Thursday, 9 May 2013


This is an article taken from Russia Today (RT)

Which shows how low this country has sunk.
Britain in the 1980s would never have allowed the scum of the world to come here, claim benefits, Free housing, health and money and education.

But not now the Country and the Indigenous Population have been betrayed by the LibLabCon party.

Read and be disgusted -

In the UK, which is often called a haven for foreign criminals, ministers are under growing pressure to take measures to close a loophole in the law that allows to offenders to stay in the country even after committing serious crimes.
­In mid-November, the Home Office officially recognized for the first that foreign criminals facing deportation from Britain are creating “a network of children,” starting families in order to stay in the country.
The official recognition of the growing problem has strengthened calls to reform the Human Rights Act in order to ensure that the UK can deport those considered to pose a threat to the public.
“The right to a family life is not an absolute right, and must not be used to drive a coach and horses though our immigration system,” Home Secretary Theresa May argues.
Home Office rules state that any such individual who is jailed for more than a year should be deported, but many judges are appealing to the Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.
An innocuous-sounding element in the HRA means that having children can stop illegal immigrants being kicked out of Britain – no matter what they have done.
Paul Houston knows what it is like to have your family destroyed. His 12-year-old daughter Amy was killed in a hit-and-run driver – it was an Iraqi man who had been banned from driving.
“As she was crossing the road, Mr. Ibrahim, the driver of the car that ran her over, hit her and carried her on the bonnet of the car, and she became trapped under the wheels of the car, and he basically fled the scene and left her to die trapped under the wheels of a motor car,” the victim Paul Houston says.
Amy’s killer, Aso Mohammed Ibrahim already had a string of minor convictions even before he mowed her down and fled.
But because he subsequently fathered two children by a British woman, he still lives in the UK. It is Article 8 that keeps him there.
In May this year, it was revealed that nearly 4,000 foreign criminals were set free from detention centers because it was decided they could not be deported within a reasonable timeframe. Among them were dozens of rapists, murderers and pedophiles. Separately, last year nearly 600 people used the Human Rights Act to avoid deportation, the vast majority citing the right to a private and family life.
In the case of Amy’s killer, a series of bungles and delays by the authorities meant that, by the time Ibrahim came up for deportation, he appeared to have established a family. Despite flimsy evidence about his parenting intentions, he was allowed to stay.
Yet human rights campaigners argue Britain’s status as a haven for the persecuted is sacred.
“These are rights that hark back hundreds of years. They’re embedded in international law, adopted after the Second World War to make sure we always grounded our own society on those principles we hold dear,” says Angela Patrick, director of Human Rights Policy.
But for a grieving father like Paul, that stance is missing the point.
“What we have, especially with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, is criminals, terrorists, murderers, rapists, drug dealers, all using the Human Rights Act as a shield to hide behind, and to allow them to stay in the country. I don’t have a problem with genuine asylum seekers – I don’t think anyone has – but we have people abusing it, and that’s what needs to be addressed,” says Paul Houston.
Amy was Paul’s only child. He now lives alone, spending his time campaigning against Article 8, and wondering why the rights of his daughter’s immigrant killer outweigh his own.
Oddly enough, but even a cat and its criminal owner have catapulted the issue into the headlines.
The Home Secretary has seized on claims that an illegal Bolivian was allowed to stay in the UK country because of the emotional trauma of separating him from his pet. Not quite true, but it got people talking, and noticing much more serious cases, including a rapist who successfully argued asylum over his social life, and a killer who lived with his parents.


Now you can do something about it.

You can forget the BNP, they're dead in the water and sinking fast as the Local Election Results show.


The BDP, a party newly formed and in existence for less than 3 months decided to test the waters in the Local elections.

The results are extremely surprising -

Here are the election  results for our three candidates:

Leicestershire County Council

Loughborough South
Robert SHARP –  Labour Party 1449 – 51.8%
David SLATER – Conservative 921 – 32.9%
Kevan STAFFORD  – British Democrats 206 – 7.4%
Diana BRASS – Liberal Democrat 162 – 5.8%
Tony ONIONS – TU & Soc Against Cuts 60 – 2.1%

Terri EYNON – Labour Party 1294 – 44.7%
Phil HOLLAND –  UKIP 825 28.5%
John COTTERILL  - Conservative 476 – 16.4%
Graham PARTNER -  British Democrats 215 – 7.4%
Lee WINDRAM – Liberal Democrat 84 – 2.9%

Lancashire County Council

Pendle Central
Dorothy Lord – Liberal Democrats 1055 -
Ian Graham – Labour 864 -
Tommy Cooney – Conservatives 847 -
Brian Parker – BNP 423 – 12.7%
Gary Topping – Brit Dems 133 – 4%

I advise you to take a look at the BDP Website and decide for yourself whether you stay away from Nationalism or rejoin and start fighting back without the baggage of the BNP or Griffin.

We can take our country back but YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU.

You don't need to dodge bullets or bombs to take OUR COUNTRY BACK.

Are you up for it ?



antifascist said...

The Lefts willingness to point out that our freedoms are hundreds of years old and should be protected at all costs is difficult to square with the enthusiasm they displayed in abolishing the Double Jeopardy rule contained in Magna Carta just a few years ago. But as this was only almost 800 years old I suppose it wasn't quite as well established as the Lefts desire to suck up to the family of St. Stephen of Lawrence! Obviously pleasing some gang of niggers is far more important than retaining rights that took a civil war to win and another one to retain,we must put things into perspective and recognize that pleasing this family is massively more important than retaining the foundations of British freedom!
And by the way the use of the word NIGGERS to describe Blacks is perfectly common among BLACKS so I shall do likewise as it not only supports their own racial identity but annoys the hell out of the fascists who want to impose THEIR language laws upon everyone.
Recently a Black American comedian performed in London and used the word NIGGER throughout his act and has since been called a RACIST for doing so. Clearly George Orwell was far too optimistic in 1984.

Andyj said...

The double jeopardy rule has nothing to do with any English law. This was imposed after the treaty signed at the turn of the previous decade.

Paul Strickland said...

Am having some problems with some Chinese in the top flat at 15 Kingstown Road Abram. Any Assistance would be greatly appreciated. Cheers.

Andyj said...

@Paul Strickland. If you are having issues. Take it up with those you rent off. Ask the police for advice.. Especially to call over and meet you at your flat. Best of all, get proof of your situation.