UKIPs Lord Pearson & Nigel Farage appear not to have declared certain Donations to UKIPs Election Fund that have gone through a unincorporated association called "GLOBAL BRITAIN" which was set-up by Lord Pearson to LAUNDER LARGE DONATIONS TO UKIP.
In the Times article UKIP MEP Stuart Agnew is explaining to a Female Journalist how to donate to UKIP in a certain way using LOANS and going through "Global Britain" unincorporated to launder donations to UKIP
He also explains that to help UKIP AVOID PAYING BACK THE DONATION through clauses in her (The Female Journalists) Mothers WILL.
And that a donation of upto £25:000 or above will not be declared and the Donor remains anonymous.
He also admits that Peter (unknown)? and what he does or doesn't do for UKIP is ILLEGAL.
Lord Pearson is heard explaining how a donation to "Global Britain" will actually go into UKIPs ELECTION FUND UNDECLARED and the IDENTITY of the DONOR kept SECRET
He also claims that during the Euro Elections £80.000 & £100,000 donations were undeclared and the donors identity was kept secret through LAUNDERING MONEY through "GLOBAL BRITAIN".
I do hope the UKIP voters understand that Lord Pearson and Co may be heading to the courts for their ILLEGAL ways of accepting ILLEGAL donations and hiding the identities of donors.
Watch the two Videos HERE
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7086827.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797084
The BNP will welcome any disaffected or dissapointed UKIP members.
At least when Mark Collett was caught out the BNP suspended him straight away, unlike the TRAITOROUS PIGS IN PARLIAMENT.
19 comments:
I do wish UKIP & BNP would stop fighting each other and go against the LibLabCon. It's alright saying you'd welcome UKIP voters, but you don't field a candidate in my area, UKIP do. We have a common enemy, LibLabCon, not each other.
Hi Road Hog,
Just for interests sake. What ward are you in?
Andy
Yes as a UKIP member I was shocked when I saw this video. I left the Labour party (back in 1988) after I became disillusioned by its hypocrisy. I left the BNP last year (31-12-09) because of Griffin's dictatorial leadership and personal doubts I had about his integrity. Now after joining UKIP in January I find out they too are not as trustworthy and open as they claim to be.
I've always held people who don't vote with some contempt, but I'm now beginning to see their point of view. What a sad state of affairs, but I have to ask: "was it ever so".
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
We don't fight against UKIP.
UKIP are a stooge party set up to take votes from us.
Proof?
How many times do you see the smug grinning Farage on Telly?
How many times has UKIP been attacked by the Tory sponsored UAF?
None.
Does that not suggest anything.
They are part of the anti British establishment, all of them
We are standing in as many areas as we can and you may be surprised and may be able to vote BNP, I don't know, but we are standing in over 330 parliamentary seats, a record for us in spite of all the intimidation that UKIP does not have to endure.
That Charles is something I can buy. ukip & the torys are bed fellows when it comes to breaking promises.
They are a spoiler party. I've also wondered why the NF never ended up in the dock too.
In two words:
Useful idiots.
..............................
At least when Mark Collett was caught out the BNP suspended him straight away
..............................
But most members in the know, knew Collett was overcharging for leaflets more than five years ago, but up until now Griffin has always protected him. It has also been obvious that he was taking payments on a job by job basis (from the likes of searchlight) for messing up leaflets etc. for years. And again Griffin has protect him.
I think this current situation must be a result of Griffin not putting Collett on his EU payroll. That would certainly have put Mark's nose out of joint, resulting in a temper tantrum leading to a meaningless threats against his old partner in crime Griffin.
Pouring scorn on UKIP for trying to protect donors from political intimidation, sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
@ Chris Hill
"At least when Mark Collett was caught out the BNP suspended him straight away"
In the context of ZaNULiebours thieves who are still grubbing around with their snouts in the tin.
Chris, I was at the meeting today and heard and saw all.
I'm not going to comment on all the details of the meeting but I am satisfied all is above board and we were all given the chance to comment and took a vote on a couple of issues.
The reason Collett's thievery was found out is because we now have in place a much more efficient structure which we could not afford before and have people trained in finance and business.
That Nick Griffin is the only possible leader of our party was confirmed today. However he is a politician and not a financial expert and thus he was to some extent hoodwinked by Collett as many were.
When we got the expert the fraud and inefficiencies were shown up.
Yes many of us had their doubts and issues with him but in the intetrests of party UNITY we did not speak openly about these. I did speak to Nick about it but as I said he is not a financial expert.
He is however loyal to those who are loyal to him and this is perhaps a weakness although I consider it a virtue.It sets him apart from other politicians.
We came from the meeting elated, feeling a sense of achievement and purpose in our struggle to save our country and that the answer to our country's problems is not to jump ship to a sham party set up by the establishment to confuse the electorate and prevent our progress.
Chris, in backing UKIP you are backing a loser and are being used by the anti British establishment just as much as are the fascists of the UAF and SWP.
Hi Charles,
You said:
"Chris, in backing UKIP you are backing a loser and are being used by the anti British establishment just as much as are the fascists of the UAF and SWP."
I say:
OK we will just have to wait and see. But I note the bookies think UKIP's chances of winning a seat at Westminster next month, are far higher than the BNP's.
As for Collett, the BNP is certainly better off without him. Although I'm not sure your defence of Griffin holds much water. He was (and still is) the leader, so given that he was warned about Collett on many many occasions and by very senior party officials at that, I think he must take full responsibility.
Collett has been wrecking havoc in the party for years, and it cost the BNP some very good people (Sadie Ian etc.). It might be nice if Mr Griffin now apologised to these people for trusting Collett rather than those decent hard working ex members.
Anyway as I say: I'm glad you're rid of Collett, he really was a nasty piece of work.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Dr. C.H.:
This is the umpteenth time UKIP has been caught out. Can you lend me some money please?
..............................
About that Collett:
Its good to know what was really going on. One young friend of mine was backing Collett. He heard Collett was trying for NG's place.. I blew at the lad "At this time.With a general election coming up. Is he nuts?".
Then all the papers heard of the "death threats" and the BNP in "disarray". (Which made them look silly, again).
Collett is the only one in the BNP who made my skin crawl. I've always said he was a liability. Glad he's been kicked out. No other party considers such an action. Top marks.
PS.
After all that is said, I would like to point out that I still hold the grassroots membership of the BNP in high regard.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Hi Andy, I prefer not to give the exact ward, but I'm South Warwickshire and the BNP wouldn't get a sniff around here.
Chris, I accept that Collett should have been sacked long ago.
I don't propose to go into all the details of the meeting yesterday and who said what but all has been settled.
let me use a phrase often used by the present government and opposition.
LESSONS HAVE BEEN LEARNT, and we go forward united.
BTW our membership is greater than UKIPs but if we do not match them at the polls it is entirely because they are promoted by the media and we are slagged off.
UKIP are losers even if they win as they are being used by the Establishment for their own ends while we stay true to our principles no matter what.
Hi Charles,
You say that UKIP is an establishment ploy to deflect votes away from the BNP, if that's true how do you explain the Sunday Times story exposing the donation scam? Your protection theory simply doesn't hold water, unless of course you regard the ST as being anti establishment.
As for membership, I'm told UKIP has around 25000 members, while my estimate of the BNP's membership is around 10000 max. Both figures are of course open to question.
I also note you avoid the question of an apology from Griffin to: Sadie, Ian, Rodger, Kenny Etc. They knew enough was enough, as far as Collett was concerned, more than two years before Griffin seems to have got the message, but all were purged simply for warning the grassroots membership who paid their salaries, about Collett. And NO, as paid party officials their ultimate loyalty was (quite rightly) to the membership not to the chairman.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
I'm not going into past history Chris.
We've an election to fight, and our party is on the right track.
SORTED.
I'm not commenting on this subject again as it is irrelevant to the job in hand.
Hi Charles,
OK fair enough!
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Ya, we could go for ever about membership..
My Dad became a member of ukip and never gave them a penny. He is not interested in them any more either.
Since the EU elections, Wigans membership Has increased by almost 30%.
Thats the numbers game as I see it.
Dear Andy (15:06 hrs),
You said:
"My Dad became a member of ukip and never gave them a penny. He is not interested in them any more either."
I say:
Are you sure about that? Just because your dad's name isn't on the UKIP donors list, doesn't mean we (UKIP) haven't had £100K from him. :-)
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
My mistake Chris.
Dad did pay for ukip membership. It was something like a fiver.
No, he is not renewing.
Post a Comment