Wednesday, 10 November 2010
CAMERON'S BIG? SOCIETY
The proposed increase in university tuition fees is a kick in the teeth for young students given by those who were educated free of charge(after they left public school)
That much is self evident but let's examine the issue in more detail and the underlying reasons.
First was the decision to increase student numbers to 50%. This entailed building many new colleges and giving university status to establishments of dubious value. These in turn "teach" such academically rigorous subjects such as media studies, film studies, golf course management etc which are of little value to the students or the country.
So why go to all this expense? Why delude these kids that their "qualifications" will be the key to a secure future in the jobs market?
One reason is to reduce the youth unemployment figures and at the same time make it "seem" that the governement is "investing" in education.
The second reason is that these misled students, of necessity build up large debts which can take years to pay off and create a nice little? earner for the banks.(Today it has been announced that one bank Barklays is paying £4.2 billion in bonuses)
After graduating these cheated young people if they want to live independntly must take a mortgage out or pay a high rent (more interest payments to the banks). Oh and they must pay into a pension,(more money to investment bankers) soon to be made compulsary
Thus they never get out of the grip of the financial wolves of the "City".
What can they do?
Well they can't start a family and must remain at home with their parents. Thus the birth rate for indigenous Brits falls and this is used to highlight the "need" for immigrants to look after our old people.
The ones with mediocre qualifications are condemned to a life of debt and dependancy on the banks.
Those with qualifications which are sought after abroad emigrate thus avoiding repaying their student debt. But the main downside is that talented young people avoid university altogether.
Thus we have shortages of engineers,doctors, nurses etc and are told we must import them from abroad, ironic after all the money which has been lavished on education in recent years. This of course dilutes our society and culture and makes us dependent on "experts" who were taught in foreign institutions of dubious worth.
How to solve the problem and give our young people a chance?
For a start universities should become more efficient.
Lectures are often given to as many as 90 students and lecturers are not highly paid so where the universities get their prices from is a mystery. They often reply that research is costly. So it is but that is for industry and government to pay for. It should not be subsidised by students.
Secondly courses should be free and limited to subjects the country needs (I know I have said this before),and good apprenticeships made available, the costs paid back by working for a period in this country.
I have mentioned the latter points before but the saddling of a generation with a lifetime of debts and few prospects is a far more sinister threat to them and us who will increasingly sidelined in our own society. But is that not what Cameron wants in his "Big Society"?
A globalised society with big banks calling the shots and the ordinary people just small units of production as in Orwell's 1984 and forever controlled by the "elite"
STOP PRESS.---Cameron has told Chinese students that the increase in fees our students must pay will enable Chinese students studying here less. That is our students subsidise Chinese students.
He couldn't be more blatant than that, or could he?
The BNP believes fees should be scrapped for all British students, but then we are not in hock to the banks.
That much is self evident but let's examine the issue in more detail and the underlying reasons.
First was the decision to increase student numbers to 50%. This entailed building many new colleges and giving university status to establishments of dubious value. These in turn "teach" such academically rigorous subjects such as media studies, film studies, golf course management etc which are of little value to the students or the country.
So why go to all this expense? Why delude these kids that their "qualifications" will be the key to a secure future in the jobs market?
One reason is to reduce the youth unemployment figures and at the same time make it "seem" that the governement is "investing" in education.
The second reason is that these misled students, of necessity build up large debts which can take years to pay off and create a nice little? earner for the banks.(Today it has been announced that one bank Barklays is paying £4.2 billion in bonuses)
After graduating these cheated young people if they want to live independntly must take a mortgage out or pay a high rent (more interest payments to the banks). Oh and they must pay into a pension,(more money to investment bankers) soon to be made compulsary
Thus they never get out of the grip of the financial wolves of the "City".
What can they do?
Well they can't start a family and must remain at home with their parents. Thus the birth rate for indigenous Brits falls and this is used to highlight the "need" for immigrants to look after our old people.
The ones with mediocre qualifications are condemned to a life of debt and dependancy on the banks.
Those with qualifications which are sought after abroad emigrate thus avoiding repaying their student debt. But the main downside is that talented young people avoid university altogether.
Thus we have shortages of engineers,doctors, nurses etc and are told we must import them from abroad, ironic after all the money which has been lavished on education in recent years. This of course dilutes our society and culture and makes us dependent on "experts" who were taught in foreign institutions of dubious worth.
How to solve the problem and give our young people a chance?
For a start universities should become more efficient.
Lectures are often given to as many as 90 students and lecturers are not highly paid so where the universities get their prices from is a mystery. They often reply that research is costly. So it is but that is for industry and government to pay for. It should not be subsidised by students.
Secondly courses should be free and limited to subjects the country needs (I know I have said this before),and good apprenticeships made available, the costs paid back by working for a period in this country.
I have mentioned the latter points before but the saddling of a generation with a lifetime of debts and few prospects is a far more sinister threat to them and us who will increasingly sidelined in our own society. But is that not what Cameron wants in his "Big Society"?
A globalised society with big banks calling the shots and the ordinary people just small units of production as in Orwell's 1984 and forever controlled by the "elite"
STOP PRESS.---Cameron has told Chinese students that the increase in fees our students must pay will enable Chinese students studying here less. That is our students subsidise Chinese students.
He couldn't be more blatant than that, or could he?
The BNP believes fees should be scrapped for all British students, but then we are not in hock to the banks.
Monday, 8 November 2010
DANGEROUS THINKING
Steve Shark and Leg Iron are seduced by the dark side. Well, sort of. The idea that the permanently workshy will be forced to work sounds good, at first. Indeed, for those of us of a certain frame of mind, it’s almost too good to be true. Remember what they always say on those confidence trickster television programmes? If something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
It sounds a lovely idea. We’re paying for the unemployed anyway, so we might as well pay them to do something useful. In fact, it might even do them some good. Yes, that’s it! We can use the government to improve people! After all, we’ve been paying for them all these years, and if we can just force them to become working, taxpaying individuals, give them a good start, something to put on their reference, after all, it’s not really their fault…
Sounding familiar?
It’s a scam. It’s slave labour mixed with “public works schemes” dressed up to appeal to the non-left. Seriously, these poor slaves will largely never still never escape the benefits trap. At least, not the ones who have never worked, or not worked for decades. Vast pools of slave labour tend to depress wages, so the likelihood of benefit slavery being a stepping-stone to an unskilled job that pays enough to replace the low-cash but housing-etc-rolled-in indentured labour scheme is low. The benefits trap is just that -a trap- and that is unlikely to change, save for the fact that those within it will now be slaves. The State won’t let those slaves go that easily.
What do you suppose the life chances of free unskilled labour are in places where slavery exists? Who is going to pay you when they can get slave labour for free? So all these dole-scroungers get forced to pick up litter. What do you suppose happens to people who currently work for Cleanaway or SITA? You can earn quite good money emptying dustbins or sweeping the streets, and provided you don’t mind being up early and out in all weather you don’t even have to be the full shilling. What do you suppose will happen to those people once the councils realise they can cancel the contracts and get the unemployed to do the work? On the dole with you! Out to sweep the streets for free, slave, and lose your house and stay in this dodgy council-approved bedsit to boot! Oh, and we’ll probably take your kids into care to be fiddled and buggered and moulded into the next generation of government lackeys too, since you AND your wife now have to go to work at 6am and can’t get them to school…
No, I can’t support this. What we have now is broken, bloated and definitely unsustainable, but this alternative has the potential, nay, likelihood of growing into something much much worse. A Trojan Horse smuggling in a massive increase in the power and scope of the government under a banner of reducing the welfare state.
http://wh00ps.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/dangerous-thinking/
And anyway, as I've said elsewhere, how are the overseers going to keep themselves anonymous?
Morg
.
It sounds a lovely idea. We’re paying for the unemployed anyway, so we might as well pay them to do something useful. In fact, it might even do them some good. Yes, that’s it! We can use the government to improve people! After all, we’ve been paying for them all these years, and if we can just force them to become working, taxpaying individuals, give them a good start, something to put on their reference, after all, it’s not really their fault…
Sounding familiar?
It’s a scam. It’s slave labour mixed with “public works schemes” dressed up to appeal to the non-left. Seriously, these poor slaves will largely never still never escape the benefits trap. At least, not the ones who have never worked, or not worked for decades. Vast pools of slave labour tend to depress wages, so the likelihood of benefit slavery being a stepping-stone to an unskilled job that pays enough to replace the low-cash but housing-etc-rolled-in indentured labour scheme is low. The benefits trap is just that -a trap- and that is unlikely to change, save for the fact that those within it will now be slaves. The State won’t let those slaves go that easily.
What do you suppose the life chances of free unskilled labour are in places where slavery exists? Who is going to pay you when they can get slave labour for free? So all these dole-scroungers get forced to pick up litter. What do you suppose happens to people who currently work for Cleanaway or SITA? You can earn quite good money emptying dustbins or sweeping the streets, and provided you don’t mind being up early and out in all weather you don’t even have to be the full shilling. What do you suppose will happen to those people once the councils realise they can cancel the contracts and get the unemployed to do the work? On the dole with you! Out to sweep the streets for free, slave, and lose your house and stay in this dodgy council-approved bedsit to boot! Oh, and we’ll probably take your kids into care to be fiddled and buggered and moulded into the next generation of government lackeys too, since you AND your wife now have to go to work at 6am and can’t get them to school…
No, I can’t support this. What we have now is broken, bloated and definitely unsustainable, but this alternative has the potential, nay, likelihood of growing into something much much worse. A Trojan Horse smuggling in a massive increase in the power and scope of the government under a banner of reducing the welfare state.
http://wh00ps.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/dangerous-thinking/
And anyway, as I've said elsewhere, how are the overseers going to keep themselves anonymous?
Morg
.
'WHAT IS IT' - NUCLEAR TERRORISM ?
I have mentioned before on this blog that terrorists with a "Dirty Bomb" within the UK may be responsible for the way British Governments behave in regards to the treatment of known Islamists within the UK.
Why are the Islamists allowed to preach and demand in public that we in the west who are not mohammedans should be beheaded or attacked and murdered for being non-believers ?
We have seen time and time again our Governments allowing into this country known Islamist Imams who have declared Jihad (holy-war) on the west, I have wondered why they are allowed into this country to travel freely around our country and live in our country fomenting hatred against us.
Another instance of the British government failing to halt this hatred and its Islamist peddlers is to allow the Egyptian thief (I call him a thief as in Shari Law anyone found guilty of theft, robbery etc have their hands chopped off) Abu Hamza (who is unable to wipe his own a**e) to stay in our country.
They have allowed the Mohammedan Law system 'Sharia Law' to take the place of our own 'Common LAW' within Mohammedan communities.
Many Islamists in this country who spread hatred of us have been arrested but not sent to prison and are freed due to government "Control Orders", but are still able to do what Islamists supporters do which is fomenting Terrorism, raising funds, spreading hatred against us within their Mosques (Barracks) and promoting terrorism and Jihad against us.
A while back I did a blog on here called - "WHAT IS IT"
http://wiganpatriot.blogspot.com/2010/09/what-is-it.html,"
asking why Islamists and known Mohammedan preachers of hate and known supporters of Mohammedan terrorism (JIHAD) against the west are allowed to stay in our country, visit our country to spread hatred against the west in Mohammedan mosques up and down the country and one Imam who was refused entry because of his support for Jihad and his extreme views, had the security chief in Whitehall, and the probable next head of MI6, supporting his entry into this country
Well now I think I know why -
Please click and follow the links below to get a better idea of where I'm coming from on this.
Armenian smugglers tried to sell Nuclear Material to Terrorists
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/armenia/8116106/Armenian-smugglers-tried-to-sell-nuclear-material-to-terrorists.html
Mission to stop Nuclear terrorsim
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/8053159/Mission-to-stop-nuclear-terrorism.html
If terrorists have a "Dirty Bomb" within the UK it could explain why Mohammedan terrorists and their supporters are allowed virtual free reign in their hatred of us, usurping our Laws and customs, hunting in packs and commiting Racist attacks,
murdering non-believers, usually indigenous British who are unacompanied. They never attack without a gang of them.
They are Grooming, Raping and prostituting underage Indigenous British Girls with impunity, supplying and selling Class A drugs 'Heroin Jihad' selling Halal meat to the unsuspecting public and demanding our subservience, .
Is Britain being held to ransom with the threat of a "Dirty Bomb" ?
Why are the Islamists allowed to preach and demand in public that we in the west who are not mohammedans should be beheaded or attacked and murdered for being non-believers ?
We have seen time and time again our Governments allowing into this country known Islamist Imams who have declared Jihad (holy-war) on the west, I have wondered why they are allowed into this country to travel freely around our country and live in our country fomenting hatred against us.
Another instance of the British government failing to halt this hatred and its Islamist peddlers is to allow the Egyptian thief (I call him a thief as in Shari Law anyone found guilty of theft, robbery etc have their hands chopped off) Abu Hamza (who is unable to wipe his own a**e) to stay in our country.
They have allowed the Mohammedan Law system 'Sharia Law' to take the place of our own 'Common LAW' within Mohammedan communities.
Many Islamists in this country who spread hatred of us have been arrested but not sent to prison and are freed due to government "Control Orders", but are still able to do what Islamists supporters do which is fomenting Terrorism, raising funds, spreading hatred against us within their Mosques (Barracks) and promoting terrorism and Jihad against us.
A while back I did a blog on here called - "WHAT IS IT"
http://wiganpatriot.blogspot.com/2010/09/what-is-it.html,"
asking why Islamists and known Mohammedan preachers of hate and known supporters of Mohammedan terrorism (JIHAD) against the west are allowed to stay in our country, visit our country to spread hatred against the west in Mohammedan mosques up and down the country and one Imam who was refused entry because of his support for Jihad and his extreme views, had the security chief in Whitehall, and the probable next head of MI6, supporting his entry into this country
"Charles Farr has said he is willing to “put himself on the line” to secure Dr Naik’s entry." [...]
"What could the underlying force be that is sweeping its way through our Institutions, that the man who was in line for Britains top security job, the Head of MI6, is willing to put his whole credibilty and job on the line for a Islamist Terrorist supporter, to gain Zakir Naik and his family entry into Britain ?"
Well now I think I know why -
NUCLEAR TERRORISM -"Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili claimed that he had uncovered and foiled a plot to sell highly enriched uranium to an Islamist extremist group" [...]
"Prosecutors said they had smuggled 18 grams of HEU by train from the capital of Armenia, Yerevan, to the capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, in a lead-lined cigarette box. Such a quantity was nowhere near enough to make a nuclear bomb but was meant as a "taster sample" with more HEU available if the buyer was satisfied. " [...]
"It is unclear how much stolen nuclear material is already in circulation and how much may have already been purchased by extremist groups."
Please click and follow the links below to get a better idea of where I'm coming from on this.
Armenian smugglers tried to sell Nuclear Material to Terrorists
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/armenia/8116106/Armenian-smugglers-tried-to-sell-nuclear-material-to-terrorists.html
Mission to stop Nuclear terrorsim
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/8053159/Mission-to-stop-nuclear-terrorism.html
"American intelligence officials believe that if al Qaeda could get its hands on a piece of highly enriched uranium (HEU) the size of a grapefruit, let alone a consignment as big as the Polish one, the destruction of a city like London, New York or Washington would follow."
If terrorists have a "Dirty Bomb" within the UK it could explain why Mohammedan terrorists and their supporters are allowed virtual free reign in their hatred of us, usurping our Laws and customs, hunting in packs and commiting Racist attacks,
murdering non-believers, usually indigenous British who are unacompanied. They never attack without a gang of them.
They are Grooming, Raping and prostituting underage Indigenous British Girls with impunity, supplying and selling Class A drugs 'Heroin Jihad' selling Halal meat to the unsuspecting public and demanding our subservience, .
Is Britain being held to ransom with the threat of a "Dirty Bomb" ?
Maybe THATS WHAT IT IS ?
Saturday, 6 November 2010
GOVERNMENT INDUCED PLAGUES
Deadly TB cases on the rise
More news of foreign invasion, this time Tuberculosis.
It is revealed by public health specialist Dr Petrovic Markovic (good old English name)in latest figures that there were 536 new cases in Greater Manchester,179 in Lancashire and just 68 in Merseyside.
Now TB, previously a scourge was all but eradicated 30 years ago as housing and general health conditions improved.
It was associated with poor living standards and unhealthy living conditions but also by a genetic susceptibility to the disease.
With vaccination and modern treatment it was thought that this terrible disease had become a thing of the past.
I have a personal interest as my ex wife had it and was in Wrightington Hospital for four months at the time of the birth of my first daughter and was not allowed contact with her baby until the baby was 2 months old. This means my daughters could have inherited the genetic succeptibility to the disease and indeed my grandchildren could be equally at risk.
If there is no contact with TB there is no risk to them but these latest figures give me cause for alarm .
Why has this increase happened? The reason has of course not been stated but it is as a direct result of the uncontrolled immigration of people from countries where it is rife and resistant strains are prevalent because of faulty treatments.
It is no coincidence that in the North West that the greatest number of new cases are in the regions of highest immigration.
That means that if those in my family contract it treatment could be less easy than that of my wife who even then was disabled for over a year.
The callous disregard for the health of our young people by those of the main parties is in parallel with their disregard for our culture. To make matters worse immigrants with TB are not sent back to their countries of origin as they are in other countries but are allowed to stay BECAUSE they carry the disease, taking resources from our people who have paid for the NHS.
It gets even worse.
The figures relate only to TB. Most cases of HIV and AIDS are as a result of African migrants to our country and the cost of treatment of them is enormous, although I do not think any of my close family is at risk of these latter diseases (they will not be if they listen to their grandad).
So in a nutshell our culture and environment is increasingly eroded while our health is put in jeapordy by the governing classes in their pursuit of their globalist agenda and without our consent.
Yet people still vote for these traitors.
WHY?
More news of foreign invasion, this time Tuberculosis.
It is revealed by public health specialist Dr Petrovic Markovic (good old English name)in latest figures that there were 536 new cases in Greater Manchester,179 in Lancashire and just 68 in Merseyside.
Now TB, previously a scourge was all but eradicated 30 years ago as housing and general health conditions improved.
It was associated with poor living standards and unhealthy living conditions but also by a genetic susceptibility to the disease.
With vaccination and modern treatment it was thought that this terrible disease had become a thing of the past.
I have a personal interest as my ex wife had it and was in Wrightington Hospital for four months at the time of the birth of my first daughter and was not allowed contact with her baby until the baby was 2 months old. This means my daughters could have inherited the genetic succeptibility to the disease and indeed my grandchildren could be equally at risk.
If there is no contact with TB there is no risk to them but these latest figures give me cause for alarm .
Why has this increase happened? The reason has of course not been stated but it is as a direct result of the uncontrolled immigration of people from countries where it is rife and resistant strains are prevalent because of faulty treatments.
It is no coincidence that in the North West that the greatest number of new cases are in the regions of highest immigration.
That means that if those in my family contract it treatment could be less easy than that of my wife who even then was disabled for over a year.
The callous disregard for the health of our young people by those of the main parties is in parallel with their disregard for our culture. To make matters worse immigrants with TB are not sent back to their countries of origin as they are in other countries but are allowed to stay BECAUSE they carry the disease, taking resources from our people who have paid for the NHS.
It gets even worse.
The figures relate only to TB. Most cases of HIV and AIDS are as a result of African migrants to our country and the cost of treatment of them is enormous, although I do not think any of my close family is at risk of these latter diseases (they will not be if they listen to their grandad).
So in a nutshell our culture and environment is increasingly eroded while our health is put in jeapordy by the governing classes in their pursuit of their globalist agenda and without our consent.
Yet people still vote for these traitors.
WHY?
Friday, 5 November 2010
FOUNDATION X
WHO OR WHAT IS FOUNDATION X ?
HAS IT TRIED TO BUY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT ?
HAS IT TRIED TO BUY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT ?
So when an eminent member of the House of Lords stands up six hours into a debate and blows the gaff on a shadowy foreign Foundation making a bid to buy the British state, and this is recorded in Hansard, one tends to sit up and take notice. And one takes even more notice when His Lordship tip-toes around actually naming the Foundation in question, especially after the throw-away about money-laundering for the IRA on behalf of the Bank of England. Parliamentary privilege only stretches so far, it seems, and Foundation X is beyond its reach. I'm going to quote at length below the cut — if you want to read the original, search for "1 Nov 2010 : Column 1538" which is where things begin to tip-toe into Robert Ludlum territory.
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/11/conspiracy-theories.html
............................................
Taken from HANSARD (Thanks to TPUC for HANSARD details)
Taken from HANSARD (Thanks to TPUC for HANSARD details)
For the past 20 weeks I have been engaged in a very strange dialogue with the two noble Lords, in the course of which I have been trying to bring to their attention the willing availability of a strange organisation which wishes to make a great deal of money available to assist the recovery of the economy in this country. For want of a better name, I shall call it foundation X. That is not its real name, but it will do for the moment. Foundation X was introduced to me 20 weeks ago last week by an eminent City firm, which is FSA controlled. Its chairman came to me and said, "We have this extraordinary request to assist in a major financial reconstruction. It is megabucks, but we need your help to assist us in understanding whether this business is legitimate". I had the biggest put-down of my life from my noble friend Lord Strathclyde when I told him this story. He said, "Why you? You're not important enough to have the answer to a question like that". He is quite right, I am not important enough, but the answer to the next question was, "You haven't got the experience for it". Yes I do. I have had one of the biggest experiences in the laundering of terrorist money and funny money that anyone has had in the City. I have handled billions of pounds of terrorist money.
http://www.tpuc.org/content/you-might-find-interesting
Click on text to take you to the full articles
Who are/is FOUNDATION X ?
What are/is FOUNDATION X ?
HOIST BY HIS OWN PETARD
The news that Phil Woolas has had his election overturned for misrepresenting his opponents is a good news story for democracy, albeit a small step.
By making misleading statements about his Lib Dem opponent he has lost his seat and job.
How many times have our candidates been misrepresented as fascists or even Nazis when their policies have only been to protect our culture? We have often been smeared by these unjustified allegations in spite of our commitment for true democracy and our opposition to any form of coercion or violence.
I am pleased with this result being a small step in prohibiting the slander to which we seem to be repeatedly subject. Hopefully it will make the other parties a bit more careful and circumspect when attacking us.
The Lib Dems of course have the financial clout to bring cases such as this, aided sometimes by donors of dubious repute but I'm sure in future we will use this judgement to defend ourselves.
"As ye sow so shall ye reap" to coin a phrase.
So, Lib Lab Con you will have to be a bit more careful in future before your opening your lying mouths.
Be careful, we will be watching.
By making misleading statements about his Lib Dem opponent he has lost his seat and job.
How many times have our candidates been misrepresented as fascists or even Nazis when their policies have only been to protect our culture? We have often been smeared by these unjustified allegations in spite of our commitment for true democracy and our opposition to any form of coercion or violence.
I am pleased with this result being a small step in prohibiting the slander to which we seem to be repeatedly subject. Hopefully it will make the other parties a bit more careful and circumspect when attacking us.
The Lib Dems of course have the financial clout to bring cases such as this, aided sometimes by donors of dubious repute but I'm sure in future we will use this judgement to defend ourselves.
"As ye sow so shall ye reap" to coin a phrase.
So, Lib Lab Con you will have to be a bit more careful in future before your opening your lying mouths.
Be careful, we will be watching.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)