Sunday, 30 December 2012

CIVIL UNREST WARNING - NEW LABOUR PASSING THE BUCK

City Leaders Warn Of 'Civil Unrest' Amid Cuts

City leaders have warned that spending cuts could lead to social unrest and the "break-up of civil society".

The council leaders of three of England's biggest cities - Newcastle, Liverpool and Sheffield - say the north of England has been unfairly targeted.

But there are also signs of a backlash from rural authorities, mostly Conservative-led, who claim the shires are losing out disproportionately under the Government's cuts.

The criticism presents a headache for David Cameron, who announced in the Autumn Statement that councils must find a further 2% of savings in 2014/15.

That comes on top of the 27% cuts announced in 2010.

The Labour leaders of Newcastle, Liverpool and Sheffield - where Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg is an MP - wrote to The Observer accusing Whitehall of "Dickensian" views.
"Rising crime, increasing community tension and more problems on our streets will contribute to the break-up of civil society if we do not turn back," they write.

"The one nation Tory brand of conservatism recognised the duty of government to help the country's most deprived in the belief that economic and social responsibility benefited us all.
"The unfairness of the Government's cuts is in danger of creating a deeply divided nation.
"We urge them to stop what they are doing now and listen to our warnings before the forces of social unrest start to smoulder."
Separately, The Sunday Telegraph reported that more than 120 rural councils were weighing up a judicial review of the spending settlement for local authorities because it was "grossly unfair" and would hit services in remote areas.

DON'T SAY WE DIDN'T TELL YOU IT WAS COMING.

 

A New Year approaches with warnings of Civil Unrest due to the cuts in their budgets. 
If the Lib/Lab/CONned hadn't flooded our country with millions of immigrants their would never be a warning about Civil Unrest due to the cuts.
Why ?
Because we wouldn't be giving our wealth and country away to every one who steps foot on our land.
We could use some the £Billions saved by removing ALL BENEFITS FOR ALL IMMIGRANTS until our own are not found wanting.
If your going to have Civil Unrest on Englands Streets then look at who has bought all this down on us......the Lib/Lab/CONned will have NO SOLUTION, if they were good enough they wouldn't have allowed this country to become part of the THIRD WORLD.

Look towards those who offer the ANSWERS to the destruction of our land and people.    Before it turns into CIVIL WAR

We now produce only 40% of the food needed to feed everyone.
Fields have been given over to "SET A SIDE" schemes, now growing Trees and Shrubs instead of Crops and Grazing Fields.
Then add the Immigration problem on top of that.
We are now told about the HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS of Imported DISEASE RIDDEN ASH TREES -


Strange how many Acres of Land have just become freed up for building houses on after the removal of the "DISEASED TREES"

"chalara fraxinea – is now threatening to wipe out 80 million trees in Britain"

Coincidence ?

WAKE UP.


HAPPY NEW YEAR


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, 29 December 2012

Thursday, 20 December 2012

The great global warming swindle - Full version



 

All "THEY" are trying to do is TAX the AIR THAT WE BREATH in order to line the pockets of MULTI-MILLION/BILLIONAIRES.

Monday, 17 December 2012

DECLARATION OF RIGHT

Declaration Of Right

This is a brief outline of our inalienable RIGHTS.

Definition:
Inalienable -
Adjective:
Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor: "inalienable human rights of the citizen"

Declaration Of Right

  
"The Petition of Right at the beginning of the 17th century, and the Declaration of Right and Bill of Rights at the end, embody a century long fight to constrain the power of Government. At that time it was the Monarch who desired a divine right. Today it is our Parlimentarians. The Petition of Right and Declaration of Right are Common Law contracts between the People and the Crown. The Bill of Rights is a statue law enactment of the Declaration of Right.
The Declaration of Right was imposed upon William and Mary as a condition of their assuming the Crown - in other words, they would only be elected by the People if they accepted its terms.
The Declaration of Right, and the Bill of Rights, clearly state that -
no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.
So it can clearly be seen that every EU treaty imposed upon us by Parliament, is unconstitutional. Here is the evidence that our present Monarch has indeed broken her Coronation Oath, by giving Royal Assent to these treaties.
Other constitutional rights given by these contracts -
  • The right to bear arms
  • The right to petition the Sovereign
  • Free men cannot be imprisoned without cause
  • The Government cannot arrest any man because he disagrees with the Government’s policies
  • Habeas corpus is not to be denied
  • No person will be compelled to make loans to the King, and there will be no tax without the approval of Parliament
  • Soldiers and sailors will not be billeted on civilians
  • Government will not impose martial law during peacetime
The right to bear arms gives every person the right to self defence using reasonable force, including deadly force if appropriate. Using tragic events as an excuse to remove that right has historically been the work of governments with good reason to fear their people - governments intent on some kind of future totalitarian control of their populations."

With thanks to -

The BCG don't make any mention of the FOREIGNERS or offspring of FOREIGNERS who are now sitting in positions of  jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm.
Don't you think that's a point we should be making vehemently and explaining how this DENYS US OUR RIGHTS ?

I do think that there is more to RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS than for self defence.
Surely it was also used to keep the PTB on their toes and to ward off Totalitarian and Despotic Regimes as well as for the rapid mobilisation of the Population, used to carrying and using Arms, against INVASION.

I don't think an unarmed and untrained in Arms "Olivers Army" would have fared well against the well Armed and trained Royalists in the ENGLISH CIVIL WAR.

"THEY" cannot stop us BEARING ARMS  ENGLISHMEN SHOULD ASSERT THEIR RIGHTS, as laid down in the ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS (1689)and the PTB come for them, then they will be facing Armed ENGLISHMEN who would then be within their RIGHTS to FIGHT A NEW CIVIL WAR AGAINST THE TRAITORS AND THOSE WHO WOULD DESTROY US.

THEY ARE OUR RIGHTS - "THEY" CANNOT TAKE THEM AWAY AND NO LAW CAN SUPERCEDE RIGHTS, EVEN THOUGH THEY WILL TRY TO TELL YOU DIFFERENT.

RIGHTS OVERRULE  LAWS.

ENGLISHMEN SHOULD STAND UP, BECOME THE FEARLESS AND FEARED ENGLISHMAN AGAIN AND BE COUNTED, AND FIGHT FOR OUR/YOUR RIGHTS AS AN ENGLISHMAN.


AS WE HAVE NOTHING TO FIGHTBACK WITH AT PRESENT
THE LIB/LAB/CONned ARE PISSING ON OUR GRANDFATHERS GRAVES, OUR WAR DEAD GRAVES, OUR ANCESTORS GRAVES.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

 Taken from Wikipedia -

The meaning of RIGHTS

Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement; that is, rights are the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people, according to some legal system, social convention, or ethical theory.[1] Rights are of essential importance in such disciplines as law and ethics, especially theories of justice and deontology.
Rights are often considered fundamental to civilization, being regarded as established pillars of society and culture,[2] and the history of social conflicts can be found in the history of each right and its development. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws, and the shape of morality as it is currently perceived."[1] The connection between rights and struggle cannot be overstated — rights are not as much granted or endowed as they are fought for and claimed, and the essence of struggles past and ancient are encoded in the spirit of current concepts of rights and their modern formulations.


Saturday, 15 December 2012

HIGH PROFILE RACISM FROM A HIGH PROFILE RACIST JAMIE FOXX "AS A BLACK PERSON IT'S ALWAYS RACIAL

BLACK ACTOR JAMIE FOXX DOING WHAT ANTI-RACISTS DO BEST AND OPENLY DECLARE THEIR ANTI-WHITE RACISM. FOXX ALSO WANTS MORE FILMS ABOUT THE HOLO(HOAX)CAUST AND THE SLAVE TRADE TO BE MADE EVERY 3 YRS OR SO, ENFORCING BIGOTED ANTI-WHITE RACIST BELIEFS WITHIN THE NON-WHITE COMMUNITIES -: ANTI RACISM IS CODE FOR ANTI-WHITE.

 .................

Jamie Foxx: ‘Every single thing in my life is built around race’

 Oscar-winning actor Jamie Foxx, snubbed this week during the Golden Globe  nominations for his leading role in the upcoming slavery-era revenge fantasy “Django Unchained” says “every single thing in my life is built around race.”

“Django Unchained,” directed by Quentin Tarantino, features Foxx as a freed  gun-toting slave on a revenge mission to hunt the men who sold his wife (played  by Kerry Washington) to an evil slave owner (played by Leonardo DiCaprio).

The movie, scheduled to open Christmas Day, is already generating controversy for its indelicate, and at times campy, treatment of slavery, as well as the amount of times the N word is used (by some counts, the word is used more than 100 times throughout the film).

In an interview in the December-January issue of Vibe, Foxx discussed how race plays into his job as an actor and how the movie is likely to be perceived among different racial  communities.

“When I get home my other homies are like how was your day? Well, I only had  to be white for at least eight hours today (or) I only had to be white for four  hours,” Foxx told Vibe. “Everything we do is that. When you’re talking about the  script, of course it’s going to be controversy,” he added.
Foxx says he’s anticipating some pretty sharp reactions to the movie,  especially from the black community.

As black folks we’re always sensitive,” Foxx said. “As a black person it’s always racial. I come into this place to do a photo shoot and they got Ritz  crackers and cheese — I’ll be like, ain’t this a b—-. Y’all didn’t know black  people was coming. What’s with all this white s—? By the same token, if there  is fried chicken and watermelon I’ll say ain’t this a b—-? So, no matter what  we do as black people it’s always gonna be that. Every single thing in my life  is built around race. I don’t necessarily speak it because you can’t.”

The movie, conceptually at least, is not unlike Tarantino’s last revenge  fantasy, “Inglourious Basterds,” in which a group of Jewish American soldiers  hunt down Nazis. But Foxx is certain “Django Unchained” will be received  differently.

“I told (Tarantino), black people watch a movie different than white folks.  When you watch (‘Inglourious Basterds’), Jewish people have a more quiet  response. [WHISPERS]‘I can’t believe they did that.’ When black people don’t  like something it’s like: [LOUDER]‘Ay dawg, why Olivia Pope went down like that.  That s— is f—– up.’
“Because there’s certain things that we watch as black people that if we don’t agree with it, we not only turn off the movie but we turn off that person,” Foxx added. “When we feel like the character was compromised by the white establishment.”

But despite the controversy, Foxx maintained that it’s important for  Hollywood to continue to make movies about slavery. “Every two, three years there is a movie about the Holocaust because they want you to remember and they want you to be reminded of what it was,” Foxx  said. “When was the last time you seen a movie about slavery?”
Well I guess he should make it all about race. After all, about this movie he says, “I get to kill all the white people in this movie! How great is that?”

Imagine living your life focused on your race or gender? How utterly miserable one would be in seeing your life through just one prism? I doubt MLK, Jr. would approve.

----------------

The unashamedly open RACISM towards WHITES committed by Blacks, Jews and Asians such as Foxx, Diane Abbott, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Ed Milliband and other assorted IMMIGRANTS is allowed and encouraged to be used OPENLY and FREELY without fear of prosecution.
Yet if we (The INDIGENOUS POPULATION) complain about ANTI-WHITE RACISM, IMMIGRATION, CHILD GROOMING etc we are instantly labeled RACISTNAZISWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJOOOS.
 
Especially here in England where you can be sent to prison for using WORDS which the INDIGENOUS POPULATION ARE FORBIDDEN TO USE  ON THE PENALTY OF IMPRISONMENT but is used openly by these IMMIGRANT groups in daily life.

WE are unable to set up groups specifically for WHITES or the INDIGENOUS PEOPLE who are WHITE.
The IMMIGRANTS HAVE MANY MANY GROUPS AND CHARITIES SPECIFICALLY RACIALLY TARGETED SUCH AS OPERATION BLACK VOTE, BLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION or any of these 


 "THEY" tell us we live in a "FREE SOCIETY", only "THEY" are FREE. FREE TO LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, MURDER, RAPE, COMMIT TREASON, COMMIT PAEDOPHILIA and more FREE FROM PROSECUTION.

And it's going to get worse.

Aren't you sick of the lies and hypocrisy from the LIB/LAB/CONned?



Tuesday, 11 December 2012

BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MEMBERSHIP FORM (pdf)


Join the BDP NOW– Link to Membership form below!

 

Get into the Fight for OUR COUNTRY and OUR SURVIVAL and help BRITAIN to become a NATION FIT FOR HEROES.

Become a Member and/or an Activist of the


British Democratic Party



You could make all the difference in taking OUR COUNTRY BACK.



DON'T DELAY - JOIN TODAY

Click here for the BDP Membership form. (pdf)


This could be our last chance to reclaim our BIRTHRIGHT and to assert OUR RIGHTS as laid down in Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights (1689) and Common Law.

From the English Bill of Rights (1689)


 "no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm"

The statement above should make you realise the truth about who should be sitting in Parliament, the Lords, Judiciary/Law Courts, Police, Military, Religious Leaders, Council Leaders, Lord Mayors, Monarchy ... Take a good look at the Foreign Names of the so-called "Elected" representative. Jack Straw

Unless you open your eyes to OUR BETRAYAL then all of the above will be meaningless to you and you won't understand your Servitude, the Oppression your under, your STRICTLY DEFINED FREEDOMS, your LACK OF RIGHTS and FREEDOMS.

 Rights and Freedoms for which my (OUR) Grandparents and many many thousands before, were willing to (and many many Indigenous British did), give their Lives in order that we should remain FREE FROM TYRANNY, HATE and OPPRESSION, especially in OUR MOTHERLAND.

We are not the only ones to be betrayed by LABOUR/LIB-DEMS/CONServatives. 

The LIB/LAB/CON have LIED TO US, STOLEN FROM US, BETRAYED US and PUNISHED US if we spoke out.

In BRITAIN 2012 you can be sent to PRISON for using WORDS, not for GUNS, KNIVES, PAEDOPHILIA, DRUG IMPORTATION, RACIALLY MOTIVATED ATTACKS AGAINST the INDIGENOUS POPULATION etc.

Isn't it time we put a stop to this? 

If you vote for the LIB/LAB/CON then you deserve what's coming to you in the very near future and from the very people you encouraged to replace us with after OUR GENOCIDE.
If you have a conscience then listen to it, abandon the LIARS, THIEVES,PAEDOPHILES and TRAITORS and help us to make BRITAIN A PLACE SAFE FOR YOUNG and OLD ALIKE and a NATION FIT FOR OUR HEROES IN OUR ARMED FORCES








 

yaz