Saturday, 5 May 2012

Sign this e-petition Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK

Sign this e-petition

Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK




Ban Religious Slaughter in the UK

Responsible department: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Under UK law, all farmed animals have to be stunned to render them unconscious before their throats are cut. However, a special legal exemption (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/contents/made#sdiv12) which applies ONLY to Halal and Kosher slaughter, means that animals slaughtered, “by a religious method” for halal or kosher meat - are exempt. We believe that on animal cruelty grounds, that this exemption should be removed. This method has now been found illegal under the legislation but those in power refuse to change the law or press charges.This group is not racist, is not anti Muslim or anti Jewish. It is concerned over animal welfare in the UK. Pre-stunning of animals is not sufficient to render the animal fully unconscious until it is dead.


Not received your confirmation email?
Number of signatures:

Not received your confirmation email?
700
Created by:
jen colclough
Closing:
12/08/2012 15:23

ELECTION POST MORTEM

The local election results have as expected been disasterous for the BNP.
In the Wigan area some interesting facts can be gleaned.

First the Tories are even more hated than they were previously and the BNP had some success in beating them.
Congratulations to Morgan in Ince for having well beaten the Tory, and to Dennis Shambley for doing the same in Abram and Steve Bradbury in Hindley.

However the results in this area also show that in spite of it being a Labour stronghold Independents did well as shown by the vote gained by Gary Chadwick and Chris Garfin in Leigh.
Gary almost beat the Tory while Chris easily beat his Tory opponent.
I do not think that Gary and Chris would have gained so many votes if they had stood under the BNP banner, an indication of the toxicity the party has become under the present leadership.

The Community Action Party was well beaten and the odious, uncouth Peter Franzen saw his support drop even further. It is Ironic that a few years it looked and he thought that they would become the largest party in Wigan and the possibility of him becoming mayor.

That he did not was because of our standing a candidate in Douglas ward and in spite of polling few votes it was enough to deprive his party of a majority in Wigan.
Similarly in Golborne I believe in the past we caused his defeat, a defeat from which he has never recovered.
No we did not win in these wards but winning is not always necessary to influence the results.
Another bit of good news was that Franzen's extremist undemocratic friend Stephen Hall was well beaten.

So what is the general verdict?

First, the Tories suffered a disaster, well deserved on account of their incompetence and general lack of  concern for ordinary people.
It made my heart glad to see the glum face of the arrogant and out of touch Cameron.
Perhaps he will now listen to people a bit more.

Secondly, good Independent candidates can beat Labour, even in Wigan.
And thirdly there is still, in spite of the poor leadership of the BNP a resevoir of people who will vote nationalist if a clean and competent party emerges.
Many voters stayed at home having lost interest in the present political system.
We nationalists need to enthuse them, show them that unlike the other parties we are on their side and then reap the reward.

BUT WE CAN'T AND WON'T UNDER GRIFFIN.

His verdict, "we are still here and have spread our word".
Yes maybe but people have not voted for his party and that is what counts.

UKIP, Nationalism lite got 16% where they stood and deprived many Tory councillors of their seats even if they did not themselves get elected.
THEIR INFLUENCE IS INCREASING.
The Tories are frightened of UKIP and their presence will influence government policies.
BUT THEY IGNORE THE BNP.

At a time of recession and general disillusionment with the major parties thje BNP should have massively increased its influence and votes.
The time is ripe.

SO WHY IS IT NOT DOING SO MR GRIFFIN?

COULD YOU BE THE REASON?

When other parties do badly, pressure is exerted on the leader and he is often changed.

IS IT NOT TIME FOR YOU TO GO?

For the sake of our country and movement PLEASE DO.




Friday, 4 May 2012

THE THIN BLUE LINE OF JIHAD - MELANIE PHILLIPS

The Telegraph reports (link) that the National Association of Muslim Police has attacked government policy on countering Islamic extremism. In evidence to a parliamentary committee investigating Islamic extremism, the NAMP attacked

the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy, warning that it is an ‘affront to British values’ which threatens to trigger ethnic unrest... that ministers were wrong to blame Islam for being the ‘driver’ behind recent terrorist attacks. Far-Right extremists were a more dangerous threat to national security... that Muslims were being ‘stigmatised’ by the Government’s attempts to tackle terrorism, which was adding to ‘hatred’ against entire communities.

...The memorandum warned that Muslims were subjected to 'daily abuse' due to the strategy. 'We must not diminish our British values further by continuing to allow such behaviour and policies to continue unchecked.'

This is an extremely alarming development.

First, a general point. The very idea that police officers form themselves into interest groups of any stripe whatever should be anathema to the ethic of policing. That applies equally to Black, Gay, Jewish or One-Legged Transgendered Red-Haired Police associations. Police officers should serve the entire community equally, and should have no agenda but that professional commitment of equal public service to all. The idea that they identify themselves as an interest group is simply wrong, and the police service should never have allowed this to develop.

The memorandum by the National Association of Muslim Police, however, is of a different order of magnitude altogether.

To take their least serious point first: the idea that there is no Islamic threat and that the real threat to Britain comes from the ‘far right’ is demonstrably ludicrous. The ‘far right’ poses no threat to Britain other than some low-level thuggery. The Islamist threat to Britain is very great indeed. Dozens of Islamist plots aimed at murdering thousands of people have been thwarted, and the security service say between 2000 and 4000 British Muslims are radicalised to potential acts of terrorism. This terrorism is part of a global holy war being waged in the name of Islam. While many British Muslims support neither the aims nor the tactics of this holy war, an insupportable number do. For Muslim police officers to deny this is extremely disturbing. It means they have bought into the radical narrative of systematic denial and deceit.

But the NAMP went much, much further than this. They attacked government policy; worse, they attacked government policy aimed at protecting the lives and safety of British citizens; worse still, they suggested that British Muslims should resist that policy, and implicitly threatened disorder if it were not changed.

Let us pinch ourselves: these are British police officers, subject to the same disciplinary and professional codes as any other police officers. Yet their call for action to ‘check’ counter-terrorism policy, and the implicit threat of violence if it is not so checked, suggests that rather than helping form the line of defence against the Islamist threat, these police officers must be considered to be part of that threat.

On its website, moreover, NAMP recommends that British Muslims reporting crimes should also ‘report any such actions to the Islamic Human Rights Commission’. Let’s think about the implications of this for a moment. The IHRC is an extremist organisation with links to Iran. The NAMP is therefore advising British Muslims to use an extreme Iran-linked Islamic jihadi front organisation, which threatens the security of this nation, as a parallel law enforcement mechanism in Britain. The attempt to set up parallel Islamic institutions and jurisdiction in Britain is a core element of the Islamist attempt to suborn and take over this country.

The irony of this frightening situation is extreme. The government has bent over backwards to avoid associating Islam with terrorism. In an attempt to peel moderate Muslims away from the radicals, it has poured more than £140 million a year into ‘moderate’ Muslim groups. It has positively fallen over itself to encourage the recruitment of Muslim police officers in the belief that that this would persuade British Muslims that the government had no problem with them, only with the radicals in their midst. Yet these are precisely the policies which the NAMP claims have led to ‘hatred against Muslims’ which ‘has grown to a level that defies all logic and is an affront to British values’.

Thus the fruits of appeasement. Rather than taming jihadi extremism in Britain, the cowardice of politicians has merely resulted in fracturing the thin blue line that protects us -- and turning it into a potential weapon of the jihad.

DISASTEROUS ELECTION FOR THE BNP

NICK GRIFFIN HAS DONE MORE DAMAGE TO THE BNP AND NATIONALISM IN BRITAIN THAN THE UAF/LIB/LAB/CON COULD EVER HAVE DONE, SO, NOW IT'S TIME TO SAY

NICK GRIFFIN RESIGN NOW AND LEAVE IT TO THOSE WHO WANT TO FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE
YOU HAVE MADE THE BNP A LAUGHING STOCK
THE BNP ARE NOW AN IRRELEVANCE AND UNELECTABLE
IF YOU LOVE OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE THEN DO WHAT IS BEST FOR US AND NOT FOR YOU AND THE REST OF YOUR STATE AGENTS


NICK GRIFFIN RESIGN NOW



Thursday, 3 May 2012

READUCATION CAMPS BEING INTRODUCED TO AMERICA - BRITAIN NEXT ?

A leaked U.S. Army document prepared for the Department of Defense contains shocking plans for “political activists” to be pacified by “PSYOP officers” into developing an “appreciation of U.S. policies” while detained in prison camps inside the United States.

The document, entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations (PDF) was originally released on a restricted basis to the DoD in February 2010, but has now been made public.

The manual outlines policies for processing detainees into internment camps both globally and inside the United States.

International agencies like the UN and the Red Cross are named as partners in addition to domestic federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA.

The document makes it clear that the policies apply “within U.S. territory” and involve, “DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and for designated law enforcement and other activities,” including “man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.”

Aside from enemy combatants and other classifications of detainees, the manual includes the designation of “civilian internees,” in other words citizens who are detained for, “security reasons, for protection, or because he or she committed an offense against the detaining power.”

Once the detainees have been processed into the internment camp, the manual explains how they will be re-educated, with a particular focus on targeting political dissidents, into expressing support for U.S. policies.

The re-education process is the responsibility of the “Psychological Operations Officer,” whose job it is to design “PSYOP products that are designed to pacify and acclimate detainees or DCs to accept U.S. I/R facility authority and regulations,” according to the document.

The manual lists the following roles that are designated to the “PSYOP team”.

- Identifies malcontents, trained agitators, and political leaders within the facility who may try to organize resistance or create disturbances.

- Develops and executes indoctrination programs to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes.

- Identifies political activists.

- Provides loudspeaker support (such as administrative announcements and facility instructions when necessary).

- Helps the military police commander control detainee and DC populations during emergencies.

- Plans and executes a PSYOP program that produces an understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions.


Remember, this is not restricted to insurgents in Iraq who are detained in prison camps – the manual makes it clear that the policies also apply “within U.S. territory” under the auspices of the DHS and FEMA.

The historical significance of states using internment camps to re-educate detainees is the fact that it is almost exclusively practiced by repressive and dictatorial regimes like the former Soviet Union and Stalinist regimes like modern day North Korea.

We have exhaustively documented preparations for the mass internment of citizens inside America, but this is the first time that language concerning the re-education of detainees, in particular political activists, has cropped up in our research.

Remember, this is not restricted to insurgents in Iraq who are detained in prison camps – the manual makes it clear that the policies also apply “within U.S. territory” under the auspices of the DHS and FEMA.

The historical significance of states using internment camps to re-educate detainees is the fact that it is almost exclusively practiced by repressive and dictatorial regimes like the former Soviet Union and Stalinist regimes like modern day North Korea.

We have exhaustively documented preparations for the mass internment of citizens inside America, but this is the first time that language concerning the re-education of detainees, in particular political activists, has cropped up in our research.

In 2009, the National Guard posted a number of job opportunities looking for “Internment/Resettlement Specialists” to work in “civilian internee camps” within the United States.

In December last year it was also revealed that Halliburton subsidiary KBR is seeking sub-contractors to staff and outfit “emergency environment” camps located in five regions of the United States.

In 2006, KBR was contracted by Homeland Security to build detention centers designed to deal with “an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S,” or the rapid development of unspecified “new programs” that would require large numbers of people to be interned.

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border, the same pretense used in the language of the KBR request for services.

During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”

Under the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed by Barack Obama on New Year’s Eve, American citizens can be kidnapped and detained indefinitely without trial.

Read a portion of the Internment and Resettlement Operations manual below.

It look s like America, therefore the west, including Britain, lost the Cold War.

New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism


THOUGHTS ON TODAY'S ELECTION

Third of May, local election day.

In years past I would have been busy pushing for a BNP vote, and our opponents trying to get their voters out, but today it seems all quiet.
It hardly seems there is an election on at all.

Admittedly we have some able candidates in Wigan and Leigh, endeavouring to keep the BNP flame alight and Gary Chadwick standing as Independent in Leigh ensuring a nationalist presence there.

In spite of my falling out with the Party hierarchy I wish them all well.
The policies are still right and the best for our country.
However I feel that the collapse in local party morale will mitigate against a good result for us.
Labour will do well, it always does round here but it will do better percentage wise this year owing to the incompetence of the present coalition government.

I believe this election will be characterised by apathy with a low turn out.
Many see the main parties as unworthy of their votes, incompetent traitors who care little about the concerns of the man in the street and will stop at home.

These times should be where patriotism and nationalism make their breakthrough, but with the collapse of the BNP and general disillusionment with the leadership we will fail miserably.
I hope I am wrong but the BNP is a shadow of its former self and the leadership a joke.

A poor result for the BNP would not mean that the support is not there, it is that the present leadership is held in contempt.
WE NEED A NEW LEADER who is respected.

We need a Geert Wilders or Marine Le Pen to enthuse our people. A leader with no skeletons in his cupboard, a speaker and a motivator who can rebuild the support we once had and harvest votes.

The block on our progress is Griffin who has made himself immovable in spite of falling support.
That support has collapsed is shown by the photographs on the official website where in spite of photographing to the best advantage there seem few attendees.

Tomorrow when the results are in and the decline is shown to have accelerated people will realise that past disagreements should be put aside and we can unite as a Nationalist brotherhood.

I may be wrong in all this and the propaganda put out by the Party proved to be true and it will make a comeback and gain some seats or at least an increased vote.

I hope so but I doubt it.

And then I think what might have been if we had been better run.




THIS IS PROOF THAT THE FAR LEFT ARE NOT QUITE RIGHT IN THE HEAD..HEHE..HEH

The FAR LEFT PAEDOPHILE SUPPORT GROUP LEADER has now become RACIST and decided to change his video title so it says WiganPatriot (sic) Loves Ethnic Dick in some crazed attempt to try and make the following video about Mike Whitbys arrest suddenly become embarrassing to us.
The FAR LEFT PAEDOPHILE SUPPORT GROUP LEADER must think he was being intelligent.





This is the stuff we need to be posting on the net to show the mentality of the FAR-LEFT PAEDOPHILE SUPPORT GROUP.

I have just noticed this little reply from the PAEDOPHILE SUPPORT GROUP LEADER -
"Oh, and the title is just for shits and giggles, I'll change it back shortly and at the same time disable embedding. Twat."

The workings of a polluted mind me thinks.

The idiot thought that if he disabled embedding that we would not be able to watch his crazed ranting on this video, I'll leave the original with EMBEDDING DISABLED BY REQUEST on.


yaz