.
Foreign Ideologies and Culture surplanting the Indigenous one.
Maybe the Catholics and Rome are now realising who their enemy is in Britain ?
The Church of England seems more intent on being a battering ram, forcing forward Immorality in the face of Christian Beliefs.

POPE Encourages Catholic Church to Condemn Harriet Hormones Equality Bill.

Pope Benedict XVI has condemned British equality legislation for running contrary to "natural law" as he confirmed his first visit to the UK later this year.

Turkeys and Christmas come to...Oh wait a min...Winterval comes to mind.


Let them, the Perverted Church Of England and according to reports, The Archbishop of Canterbury, crow over their dwindling but dis-believing congregations. Let the TRAITORS build their Funeral Pyre.

We shall Renew Christianity as we shalll Renew our Country and our People.

BNP...What choice do you have...more of the same ?

ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING

.
You think man can destroy the planet? What intoxicating vanity. Let me tell you about our planet. Earth is four-and-a-half-billion-years-old. There’s been life on it for nearly that long, 3.8 billion years. Bacteria first; later the first multicellular life, then the first complex creatures in the sea, on the land.

Then finally the great sweeping ages of animals, the amphibians, the dinosaurs, at last the mammals, each one enduring millions on millions of years, great dynasties of creatures rising, flourishing, dying away — all this against a background of continuous and violent upheaval. Mountain ranges thrust up, eroded away, cometary impacts, volcano eruptions, oceans rising and falling, whole continents moving, an endless, constant, violent change, colliding, buckling to make mountains over millions of years.

Earth has survived everything in its time. It will certainly survive us. If all the nuclear weapons in the world went off at once and all the plants, all the animals died and the earth was sizzling hot for a hundred thousand years, life would survive, somewhere: under the soil, frozen in Arctic ice. Sooner or later, when the planet was no longer inhospitable, life would spread again. The evolutionary process would begin again. It might take a few billion years for life to regain its present variety.

Of course, it would be very different from what it is now, but the earth would survive our folly, only we would not. If the ozone layer gets thinner, ultraviolet radiation sears the earth, so what? Ultraviolet radiation is good for life. It’s powerful energy. It promotes mutation, change. Many forms of life will thrive with more UV radiation. Many others will die out. Do you think this is the first time that’s happened? Think about oxygen. Necessary for life now, but oxygen is actually a metabolic poison, a corrosive glass, like fluorine.

When oxygen was first produced as a waste product by certain plant cells some three billion years ago, it created a crisis for all other life on earth. Those plants were polluting the environment, exhaling a lethal gas. Earth eventually had an atmosphere incompatible with life. Nevertheless, life on earth took care of itself. In the thinking of the human being a hundred years is a long time.

A hundred years ago we didn’t have cars, airplanes, computers or vaccines. It was a whole different world, but to the earth, a hundred years is nothing. A million years is nothing. This planet lives and breathes on a much vaster scale. We can’t imagine its slow and powerful rhythms, and we haven’t got the humility to try. We’ve been residents here for the blink of an eye. If we’re gone tomorrow, the earth will not miss us.

Read it all

http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/28/climate-change-fanaticism-is-all-about-government-power-reader-post/

Morg
.

yaz