Bridges TV founder and Chief Executive Muzzammil Hassan founded the TV network in 2004. According to a Reuters story at that time, "his wife came up with the idea in December 2001 while listening to the radio on a road trip.":
"Some derogatory comments were being made about Muslims that offended her," [ oh no, that can't be so. Who ever heard of Mohammedans getting offended?] Hassan told Reuters ahead of Tuesday's launch. "She was seven months pregnant [well there's a surprise], and she thought she didn't want her kids growing up in this environment [a Sharia environment would be such an improvement]."
So he founded Bridges TV to combat negative perceptions of Muslims.
But now that he has beheaded his wife, I'm afraid this prominent moderate Muslim will only be feeding those negative perceptions.
[ ... ]
Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband [my oh my, who would have guessed it - Morg].
So the moderate Mohammedan cut her head off.
Go read it all:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024821.php
I wonder if he'd have gotten the Wilders treatment if he'd turned up at Heathrow a week ago? What with him being a "Moderate Muslim" and all. But then Wilders, so we're told by our lords and masters, is an extremist.
I live on planet Earth. Where do our lords and masters live?
Morg
.
Friday, 13 February 2009
MORE ON Ms SMITH AND Mr MILLIPEDE
By preventing Geert Wilders from entering the country the idiotic and incompetent Jaqui Smith has shot her government in the foot. Her actions were compounded by the statement of Millipede when he likened him to shouting fire in a crowded theatre.
NO IT WAS NOT!
Geert Wilders is like a smoke alarm, warning us of the impending danger. To ignore the alarm is foolish and in the government's case criminal. As Morgan said in his post, islamic extremists can come in almost with impunity and they do not warn of danger, they preach death to the infidels (that's us folks).
I object to the campaigning of people such as "Lord" Kahn and his threats as well as the slimy Keith Vaz to prevent Mr Wilders admission. What right do these people, born abroad have to tell us who we should admit?
The power that these people and their fellow fifth columnists have already shows the danger we face when their numbers increase to form a large proportion of the population.
This inept and corrupt government, in order to gain the muslim vote and secure more time at the trough can only appease these anti British people. The Tories are notable by their silence on this matter, seeking to curry favour with the same groups for similar reasons.
Appeasement does not work as shown before WW2, it shows a weakness that the other side will exploit, and is doing.
We did not ask for this massive influx of people whose values are so alien to us. Some democracy! It has been forced on us and we are prohibited from complaining.
Never mind though. This attempt to stifle free speech and prohibit a patriot from The Netherlands entering the country has resulted in massive publicity and many who would never have heard of the film will now see it in its full horror.
SO THANKS Ms SMITH AND Mr MILLIPEDE.
Below is the link to the film
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2949546475561399959
NO IT WAS NOT!
Geert Wilders is like a smoke alarm, warning us of the impending danger. To ignore the alarm is foolish and in the government's case criminal. As Morgan said in his post, islamic extremists can come in almost with impunity and they do not warn of danger, they preach death to the infidels (that's us folks).
I object to the campaigning of people such as "Lord" Kahn and his threats as well as the slimy Keith Vaz to prevent Mr Wilders admission. What right do these people, born abroad have to tell us who we should admit?
The power that these people and their fellow fifth columnists have already shows the danger we face when their numbers increase to form a large proportion of the population.
This inept and corrupt government, in order to gain the muslim vote and secure more time at the trough can only appease these anti British people. The Tories are notable by their silence on this matter, seeking to curry favour with the same groups for similar reasons.
Appeasement does not work as shown before WW2, it shows a weakness that the other side will exploit, and is doing.
We did not ask for this massive influx of people whose values are so alien to us. Some democracy! It has been forced on us and we are prohibited from complaining.
Never mind though. This attempt to stifle free speech and prohibit a patriot from The Netherlands entering the country has resulted in massive publicity and many who would never have heard of the film will now see it in its full horror.
SO THANKS Ms SMITH AND Mr MILLIPEDE.
Below is the link to the film
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2949546475561399959
Thursday, 12 February 2009
DAMN I'M ANGRY
You must all be aware of the fuss over Geert Wilders.
Strange isn't it: the Government claims that because of European Union rules it can't exclude Latvian farm workers, Italian, Portuguese or Polish construction workers, Romanian Pikey pickpockets etc from the UK. It cannot deport Albanian pimps or assorted murderers and rapists.
However, along comes a squeaky clean Dutch elected member of parliament who says things the Mohammedans and multi-cultis don't like, and all of a sudden ... no sweat.
Morg
.
Strange isn't it: the Government claims that because of European Union rules it can't exclude Latvian farm workers, Italian, Portuguese or Polish construction workers, Romanian Pikey pickpockets etc from the UK. It cannot deport Albanian pimps or assorted murderers and rapists.
However, along comes a squeaky clean Dutch elected member of parliament who says things the Mohammedans and multi-cultis don't like, and all of a sudden ... no sweat.
Morg
.
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
THE CHURCH HAS LOST ITS WAY
News in today that the Church of England is to ban clergy from being members of the BNP.
Not much Christian charity there then, although the ban does not stop clergy voting for us.
In their anxiety to be inclusive and accomodating to everybody they have lost sight of what they exist to do, namely promote Christianity.
While membership of the BNP is prohibited, homosexual clergy are tolerated. The Archbishop of Canterbury advocates Sharia Law and C of E schools have separate muslim assemblies.
The church has lost all meaning and purpose. No wonder the churches are becoming increasingly empty and many are closing and turned into mosques when their elderly congregations die.
Muslims stick to their faith and do not dilute it to suit modern society.
The Church of England should do the same if it still believes in Christianity which sometimes I doubt.
We of the BNP should not worry too much about this as the C of E has become an irrelevance and nobody takes much notice of what it says.
An indication of what it should be fighting against (taken from Simon Darby's blog), the beliefs of "The Religion of Peace".
Good news however, we are getting much more publicity in the media and even Prescott and Balls are worried about our progress. They talk about us far more than they do about the Lib Dems.
We are getting there!
Not much Christian charity there then, although the ban does not stop clergy voting for us.
In their anxiety to be inclusive and accomodating to everybody they have lost sight of what they exist to do, namely promote Christianity.
While membership of the BNP is prohibited, homosexual clergy are tolerated. The Archbishop of Canterbury advocates Sharia Law and C of E schools have separate muslim assemblies.
The church has lost all meaning and purpose. No wonder the churches are becoming increasingly empty and many are closing and turned into mosques when their elderly congregations die.
Muslims stick to their faith and do not dilute it to suit modern society.
The Church of England should do the same if it still believes in Christianity which sometimes I doubt.
We of the BNP should not worry too much about this as the C of E has become an irrelevance and nobody takes much notice of what it says.
An indication of what it should be fighting against (taken from Simon Darby's blog), the beliefs of "The Religion of Peace".
Good news however, we are getting much more publicity in the media and even Prescott and Balls are worried about our progress. They talk about us far more than they do about the Lib Dems.
We are getting there!
ENTRY POLICY AT OUR BORDERS
Last week a film-showing of the film "Fitna" was cancelled in the House of Lords after that repulsive Mohammedan Lewd Achmed threatened to blockade Parliament with 10,000 angry Mohammedans if the showing went ahead.
Later, the members of the House seemed to come to their senses about what they had just submitted to (threat of violence by aliens), and again made arrangements to show the film and a speech from its producer, Geert Wilders.
Now read this (not long):
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2009/02/breaking-wilders-not-allowed-into-uk.html
So, not just the House of Lords (temporarily), but the government itself seems to have submitted to Mohammedan threat of violence, and submitted its (OUR) border admission policies to Mohammedan veto.
WRITE TO TURNER, BURNHAM, AND THE REPULSIVE LITTLE SCOTCH GIT.
UPDATE:
This afternoon Mr. Wilders received a letter from the British ambassador to the Netherlands saying that he is a “persona non grata” in the United Kingdom. The ambassador told Mr. Wilders that he is a threat to public security and public harmony because of the controversy created by Fitna. Mr. Wilders intends to go to London anyway. “Let them arrest me in Heathrow,” he says.
If Mr. Wilders is denied entry to the United Kingdom, it will be the first time that Britain refuses entry to an elected politician from another member state of the European Union. The Dutch government has protested to the British government over the unprecedented barring of an EU parliamentarian by another EU country.
The meeting of Mr. Wilders and members of the British Parliament had originally been planned for 29 January, but was postponed. Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Muslim member of the House of Lords (Labour), had threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the British Parliament. Lord Ahmed boasted in the Pakistani press that the cancellation of Mr. Wilders’ visit was “a victory for the Muslim community.”
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3793
That'll be the doing of that little worm Milliband.
Morg
.
Later, the members of the House seemed to come to their senses about what they had just submitted to (threat of violence by aliens), and again made arrangements to show the film and a speech from its producer, Geert Wilders.
Now read this (not long):
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2009/02/breaking-wilders-not-allowed-into-uk.html
So, not just the House of Lords (temporarily), but the government itself seems to have submitted to Mohammedan threat of violence, and submitted its (OUR) border admission policies to Mohammedan veto.
WRITE TO TURNER, BURNHAM, AND THE REPULSIVE LITTLE SCOTCH GIT.
UPDATE:
This afternoon Mr. Wilders received a letter from the British ambassador to the Netherlands saying that he is a “persona non grata” in the United Kingdom. The ambassador told Mr. Wilders that he is a threat to public security and public harmony because of the controversy created by Fitna. Mr. Wilders intends to go to London anyway. “Let them arrest me in Heathrow,” he says.
If Mr. Wilders is denied entry to the United Kingdom, it will be the first time that Britain refuses entry to an elected politician from another member state of the European Union. The Dutch government has protested to the British government over the unprecedented barring of an EU parliamentarian by another EU country.
The meeting of Mr. Wilders and members of the British Parliament had originally been planned for 29 January, but was postponed. Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Muslim member of the House of Lords (Labour), had threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the British Parliament. Lord Ahmed boasted in the Pakistani press that the cancellation of Mr. Wilders’ visit was “a victory for the Muslim community.”
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3793
That'll be the doing of that little worm Milliband.
Morg
.
Monday, 9 February 2009
GOLLIWOGS AND RACISM
" For the past four decades Europeans have debated whether the Golliwog is a lovable icon or a racist symbol. …
In this climate the Golliwog doll and other Golliwog emblems were seen as symbols of racial insensitivity. Many books containing Golliwogs were withdrawn from public libraries, and the manufacturing of Golliwog dolls dwindled as the demand for Golliwogs decreased. Many items with Golliwog images were destroyed. Despite much criticism, James Robertson & Sons did not discontinue its use of the Golliwog as a mascot. …
The claim that Golliwogs are racist is supported by literary depictions by writers such as Enid Blyton. Unlike Florence Upton's, Blyton's Golliwogs were often rude, mischievous, elfin villains. In Blyton's book, "Here Comes Noddy Again", a Golliwog asks the hero for help, then steals his car. … [ hahahahahahahaha … sorry, couldn’t help myself; generations ahead of her time. Does this make her a Prophet, may she rest in peace ... ?] … Blyton, one of the most prolific European writers, included the Golliwogs in many stories, but she only wrote three books primarily about Golliwogs: The Three Golliwogs (1944), The Proud Golliwog (1951), and The Golliwog Grumbled (1953). Her depictions of Golliwogs are, by contemporary standards, racially insensitive. An excerpt from The Three Golliwogs is illustrative:
‘Once the three bold Golliwogs, Golly, Woggie, and Nigger, decided to go for a walk to Bumble-Bee Common. Golly wasn't quite ready so Woggie and Nigger said they would start off without him, and Golly would catch them up as soon as he could. So off went Woggie and Nigger, arm-in-arm, singing merrily their favourite song - which, as you may guess, was Ten Little Nigger Boys.’
… The Three Golliwogs was reprinted as recently as 1968, and it still contained the above passage. Ten Little Niggers was also the name of a 1939 Agatha Christie novel, whose cover showed a Golliwog lynched, hanging from a noose. "
Why not go over and read it all:
http://www.golliwogg.co.uk/racism.htm
There are some more interesting pages on this site, including a shop, accessed via links on the L/H sidebar.
Morg
Note: Sometimes on the internet I use the name Taffiwog. No, I don’t think this is at all offensive. Is there such a thing as a Paddywog, or a Jockiwog? Are you all Wiggiwogs?
... I was only wondering is all.
Is it criminal to have a sense of humour these days, or is it only considered humour when you are a fully paid-up repulsively obese member of the politically correct brigade suggesting, in front of an audience of millions on the BBC, that people send "poo" through the post to BNP members?
At least we know who ate all the pies.
.
In this climate the Golliwog doll and other Golliwog emblems were seen as symbols of racial insensitivity. Many books containing Golliwogs were withdrawn from public libraries, and the manufacturing of Golliwog dolls dwindled as the demand for Golliwogs decreased. Many items with Golliwog images were destroyed. Despite much criticism, James Robertson & Sons did not discontinue its use of the Golliwog as a mascot. …
The claim that Golliwogs are racist is supported by literary depictions by writers such as Enid Blyton. Unlike Florence Upton's, Blyton's Golliwogs were often rude, mischievous, elfin villains. In Blyton's book, "Here Comes Noddy Again", a Golliwog asks the hero for help, then steals his car. … [ hahahahahahahaha … sorry, couldn’t help myself; generations ahead of her time. Does this make her a Prophet, may she rest in peace ... ?] … Blyton, one of the most prolific European writers, included the Golliwogs in many stories, but she only wrote three books primarily about Golliwogs: The Three Golliwogs (1944), The Proud Golliwog (1951), and The Golliwog Grumbled (1953). Her depictions of Golliwogs are, by contemporary standards, racially insensitive. An excerpt from The Three Golliwogs is illustrative:
‘Once the three bold Golliwogs, Golly, Woggie, and Nigger, decided to go for a walk to Bumble-Bee Common. Golly wasn't quite ready so Woggie and Nigger said they would start off without him, and Golly would catch them up as soon as he could. So off went Woggie and Nigger, arm-in-arm, singing merrily their favourite song - which, as you may guess, was Ten Little Nigger Boys.’
… The Three Golliwogs was reprinted as recently as 1968, and it still contained the above passage. Ten Little Niggers was also the name of a 1939 Agatha Christie novel, whose cover showed a Golliwog lynched, hanging from a noose. "
Why not go over and read it all:
http://www.golliwogg.co.uk/racism.htm
There are some more interesting pages on this site, including a shop, accessed via links on the L/H sidebar.
Morg
Note: Sometimes on the internet I use the name Taffiwog. No, I don’t think this is at all offensive. Is there such a thing as a Paddywog, or a Jockiwog? Are you all Wiggiwogs?
... I was only wondering is all.
Is it criminal to have a sense of humour these days, or is it only considered humour when you are a fully paid-up repulsively obese member of the politically correct brigade suggesting, in front of an audience of millions on the BBC, that people send "poo" through the post to BNP members?
At least we know who ate all the pies.
.
Friday, 6 February 2009
SUCCESS IN LEIGH AND HYDE
Our Wigan and Leigh group held another successful meeting last night in Leigh.
The meeting was opened by Gary Chadwick followed by the break with hot pot provided by the landlord after which I gave a talk on the lines of "Where We Stand" basically to explain our policies to new attendees and counter the falsehoods spread by the media. This was followed by a question and answer session.
Judging by the reception of the audience and its size, it seems that Leigh is a fertile area for our party and we will seek to expand there in the coming months.
I can understand people who do not know us being influenced by our many enemies in the media and I tried to redress this. I remember being somewhat nervous at attending my first meeting and being very favourably impressed by the members and the moderation of the Party's policies.
The three main parties are united in their opposition to us in spite of being nominally opposed to each other. Their onslaught against us over the last weeks in Hyde showed that there is no difference between them, and they want to preserve their cosy consensus and policies which have led to our financial and social disaster.
They must have had a limited effect and boosted the Labour vote at the expense of the Tories, Lib Dems, Greens and most of all UKIP who only got 33 votes as against our 889.
In spite of their efforts we boosted our share by 2% to nearly 30%,coming second and with more votes than the combined votes of the other four non Labour parties.
WELL DONE HYDE!
Our party, a small party derided as having no future or "no place" in British politics seems to be causing them much concern. The threat of our advance was mentioned on Question Time, This Week and today on Channel 2.
WE REALLY DO PUNCH ABOVE OUR WEIGHT!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)