WE'RE LED BY DONKEYS

I subscribe to an online email service. The service provider has said to me that he has the same attitude to information that I have - it doesn't matter how people get the information, just so long as they do get it (he said that as far as he's aware, I'm the only BNP person to be on his subscription list - and no, he is not one of our supporters).

It's called "Not Born Yesterday" (nby); and he said this means it is fine for me to re-post what he writes with appropriate accreditation. His name is John Ward and he was the original publisher of the story about McBroon taking serious anti-depression drugs. His writing appears occasionally in the msm. The following item is in the latest email I got today.

THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE IS HERE.

All those of you who know me are fully aware of my attitude towards Islam. This puts my attitude into writing far better than I'm able to do. I'm making no threat, but rather a prophecy when I say that war is coming, and if only our stupid elites weren't so blinded by their ideology they'd see it as clear as day.

Here's the web page that is associated with the email service. I recommend bookmarking, regular reading, and a root through the archives. This man may not be one of our supporters, but he's certainly a realist:

http://www.notbornyesterday.org/

The article (emphases mine):

The problem our leaders never foresaw is about to go ballistic. And they still don't get it.

Some thirty years ago I was trying to get a new ad agency off the ground with four partners. As always at this stage of a company's development, new business was paramount. So we were delighted when into our offices walked the marketing director of a large paperware company.

We got the business, and during a celebratory lunch soon afterwards (in those days, lunch was code for 'the rest of the day') the new client explained his view of the future. I can't remember why he chose to do this, although I recall very well thinking 'Oh my God, here we go'. But rather than talking about his vision of paperware in 1990, this chap treated us to a succinct and chilling prediction about expansionist Islam.

We all thought he was off his trolley to be honest. However, almost everything he said has come to pass. After 9/11, I began to take his outlook more seriously; today, I'm convinced he was absolutely right.

Islam's intolerance of other viewpoints is about to go head to head with intolerance of Islam. And this is happening on four fronts.

As we predicted here earlier this year (although far from exclusively) Iran has played the Atomic Energy Commission, the EU, the UN and Uncle Tom whatnot and all along - but in the end, not only told the infidel to stuff it, but also forged ahead with an expansionist uranium enrichment programme. This the Middle East nuclear dimension.

Dubai has as near as damn it reneged on its loan commitment, thus handing the trump cards to neighbouring Abu Dhabi. The latter will now become the dominant partner: and lest you're unsure about it, let me tell you that Abu Dhabi is considerably more Islamist than Dubai. This is the financial dimension.

In Switzerland, a right-wing law has unexpectedly won sweeping approval. It states categorically that no more minarets may be constructed in that country. In France, religious jewellery and burkhas are banned from educational establishments. In the Balkans, old emnities have been open sores for a decade or more. In the UK, research shows an increasing antipathy towards the Muslim minority. This is the Euro-backlash dimension.

And last but not least, among the NATO allies patience with Pakistan's yes-and-no approach to Al Q'eida has finally run out. There's no sign that Obama and Brown understand how stretched Pakistan is already: only signs that while more troops are being committed by these two bewildered men, from the other side of the mouth they talk about disengagement from the conflict. This is the military dimension. 

There is also a Chinese/African dimension, but this is (I suspect) further down the road. In the meantime, let's take each aspect of the existing problem in turn. 

In Tehran, Ahmadinnejad must know by now that, unlike Hitler, he won't be allowed to keep on pretending what a nice chap he is. Being intelligent but full of himself (and underestimating mixed signals from the West) he may not as yet know that retribution is coming. But there is a more than outside chance he fancies himself in the martyr role - only ultimately, using the nuclear solution to take the impure infidel with him. He must be destabilised and/or removed as a matter of great urgency.

When it comes to Dubai, for once Western business is genuinely between a rock and a hard place: we can't afford - morally or financially - to reward mendacity. But equally, we can't stand by as a rich Islamic State gets even richer by taking over. It goes without saying that - the quarterly results mentality now holding sway among the globalists - we will choose the former, easier way out. But we will be storing up problems for the future in the region: for Abu Dhabi will be more than happy to arm Islamists of every shape and hue.

The European dimension at first sight looks like little more than a long-awaited realisation by the West that (at least on home ground) the age of appeasement must end. It's what follows that worries me. Although I do not doubt that the mad folks would brand nby Islamaphobic, I have no phobia about Islam: rather, I have an awareness of Islam, and where its own blindness will lead. The Islamic reaction to being told they can't have all those religious rights after all will not be temperate - few Muslim reactions ever are. This will hand more votes to the BNP and other Parties of the Euro-Right: but it's what the poor working class will do of their own accord that should concern us. 

There is an elitist middle-class Left-leaning view that the downtrodden in society are noble - but stupid, and therefore open to the infernal arguments of those nasty racists. The poor are, in my experience, neither noble nor stupid: they know a threat when they see one, and they will show no mercy to those whom (they already feel) have enjoyed privileges at their expense.

The non-nuclear military dimension is the one that really worries me, because it is the area where we have given the most confusing signals to the Deluded Ones. From applauding televised confessions to emotional incontinence about those who have died, we have looked decadent - and yet at the same time, shown the awesome power of our misguided revenge. To the average Mid-Eastern Muslim, the US/EU/UK alliance probably comes across as a self-obsessed weakling given the power of Armageddon for his birthday by a false prophet. There are few spectres more effective than that at recruiting martyrs.

We in the UK are going to fail this last test, because in the age of easy solutions it seems almost 'a no-brainer' to simply retreat back behind our own borders - where a series of increasingly draconian anti-terrorist laws will remove the very libertarian democracy Islam wants to see the back of anyway.

The most newsworthy of these facets right now is the Dubai thing. If ever there was a situation where denial and lack of foresight clouded the issue for those intimately involved, then this is it. The Financial Times unconsciously gave this away when it wrote on the 27th November:

'As always, the problem in Dubai is that no one had all the facts, and perhaps some in the financial community had made all the wrong assumptions'

Right then, apart from making assumptions based on trusting the innately untrustworthy, where exactly did we go wrong here? In most circumstances it would be truly laughable; but in our current position, it will surely make a final, tragic showdown inevitable. 

Morg

.

THAT SWISS REFERENDUM

Do we all agree on congratulations to the Swiss for stopping the building of any more minarets? Would we like a similar referendum here? Would it produce the same result?

You betcha! ... AND WE ARE NOT ALONE

Approximately 75% of all European peoples polled feel the same. Look at the polling results.

I said it before a few posts back: if I was a Mohammedan, I'd give some serious thought to getting out of Britain and Europe while the getting is still good. Seems the whole of Europe has had it with Islam, not just us.

WE DON'T WANT IT HERE, same as the rest of Europe don't want it there.

But do we think the righteous will take the blindest bit of notice?

If you want change instead of the guff we've been hearing for years, vote BNP.

Morg
.

NOT MAD IN THE SLIGHTEST

.

PRESIDENT Obama last night unveiled plans to send an extra 30,000 troops to Afghanistan after confusing it with a country that is not completely insane.

Mr Obama insisted the troop surge would eliminate Al-Qaeda, Contain the Taleban and help Afghanistan achieve stability during a speech that, according to some analysts, suggests he may be insane too.


Roy Hobbs, professor of Afghan history at Reading University, said: "Mr Obama seems to think Afghanistan is a place where people will, if given the choice, behave normally. That would suggest some sort of chemical imbalance in his brain.


"What Afghanistan actually is, is a place where 50,000 different tribes all want to kill each other all the time and then feast on each other's testicles while killing anyone who gets in the way of their unquenchable desire to kill.


"Anyone left alive at the end of this process has to live in a mud hut eating their own shit and will be stoned to death for humming.


"Many people have asked why they do this and the answer always comes back the same - they're out of their fucking minds."


Professor Hobbs added: "Having devoted my career to studying Afghanistan, I am now absolutely certain we should construct a 50ft high wall around the place, wait until everyone's dead and then build some really nice, upmarket golf courses."


Omar Kalifi, a Taleban fighter in Helmand province, welcomed Mr Obama's announcement, adding, 'ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH! ALLAH' before sawing his own head off with a penknife.


His colleague, Mohammed Akra, picked up Mr Kalifi's severed head, attached a leather strap to it and is now wearing it as a hat.

Lifted wholesale from here.

Morg
.

FREEDOM R.I.P.

Well folks, it's December the first today, and as of one minute past midnight last night we ceased to exist as a free independent country. We are now legally just a collection of eight regions of Europe. So we members of the BNP are no longer members of the BNP because the 'British' bit no longer exists: technically we are not the British National Party, but rather the Eight Regions Of Europe National Party - or the EROENP, for short. How much do you like that then? Well, at least until they proscribe us, that is.


Wont be long before police are arresting people for making anti-EU statements, and handing them over to Euro-Fed police for transfer to the mainland for punishment (one thinks of Dachau). Our country has been stolen from us, and we just sat back and watched it happen.

You'll be sorrrreeeeeeee! And so will they!

Want to know some of the things you've lost? THEN READ THIS.  Extracts:

It is a notable theft and bears reporting. Many others have tried, and failed, to obtain police action. Politicians have been asked, and in turn, they have ignored our questions, and our documented demands that they cease and desist. Not surprising, when you learn that it is the politicians themselves that will aid and abet in the theft.

What will be taken?

A few small items. Items that we have had in our possession for around a thousand years. Antiques, then? Well, sort of. These particular ancient items are truly priceless. Countless numbers of people have died, have been imprisoned, and had their lives ruined in the obtaining and in the retaining of these precious items. We thought that they were safe, we thought we would keep them forever, but a group of mindless, thoughtless, greedy and inept people, charged with their safekeeping went to great lengths to ensure that the theft will take place.

Item 1.

Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. Latin for "you may hold the body subject to examination". This undeniable right protects one from the state. Whilst it is in place, no-one can lock you away without having solid lawful reasons to do so. Today, if you believe that you have been incarcerated and no evidence supports that incarceration, you can demand a Writ of Habeas Corpus from the court. The court will then examine evidence that you should be gaoled, remanded, or sectioned. You might also be interested to learn that once habeas corpus is gone you can be incarcerated for up to eight months without charge.
 
Item 2.

Courts de jure. Latin for "courts by jury". Today we have some 70 courts in our land geared for jury trials. On Tuesday morning your right to be judged by a jury of your peers evaporates completely.

Item 3.

Innocent until proven guilty. On Tuesday morning we start playing a whole new game whereby you, the accused, are guilty until you can prove your innocence. Our age old method under Common Law is dumped without ceremony and we revert instead to a mix of Napoleonic and Roman Law.


Item 4.

Loss of sovereignty. We are an ancient civilisation. People inhabited this land thousands of years before the Egyptians issued the tenders for pyramid building. Countless lives have been lost defending our little island. It had been a mecca for those wanting to live unfettered lives. Until now.

Item 5.

Democracy. From the Greek demokratia-power to the people. The first democratically elected parliament was De Montforts in England in 1265. We shared this method of rule with others, and it spread. Many authoritarian systems have been toppled only to have democracy established. On Tuesday morning we give away this unique method of rule for an oligarchy. Mandarins in Europe are not elected. They are selected. No previous experience is required. Which is handy if you are a (well connected) imbecile. Fat salary, fat pension, fat chance of actually having to work for a living like the proles. Arguably, because of their vastly diminished responsibilities, we have no need for a parliament, no need of the traitorous monarch, and certainly no need to pay 646 goons and their back-room staff billions every year. Brussels will rule absolutely. They will waste our money with unimagined skill. Bye bye democracy. It was nice while it lasted.

Technically, in writing this anti-EU post I am committing a crime. See:


http://www.davekopel.org/Media/Mags/SilencingOppositionInTheEU.htm 

Although the Connolly case involved enforcement of an employment regulation against an E.U. employee, nothing in the opinion limits the court's rationale to this narrow context. Freedom of expression, the opinion argues, may be stifled if necessary for "the protection of the rights of others." And the "rights of others" include the "right" of the European Union to prevent damage to its own "image and reputation." The principle would certainly sustain a national government's law forbidding criticism of the European Union. Indeed, since the European Court of Justice can override national laws in order to enforce E.U. laws, the Connolly principle could conceivably be used to invalidate a nation's constitutional protection of free speech—at least where criticism of the European Union or other governments is involved.

In short, Connolly takes a major step toward reinstating the offense of seditious libel—that is, the crime of criticizing the government so as to injure its reputation.

Historically, the truth of the statement was no defense against the charge of seditious libel. Indeed, truthfulness harmed the government all the more.

Come and get me then! I promise I wont go quietly.

UPDATE: How do other Europeans think? This is from a Dutch site:


KLEIN VERZET 


Given that the Dutch voted a referendum majority against the Constitution, I think it fair to say this is a majority opinion in the Netherlands. 


So we are not alone. If anyone finds any similar links from other European sites, please post links in the comments.


Morg
. 

STIRRING INTO WAKEFULNESS?

.
READ THIS FIRST.

With this, the growing Dutch support for Geert Wilders, the immigration restrictions that have started in Denmark, the proposed French ban on the hijab, and the ever growing support for the BNP, we have to ask ourselves: are these the first stirrings of a backlash waking up throughout Europe? If I was a Muslim, I'd give some serious thought to getting out of Europe while it's still possible.


European peoples have form for this sort of thing (including the British); and Muslims' deliberate policy of concentrating themselves into ghettos just makes it all the easier to find them.

It wont be pretty.

Morg
.

EVEN OVER TRIVIAL STUFF ...

... they don't tell us what's going on.

This is what the BBC says:

... and this is what a local source says:

Local information provided here:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/

If we can't trust the BBC and other national media to get things right over trivial matters such as this, then what hope do we have that serious matters will be reported correctly? 

The local story was posted just after midday, and the BBC report was published more than 10 hours later, so they don't even get the excuse of saying they haven't had time to obtain the latest news yet. Little old me sitting in my living-room had the local information nearly half a day ago.

How much does the BBC get paid? How much is your television licence?

Here are some pictures of his wife

Morg
.

I AM NOT A NUMBER!