Miko Peled Part 1

1. Why a "two state" solution is a fantasy that will never happen

2. Why one state - with democracy for all - is the solution just as Switzerland and Belgium managed to pull disparate nations together

3. How Israel rules its territory and why, given how it operates today, it is a racist, terrorist state

4. "The most shameful day in the history of the Jewish people" - and it took place not long ago

5. Why Israel will never attack Iran (only an idiotic US can be drawn into such a misadventure)

Note: To all the "Israel-as-it-is uber alles" folks, I could not possibly be less interested in reading your ravings. Save your keystrokes. Watch the videos and learn something.

Your position that Israel is entitled to carry on any way it pleases without adhering to international law and basic human decency is morally indefensible. 

ZIONISTS MURDER BRITISH SOLDIERS 1946

Zionist Bombing In Jerusalem 1946 

 

 

 ZIONIST JEWS THE WORLDS FIRST TERRORISTS.

 What do Britains "Friends of Israel think about that ?

Labour Friends of Israel

Chair
Andrew Gwynne MP
Vice Chairs
Andrew Dismore MP
Louise Ellman MP
Gary Titley MEP

Policy Council
Stephen Byers MP (Chair)
David Blunkett MP
Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Adam Ingram MP
Denis MacShane MP
Alun Michael MP
Don Touhig MP

Convenor
Anne Snelgrove MP

Parliamentary Executive
Fabian Hamilton MP
Sharon Hodgson MP
Joan Humble MP
Eric Joyce MP
Ashok Kumar MP
Stephen Ladyman MP
Andrew Miller MP
Dan Norris MP
Nick Palmer MP
Terry Rooney MP
Dari Taylor MP

Chair (House of Lords)
Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale

Peers
Lord Archer of Sandwell
Lord Clarke of Hampstead
Lord Clinton-Davis
Lord Davies of Coity
Lord Glenamara
Lord Haskel
Lord Janner of Braunstone
Lord Macdonald of Tradeston
Lord Mitchell
Lord Turnberg
Professor Lord Winston
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton QC

Conservative Friends of Israel

Director
Stuart Polak

Political Director
Robert Halfon

Projects Director
Stephanie Leven,

Research Manager
Nathalie Tamam,

Secretary
Julie Tamir,

Membership Secretary
Charlotte Polak,

Parliamentary Group
Chairman
James Arbuthnot MP

Vice Chairmen
Sir John Butterfill
James Clappison MP
Secretary
David Amess MP

Officers
Alistair Burt MP
Lee Scott MP
Theresa Villiers MP

Chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel Europe
Timothy Kirkhope MEP
Honorary Officers
President
Baroness Shephard of Northwold

Vice Chairmen
Jeremy Galbraith
Betty Geller
Lord Taylor of Holbeach
Stanley Cohen
Michael Heller

Vice Presidents
Sir Timothy Sainsbury
Lord Lane of Horsell
Sir Michael Latham
Lord Sanderson of Bowden
Lord Steinberg
Lord Thomas of Gwydir

Executive Board
Richard Harrington (Chairman)
Lance Anisfeld
Lorraine da Costa
Jonathan Gough
Andrew Heller (Hon. Treasurer)
Steven Kaye
Edward Lee
Howard Leigh
Stephen Massey
David Meller
Jonathan Metliss
Gary Mond
Stephan Shakespeare
Barry Welck
Hilda Worth

Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel

President
Sir Alan Beith MP

Chair
Cllr Monroe Palmer

Vice-Chair
Gavin Stollar

Secretary
Matthew Harris

Treasurer
Alexander Gilbert

Policy and Research Officer

THIS IS WHY YOU NEED TO VOTE

Scientist that Discovered GMO Health Hazards Immediately Fired, Team Dismantled

Though it barely received any media attention at the time, a renowned British biochemist who back in 1998 exposed the shocking truth about how genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) cause organ damage, reproductive failure, digestive dysfunction, impaired immunity, and cancer, among many other conditions, was immediately fired from his job, and the team of researchers who assisted him dismissed from their post within 24 hours from the time when the findings went public.

Arpad Pusztai, who is considered to be one of the world’s most respected and well-learned biochemists, had for three years led a team of researchers from Scotland’s prestigious Rowett Research Institute (RRI) in studying the health effects of a novel GM potato with built-in Bt toxin. Much to the surprise of many, the team discovered that, contrary to industry rhetoric, Bt potato was responsible for causing severe health damage in test rats, a fact that was quickly relayed to the media out of concern for  public hearing.

But rather than be praised for their honest assessment into this genetically-tampered potato, Pusztai and his colleagues were chastised by industry-backed government authorities, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair, whose office was discovered to have secretly contacted RRI just hours after Pusztai and his team announced the results of their study on television. For speaking the truth, Pusztai was immediately fired from his position, and his team dismissed from their positions at the school.

Research out of Egypt finds similar results – GMOs cause severe, long-term health damage

As reported recently in Egypt Independent, similar research by Hussein Kaoud from Cairo University‘s Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene also made some fascinating, though politically incorrect, discoveries about the effects of GMOs on the body. After feeding nine groups of rats varying combinations of GM soy, corn, wheat, and canola, Kaoud and his team observed that these genetic poisons clearly obstructed the normal function of the animals, affirming Pusztai’s research.

 

“I recorded the alteration of different organs, shrinkage of kidneys, change in the liver and spleen, appearance of malignant parts in the tissues, (and) kidney failure and hemorrhages in the intestine,” said Kaoud about the effects of GMOs as observed in the test rats. “The brain functions were touched as well, and the rats’ learning and memory abilities were seriously altered.”

In Kaoud’s case, his groundbreaking findings will soon be published in the respected journals Neurotoxicology and Ecotoxicology. But it remains to be seen whether or not the scientific community at large, which is heavily influenced by biotechnology interests, and the political structures that control it will accept the results as valid,  or pull a similar character assassination on Kaoud and his team as punishment for defying the status quo.

What all this clearly illustrates, of course, is that modern science can hardly be considered the independent, truth-seeking, “gold standard” of interpreting and understanding reality that many people mistakenly think it is. The truth about GMOs, as uncovered by mounds of independent research, is that they are inadequately safety tested, at best, and deadly at worst. But this fact remains shrouded in deception, thanks to the corporatized, pro-GMO culture of mainstream science.

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/11/23/scientist-that-discovered-gmo-health-hazards-immediately-fired-team-dismantled/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

VILE RACIST FOREIGNER ATTACKS INNOCENT LONE WHITE WOMAN FROM BEHIND - RACIST ATTACKS AGAINST WHITES CONTINUE UNABATED

ANOTHER PIECE OF SCUM THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT, BANKS, LOCAL COUNCILS, LOCAL POLICE, THE JUDICIARY, SCHOOLS, so called CHRISTIAN LEADERS (Satanists) ETC ALLOWED INTO THIS COUNTRY without asking the INDIGENOUS POPULATION if they wanted to be replaced inin the Country OUR ANCESTORS FOUGHT VALIANTLY TO KEEP. 

Our time will come, slowly, slowly, slowly the People are waking up and their anger builds until one day the pressure gets too much and then BEWARE ALL THOSE LISTED ABOVE. It won't be the Immigrants who will bear the brunt, well not at first.
Everyone one who has facilitated, promoted end encouraged Immigration shall be the first ones to PAY THEIR TRAITOROUS DUE.

Then we will go for the IMMIGRANTS/FOREIGNERS.
Every single PASSPORT, Right to Reside, Human Rights to Family LIfe, Foreign Criminals will all be REPATRIATED.
For those who want to go a Generous resettlement Package will be offered to those willing to go.

Then a check on all Immigrants who have entered the country since 1997 will have their Passports and Risidency REMOVED.
Those who argue on Human Rights to their "RIGHT TO FAMILY LIFE" Doesn't give them ANY HUMAN RIGHTS that the family has to live in Britain.
If it's true love they will not hesitate to leave Britain and go and live in the Mother Country of the Immigrant/Foreigner they fell in love with.
There they can live their lives according to their laws and customs, considering they hate British Culture and want to have their culture DOMINATE OURS.

WE allow the WORLDS MOST EVIL AND PSYCOPATHIC  FOREIGNERS TO LIVE IN OUR COUNTRY WITHOUT EVEN THE COURTESY TO CHECK THEIR BACKGROUND THOUROUGLY.

No wonder our Pensioner lie terrified at night unable to sleep,
Our Children are being Violently Racially and Verbally attacked on a daily basis,  Groomed, plied with Drugs and Alchol by Muslim Paedophile Grooming Gangs who are taken to seedy rooms where Pakistani men of ALL AGES, from 20 - 70 are raping, gang raping, pimping out and, in certain cases MURDERING OUR CHILDREN (See Charlene Downes, Kriss Donald, Gavin Hopley, Mark Clayton, ).
The Government, Police, the SS social service (very much like the nazi SS), are all involved.
GOVERNMENT AND JUDICIARY PAEDOPHILES ARE FROM THE ESTABLISHMENT PAEDOPHILE  RING.
JIMMY SAVILE, FIND OUT WHO HE SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH.

Whilst all this goes on, and all we do is NOTHING, then why should the PTB care.
They know we won't do anything as the BRITISH ARE NOW COWARDS, TERRIFIED IN THE HOMELAND OF THEIR ANCESTORS.

A COUNTRY FIT FOR FOREIGN FILTH.

PAEDOPHILE INNUEND0 AND THE SOHAM MURDERS -

Paedophile innuendo & the Soham murders: Something for the wannabe censors to think about.

 

When he was Home Secretary, David Blunkett discovered how disastrous the benefit of the doubt could be. Had Alistair McAlpine been Home Secretary at the time, what would he have done?

 

Ian Huntley…why was his past erased?

What follows is a disturbing tale of how ignoring circumstancial evidence and doubtful acquittal may have led to the deaths of two little girls, Holly Marie Wells and Jessica Aimee Chapman. They were murdered in the village of Soham, Cambridgeshire on 4 August 2002. The girls passed the home of local school caretaker Ian Kevin Huntley, who called them into his house and then murdered them. In December 2003 he was convicted of two counts of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, with the High Court later setting a minimum term of 40 years.
After Huntley was convicted, it was revealed that he had been investigated in the past for sexual offences, but had still been allowed to work at Soham School  – as none of these investigations had resulted in a conviction.
This much many British citizens already know. But what most of them will not know is how potentially fuzzy and misleading the phrase ‘had still been allowed to’ actually is. And to learn more about this, we have to go back to a past involving Huntley…..and a local Labour Party bigwig on Humberside.

--------------

 The key figure in this case is a former social worker and Labour Councillor on Humberside called Colin Inglis (Above). When a 29 year old care home social worker in the 1980s, Inglis was accused of sexually assaulting a teenage boy. It never came to anything, but then in 1997, Inglis’s physical advances towards a teenage boy in the Spring Cottage care home were the subject of a further investigation. No charges were preferred.
Then on 4th December 2005, he was charged on 14 counts of indecent assault in relation to allegations of child abuse from his social worker period. And the trial was to say the least controversial – not least because, by now, Colin Inglis had managed to get himself elected as  a Labour Councillor…having along the way somehow become the Chairman of Humberside police authority.
Partway through the trial, Inglis was cleared of eight of the charges on the orders of the judge.

At the end of an epic trial, the jury cleared him of a further charge in little more than two hours. But it took considerably longer for them to arrive at a verdict – a majority verdict – on the five other charges. He was found Not Guilty. These five charges related to a man now 37 years old and a financial adviser. But the jury was not told that the complainant was among a number of other people who had made allegations against Inglis at the time.
I have no doubt that the merry band on the McAlpinite Committee investigating Innuendoist Activities would dismiss all this as scare-mongering smear tactics upon Colin Inglis. And they might have a case, were it not for two vital facts: first, Inglis had a close relationship with the top cop involved in the Soham murders, David Westwood. Second, Huntley had an abuse record as long as your arm that coincided with Inglis’s time in the same social worker/police authority where Huntley lived.
In August 1995, when Huntley was 21 years old, a joint investigation was launched by police and social services in Grimsby, after a 15-year-old girl admitted that she had been having sex with Huntley. Police did not pursue the case against Huntley in accordance with the girl’s wishes. But in March 1996, Huntley was once again investigated over allegations of having sex with an underage girl. Again he was not charged.
A month later, Huntley was investigated yet again over allegations of underage sex, but this allegation too did not result in a charge. The same outcome occurred the following month when he was investigated over allegations of having sex with a 13-year-old girl.
In April 1998, Huntley was arrested on suspicion of raping a woman. He admitted having sex with the woman but claimed it was consensual. The police decided not to charge Huntley.
In July 1998, Huntley was investigated by the police on allegations that he indecently assaulted an 11-year-old girl in September 1997. However, he was never charged, though in April 2007 he confessed that he attacked the girl. He was investigated over allegations of rape on a 17-year-old woman in February 1999, but no charges were made against him.
Now in law, of course, this means nothing more than suspicion. But when a third factor emerged later, the case went beyond any suggestion of mere suspicion: it became a catalogue of at best wilful stupidity by the authorities.

---------------

The final astonishing episode in this tale occurred when the Home Secretary during the time of the Soham murders, David Blunkett, received a full report on the Enquiry about what went wrong in relation to the school’s seemingly mad decision to employ psychopath Ian Huntley. We are now in 2004 – nearly two years after the tragic deaths of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. On reading the report documentation, Mr Blunkett  immediately demanded the resignation of a top cop related to the case, David Westwood. Here’s why: the Enquiry criticised his Humberside Police force for deleting information relating to previous allegations against Huntley.
As if this isn’t bad enough – that is, the placement of former Humberside Police Authority Chairman Colin Inglis firmly in a frame of potential conspiracy to pervert justice – Mr Inglis and his colleagues now effectively told the Home Secretary to shove his request for Westwood’s dismissal. Furious, Blunkett announced that he would take legal action if Humberside Police Authority didn’t carry out his request to suspend him. Amazingly, the police authority had the brass neck to yet again ask David Blunkett ‘to reconsider his decision to order the suspension of David Westwood’.
Westwood had to go, and did. But this particular aspect of the case is creepy for one overriding reason: here we have a man with a history of sex abuse allegations and half-hearted acquittals to his name openly defying a Home Secretary insisting on the departure of a police associate whose force had conspired to erase crucial evidence about the past of a man who, soon afterwards, became one of the most infamous child-killers in British history.
It is creepy, I would contend, because clearly Colin Inglis had no fear at all of potential retribution.
In the aftermath of these murky circumstances, it has been the assumption of many people associated with this case that Huntley’s girlfriend Maxine Carr was the key to him going unsuspected. Her failure to expose Huntley’s lies in the early stages of the investigation (and donation of a false alibi) meant that police initially eliminated Huntley as a suspect. But as we can see, what’s emerged since – following more thorough piecing together of the facts over many years – is that without help of a different kind beforehand, Huntley would never have been let near Soham school in the first place. And had that happened, Holly and Jessica would almost certainly still be alive.

---------------

Circumstancial or not, the nature of this case has all the classic hallmarks of crony assistance in gaining employment, and then cover-up afterwards. The weakness of the vetting system which allowed Huntley to get a caretaker’s job at a school – despite four separate complaints about him reaching social services -   was shown up when Humberside Police (where all the alleged offences had taken place) stated that they believed that it was unlawful under the Data Protection Act to hold data regarding allegations which did not lead to a conviction. The Chairman of the police authority at this time was…..Colin Inglis.
That interpretation was and is total bollocks. It was roundly contradicted by other police forces who thought it ‘too strict an interpretation of the Act’. It feels to me, eleven years on, like a false passport allowing Ian Huntley to go about his ghastly work.
Neither I nor anyone else remote to events is in a position to make an unqualified accusation here. But some very, very disturbing questions remain. Not only that, the trail is just warm enough in 2012 – with enough people still alive – to ascertain the value or otherwise of these queries..if the Establishment flesh is willing. They are:
1. How did Inglis (with dark grey clouds over him about sex abuse) gain election to the post of Chairman of the Humberside Police Authority…or indeed any other position in public life?
2. Did Inglis have any dealings with Huntley during his social worker or CPA terms? If so, what were they?
3. How did Huntley evade capture and incarceration as an obvious sex-pest during the overlap period between his offences and the CPA rule of Inglis?
4. Why didn’t David Blunkett – a man familiar with Yorkshire Labour politics – look more thoroughly into the uniquely negative response of Inglis to his demand for Westwood’s head?
5. What exactly was the relationship between David Westwood and Colin Inglis, and why was the latter so desperate for the police constable to remain in place?
6. How on earth did the Labour Party then allow Colin Inglis to go on to become Lord Mayor of Hull? (On on 1 May 2008, he topped the poll in the Myton Ward of Hull to return to the Council, and in 201o he became Lord Mayor of the City.)
But the most fishy bit of this tale of a Hull infamous for its smell of piscean food processing came in this very year, 2012. For the ever-rhinoceros-skinned Colin Inglis tried to become one of the newly invented PCCs for Humberside.
However, on March 14th he was dumped from the Labour ticket as a prospective police and crime commissioner. Incredibly, a ‘source close to Inglis’ told the local media, “Colin will be bitterly disappointed by this. It is a snub, and it seems very strange that a man of his experience within the politics of policing hasn’t been put on the longlist.”
Perhaps we should look into the strange mentality of the source who thought rejecting a dubious bloke like Inglis for the PCC job was strange. Perhaps we should look into why Labour Big Beast John Prescott (who got the nomination) was then humiliatingly defeated in the ensuing contest. But most of all, we should definitely look very closely indeed at why the local Labour mafia flatly refused to comment on why it had firmly rejected the application of Colin Inglis at the longlist stage.

-------------

We are now at the lessons-drawing conclusions stage of this piece.
I fully agree with Lord McAlpine that baseless accusation and wild speculation in the media are things to be discouraged. However, where I differ from the pools-winning Peer is on the question of where informed hypotheses end and innuendos begin. You see, I have no desire to convict on the basis of hearsay and gossip…even though the BBC has effectively been convicted on the basis of threatened rather than actual litigation. No, what I would like is for those accompanied by very thick circumstancially paedophiliac clouds to be denied access to care system and educational institutions. Not sent to prison: just barred from access to children’s front or back bottoms and little willies.
The problem as I see it is this. As the case history above suggests very strongly, there is a discouraging silence among the police, local politicians, social workers and higher authorities when it comes to (a) discovering the background of applicants for positions allowing child access and (b) working out why and how – time and again – an odd alliance between those authorities seems to at best obfuscate or at worst eradicate WTF happened.
Now, were the information playing-field level, it would be a matter of simple analysis to establish these facts, and thus the use of innuendo, smear and pernicious suggestion could be banned from these islands. But the data pitch is about as level as the north face of the Eiger. So given the uncertain nature of this data-collection context, it seems to me a bit of a no-brainer that – for the purposes of judging an individual’s suitability for employment – billowing clouds of throat-assaulting smoke should be accepted as evidence of fire.
It is of course vital to retain a scrupulous focus on complete fairness in serious legal cases: ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is a fundamental tenet of any enlightened judicial system. But what those who so blindly support a blanket ban on all informed speculation forget is that, in many ways, sexual abuse of a child is almost the perfect crime when it comes to evading justice.
There are rarely any witnesses. The victims are often seen as fanciful…a perception hardened by spread of the pernicious psychiatric theory of ‘false memory syndrome’. It is an adult’s word against an immature child’s. Inventing a case for childish vengeance is not that dificult. As we saw in the case of Huntley, the police are wary of it as an area of crime. The kids themselves are traumatised and convinced they’ve been punished: in many cases, they have no grounds for judging the degree of abnormality involved, but they do in turn have a natural desire not to tell parents if they feel they have been bad in some way.
And of course last but not least, the defendant’s previous behaviour record is inadmissable as evidence.
Many McAlpinites would still regard the speculation as unsafe. But I can guarantee to all of them that not a single sane parent in Britain would object to overwhelming doubts being applied negatively to access vetting.
In short, as the law is often a complete ambulance-chasing ass, it is vitally important for procedures outside the Courts to err on the highly conservative side of decision-making in this regard. Particularly given the alleged proclivities of some Conservatives. And without wishing to labour the point vis-a-vis balance, especially give the quirky sexual desires of some Labour local politicians.
As I have said from Day One of this utterly gross episode in British socio-political history, Jimmy Savile got away with being a serially destructive pervert because far too many people either looked the other way, or gave him the benefit of the doubt. I have never tried to suggest that Lord McAlpine having a sexually deranged second-cousin is in any way a guide to Alistair’s own carnal preferences. But I would respectfully suggest that one man’s reputation versus the deaths of two young children is something of a no-brainer.

Hat Tip to John ward @

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/paedophile-innuendo-the-soham-murders-something-for-the-wannabe-censors-to-think-about/

 

  

 

NOT GRATEFUL TO US FOR FIGHTING THEIR BATTLES IN WWII THE POLISH MINISTER NOW THREATENS BRITAIN

Britain entered WWII after going to the aid of Poland after the country was attacked by Germany who wanted to Reclaim Prussia which was taken by Poland after WWI.

Why we had to sacrifice British soldiers lives for Poland I still don't know the answer.

But now, the Country we sent OUR MOTHERS,FATHERS, BROTHERS,SISTERS TO FIGHT AND DIE FOR NOW ATTACK BRITAIN WITH VEILED THREATS -

"In the Telegraph, London Mayor Boris Johnson writes that he has “absolutely no doubt” that David Cameron will veto demands for an EU budget increase. Writing in the Guardian, Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski argues that in the event of a deal not being reached, “under annual budgets, payments for agriculture would increase – hardly a boost to innovation or better spending”. He warns that “We need more British common sense in the EU, but Britain also needs friends. An important test of our friendship is coming up.”"

Thanks to open europe for pointing this out.

Do our European neigbours recognise that Britain is now Corrupted and Broken and would struggle to defend itself against attack,(mainy due to FOREIGNERS being placed in positions of Power and Influence over the INDIGENOUS POPULATION) and now see us not as Friendly Ally but a weakened Country and Race and are now THREATENING US.




 

Counting bodies in Gaza: this is what Israeli "self-defense" looks like

Counting bodies in Gaza: this is what Israeli "self-defense" looks like By Yousef Munayyer The Beast 15 November 2012

 Four-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israeli "self-defense".

Gaza Under Attack: Emergency Protest Saturday 17 November 2-4pm Israeli Embassy at 2 Palace Green, London W8 4QB


THEY SAY WHEN all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. But when you are a politician and all you have is a hammer, you must convince voters every problem looks like a nail. This is the only thinking that can explain Israel's behavior in escalating bombardment of Gaza.

The Israeli spin machines are out in full force in the hopes of convincing Israelis and the rest of the world that the attacks on Gaza are in self-defense. But anyone following the situation closely and over time will tell you that cannot be the case.

Gaza is a tiny territory where 1.7 million Palestinians, most of whom are refugees, are denied the right to return to their homes simply because they are not Jewish.

It is from this besieged territory that militants have fired mostly rudimentary projectiles at Israel. While Israeli officials are quick to rattle off the numbers of projectiles fired from Gaza, rarely do they tell you what they fire into Gaza, what the effects of this fire is and what the fallout from it is.

For example, in 2011, the projectiles fired by the Israeli military into Gaza have been responsible for the death of 108 Palestinians, of which 15 where women or children, and the injury of 468 Palestinians, of which 143 where women or children. The methods by which these causalities were inflicted by Israeli projectiles breaks down as follows: 57 percent, or 310, were caused by Israeli aircraft missile fire; 28 percent, or 150, where from Israeli live ammunition; 11 percent, or 59, were from Israeli tank shells; while another 3 percent, or 18, were from Israeli mortar fire.

Through September 2012, Israeli weaponry caused 55 Palestinian deaths and 257 injuries. Among these 312 casualties, 61, or roughly 20 percent, were children and 28 were female. 209 of these casualties came as a result of Israeli Air Force missiles, 69 from live ammunition fire, and 18 from tank shells. It is important to note that these figures do not represent a totality of Israeli projectiles fired into Gaza but rather only Israeli projectiles fired into Gaza which cause casualties. The total number of Israeli projectiles fired into Gaza is bound to be significantly larger.

For context, consider this: more Palestinians were killed in Gaza yesterday than Israelis have been killed by projectile fire from Gaza in the past three years.

But the Israelis are also keeping another issue quiet. If you follow the dynamics of fire you will learn two things. First, the vast majority of projectiles from Gaza result in no injuries or deaths. Second, most of them are fired during "flare ups" which are initiated, more often than not, by Israeli strikes which cause significant casualties. Hamas has in the past worked to clamp down on factions firing projectiles, like Islamic Jihad and others. But when Israeli strikes target these organizations and kill and injure Palestinians in Gaza, it ignites responses that lead to flare ups.

 In short, what this means is that if it chose to modify its strategy, Israel could have likely dropped the number of projectiles it saw coming from Gaza significantly. Israel could coordinate with Hamas through third parties like the Egyptians; positive things like truces and prisoner exchanges have happened in the past. But the strategy Israel chose was not one of restraint or diplomacy.

 The problem Gaza presents for Israel is that it won't go away—though Israel would love it if it would. It is a constant reminder of the depopulation of Palestine in 1948, the folly of the 1967 occupation, and the many massacres which have happened since then. It also places the Israelis in an uncomfortable position because it presents a problem (in the form of projectiles) which cannot be solved by force.

Israel does not like to admit it doesn't have the military might to accomplish something. But when it comes to relations with Palestinians, and with Gaza in particular, there is no military solution.

 Israel has tried assassinating Palestinian leaders for decades but the resistance persists. Israel launched a devastating and brutal war on Gaza from 2008 to 2009 killing 1,400 people, mostly civilians, but the resistance persists.

 Why, then, would Israel choose to revert to a failed strategy that will undoubtedly only escalate the situation? Because it is far easier for politicians to lie to voters, vilify their adversaries, and tell them 'we will hit them hard' than to come clean and say instead, 'we've failed and there is no military solution to this problem.'

With Israeli elections around the corner, the right-wing Israeli government chose the counter-productive path of escalation even though civilians would pay the price and their domestic opposition rallied behind them.

 Trading bodies for ballots is an equation Israeli leaders are happy to be engaged in, especially since all the ballots are Israeli and the bodies are almost always Palestinian.

 http://stopwar.org.uk/index.php/palestine-and-israel/2031-counting-the-bodies-in-gaza-this-is-what-israeli-qself-defenseq-looks-like

BRITAINS CHIEF RABBI STIRRING UP WAR AGAINST IRAN -BLAMES IRAN FOR ATTACK ON GAZA

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9682850/BBC-apologises-after-Chief-Rabbi-blames-Iran-for-Gaza-conflict.html

Now WHAT has IRAN got do with GAZA ?

Could it be that by carrying on the GENOCIDE of the PALESTINIAN PEOPLE may cause IRAN to get involved, therefore giving Israel and ZIONIST CONTROLLED NATO led by America into an ATTACK ON IRAN and ALL OUT FULL ON WAR in the Middle East ?


It is the CHILDREN :SONS and DAUGHTERS, FATHERS and MOTHERS of the INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF NATO COUNTRIES that will be USED BY THE ZIONISTS.
Why let ZIONISTS BE KILLED ATTACKING IRAN when you can use the GOY of BRITAIN, AMERICA, FRANCE(?) etc , let the GOY die instead.

 THE PAEDOPHILE LOVING TRAITORS AT THE BBC APOLOGISE FOR THE ZIONISTS LOOSE TONGUE WHILST THE IDL OR ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCE (I WONDER IF THE NOW ZIONIST CONTROLLED EDL STILL SUPPORTS THE ISRAELI DEFENCE LEAGUE?) ARE CARRYING ON THEIR GENOCIDAL ATTACKS ON INNOCENT PALESTINIANS.


 PALESTINIANS ARE A PEOPLE BEING EXTERMINATED IN THE ZIONIST GENOCIDAL VERSION OF THE FINAL SOLUTION.

At least the PALESTINIANS ARE FIGHTING TO SAVE THEIR COUNTRY.
Besides what the BRITISH and ENGLISH NATIONALIST COMMUNITY have been trying to do...
What have the BRITISH DONE TO SAVE THEIRS ?

It is the CHILDREN :SONS and DAUGHTERS, FATHERS and MOTHERS of the INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF NATO COUNTRIES that will be USED BY THE ZIONISTS.
Why let ZIONISTS BE KILLED ATTACKING IRAN when you can use the GOY of BRITAIN, AMERICA, FRANCE(?) etc , let the GOY die instead.

How long before our Armed Forces and £ BILLIONS OF POUNDS are sent to support the ISLAMIC TERRORISTS who they are using to implement their regime change ?


*PLEASE NOTE *

This is NOT an attack on JEWS, as their are plenty of Jews, even in Israel, who do not like what the ZIONISTS are doing Globally and to the Palestinians and don't want War with Iran. The problem they have is that ZIONISTS CONTROL ISRAEL, NATO, AMERICA and BRITAIN.

Our only problem is ZIONISM IS Jewish.

History They Don't Teach You In School Part 2

WHY THE WAIT ?

Just been looking on the Government Website for the Resutls of the Police Commisioner Elections.

Considering that they are reporting that the Voter turnout was extremely if not historically LOW, with one Polling Station in Wales reporting NO VOTES then why are we still awaiting the Results ?

Most should have been in, counted and declared by 6 this morning.

But their is very little information on the results.

A bit of behind the scenes fiddling the figures of whether the New Commissioners are New Labour or Conservative Commissioners?

Why else is it ALL QUIET ON THE ELECTION FRONT ?

JIHADI (TERRORIST) FIGHTERS WON'T FIGHT FOR THEIR PALESTINIAN BROTHERS.

Just a few thoughts on the attacks on Palestine, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia by so called Muslim Extremists who are now fighting for another Islamic Countries  freedom from tyrrany ?

So...now Israel is attacking the Palestinians shouldn't the Jihadist "Freedom Fighters" now be abandoning Regime changes for $$$ to go and help their Islamic Palestinian"Brothers and Sisters" who are on the verge of Total Annihilation after Israels Pogroms against the Palestinians and the theft of 90% of Palestinian lands.



I don't get it, why would an Islamic "Freedom Army" go attacking countries who are already Islamic and undergoing no persecution of Muslims and still living basically by Islamic Laws and Traditions and in their own lands ?

PALESTINIAN LOSS OF LAND 1946 - 2000

I really don't get why Jihadists haven't done a thing to help the Palestinians or attack Israel, as Israel is surrounded by Islamic States and committing WAR CRIMES AGAINST AN INDIGENOUS MUSLIM PEOPLE ?

Maybe Britain, America , Germany, France etc are leaving Palestine and the Palestinians to their fate, in the hands of those capable of GENOCIDE or they can't\won't use the Western Backed Jihadists now attacking Syria after DESTROYING LIBYA to fight against Israel ?

It looks like the Fate of the Palestinians and the Biblically Historic Country of Palestine will soon disappear.

Genocide. I wonder what Britains "Friends of Israel" think of it?

LISA NANDY & yvonne fovargue star in VOTING RECORD - NO SIGN OF INDEPENDENT THOUGHT

As you can see from her voting record Lisa Nandy seems to have NO SIGN OF INDEPENDENT THOUGHT INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. 

To follow the Party in every vote isn't very DIVERSE now is it ! 

Click on the Link below to see how NUMB Lisa is -

 Voting Record — Lisa Nandy MP, Wigan (24831)

She's not going to be of much help to her Constituents if their problem is unsupported by New Labour.

As you can see SHE CANNOT PERFORM INDEPENDENT VOTING or VOTE AGAINST THE PARTY WHIP.

Useless.Let's play a Guessing game called - - -

Can FOVARGUE show signs of INDEPENDENT THOUGHT ???

Just played it.....

WOO HOO --

On "25/10/2011 was the LAST TIME Fovargue showed INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. So, with it being over a year since she showed any signs of INDEPENDENT THOUGHT from their Party Whip then I call - FOVARGUE: NO SIGN OF INDEPENDENT THOUGHT.

 FOVARGUE: NO SIGN OF INDEPENDENT THOUGHT.

Click on the Link above to see how NUMB Yvonne is.

 

History They Don't Teach You in School Part1

WHAT DO BRITAINS "FRIENDS OF ISRAEL" THINK ABOUT RACISM ?

Poll: Majority of Israelis back apartheid against Arabs

+

A new poll has revealed shocking widespread discriminatory views held by Israeli Jews toward the country's Arab citizens and majority support for apartheid policies toward occupied Palestinians.

The leading left-leaning Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz originally reported on the results of the survey, carried out by Israel's Dialog polling group, under the headline "Most Israelis Support An Apartheid Regime In Israel." That headline proved too controversial, and so it was changed. But what's most shocking is not the headline but the findings of the Dialog poll. A third of those surveyed said that Israel's Arab citizens, who number about 20 percent of the nation's population, should be denied their voting rights. Nearly half-- 47 percent-- said they want Israeli Arabs stripped of their citizenship. Half said they believe Jews should be treated better than Arabs, and 59 percent said they want Jews to receive preferential treatment in public sector employment. More than 40 percent of the 503 Israelis polled said they want segregated housing and classrooms for Jews and Arabs. Forty percent back annexation of the West Bank, part of Palestine which was invaded in 1967 and has been illegally occupied ever since. In the hypothetical event of annexation, fully 70 percent of the poll respondents said they want to deny the Palestinians living in the West Bank their voting rights. Three-quarters said they favor separate roads for Israelis and Palestinians. While annexation is a hypothetical scenario, Israeli-only roads are an everyday fact of life for Palestinians living under the cloud of occupation and apartheid. The poll's troubling results "reflect the widespread notion that Israel, as a Jewish state, should be a state that favors Jews," Israeli journalist Noam Sheizaf is quoted in The Independent. "They are also the result of the occupation... After almost half a century of dominating another people, it's no surprise that most Israelis don't think Arabs deserve the same rights." The survey "lays bare an image of Israeli society, and the picture is a very, very sick one," Haaretz reporter Gideon Levy wrote. "Now it is not just critics at home and abroad, but Israelis themselves who are openly, shamelessly, and guiltlessly defining themselves as nationalistic racists." "If such a survey were released about the attitude to Jews in a European state, Israel would have raised hell," Levy added. "When it comes to us, the rules don't apply." Racism and the notion that Jews are God's chosen people permeates all levels of Israeli society. Dr. Mordechai Nissan, a respected professor at the prestigious Hebrew University of Jerusalem wrote:

"[The Jews] are designated as a "light unto the nations..." a nation that has deeper historical roots, greater spiritual obligations, higher moral standards and more powerful intellectual capacities than others. This... is not at all based on arbitrary hostility towards non-Jews, but rather on a fundamental existential understanding of the quality of the Jewish peoplehood."

Yitzchak Ginsburgh, an influential US-born Israeli rabbi, adds that:

"If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life."

Theoretically, Israel's Arab citizens enjoy almost all of the same rights as Jews. But many Israeli Arabs feel like second-class citizens. There is widespread employment discrimination, even though many Arabs hold advanced university degrees. Although one in five Israelis is an Arab, it took 59 years for the government to appoint an Arab to the cabinet. A 2011 study commissioned by Israel's Courts Administration and the Israeli Bar Association found that Israeli Arabs are given jail sentences more frequently than Jews convicted of the same crimes. Arabs also tend to receive longer sentences than Jews jailed for the same offenses. Arabs have also been convicted of highly dubious "crimes;" a Palestinian man was found guilty of raping a Jewish woman after she had consensual sex with him because he told her he was Jewish. "I would like to raise only one question with the judge," Gideon Levy wrote. "What if this guy had been a Jew who pretended to be a Muslim and had sex with a Muslim woman? Would he have been convicted of rape?" The new Dialog poll is but the latest to reveal racist sentiment among Israeli Jews. A 2007 survey conducted by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel found that 55 percent of Jews believed Arabs should leave the country, 75 percent would not want to live in the same neighborhood as Arabs and 74 percent said that Arabs are "unclean." More than half of the respondents to that poll also said that a Jewish woman who marries an Arab man was "committing a betrayal of the country and the Jewish people." Indeed, even the prospect of Jewish women dating Arab men has brought seething crowds of racist Jews into the streets of Israeli towns like Bat Yam, where one protester handed out flyers accusing Arabs men of "ruining" Jewish girls. "We are not racist, we're just Jews," one speaker at the rally insisted. "The Arabs are coming and taking our daughters," another shouted. "We will not allow it! Any Jewish woman that goes with an Arab should be killed; any Jew who sells his home to an Arab should be killed." The Bat Yam rally came just weeks after dozens of municipal chief rabbis issued a religious edict that forbids renting homes to non-Jews, especially Arabs. The ruling states that doing so will depress property values and commands the neighbors of those who rent to non-Jews to name, shame and ostracize the "offenders." More than 250 rabbis signed on to the directive, including many government employees. Among those who support the measure is Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed, who once proposed hanging Palestinian children from trees. Racism and notions of divinely-ordained Jewish superiority are deeply ingrained in Israeli children from the youngest age. Classroom lessons teach that before their country was Israel it was "a land without a people for a people without a land," almost always failing to acknowledge that today's Israel was more than 90 percent Arab just a century ago and that more than a million Palestinian Arabs were driven from their homes, often by force, during the Nakba ethnic cleansing campaign that accompanied Israel's independence as well as after the 1967 war. These children are taught that God himself promised Israel solely to the Jews, His own Chosen People, and that the Jews took a barren desert and made it blossom by virtue of their superior intelligence and industriousness. This message is reinforced during compulsory military service, which both men and women must complete and in which dehumanization of Arabs is a daily fact of life. Most Israelis bristle when the word 'apartheid' is used to describe the way in which the Palestinians are treated. But even many Israelis readily admit that their country is an apartheid state. Poet, author and journalist Yitzhak Laor wrote that "the system preserving this apartheid is more ruthless than that seen in South Africa," a sentiment shared by Nelson Mandela, a man who knows a thing or two about apartheid. Mandela also accuses Israel of "ethnic cleansing" and calls the Palestinian struggle for justice "the greatest moral issue of our age." Former US President Jimmy Carter also agrees that Israel's apartheid is even worse than that of the former South African regime:

"When Israel [occupies] territories deep within the West Bank, and connects the 200-or-so settlements with each other with a road and then prohibits Palestinians from using that road, or in many cases even crossing that road, this perpetuates even worse incidents of apartness, or apartheid, than we witnessed even in South Africa."

Israel's apologists reject such criticism out-of-hand as "anti-Semitism," "a trick we always use," as former Israeli education minister Shulamit Aloni admitted. If the person criticizing Israeli policies or actions is Jewish, then he or she is labeled a "self-hating Jew," even if they are a Holocaust survivor. 

 http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/336331

 By Brett Wilkins

And THEY DARE CALL THE BRITISH RACIST.

They'll have the Palestinians wearing little YELLOW EMBLEMS soon.

 

Cheapest stations within 5 miles of WIGAN TOWN CENTRE Unleaded Only

      A little help for the poor beleaguered Wigan motorist.

CHEAPEST PETROL WITHIN 5 MILES OF WIGAN TOWN CENTER

	£1:33.7P	Asda Golborne  £1:33.7P Edge Green Lane, Golborne, Warrington, WA3 3SP Asda, 4.65 miles away, last updated on 3 November
	£1:33.9p	Warrington Road Filling Station                       £1:33.9p   Warrington Road, Spring View, Wigan, WN3 4TB Texaco, 1.82 miles away, last updated on 4 November
	£1:33.9p	Esso Boars Head £1:33.9p Wigan Road, Standish, Wigan, WN6 0AD Esso, 2.17 miles away, last updated on 4 November
	£1:33.9p	Morrisons Ince £1:33.9p Makerfield Way, Ince, Wigan, WN2 2ER Morrisons, 2.42 miles away, last updated on 4 November
	£1:33.9p	Sainsburys Wigan £1:33.9p Warrington Road, Goose Green, Wigan, WN3 6XA Sainsburys, 2.55 miles away, last updated on 4 November

3p Fuel Duty Rise in January. Email your MP to Help Scrap it

 http://www.fairfueluk.com/scrap3pijan.html

Only 8 Weeks to the 3p/Litre Tax Hike on Petrol & Diesel. Please Email your MP to Scrap this Crippling Tax Rise Dear FairFuelUK Supporter, With just over a month to the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement, we’re stepping up our fight to stop the 3p per litre Fuel Duty Rise planned for 1st January 2013. That represents over 16p a gallon (combined Fuel Duty and VAT). Petrol and diesel prices are still far too high. The economy is still on its knees. Hitting families and businesses with this tax hike is the last thing that the economy needs. We need your help.... We need you to get in touch with your MP and ask them to support our fight in a number of ways. Please use this link to contact your MP. Some people say that ‘writing/emailing your MP doesn’t work’ – but remember, with your help, we have successfully fought off over 9p per litre of Fuel Duty rises in the last 20 months. That's £4.5 Billion less of tax paid by us all. Here’s the link http://action.fairfueluk.com/Stop3pRise Only a few days ago, our National spokesman Quentin Willson led a delegation of FairFuelUK backers to meet Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander MP (Photo). We presented him with a report that set out the damage that the 3p rise will do to the economy – 35,000 jobs destroyed and growth hit hard. The report also explained why it would be in the Government’s own interest to CUT Fuel Duty. If you’d like to see this report yourself please download it. There’s a summary report here http://www.fairfueluk.com/niesr_report.html and the full detailed report itself can be downloaded on the same page. Pictures of our visit to The Treasury are at http://www.fairfueluk.com/fairfueluk_images.html We have a real chance of seeing off this rise. This is only possible because of your support and that of our major backers – the RAC, the Road Haulage Association (RHA), the Freight Transport Association(FTA), Aldermore Bank, and Palletline. Particular thanks are due to the RHA which funded the report referred to above and to the FTA which funded a similar report earlier in the year. Without the backing of these organisations, it’s fair to say that we’d all be paying about 9p per litre (11p including the VAT) more for our fuel. If you get a chance, please visit their sites. As well as fighting the 3p rise and campaigning for a CUT in Fuel Duty we are continuing to press the case for fairer petrol & diesel prices on other fronts. 1. On our call to have the Fuel Duty listed on all till receipts from forecourts see http://www.fairfueluk.com/all_on_receipt.html we have had over 15,000 supporters backing this initiative. Robert Halfon MP with your support has secured a further debate in late November to push this through. We need to keep up the pressure. 2. FairFuelUK has met with the Office of Fair Trading to investigate the supply of petrol & diesel, the fairness of pricing and for the authorities to investigate the rigging of Oil markets. We presented over 2000 pieces of evidence to the OFT that FairFuelUK supporters supplied. If you any more please go to http://www.fairfueluk.com/callforinformation.html 3. Lastly, please spread word of our campaign – we’ve achieved so much with our 340,000 supporters – just think what we can do if we get a million! Please spread the word to your email lists and on Facebook and Twitter. We’re entering a very busy phase of the campaign and any help you could give by purchasing and displaying a campaign sticker would be hugely appreciated http://www.fairfueluk.com/campaign_support.html Thanks from all in the FairFuelUK team …… go on, send that email to your MP now…… http://action.fairfueluk.com/Stop3pRise Very kind regards, The FairFuelUK Team Quentin Willson Peter Carroll Lynne Beaumont Howard Cox

Email Your MP to Scrap 3p Fuel Duty Rise Planned for January 2013 FairFuelUK is actively backed by: Sign up and support the FairFuelUK Campaign Get more supporters Follow FairFuelUK on Twitter and Like us on Facebook

Email your MP to Scrap the 3p Fuel Duty Rise = http://action.fairfueluk.com/Stop3pRise The National Institute for Economic and Social Research Report = http://www.fairfueluk.com/niesr_report.html Support Robert Halfon MP's debate for showing all Tax on fuel receipts = http://fairfueluk.com/all_on_receipt.html Background to "CALL FOR INFORMATION" to the OFT Inquiries = http://www.fairfueluk.com/callforinformation.html Supply your evidence for the fuel pricing OFT Inquiry = http://www.fairfueluk.com/fuelfuelukpriceinquiryform.html Do you have hard evidence of Oil Price Manipulation? = http://www.fairfueluk.com/fairfuelukoilpriceinquiryform.html FairFuelUK Cited in the House of Commons = www.fairfueluk.com/quentins_blog.php?entry_id=1347811173 Fairfueluk website and sign-up = http://www.fairfueluk.com Help Support Campaign = http://www.fairfueluk.com/campaign_support.html Start local Campaigning= http://www.fairfueluk.com/localcampaigning.html

WHOSE GOING DEFEND YOU/ YOUR FAMILY, CHILDREN, GRAND CHILDREN ?

To all those who agree thaty we must tackle Islam and IMMIGRATION.but listen to the lies about British Nationalist in the PRIVATELY OWNED, GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS and TV NEWS about NATIONALISM...WAKE UP, USE YOUR INTELLIGENCE and LISTEN FOR THE LIES, you can spot a lie easy on TV News, they OPEN THEIR MOUTHS. The Newspapers are just ANTI-WHITE INDIGENOUS BRITISH TRAITORS, who will write anything that the PTB tell them too. We have FREE SPEECH here in Britain ? Just check out the NUJ Guidlines on reporting on NATIONALIST PARTIES, NATIONALIST FIGUREHEADS, NATIONALIST PARTY MEMBERS etc. But we know we can overcome the LIES with the SWORD OF TRUTH and the SHIELD OF JUSTICE. We have done it once with the BNP. even after all the HATRED which the TV, RADIO, NEWSPAPERS etc could throw at us and we WON SEATS. A NEW YEAR hopefully will bring a NEW ERA and NEW EXPECTATIONS in regards to making a MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH FOR BRITISH NATIONALISM that will make the BNPs results when they were at their peak will be end up as a minor sidenote in Nationalist history whilst Next Year it shall be WE who are making the headlines, making inroads into Local and National Government. It won't be easy but if the Activists who left the BNP join this New Party we can hit the ground RUNNING.

THE CREATION OF A NEW PARTY

   New Party Being Formed

We have watched, with dismay, the destruction of the British National Party, by its Chairman. It is now a pale shadow of its size and level of activity at its height. The current Chairman pretends that the Party has recovered but to support his contention he can point only to a sizeable legacy that the Party is reported to have received. A party that is solvent but empty cannot hope to thrive.

Its branches, groups and regions have fallen apart. Most of its former candidates at the European Elections in 2009 and the General Election in 2010 have left or been driven out of the Party. Most of its organisers, former members of the Advisory Council and activists are no longer with the Party.

The former activists have either left politics or  have gone in many different directions to a variety of parties. It is our considered opinion that none of those parties can be recommended as a home for British Nationalists. However, we cannot simply stand on the sidelines while the Chairman presides over a ghost party that will be incapable of rising to the challenges that face our Nation.

We have come to the conclusion that a new party will have to be formed – a successor to, but not a clone of, the British National Party.

We have resolved to form a new party – a successor to the British National Party but with inner party democracy, financial transparency and a culture that values debate and differences of opinion. It will be a Party in which there will be safeguards against financial incompetence and the misuse of party funds and against the partisan employment of the security and disciplinary machinery.

We are confident that the new party will appeal to those who have left or have been driven out of the British National Party, including those who have chosen inappropriate alternatives. Dual membership is permissible for members of certain parties.  We also expect to attract people to us who agree with our policies but would have been reluctant to join the BNP under its current regime.

We whould like to hear from all of those former members and others who would be prepared to help us in this important venture.


Kevin Scott (Founder member of the British National Party)
Newcastle
Secretary to the Steering Committee

 http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/new-party-being-formed/

--------------------

For all those NATIONALISTS in the NW of England who are interested in helping to form this New Party will be welcome to a meeting being held in the NW Region in Dec.

The PARTY needs input, FROM THE START, from all interested parties and activists, we need to discuss Policies, Manifesto, Party Structure etc.

ALL MEMBERS OF THE BNPs HIERARCHY ARE NOT WELCOME TO THE MEETING OR AS MEMBERS OF THE NEW PARTY.

ALL BNP MEMBERS NOW, WHO HAVE NOT BEEN PERSONALLY INVITED, UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN INVITED BY SOMEONE WHO WILL BE ATTENDING, AND/OR WITH A VIEW TO JOINING THE NEW PARTY MUST LEAVE THE BNP BEFORE APPLYING FOR  APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP BUT WILL NOT BE REFUSED ENTRY TO THE MEETING.

ANY ROWDY, DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR UNBECOMING OF TRUE NATIONALISTS WILL BE BARRED FROM ENTRY AND/OR EJECTED FROM THE MEETING.

IF YOU FEEL THAT THIS IS THE WAY FOREWARD  AND WOULD LIKE TO BE A PART OF CREATING A NATIONALIST PARTY THAT CAN AND WILL SUCCEED PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ATTEND.

WE ARE WILLING TO WORK WITH ALL AND ANY TRUE NATIONALIST PARTIES TO MAXIMIZE OUR POTENTIAL, SUCH AS NOT STANDING CANDIDATES AGAINST EACH OTHER IN ELECTIONS. HELP OTHER PARTIES TO LEAFLET AND SET UP TABLETOPS, WE CAN SHOW YOU THE ROPES AND IF POSSIBLE, AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY TABLETOPS THAT WEEKEND i'M SURE AS A SIGN OF GOOD FAITH OUR ACTIVISTS MAY BE WILLING TO HELP OUT FOR YOUR  FIRST FEW TABLETOPS SO AS TO GIVE YOU AND IDEA ON WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND SAID.

HOPE YOU ALL JUMP ON BOARD AND LET'S GET OUR COUNTRY BACK............................. Before it's too late.

THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO  MEMBERS OF CERTAIN OTHER NATIONALIST PARTIES WHO ARE WILLING TO JOIN THE NEW PARTY WHILST STILL RETAINING MEMBERSHIP OF THE NATIONALIST PARTY THEY ARE NOW IN, if they truly feed the need to.

For Information in regards to the meeting  could you please ring Tony on

07522225294 for full details.