.
Have you heard of this State-run organisation?
I guggest you follow the above link and read it all. It's another one of those things the State would prefer you had never heard of.
Then sometime in the coming week, go to a solicitor and have him make out a LASTING POWER OF ATTORNEY, to ensure that YOU decide who has control over your affairs should you become incapacitated.
It's one of those things which, if you need it, it's too late to get it.
I'll be doing exactly that, this coming week. I will be giving the power to my youngest brother and sister. They know me better than anyone, and know what decisions I would make if I was of sound body and mind and was making said decisions for myself.
It shouldn't take any longer than about half an hour.
If the State would prefer you didn't know about this, then my experience says it's safer for you to know - and act on what you know.
Further info here:
http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-masters-of-lunacy/
Thank you Anna.
Morg
.
UPDATE: You might have to pay to have the form registered and it has to be registered before it can be used (change of rule when Lasting Power of Attorney replaced Enduring Power of Attorney in 2007).
Sunday, 15 November 2009
I'M SURE THIS IS HERE, NOT AUSTRALIA
Let me see if I understand all this...
IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOUR.
IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.
IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.
IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.
IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.
IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.
IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.
IF YOU CROSS THE AUSTRALIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET A JOB, A DRIVERS LICENCE, SOCIAL SECURITY CARD, WELFARE, FOOD STAMPS, CREDIT CARDS, SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE, FREE EDUCATION, FREE HEALTH CARE, A LOBBYIST IN CANBERRA AND IN MANY INSTANCES YOU CAN VOTE.
Morg
.
Saturday, 14 November 2009
WHAT'S GOING ON?
I'm sure most of you have read This story and been appalled by it. This post isn't particularly about that - I'm just using it as an example. So, what's going on? Read on and find out.
If you are part of the jury on a court case, it doesn't matter WHAT the judge directs you to do, you can bring in any verdict you like. ANY. They could have brought in a 'Not Guilty' verdict, and much as the judge CPS and men in wigs might have hated it they would have no option but to immediately release him. And thus they would have introduced a defence in law that invalidated the "Strict Liability" rule. It could have been used repeatedly in the future in like circumstances.
The system call this a jury returning a "Perverse Verdict" and they absolutely hate it. Now you know why this government (and the Tories too - 'she' started this) are trying to do away with juries. You see - the jury IS the court: not the building, not the lawyers, not the CPS, not the judge, and not even the government, Parliament or the Queen herself - THE JURY! That's you. You can bring in any verdict you wish, thus creating new law, or no verdict at all if you can't all agree.
They all absolutely hate mere ordinary people - us - knowing about this.
So remember - if you're on a jury, you don't have to take the blindest bit of notice of the judge - decide as YOU think right.
The death sentence was removed from so many - hundreds - of trivial offences in the seventeenth century, offences such as stealing to avoid starvation, or little more than anti-social behaviour, because juries started refusing to find a guilty verdict even when the case was open-and-shut, because they believed people should not face execution over such trivial matters. So you can find a verdict entirely contrary to the evidence, and there's damn all that they can do about it. And they can certainly do nothing to you.
Defend the jury system at every opportunity ... your life may depend on it. They don't have juries on the continent - and the EU will try to bring us into line with everyone else. Fight it at every opportunity - your life may depend on it.
It's another one of our ancient liberties - liberties the non-anglo-saxon world do not have because they do not have the common law - only we and countries populated by our descendants have this - even the American constitution was written by British-descended people with OUR ancient liberties in mind. DO NOT allow those liberties to be taken away - our ancestors kept them alive for us - be sure to keep them alive for our descendants.
Now you know what's going on.
Oh, and while I'm on the case - you, as a jury member, can ask questions of all witnesses, even the defendant him/herself if they're on the stand. You don't have to rely on the judge or the lawyers - you pass a note to the judge saying you have a question to ask the witness - then either the judge will ask the question for you, or you get to ask it yourself. You can utterly spoil stitch-ups between the lawyers. And you can INSIST on asking - remember - YOU are the court. And you can ask as many questions as you like - provided they are relevant to the case.
That's another thing they don't tell you when you become a jury member. They hate us ordinary mortals knowing we have enormous powers when we are serving on a jury. We in effect BECOME something that the system has to obey, and that they hate - they're more accustomed to US having to obey THEM ... the way they like it.. And that's why they're trying to abolish juries. Juries are our last safeguard, but only if the jury knows its rights. So the old rule applies:
use it or lose it.
I recommend you use it.
Morg
.
If you are part of the jury on a court case, it doesn't matter WHAT the judge directs you to do, you can bring in any verdict you like. ANY. They could have brought in a 'Not Guilty' verdict, and much as the judge CPS and men in wigs might have hated it they would have no option but to immediately release him. And thus they would have introduced a defence in law that invalidated the "Strict Liability" rule. It could have been used repeatedly in the future in like circumstances.
The system call this a jury returning a "Perverse Verdict" and they absolutely hate it. Now you know why this government (and the Tories too - 'she' started this) are trying to do away with juries. You see - the jury IS the court: not the building, not the lawyers, not the CPS, not the judge, and not even the government, Parliament or the Queen herself - THE JURY! That's you. You can bring in any verdict you wish, thus creating new law, or no verdict at all if you can't all agree.
They all absolutely hate mere ordinary people - us - knowing about this.
So remember - if you're on a jury, you don't have to take the blindest bit of notice of the judge - decide as YOU think right.
The death sentence was removed from so many - hundreds - of trivial offences in the seventeenth century, offences such as stealing to avoid starvation, or little more than anti-social behaviour, because juries started refusing to find a guilty verdict even when the case was open-and-shut, because they believed people should not face execution over such trivial matters. So you can find a verdict entirely contrary to the evidence, and there's damn all that they can do about it. And they can certainly do nothing to you.
Defend the jury system at every opportunity ... your life may depend on it. They don't have juries on the continent - and the EU will try to bring us into line with everyone else. Fight it at every opportunity - your life may depend on it.
It's another one of our ancient liberties - liberties the non-anglo-saxon world do not have because they do not have the common law - only we and countries populated by our descendants have this - even the American constitution was written by British-descended people with OUR ancient liberties in mind. DO NOT allow those liberties to be taken away - our ancestors kept them alive for us - be sure to keep them alive for our descendants.
Now you know what's going on.
Oh, and while I'm on the case - you, as a jury member, can ask questions of all witnesses, even the defendant him/herself if they're on the stand. You don't have to rely on the judge or the lawyers - you pass a note to the judge saying you have a question to ask the witness - then either the judge will ask the question for you, or you get to ask it yourself. You can utterly spoil stitch-ups between the lawyers. And you can INSIST on asking - remember - YOU are the court. And you can ask as many questions as you like - provided they are relevant to the case.
That's another thing they don't tell you when you become a jury member. They hate us ordinary mortals knowing we have enormous powers when we are serving on a jury. We in effect BECOME something that the system has to obey, and that they hate - they're more accustomed to US having to obey THEM ... the way they like it.. And that's why they're trying to abolish juries. Juries are our last safeguard, but only if the jury knows its rights. So the old rule applies:
use it or lose it.
I recommend you use it.
Morg
.
THE WASHING OF THE UNWASHED
Well the unwashed state sponsored UAF had a good wash today during their protest outside our conference venue.
We had not realised they were there as we could not hear them from inside the building.
However during the lunch break I had to go to my car and heard a mumbled distant roar from the car park but too faint to hear the words shouted. The rain was bucketing down which must have cleaned them a bit, but I am told that before it started raining a local resident warned them if they did not move from the front of her house they would have a bucket of water thrown on them.
She was saved the trouble when the heavans opened (they should realise the sun shines on the righteous so that excludes them).
It was in order to wrong foot this undemocratic trash that we were obliged to keep the venue secret. Organisers of other branches did not know the venue and even wives of our members who did know were not told.
NOW COMES THE TROUBLING BIT.
On Thursday Cumbria police "intelligence" had it that we were meeting in their area while Lancashire police thought Blackpool.
What hope of them catching Al Quaida if they can't suss us out?
By Friday lunchtime our secret still held and it did until we foolishly informed Greater Manchester Police at around 2 PM.
By 3 PM it was all over the uaf websites showing that this anti democratic scum operate with the assistance of Greater Manchester Police bosses. Indeed we were advised to only inform Manchester of the venue at the last possible moment by police from another area which shows you something of the different attitudes of police force bosses.
What does that tell you?
THAT THE UAF ARE IN LEAGUE WITH THE STAZI G M POLICE.
WE REALLY ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO A POLICE STATE.
We now have proof positive of this illegal? alliance and will in future be on our guard.
We will never trust the police again.
O, by the way the conference was a huge asuccess and NOT AFFECTED IN THE SLIGHTEST by the protest.
They, the police sponsored UAF wasted their time.
We had not realised they were there as we could not hear them from inside the building.
However during the lunch break I had to go to my car and heard a mumbled distant roar from the car park but too faint to hear the words shouted. The rain was bucketing down which must have cleaned them a bit, but I am told that before it started raining a local resident warned them if they did not move from the front of her house they would have a bucket of water thrown on them.
She was saved the trouble when the heavans opened (they should realise the sun shines on the righteous so that excludes them).
It was in order to wrong foot this undemocratic trash that we were obliged to keep the venue secret. Organisers of other branches did not know the venue and even wives of our members who did know were not told.
NOW COMES THE TROUBLING BIT.
On Thursday Cumbria police "intelligence" had it that we were meeting in their area while Lancashire police thought Blackpool.
What hope of them catching Al Quaida if they can't suss us out?
By Friday lunchtime our secret still held and it did until we foolishly informed Greater Manchester Police at around 2 PM.
By 3 PM it was all over the uaf websites showing that this anti democratic scum operate with the assistance of Greater Manchester Police bosses. Indeed we were advised to only inform Manchester of the venue at the last possible moment by police from another area which shows you something of the different attitudes of police force bosses.
What does that tell you?
THAT THE UAF ARE IN LEAGUE WITH THE STAZI G M POLICE.
WE REALLY ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO A POLICE STATE.
We now have proof positive of this illegal? alliance and will in future be on our guard.
We will never trust the police again.
O, by the way the conference was a huge asuccess and NOT AFFECTED IN THE SLIGHTEST by the protest.
They, the police sponsored UAF wasted their time.
WHAT DO WE THINK OF THIS?
.
A 22-year-old man who raped two 13-year-old girls in his car after supplying them with alcohol has been jailed for 14 years.
[...]
The girls' mothers, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told Sky News their children were just too trusting."We are absolutely devastated," one mother said.
"To any other young girls, I just want to say if you are going out - stay with a group... And never get into anyone's car."
Well, I'd go a little bit further than that in our advice to young girls: never get into anyone's car, sure - but ESPECIALLY never get into a Muslim's car. Not even if it's a taxi you phoned for - even I won't get into a Muslim's taxi and I'm a 57 year-old man (mind you, my personal boycott of all businesses Muslim may have a big hand in that).
Read it all - what do you notice?
That's right - not one mention of his ethnic/immigration status, and not one mention of the 'M' word. Mind you, we're not so stupid that once we have the name, we can't work those things out for ourselves. And all this in the same week that news was released that said every sexual assault in the city of Oslo (capital of Norway) for the past three years was committed by an immigrant. Wonder why all our police forces claim they do not record ethnicities of sexual offenders?
Think about all that.
We have experience, you see, whereas the media thinks we have the memories of goldfish and forget such things in a couple of seconds, as do our "controllers".
And we have the internet - the media can no longer filter the information we read.
Morg
.
NEW FILM - RELEASED YESTERDAY
.
How long do you reckon before it starts? I'm not talking about the film.
Soon ... soon. I'm sure I'm not the only bloke who's mightily pissed off. And I doubt I'm the only ex serviceman who can still remember his weapon drills and fieldcraft.
No Mr Policeman - none of that constitutes a threat. More like a prophecy if you don't start getting your act together.
And perhaps a promise ...
And if you seriously think the IRA and UDA handed in their really good stuff ... Hey! could I interest you in a bridge. Six lanes each side and a tollgate both ways.
I once had a M1 rifle and 84 rounds of ammo; handed it in on an amnesty many years ago. Wish I'd kept it, now. Still, easy enough to get another rifle and ammo - and you know that as well as I do.
Morg
.
How long do you reckon before it starts? I'm not talking about the film.
Soon ... soon. I'm sure I'm not the only bloke who's mightily pissed off. And I doubt I'm the only ex serviceman who can still remember his weapon drills and fieldcraft.
No Mr Policeman - none of that constitutes a threat. More like a prophecy if you don't start getting your act together.
And perhaps a promise ...
And if you seriously think the IRA and UDA handed in their really good stuff ... Hey! could I interest you in a bridge. Six lanes each side and a tollgate both ways.
I once had a M1 rifle and 84 rounds of ammo; handed it in on an amnesty many years ago. Wish I'd kept it, now. Still, easy enough to get another rifle and ammo - and you know that as well as I do.
Morg
.
Friday, 13 November 2009
THE RUSSIAN PRAVDA
As recently as 2006, a most eloquent and insightful warning against the EU and the Lisbon Treaty's precursor, the ill-fated “constitution”, was given by former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky. Traumatized by the experience of living in the Soviet Union, Bukovsky noted the deeply disturbing similarities between the old Soviet Union and the blueprints for the EU super state. The European Commission, he noted, was the exact equivalent of the old Soviet Politbureau, in terms of the secretive way power was exercised, the recruitment and personalities of its members and the scope and reach of its decisions. The “European Parliament” today (and under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty) is a mere rubber stamp institution, just like the “Supreme Soviet” of the old USSR.
As a matter of fact, there are so many similarities between the old Soviet Union and the EU that mere coincidence is unlikely. Bukovsky argues the EU was designed to be like the old USSR. The architects of the EU? Mostly social democrats, whom Stalin quite aptly called “Social Fascists.”
Most Europeans have not yet understood this. Most are still indifferent, but their indifference will soon vanish when the full weight of repressive EU policies and EU taxation doing its destructive work will be felt.
Sooner than anybody now thinks, the only way to vent criticism of the EU will be in the form of jokes. No doubt many of the characteristic old Soviet jokes will be dusted off and given an anti-European Commission twist.
By that time, all Europeans except for the privileged class of “eurocrats” will be prisoners in the EU. However, they will certainly have a wonderful Constitution.
Isn't it strange: the Pravda, which at one time we considered little more than a joke, gets something right, when our own media. which at one time we thought was serious, refuses to even talk about it.
Who's the joke now?
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/110289-0/
There are five pages to read. Fortunately, they're no long pages.
The EU is the old USSR.
It's a hell of a thing when an old Cold War serviceman (me) (60s-70s) now trusts the Russian media more than he trusts our own.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)