GENERAL ELECTION MAY 6TH

The General Election is expected to be called tomorrow and set for May 6th.

"Gordon Brown will announce on Tuesday morning that the general election will, as expected, be held on 6 May, BBC political editor Nick Robinson says.

The prime minister will go to Buckingham Palace to ask the Queen to dissolve Parliament.

On returning from the Palace he will formally confirm the date and make a speech in Downing Street in which he will dub the election "the big choice"."

Bring it on and lets get the TRAITORS out of Parliament.


VOTE BNP
SECURE YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN'S FUTURE

UKIP CAUGHT WITH THEIR HANDS IN THE TILL. OINK OINK.

UKIPs Lord Pearson & Nigel Farage appear not to have declared certain Donations to UKIPs Election Fund that have gone through a unincorporated association called "GLOBAL BRITAIN" which was set-up by Lord Pearson to LAUNDER LARGE DONATIONS TO UKIP.

In the Times article UKIP MEP Stuart Agnew is explaining to a Female Journalist how to donate to UKIP in a certain way using LOANS and going through "Global Britain" unincorporated to launder donations to UKIP
He also explains that to help UKIP AVOID PAYING BACK THE DONATION through clauses in her (The Female Journalists) Mothers WILL.
And that a donation of upto £25:000 or above will not be declared and the Donor remains anonymous.
He also admits that Peter (unknown)? and what he does or doesn't do for UKIP is ILLEGAL.

Lord Pearson is heard explaining how a donation to "Global Britain" will actually go into UKIPs ELECTION FUND UNDECLARED and the IDENTITY of the DONOR kept SECRET

He also claims that during the Euro Elections £80.000 & £100,000 donations were undeclared and the donors identity was kept secret through LAUNDERING MONEY through "GLOBAL BRITAIN".

I do hope the UKIP voters understand that Lord Pearson and Co may be heading to the courts for their ILLEGAL ways of accepting ILLEGAL donations and hiding the identities of donors.

Watch the two Videos HERE

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7086827.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797084

The BNP will welcome any disaffected or dissapointed UKIP members.

At least when Mark Collett was caught out the BNP suspended him straight away, unlike the TRAITOROUS PIGS IN PARLIAMENT.

THE PACIFIC

A new series by the same people who made 'Band of Brothers'. This one is the Pacific war against Japan.

The first three episodes can be downloaded here by anyone who uses µTorrent

http://www.kickasstorrents.com/search/the-pacific/

Morg
.

BNP ELECTION ODDS 4

BNP ODDS TO WIN A SEAT -

888sport - 11/4
BETFRED - 3/1
BLUESQ - 11/4
William HILL - 12/5


BNP ODDS TO NOT WIN A SEAT

888sport - 1/4
BETFRED - 2/9
BLUESQ - 1/4
William HILL - 3/10

VOTE MATCH: GENERAL ELECTION 2010

This is quite an interesting interactive piece in todays on-line Telegraph:

Vote Match is a guide which helps you determine your preference for the 2010 UK General Election by matching your views on the issues most important to you with each political party's policies.

Click on here and give it a try:

ANOTHER THING ...

... that happens when muslims have the upper hand.

Morg
.

SOME INTERESTING NUMBERS

THE LATEST TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE BULLETIN ON COUNCIL SALARIES ABOVE £100,000

At least 1,250 council staff nationwide get that salary or more. These are NOT elected councillors but paid staff. Our share of that in Wigan is:

Joyce Redfearn, Chief Executive; Total Remuneration 2007-2008 £196,268; 2008-2009 £200,891; increase of 2.4%.

David Smith, Executive Director;Total Remuneration 2007-2008 £159,733; 2008-2009 £147,493; DECREASE of 7.7%.

Bernard Walker, Executive Director; Total Remuneration 2007-2008 £150,035; 2008-2009 £137,101; DECREASE of 8.6%.

Sue Johnson, Deputy Chief Executive; Total Remuneration 2007-2008 £108,265; 2008-2009 £136,725; increase of 26.3%

Martin Kimber, Executive Director; Total Remuneration 2007-2008 £114,385; 2008-2009 £133,907; increase of 17.1%.

Nick Hudson, Executive Director; Total Remuneration 2008-2009 £125,531.

I'm making no comments about those salary levels (and some of the increases) other than to say that if you NEED more than £52,000/year (£1,000/week) then in my personal opinion you must have a lifestyle problem. That's just my personal opinion.

Having said that, and speaking as an outsider (Welsh) who has lived within the jurisdiction of 14 different councils in my life, and Wigan for some six years now, Wigan is one of the two best councils (the other exceptionally good one was High Wycombe, in Buckinghamshire) I've experienced.

Wigan is Labour is Labour is Labour, and has been seemingly forever. High Wycombe is Tory is Tory is Tory and has been seemingly forever. I wouldn't say one was first best and the other second best - they are just the two best.

I won't name the worst council I've experienced, but will say the first three years there it was Labour-controlled, and the second three years it was Tory-controlled. It was equally bad in both cases.

From what I've just written I've arrived at the conclusion that what decides whether you have a good council or a bad council does NOT depend on the colour of the political control, but rather the quality of the paid staff (all the paid staff, not just the highly paid staff). So maybe the salaries listed above are justified? I don't know other than my personal comment above about needing more than £52,000/year. Make your own judgements, the comment column here is available.

However, I will describe an observation I've made over the past few years: the people who complain the most about the council seem to be people who've never lived within the jurisdiction of any other council. So how can you know the council is bad or good or average if you've nothing to compare it against? If you do complain about the effectiveness of the council, please try and imagine how bad a council can be, if you think Wigan's bad.

I'll probably get it in the neck for saying those things ... but they are what I think, and a can say nothing different.

Those numbers were awfully big though, weren't they!

Morg
.