NO HUMAN RIGHTS FOR PALESTINIAN CHILDREN FROM THE ISRAELIS

Mistreating Palestinian Children

 

Societies perhaps are best judged by how they treat prisoners, their most disadvantaged and children.

On March 20, Israeli soldiers mass arrested about 30 children. Obama arrived the same day. Every child passing Tareq Bin Zeyad street was seized. They were heading for school in Hebron.

They were taken to Kiryat Arba police station. They were interrogated with no adult present. Israel’s Youth Law requires it. Shin Bet pays it no heed. Children are isolated from parents. They’re terrorized. It’s standard Israeli practice.

Targeted children committed no crimes. An Israeli army spokeswoman said soldiers “operated in the area today in order to contain rock hurling at security forces (following an increase in) rioting.”

At least 14 were aged 11 or younger. Some were young as 8. Israel treats children like adults. International law is clear. A child is anyone under age 18. State Parties are legally bound to treat them accordingly.
Principle 1 of the UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child says:
“Every child, without exception whatsoever, shall be entitled to (fundamental human and civil) rights, without distinction or discrimination on account of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, whether of himself or of his family.”

They’re entitled to special protections and opportunities. It’s to help them develop physically, mentally, morally, spiritually, and socially. It’s so they’ll do it under conditions of freedom and dignity.

They include the right to life, an adequate standard of living, healthcare, education, leisure, safety and peace. For over four decades, Israel systematically denied Palestinians all rights.

On March 31, Haaretz headlined “The IDF must stop arresting children,” saying:
On March 20, Israeli soldiers “ambushed and arrested” Palestinian children. At least 18 were under age 12. They’re below “the minimum age at which they can legally be held responsible for a crime.”
“This large-scale roundup was arbitrary.” Soldiers grabbed every child they saw. First and second-graders aged 8 or younger were taken.

Doing so was reprehensible. International law forbids it. So does Israeli law. Arrests came days after a UNICEF report. It’s titled “Children in Israeli Military Detention.”
It sharply criticized Israel. It said around 700 Palestinian children aged 12 – 17 are arrested annually. It’s about two per day. Thousands have been mistreated. They’re terrorized. They’re harshly interrogated.
Doing so “amount(s) to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The Convention on the Rights of the Child mandates that they be kept safe from harm.

Article 4 states:
“Governments have a responsibility to take all available measures to make sure children’s rights are respected, protected and fulfilled.”

Article 37 states:
“No one is allowed to punish children in a cruel or harmful way. Children who break the law should not be treated cruelly.”

Other provisions mandate State Parties to ensure that “No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

“Every child deprived of his or her liberty shall have the right to prompt access to legal and other appropriate assistance, as well as the right to challenge the legality of the deprivation of his or her liberty before a court or other competent, independent and impartial authority, and to a prompt decision on any such action.”

Israel spurns international law. It violates its own. It ignores its High Court rulings. According to UNICEF:
“In addition to Israel’s obligations under international law, the guiding principles relating to the prohibition against torture in Israel are to be found in a 1999 decision of the Supreme Court, which is also legally binding on the Israeli military courts.”

“The Court concluded that a reasonable interrogation is necessarily one free of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and that this prohibition is absolute.”
Based on interviews UNICEF conducted, abuse and mistreatment persist. It’s consistent during arrest, transfer, detention and interrogation.

Heavily armed soldiers break into homes pre-dawn. Parents and children are terrorized. Threats and physical violence follow. Fundamental rights are systematically denied.

UNICEF calls Israeli mistreatment “widespread, systematic and institutionalized.” Children are taken from their families. They’re detained. They’re terrorized under harsh conditions. Many become traumatized.

“In no other country are children systematically tried by juvenile military courts that, by definition, fall short of providing the necessary guarantees to ensure respect for their rights.”

On March 29, Gideon Levy headlined “Aged eight, wearing a Mickey Mouse sweatshirt, and placed in Israeli custody,” saying:
Hebron area Palestinian children “never made it to school this week. IDF troops lay in ambush for them.”
Hebron residents were unnerved. They saw dozens of Israeli soldiers on streets and rooftops. They were justifiably frightened.

Children were arrested indiscriminately. An International Solidarity Movement volunteer videotaped what happened. She sent it to B’Tselem. It’s available on its web site and YouTube.

Israel deported the photographer the same day. Western media ignored what happened.
“Ahmed Abu Rimaileh woke up at 7 that morning,” said Levy. His mother gave him pocket money. He left for school. He stopped to buy cookies. He kept another shekel for recess.

He was about to leave the store. Seven or eight children rushed in. So did soldiers. Arrests followed.
Ahmed was scared. He began crying. He and other detained children “were thrust into an army vehicle.” Some sat. Others stood. One child was hit. They were taken to Kiryat Arba police station.

They were placed in a closed courtyard. They were told to sit on the ground. Children over age 12 were separated from younger ones. They were taken to Ofer Prison.
“Children asked to go to the bathroom but were forbidden to do so.” Police asked who threw stones. No one confessed. They were asked if they knew who threw them. Two older children were named. They’d been arrested and separated from others.

Ahmed was released. The next day he didn’t want to go to school. Who could blame him. His parents persuaded him. He didn’t go to classes. He stayed in the principal’s office all day.

“He wants to be a doctor when he grows up….His mother says he is a good student and a good boy.” He has “seven brothers and sisters. The five boys sleep in one room, on two beds and on mattresses on the floor.”
Ahmed’s mother knows Israeli arrests happen often. “We are used to it,” she said. It doesn’t make it right. It gets worse. Palestinian children are terrorized, traumatized, tortured, abused, and imprisoned. Most sentences range from two weeks to 10 months.

Sworn affidavits obtained from the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PACTI), Adalah, DCI-Palestine, and other human rights groups say systematic cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment are commonplace.
Children are forcefully arrested, painfully handcuffed, blindfolded, intimidated, verbally abused, strip searched, beaten, threatened, isolated, sexually threatened and abused, and forced to sign confessions in Hebrew they don’t understand.

It’s standard practice. On average, it happens twice daily. What’s a child to do? Going to school, running errands for parents, or playing with friends is risky. Normal life under occupation’s impossible.

Charging children with stone throwing is commonplace. It’s unconscionable. It happens daily. Under Military Order 1651, Section 221, it’s punishable as follows:
against people or property, it carries a maximum 10 year penalty; for children aged 13 or younger, it’s six months; and throwing stones or other objects against moving vehicles risks up to 20 years imprisonment; for children 13 or younger, it’s six months.

In practice, it’s two weeks to 10 months. It’s unjust, improper and lawless. It persists. Anything goes is policy. Young children are treated like adults. Some never fully recover from the experience.

 MISTREATING PALESTINIAN CHILDREN

IS WORLD WAR III LOOMING ?

Top Economic Advisers Forecast War and Unrest

Kyle Bass, Martin Armstrong, Larry Edelson, Charles Nenner, James Dines, Nouriel Roubini, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber and Jim Rickards Warn of War

 

We’re already at war in numerous countries all over the world.
But top economic advisers warn that economic factors could lead to a new world war.
Kyle Bass writes:

Trillions of dollars of debts will be restructured and millions of financially prudent savers will lose large percentages of their real purchasing power at exactly the wrong time in their lives. Again, the world will not end, but the social fabric of the profligate nations will be stretched and in some cases torn. Sadly, looking back through economic history, all too often war is the manifestation of simple economic entropy played to its logical conclusion. We believe that war is an inevitable consequence of the current global economic situation.

Martin Armstrong writes this week:

We will be updating the Cycle of War. Obviously, it is time once again. Especially since that model also hit to the day 3 times in a row.

Similarly, Larry Edelson wrote an email to subscribers entitled “What the “Cycles of War” are saying for 2013″, which states:

Since the 1980s, I’ve been studying the so-called “cycles of war” — the natural rhythms that predispose societies to descend into chaos, into hatred, into civil and even international war.
I’m certainly not the first person to examine these very distinctive patterns in history. There have been many before me, notably, Raymond Wheeler, who published the most authoritative chronicle of war ever, covering a period of 2,600 years of data.
However, there are very few people who are willing to even discuss the issue right now. And based on what I’m seeing, the implications could be absolutely huge in 2013.

Former Goldman Sachs technical analyst Charles Nenner – who has made some big accurate calls, and counts major hedge funds, banks, brokerage houses, and high net worth individuals as clients – says there will be “a major war starting at the end of 2012 to 2013”, which will drive the Dow to 5,000.
Veteran investor adviser James Dines forecast a war is epochal as World Wars I and II, starting in the Middle East.
Nouriel Roubini has warned of war with Iran. And when Roubini was asked:

Where does this all lead us? The risk in your view is of another Great Depression. But even respectable European politicians are talking not just an economic depression but possibly even worse consequences over the next decade or so. Bearing European history in mind, where does this take us?

He responded:

In the 1930s, because we made a major policy mistake, we went through financial instability, defaults, currency devaluations, printing money, capital controls, trade wars, populism, a bunch of radical, populist, aggressive regimes coming to power from Germany to Italy to Spain to Japan, and then we ended up with World War II.
Now I’m not predicting World War III but seriously, if there was a global financial crisis after the first one, then we go into depression: the political and social instability in Europe and other advanced economies is going to become extremely severe. And that’s something we have to worry about.

Billionaire investor Jim Rogers notes:

A continuation of bailouts in Europe could ultimately spark another world war, says international investor Jim Rogers.
***
“Add debt, the situation gets worse, and eventually it just collapses. Then everybody is looking for scapegoats. Politicians blame foreigners, and we’re in World War II or World War whatever.”

Marc Faber says that the American government will start new wars in response to the economic crisis:

• “The next thing the government will do to distract the attention of the people on bad economic conditions is they’ll start a war somewhere.”

• “If the global economy doesn’t recover, usually people go to war.”

We’re in the middle of a global currency war – i.e. a situation where nations all compete to devalue their currencies the most in order to boost exports. And Brazilian president-elect Rousseff said in 2010:

The last time there was a series of competitive devaluations … it ended in world war two.

Jim Rickards agrees:

Currency wars lead to trade wars, which often lead to hot wars. In 2009, Rickards participated in the Pentagon’s first-ever “financial” war games. While expressing confidence in America’s ability to defeat any other nation-state in battle, Rickards says the U.S. could get dragged into “asymmetric warfare,” if currency wars lead to rising inflation and global economic uncertainty.

As does Jim Rogers:

Trade wars always lead to wars.

And given that many influential economists wrongly believe that war is good for the economy … many are overtly or quietly pushing for war.
Moreover, former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said that the Iraq war was really about oil , and former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. And see this and this. If that war was for petroleum, other oil-rich countries might be invaded as well.
And the American policy of using the military to contain China’s growing economic influence – and of considering economic rivalry to be a basis for war – are creating a tinderbox.
Finally, multi-billionaire investor Hugo Salinas Price says:

What happened to [Libya's] Mr. Gaddafi, many speculate the real reason he was ousted was that he was planning an all-African currency for conducting trade. The same thing happened to him that happened to Saddam because the US doesn’t want any solid competing currency out there vs the dollar. You know Gaddafi was talking about a gold dinar.

Indeed, senior CNBC editor John Carney noted:

Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power? It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era.
Robert Wenzel of Economic Policy Journal thinks the central banking initiative reveals that foreign powers may have a strong influence over the rebels.
This suggests we have a bit more than a ragtag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences. “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising,” Wenzel writes.

Indeed, some say that recent wars have really been about bringing all countries into the fold of Western central banking.

Many Warn of Unrest

Numerous economic organizations and economists also warn of crash-induced unrest, including:

• The head of the World Trade Organization

• The head of the International Monetary Fund

• The head of the World Bank

• Leading economic historian Niall Ferguson

• Leading economist John Williams

 

S0 were on the verge of WWIII.
In our not so great country how will we be protected?
Do we dust off the old WWII Bunkers and batten down the hatches hoping for the best or 'Duck and Cover'?

Let's face it that is ALL we can do.

Our Governments have been wasting Billions of Pounds of OUR TAXES on Foreign Aid instead of constructing Nuclear Bunkers/Fall out shelters to protect its citizens.

Wouldn't it be ironic if our Aid Taxes went on to pay for massive Underground Shelters in the Third world leaving us in Britain to suffer the fate of Thermonuclear war.
Russia has been building, on a huge scale, underground bunkers to protect its citizens.

Why haven't our Governments been doing the same for us, are we not worthy of life/survival?
Maybe they think that after its all over no one would want to live in Post-Apocalyptic Britain.
Or maybe they've decided that if anyone is going to be saved its going to be them.

Then again this could all be just scaremongering, but wouldn't it be better to err on the side of caution, just in case?

Whichever way and whatever happens we are always going to be shat on by the Elites of Westminster, and we pay them to do it too.

WE MUST BE MAD, LITERALLY MAD.

THE GLOBAL DISAPPEARANCE OF BEES

“Up to 12 million Bees Found Dead in Florida and No one Knows Why”.

I believe it was Albert Einstein that  said that “if the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe, man would have only four years to live”. 

Basically his theory makes a lot of sense. 

No Bees, No Pollination!  

There is no question the bees are becoming extinct. Ask any “beekeeper” and they’ll tell you the same.

I know there have been attempts at “alternative” Pollination but none have ever been successful. Only the Bees can do what GOD designed them to do.

Well for the last 7 years the bees worldwide have been disappearing and no one really knows why.
The disorder has significantly affected bee populations since the 1970′s with a sharp increase in losses since 2006. Now, as beekeepers return to their hives to prepare for spring pollination, they are finding that at least half of their bees are gone.
This syndrome, named colony collapse disorder, or CCD, is characterized by the disappearance of adult honey bees from the hive, leaving the newborns to fend for themselves.
The 2013 year now marks the highest loss on record with at least 50 percent of all European honeybees in the U.S. reported lost to CCD.

Honey bees are of vital importance, and their declining populations are an incredibly critical issue.
As pollinators, they are responsible for over 130 different fruit and vegetable crops that we eat.
As they travel from blossom to blossom in search of nectar, pollen sticks to their furry body and is transferred to another flowering blossom enabling it to swell into a ripened fruit.
Animal pollination is essential for nuts, melons and berries, and plays varying roles in citrus fruits, apples, onions, broccoli, cabbage, sprouts, courgettes, peppers, aubergines, avocados, cucumbers, coconuts, tomatoes and broad beans, as well as coffee and cocoa.

Just what’s killing the bees remains a mystery but beekeepers are beside themselves, often approaching their hives to find hundreds of worker bees dying outside the hives each day. 

As the bees die, farmers lose the ability to pollinate crops, reducing yields and thereby the food supply. 

Farmers are now projecting that the decrease in the supply of fruits and vegetables will be so great that prices will be impacted by the summer of this year. 

A number of beekeepers blame pesticides for the loss of their bees, specifically as class known as neonicotinoids.  

Neonicotinoids are a form of pesticide that work by blocking the nerve endings in insects, paralyzing them so that they die slowly by starvation. Beekeepers think their bees are being exposed to the pesticides and are dying as a result.

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/04/10/global-disappearance-of-bees/

John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook – 27.03.13

John Bean’s Nationalist Notebook – 27.03.13

Don’t Let Ukip con U

We should at least thank Ukip for  making it fashionable to at last discuss the problems of mass immigration. Although British Democrat candidates in the local elections will find that at the moment it is UKIP who is going to reap the electoral harvest it has raised.
The more politically alert have already rumbled UKIP. It is not so much a political party as a safety valve for the LibLabCon. It’s not in business to stop immigration or to get Britain out of the EU, but to stop others from doing so. By ‘others’ I mean the British Democratic Party when its full potential is realised by the electorate.
In the 14 years that Nigel Farage and his chums first appeared in Brussels they have achieved nothing – not counting excellent lunches and Farage himself admitting he had gained £2 million in EU expenses in that period (part paid by British taxpayers).
I say ‘nothing’ because under his rule Ukip has never actually campaigned in Brussels for Britain to leave the EU. As Marta Andreasen (a Ukip MEP who fell foul of Nigel) has revealed: “Ukip/Nigel has  not campaigned for a referendum. The Party is only saying we want out, but does not show how. There was never a plan and there is no plan today either.”
Just before our 2010 Parliamentary election Ukip (then minus two MEPs  who had been jailed for fiddling their expenses) needed a boost to their falling support. It started to suggest they would do something about immigration. They even called for a five year ban. But in  reality this was all a sham.
On the Daily Politics Show 4^th May 2010 Farage said: “We would need a minimum of a quarter of a million work permits annually”.
Then on Question Time 25^th November 2010 he said: “I am not opposed to immigration. Much of the immigration to this country has been good”.
On Good Friday 2010 on Radio 4’s Any Questions Farage was asked what achievement was he most proud of. Interestingly, he said: “stopping the BNP from ever becoming a large political party”.
Today, with Ukip now flavour of the month, voters are again being deluded that it can offer a full policy. It will almost certainly go the same way as the 2010 election policy. According to Nikki Sinclaire, another Ukip MEP who Farage has driven out, it was torn up by Farage who told his election workers that the people know what we stand for.
Since his secret dinner with Rupert Murdoch, the global capitalist newspaper owner who is said to be supportive of Farage’s  views towards Europe, if he expects backing from Murdoch’s The Sun and the Times he will have to curtail some of his hot air on immigration

Why All Further Immigration Must be Stopped

Whether you are talking about housing -  and social housing in particular, destruction of the green belt, the strain on the NHS, the undercutting of workers’ wages, worsening education for our children in state schools, congested roads and motorways, plus most other problems facing Britain today, the affect of immigration can no longer be avoided. Just take three issues which made the news in March.
1. Although the coalition Government, with Labour approval, has talked the talk of curbing migrants’ access to council housing and made play with the 2011-12 statistic that immigrants only occupy  9 per cent of social housing stock ( surely it must be at least 10 per cent now?), as there are 3.8 million social housing  rentals today (Independent 21 February 2013) this means 380,000 immigrant families. Probably a higher percentage take private rentals, which are 3.84 million, and the immigrant demand is known to force up rents.
2. Further aggravation of the issue will occur in nine months when the Romanians and Bulgarians are allowed to come here without let or hindrance. It will only be 15,000 to 20,000, the Government unofficially suggests. The more reliable figures coming from MigrationWatch are that it will be around 50,000 people a year for the next five years!
3. We recommend an investigation report by the Sunday Telegraph (24 March 2013)
“The Surge in foreign students who come to Britain then disappear”. Considerable  evidence is given to show that abuse of the system applies to most of the more than 100,000 foreign students who came here last year, 20 times the figure of two years ago.
We have well wishers of the Brit Dems who suggest that we would get more support if we were not so rigid on immigration. We must face it. With one person in five in Britain now being an immigrant, or born here of recent immigrant stock, and Afro-Asians having a  higher birth rate than the indigenous people, there is no alternative. All further immigration must be stopped and those who are here illegally should be deported. Otherwise our children and  grandchildren will be the ethnic minority in  these islands by 2050.

You can be Gay and a Brit Dem

If you are ‘straight’ then it is natural to feel some revulsion if contemplating the sexual practices of homosexuals. However, it is high time that nationalists accept the fact that a considerable number of gays  are fellow believers in our socio-political struggle to maintain  these islands as the homeland of the British.
What they do in private is their own affair. It should remain as being private. All we ask is that they do not join with those gays who seem intent in proselytising  our youth to become ‘converts’. If that is accepted, then they can be welcomed as supporters of the British Democratic Party.
Many gays who have wanted to bond with a partner with some form of marriage are quite content with a Civil Partnership. My personal view (which is a majority view among the public) is that this should not be extended to a church marriage, which is against the very principles of the Christian Church since its foundation. Therefore, why is this Government  pushing the gay marriage concept? Under the legislation they are passing they now have plans to make the chapel of St.Mary Undercroft, which has been the main place of Christian worship in the Palace of Westminster for 700 years, a multi-faith prayer room – so that it can be used to conduct same-sex weddings. The scheme was proposed by Labour front bencher Chris Bryant, who is openly gay.
Gross exaggeration  of sufferings that some gays have had to put up with does not help their case. Such as  when the BBC, in an Easter message, likens the treatment of gays in Britain to the crucifixion of Christ. Benjamin Cohen, the founder of the gay publisher Pink News, tells Radio 4 listeners that just like homosexual people, Jesus was punished “for something he couldn’t help’.

Classical Music is ‘Racist’

If you wondered what us old nationalists mean when we talk about ‘cultural Marxists’, here’s a ‘classical’ example.
The politically-inspired Marxists (i.e. followers of Communism and its off-shoots) who run Unite Against Fascism and Hope not Hate have long established the view that if you believe in halting immigration then any attempt to speak publically on this   should be halted by violence – particularly by UAF.
The attack on European culture has long been part of the Marxist’s long-term  campaign in order to make us more acceptable to their concept of a one-world, multi-cultural state. The above organisations have now issued an edict to target Classic FM and Radio 3 as elitist and racially offensive to minorities. This is what they say:
“Classical music is dead and should be seen for what it is, the decadent leftovers from a dying white imperialist culture that has no relevance to anybody in the younger generation. It is an anachronism that this exclusionist crap should still be tolerated, when we have such a harvest of black and global cultural music to hear and enjoy. Nobody wants to hear about dead German composers or the Nazi Wagner! It is time this stuff was treated like smoking and global warming deniers and its supporters driven to the fringes of society.  The Far Right closely identify with so called classical music and that should be enough to eradicate it from our lives in the global village.”
My musical tastes are catholic, in that I am quite happy to listen to tuneful popular music. Many of the nationalists I have mixed with in the past enjoyed music as played by Eric Clapton, Paul Weller and The Jam, and some Beatles songs. We also enjoyed trad jazz, of which the New Orleans black artists were the tops. If you have an old recording of  Otis Redding singing “I’m Sitting on the Dock of the Bay” then compare it with the criminality of much of today’s crap, sorry rap, noise -  hardly ‘music’.
I also enjoy much classical music, particularly Sibelius, Richard Straus, such as his Four Last Songs, and even some Wagner – Tristan and Isolde  in particular. I find some string quartet’s heavy going. And I tend to agree with an old friend of mine who dubbed medieval church  music  as “I’v e-caught-my-knackers-in-the-mangle music”.

Another view of the Budget

“The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled, public debts should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest we become bankrupt, the mobs should be forced to work and not depend on government for subsistence.”
This come from Marcus T Cicero 55BC.
Obviously, we’ve not learnt a lot in the last 2,068 years.

GOVERNMENT TO SUBSIDISE MORTGAGES FOR IMMIGRANTS

When you bought your home how much did the Government give you to help pay for the cost of the Motgage ?

Well they're now going to help Immigrants to buy their own homes by using your taxes to give them cheaper mortagages.

Foreigners 'can qualify for state-subsidised mortgages'

Foreigners will probably be able to qualify for state-subsidised mortgages announced in the Budget, it has emerged 

"

Analysis of plans set out by Chancellor George Osborne to make it cheaper for people to take out loans shows that people from inside and outside the European can qualify.

In an analysis published by a leading law firm, asked: “Can EU and non EU residents get government mortgages?” It replied: “Likely to be yes – [it] could be political if non EU residents get government funding.”

David Anderson, a partner at SykesAnderson, said human rights rules would make it impossible to stop foreigners from taking advantage of the scheme.

Mr Anderson said: “It would be difficult to stop EU nationals and EU residents, or you would be stopping the free movement of labour.

“If someone wants to come to work here and they could not access the same finance as English person, it would be a case for discrimination because it would prevent them from moving here.”"

READ THE REST HERE AND GET ANGRY THEN PREPARE FOR CIVIL WAR, IT'S OUR ONLY OPTION TO SORT THIS DISCRIMINATION OUT -

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/budget/9952998/Foreigners-can-qualify-for-state-subsidised-mortgages.html

MORE JOYS OF IMMIGRATION - CELEBRATE THE DIVERSITY

Afghan rape marathon in swedish refugee camp, Mariannelund. A dozen refugees rape a caretaker. A socialist reacted to the gruesome crime:" It's racism to expel them". Seven afghan refugees to Sweden were convicted of a gruesome mass rape.

 The prosecutor said it was the most gruesome rape marathon in the nations history. Nearly a dozen afghans raped of a 29-year old mother of two, a caretaker non-stop for 7 hours.

Afghans asylum seekers at the Mariannelund refugee camp tasked a friend with bringing a woman to the refugee camp so they could rape her. The main character, Rafi Bahaduri went to the home of a 29 year old female caretaker.

He tricked her into the car and to took her to the refugee housing where he and the others raped her. The young mother of 2 children were taken to the refugee camp under false pretense where a dozen asylum seekers waited. The refugees forced her down on a bed and ripped her clothes off.

The rape was oral, anal and vaginal sometimes with three rapists inside her at the same time while everybody was cheering and clapping. The gruesome rape marathon lasted for 7 hours. 11 suspect may have been involved taking turns while drinking and getting high on drugs.

The asylum seekers were cheering and clapping their hands during the rape marathon while calling the victim "whore" and "slut". For primitive afghans, a "whore" means any non-muslim woman and rape is accepted practice.

 A total of 11 rapists were suspected of taking part in the afghan rape marathon. Only 7 were convicted, they got 4.5 - 6.5 years in prison, those expelled are permitted back after a few years.

The main suspect who tricked the victim to go with him to the rape den will not even be expelled. The victim is now in a wheelchair suffering from mental distress.

GANG WARFARE ON THE STREETS OF BRITAIN - ONE OF THE JOYS OF IMMIGRATION

About two miles north-east of Birmingham city centre, in an area of Aston known for violence among gangs and drug dealers, six gang members are gathered in a building. The older members – 'elders’ – are doing what they have always done, which is teaching young members how to follow in their paths, imparting their knowledge to the next generation.

Tobeijah Atkinson, 'The Rev’, is an elder. He is 27. But instead of giving the youngsters a gun and teaching them how to sell drugs, which formed part of his own education as a gang member, he is teaching them business skills. Another elder, 36-year-old Simeon Moore, 'Zimbo’, who 'started rolling with knives when he was 12’, is writing a school programme about personal development, to encourage young people to believe that their options are not limited to a criminal lifestyle.

Atkinson is affiliated to the Burger Bar Boys, Moore to the Johnson Crew – two of the most notorious gangs in the country with a hardcore membership of about 24 on each side. Two years ago, Atkinson and Moore might have pulled guns on each other. Now they are working together.

This extraordinary change is down to a documentary, One Mile Away. Directed by Penny Woolcock and produced by James Purnell, the former Labour cabinet minister, it charts what happens after two rival gang members – Matthias 'Shabba’ Thompson, 33, from the Johnsons and Dylan Duffus, 31, from the Burger Bar Boys – take the decision to call a truce and campaign for peace.

 The gangs share the same Afro-Caribbean background, the same hostility to the police and the same criminal lifestyle – they are from the same community, but are separated by a postcode. The Johnsons are from the B6 and B19 area of Birmingham, and the Burgers from the neighbouring B20 and B21.

The distance between the homes of Duffus and Thompson is about one mile. Each gang has territories – certain streets, certain hangouts – and the appearance of rival gangsters in the wrong place can lead to bloodshed. And it soon becomes clear in the film that not everyone shares Thompson’s and Duffus’s desire for peace.

You can read the rest of the LEFTIST Propaganda here -

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/9918593/One-Mile-Away-Birmingham-gangs-give-peace-a-chance.html

And we're supposed to celebrate this "DIVERSITY" ?

Show me the WHITE Street Gangs in Britain.