Wednesday, 12 October 2011
PRESERVATION OF RARE BREEDS
There is a series on the increase in numbers of mixed race in Britain on the BBC of course headed by George Alligia a mixed race newsreader himself of course who can give his unbiassed views on the subject and help celebrate the rapidly increasing numbers of mixed race people as a proportion of the population.
What the programmes are about is in truth race replacement. This situation has been encouraged by various "liberal groups" in positions of influence and see in white Europeans as everything bad, in spite of our contribution to human knowledge. These people must be infused with new blood they say.
Hybrid vigour they say. The mixed race offspring are superior to the natives as a result of this genetic infusion they say.
In effect it is a process of eugenics perpetrated against the European people, which if it had been done the other way round would have been decried as Fascism, which of course it is.
But promoting white English people's loss of their genetic heritage will never be shown in these terms.
The insidious propaganda behind these programmes is that mixed race people are superior to pure white people.
Well I was a pedigree cattle breeder and know all about the dangers of inbreeding as a result.
Thus we were obliged to purchase a new bull (of the same breed of course) to avoid this often at great cost to ensure the right genetic material.
This bull would be put with cows also selected for their superior traits otherwise his value would have been wasted and the calves produced of poor quality.
Now I am not comparing people with cattle but the genetic imperatives are just the same.
The most usual infusion of new blood into our society is from a black man who has a child with one or many white slags, many of whom are members of the underclass and ugly or oversexed or they could have chosen a white man to father their child.
So what is the result. A combinationof their genetic characteristics. His athleticism rhythm and social irresponsibility but on average lack of brain power with hers, low inelligence and slothfulness. I am not saying all such mixtures will have exactly the same result but the general end result will be an increase in the population of violent unintelligent but physically strong people.
Lest this is thought a racist rant I do believe some new blood can be beneficial but in small amounts.
Thus peoples of the Middle East are generally intelligent even though they are often blighted in their own countries by their muslim creed. If they integrate here, leave islam and have a child with an English partner the result can be a genius such as the late Steve Jobs.
But how many mixed race people of African descent make a mark in the intellectual world? Not many.
Indians as well as Chinese are also clever and mixed race offspring often do well.
BUT we can not tolerate too many without losing our culture. If they lived here in small numbers we could just about tolerate the situation.
Pakistanis of course exhibit the opposite effect by cousin marriage causing a high proportion of genetic deformities.
Many, including Nick Griffin and television personalities support the preservation of rare breeds of domestic animals. Knowing little about livestock they do not realise the reason for that rarity. They breed and grow slowly and are out competed in one way or another.
Endangered species are also rightly protected. Remember the concern that the Ruddy Duck was interbreeding with native wild ducks and threatening their genetic purity. What happened? The interlopers were shot to preserve the native ducks, even though these species were closely related enough to interbreed
One endangered species whose extinction the media seem to welcome is the white Europeans and especially British people.
Does our genetic heritage not matter.? Are we less important than ducks? It seems so.
Why are we endangered? Because we are not producing as many children as the mixed races and muslims.
Humans like animals are subject to a Darwinian system and we are losing our race in more ways than one.
As a member of that increasingly threatened rare breed, a white Englishman I am determined to preserve our pure European pedigree, although too old to do it by breeding.
We are on the danger list. The media seem to welcome that.
WE MUST ACT TO PREVENT OUR EXTINCTION
What the programmes are about is in truth race replacement. This situation has been encouraged by various "liberal groups" in positions of influence and see in white Europeans as everything bad, in spite of our contribution to human knowledge. These people must be infused with new blood they say.
Hybrid vigour they say. The mixed race offspring are superior to the natives as a result of this genetic infusion they say.
In effect it is a process of eugenics perpetrated against the European people, which if it had been done the other way round would have been decried as Fascism, which of course it is.
But promoting white English people's loss of their genetic heritage will never be shown in these terms.
The insidious propaganda behind these programmes is that mixed race people are superior to pure white people.
Well I was a pedigree cattle breeder and know all about the dangers of inbreeding as a result.
Thus we were obliged to purchase a new bull (of the same breed of course) to avoid this often at great cost to ensure the right genetic material.
This bull would be put with cows also selected for their superior traits otherwise his value would have been wasted and the calves produced of poor quality.
Now I am not comparing people with cattle but the genetic imperatives are just the same.
The most usual infusion of new blood into our society is from a black man who has a child with one or many white slags, many of whom are members of the underclass and ugly or oversexed or they could have chosen a white man to father their child.
So what is the result. A combinationof their genetic characteristics. His athleticism rhythm and social irresponsibility but on average lack of brain power with hers, low inelligence and slothfulness. I am not saying all such mixtures will have exactly the same result but the general end result will be an increase in the population of violent unintelligent but physically strong people.
Lest this is thought a racist rant I do believe some new blood can be beneficial but in small amounts.
Thus peoples of the Middle East are generally intelligent even though they are often blighted in their own countries by their muslim creed. If they integrate here, leave islam and have a child with an English partner the result can be a genius such as the late Steve Jobs.
But how many mixed race people of African descent make a mark in the intellectual world? Not many.
Indians as well as Chinese are also clever and mixed race offspring often do well.
BUT we can not tolerate too many without losing our culture. If they lived here in small numbers we could just about tolerate the situation.
Pakistanis of course exhibit the opposite effect by cousin marriage causing a high proportion of genetic deformities.
Many, including Nick Griffin and television personalities support the preservation of rare breeds of domestic animals. Knowing little about livestock they do not realise the reason for that rarity. They breed and grow slowly and are out competed in one way or another.
Endangered species are also rightly protected. Remember the concern that the Ruddy Duck was interbreeding with native wild ducks and threatening their genetic purity. What happened? The interlopers were shot to preserve the native ducks, even though these species were closely related enough to interbreed
One endangered species whose extinction the media seem to welcome is the white Europeans and especially British people.
Does our genetic heritage not matter.? Are we less important than ducks? It seems so.
Why are we endangered? Because we are not producing as many children as the mixed races and muslims.
Humans like animals are subject to a Darwinian system and we are losing our race in more ways than one.
As a member of that increasingly threatened rare breed, a white Englishman I am determined to preserve our pure European pedigree, although too old to do it by breeding.
We are on the danger list. The media seem to welcome that.
WE MUST ACT TO PREVENT OUR EXTINCTION
SORRY ENGLISHMAN, A PICTURE.
Sorry Englishman for the absence of the picture of Haigh hall on a previous blog. Here is one of the hall itself.
It is set in a large area of parkland which extends to within a quarter mile of Wigan town centre and is a great asset to the town and it's people.
The hall itself looks well from the outside and in the front rooms which are used for receptions but the roof and rear behind the facade are in a shocking state of disrepair.
Wigan MBC has a history of cultural vandalism.
When, a few years ago when building a new shopping precinct they found a Roman bath house which they took to pieces and placed the remnants behind the new buildings.
These Roman buildings could have been preserved. Wigan could have used these as a tourist attraction "Visit Roman Wigan",(far better than Wigan Pier.
But then the people running the council, then and now are cultural illiterates and soon our ancient town will be merely a shopping clone of many other towns with a far less historic past.
We need councillors who take pride in and love our town rather than their pockets.
WILL WE GET THEM? MAYBE IN THE FUTURE BUT THEN IT WILL BE TOO LATE.
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
LIKE A CORNERED RAT
As I said yesterday I was disappointed at how little the Panorama programme exposed.
This programme was nothing to do with politics but was only concerned with allegations of financial misdemeanours. Thus any questions asked had a validity to the State and especially to members whose hard earned cash had been use to finance the party.
Mention of the massive amount of money that Jim Dowson has allegedly gathered for the Party was there, but no indication of how it was spent was elucidated, just a statement that the General Election cost it a lot of money.
How much? We have never been told.
Yes I know there were over 100 lost deposits which would have cost over £50,000 but what about the rest.
The local parties were billed and paid for their leaflets so where was the rest of this huge amount spent?
I agree with Simon Darby that the programme was a bit of a damp squib but why in that case were there six articles attacking the programme and the BBC for creating it?
If it had no effect and all the allegations wrong why keep going on about it.This obsession with a not very informative programme and their reaction to it tends to make me believe there is much more hidden under the carpet.
Perhaps some is sub judice, I expect there is and much more will be revealed later.
In that case the BBC in its mission to close down the Party(which I agree it has) has acted prematurely. Why I can only guess. Is it inefficiency or by design?
Only time will tell but one thing is certain Griffin is unsettled by it.
The truth will come out sooner or later but in the meantime Nationalists have to move the cause forward.
The politics of the BNP are broadly correct and more a reflection of member's opimions than those of any other party.
IT IS THE LEADERSHIP WHICH IS WRONG AND WHICH PUTS THE VOTERS OFF.
Nick Griffin must realise that HE IS NOT THE PARTY.The Party belongs to its members.
I wonder whether he will hang on in his bunker until the end as did Hitler in the hope of eventual victory.
If so he will find himself with a tiny rump of incompetents still believing as did Hitler in the bunker.
We nationalists must not allow him to take our movement down with him.
We must forge a new movement and unite with other patriots in honest and common cause to save our country, even if that means a new party amalgamated with other patriots.
It can be done.
IT MUST BE DONE.
I expect a start to be made next week at Andrew Brons's meeting. I hope so for all our sakes..
P S Do you know there is a clause in the BNP constitution that guarantees Nick Griffin a generous pension paid out of Party funds? It was pushed through by him at the EGM in Codnor three years ago.
If you have forgotten I bet he hasn't, but it's still there.
So the few of you who remain loyal to the man who has deceived you will find yourselves liable for another bill. Of course if there is no BNP where does the money come from?
I neither know nor care.
I just know I will not be paying it.
IT WILL BE YOU.
This programme was nothing to do with politics but was only concerned with allegations of financial misdemeanours. Thus any questions asked had a validity to the State and especially to members whose hard earned cash had been use to finance the party.
Mention of the massive amount of money that Jim Dowson has allegedly gathered for the Party was there, but no indication of how it was spent was elucidated, just a statement that the General Election cost it a lot of money.
How much? We have never been told.
Yes I know there were over 100 lost deposits which would have cost over £50,000 but what about the rest.
The local parties were billed and paid for their leaflets so where was the rest of this huge amount spent?
I agree with Simon Darby that the programme was a bit of a damp squib but why in that case were there six articles attacking the programme and the BBC for creating it?
If it had no effect and all the allegations wrong why keep going on about it.This obsession with a not very informative programme and their reaction to it tends to make me believe there is much more hidden under the carpet.
Perhaps some is sub judice, I expect there is and much more will be revealed later.
In that case the BBC in its mission to close down the Party(which I agree it has) has acted prematurely. Why I can only guess. Is it inefficiency or by design?
Only time will tell but one thing is certain Griffin is unsettled by it.
The truth will come out sooner or later but in the meantime Nationalists have to move the cause forward.
The politics of the BNP are broadly correct and more a reflection of member's opimions than those of any other party.
IT IS THE LEADERSHIP WHICH IS WRONG AND WHICH PUTS THE VOTERS OFF.
Nick Griffin must realise that HE IS NOT THE PARTY.The Party belongs to its members.
I wonder whether he will hang on in his bunker until the end as did Hitler in the hope of eventual victory.
If so he will find himself with a tiny rump of incompetents still believing as did Hitler in the bunker.
We nationalists must not allow him to take our movement down with him.
We must forge a new movement and unite with other patriots in honest and common cause to save our country, even if that means a new party amalgamated with other patriots.
It can be done.
IT MUST BE DONE.
I expect a start to be made next week at Andrew Brons's meeting. I hope so for all our sakes..
P S Do you know there is a clause in the BNP constitution that guarantees Nick Griffin a generous pension paid out of Party funds? It was pushed through by him at the EGM in Codnor three years ago.
If you have forgotten I bet he hasn't, but it's still there.
So the few of you who remain loyal to the man who has deceived you will find yourselves liable for another bill. Of course if there is no BNP where does the money come from?
I neither know nor care.
I just know I will not be paying it.
IT WILL BE YOU.
CRIMINAL NEGLECT
Now for some news of local incompetence.
Haigh Hall gifted to the then Wigan council by Lord Crawford and described as "The Jewel of The Town" with its attendant country park close to the town centre has been found to have a leaking roof.
Well that is a surprise. I went on a conducted tour of the building over ten years ago and was shocked by its condition.
The rooms open to the public seemed in good repair but the back of the building and the attics were in a state of disrepair.
The attic formerly housing the nursery room and servants quarters was a shambles. There were leaks in the roof, but they had at least put buckets under these leaks (big deal) and "acro" supports holding some of the joists up.
I asked why repairs could not be done and was told that a covenant prevented it as the building belonged to the people of Wigan.
One room at the back WAS used as a Social Services office as this was allowed as helping the people of Wigan though why a Portacabin in the town centre would not serve better I do not know.
The famous original staircase was decorated with posters warning of AIDS and other PC nonsense, given that few people would see them. For the "people of Wigan you see"
I wrote letters about this and I believe did an article on this blog about this degredation of our premier building but I heard nothing afterwards. I assumed the urgent and necessary repairs had been done.
Surprise, surprise, only a temporary fix had been done and the building is still at risk unless an estimated £2 million is spent.
Why is this still so? Why have the well remunerated councillors not insisted on the repairs before? or did they even know? Or care?
If they did not is that not a dereliction of duty.
If I knew about the state of the building all those years ago and I am not a councillor why did our councillors not know about our town's best building ?
This neglect of our heritage is nothing less than cultural vandalism and a disgrace to all involved.
Now I know that at a time of financial stringency cost is a problem, but it did not seem to be an insuperable problem for new offices for the overpaid and underworked staff of Wigan Metro which were erected recently.
I was further shocked to hear last night that the stables at the hall were in better shape having been equipped as offices replete with computers and other necessary equipment, for the Metro of course. A nice country setting for these "workers"
Another case of all talk and no action.
Some of the comments in the Evening Post have even suggested demolition.
I am appalled.
So go on Wigan Metro. Try for lottery money. Sack a few of your inspectors and diversity and equality officers (like Elliot? BTW have you not sacked him yet?).Pay your senior staff less. You can find the money if you want to.
How many hundreds of millions do you rake in in Council Tax? This is peanuts in comparison.
A project such as saving Haigh Hall would be doubly advantageous. It would save our heritage for future generations and give employment to the local building industry.
Wigan has suffered much in the past as its inhabitants toiled to play such a prominent part in our country's wealth.
Those parts unravaged by industry and their historic buildings MUST BE SAVED.
The wealth was syphoned out of our town in the past.
IT'S TIME TO GIVE A BIT BACK, YOU OWE IT US.
Haigh Hall gifted to the then Wigan council by Lord Crawford and described as "The Jewel of The Town" with its attendant country park close to the town centre has been found to have a leaking roof.
Well that is a surprise. I went on a conducted tour of the building over ten years ago and was shocked by its condition.
The rooms open to the public seemed in good repair but the back of the building and the attics were in a state of disrepair.
The attic formerly housing the nursery room and servants quarters was a shambles. There were leaks in the roof, but they had at least put buckets under these leaks (big deal) and "acro" supports holding some of the joists up.
I asked why repairs could not be done and was told that a covenant prevented it as the building belonged to the people of Wigan.
One room at the back WAS used as a Social Services office as this was allowed as helping the people of Wigan though why a Portacabin in the town centre would not serve better I do not know.
The famous original staircase was decorated with posters warning of AIDS and other PC nonsense, given that few people would see them. For the "people of Wigan you see"
I wrote letters about this and I believe did an article on this blog about this degredation of our premier building but I heard nothing afterwards. I assumed the urgent and necessary repairs had been done.
Surprise, surprise, only a temporary fix had been done and the building is still at risk unless an estimated £2 million is spent.
Why is this still so? Why have the well remunerated councillors not insisted on the repairs before? or did they even know? Or care?
If they did not is that not a dereliction of duty.
If I knew about the state of the building all those years ago and I am not a councillor why did our councillors not know about our town's best building ?
This neglect of our heritage is nothing less than cultural vandalism and a disgrace to all involved.
Now I know that at a time of financial stringency cost is a problem, but it did not seem to be an insuperable problem for new offices for the overpaid and underworked staff of Wigan Metro which were erected recently.
I was further shocked to hear last night that the stables at the hall were in better shape having been equipped as offices replete with computers and other necessary equipment, for the Metro of course. A nice country setting for these "workers"
Another case of all talk and no action.
Some of the comments in the Evening Post have even suggested demolition.
I am appalled.
So go on Wigan Metro. Try for lottery money. Sack a few of your inspectors and diversity and equality officers (like Elliot? BTW have you not sacked him yet?).Pay your senior staff less. You can find the money if you want to.
How many hundreds of millions do you rake in in Council Tax? This is peanuts in comparison.
A project such as saving Haigh Hall would be doubly advantageous. It would save our heritage for future generations and give employment to the local building industry.
Wigan has suffered much in the past as its inhabitants toiled to play such a prominent part in our country's wealth.
Those parts unravaged by industry and their historic buildings MUST BE SAVED.
The wealth was syphoned out of our town in the past.
IT'S TIME TO GIVE A BIT BACK, YOU OWE IT US.
Monday, 10 October 2011
MUCH MORE TO UNEARTH
How convenient. The BNP website is off line following the Panorama programme.
I know it is a bit soon for a comment but the inability to get on the site is to say the least strange.
have they run away as Nick did in Leicester?
Having seen the programme I was a little disappointed at its shallowness. It did not unearth much that we did not already know, so why all the fuss about it on the official site?
It was said that donations reached record levels and so did expenditure, but no details of that expenditure were discovered.
I feel there is a lot more to it still hidden.
I am and always have been a nationalist but feel cheated in not being given the answers to valid questions of on what this vast amount of money was spent. Questioning the finances is not treachery, it is a reasonable request for answers which I had hoped the programme would have elucidated.
It did not. All it showed was a culture of misaccounting and possibe fraud but no clue as to where our money has gone.
Possibly criminal charges will be brought, I don't know but the members deserve to know where their money has gone.
None of it came to our group. We put far more in the kitty than we got out.
Unfortunately the image of the party and thus of nationalism was dragged down by the disgraceful tactics at the aborted interview in Leicester, especially when the reporters were ejected from the venue. Those involved looked like and acted like the thugs we are portrayed as and this is the image we must lose.
The venue incidentally was where our last conference was held.
I have to say that those who consented to be interviewed conducted themselves in exemplary fashion and would be an asset to any patriotic party( apart from the traitor Bennett). Of course they are not members of the BNP now although they formerly held senior positions before leaving in disgust.
Their politics I am sure remain the same but the party hierarchy has let them and our nation down and those remaining in the party showed their true calibre.
I feel it is a pity that Andrew Brons did not appear on the programme as he would have shown the real BNP and countered the uncouth attitude of those still loyal to Nick Griffin.
I can only hope for a more in depth scrutiny of the Party and its finances in the future.
Is this tame programme what they were frightened of?
If so there must be much more lieing under the carpet.
Let's put all this deceit and corruption behind us and work for a clean honest Nationalist grouping which unites all true Brits.
WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.
I know it is a bit soon for a comment but the inability to get on the site is to say the least strange.
have they run away as Nick did in Leicester?
Having seen the programme I was a little disappointed at its shallowness. It did not unearth much that we did not already know, so why all the fuss about it on the official site?
It was said that donations reached record levels and so did expenditure, but no details of that expenditure were discovered.
I feel there is a lot more to it still hidden.
I am and always have been a nationalist but feel cheated in not being given the answers to valid questions of on what this vast amount of money was spent. Questioning the finances is not treachery, it is a reasonable request for answers which I had hoped the programme would have elucidated.
It did not. All it showed was a culture of misaccounting and possibe fraud but no clue as to where our money has gone.
Possibly criminal charges will be brought, I don't know but the members deserve to know where their money has gone.
None of it came to our group. We put far more in the kitty than we got out.
Unfortunately the image of the party and thus of nationalism was dragged down by the disgraceful tactics at the aborted interview in Leicester, especially when the reporters were ejected from the venue. Those involved looked like and acted like the thugs we are portrayed as and this is the image we must lose.
The venue incidentally was where our last conference was held.
I have to say that those who consented to be interviewed conducted themselves in exemplary fashion and would be an asset to any patriotic party( apart from the traitor Bennett). Of course they are not members of the BNP now although they formerly held senior positions before leaving in disgust.
Their politics I am sure remain the same but the party hierarchy has let them and our nation down and those remaining in the party showed their true calibre.
I feel it is a pity that Andrew Brons did not appear on the programme as he would have shown the real BNP and countered the uncouth attitude of those still loyal to Nick Griffin.
I can only hope for a more in depth scrutiny of the Party and its finances in the future.
Is this tame programme what they were frightened of?
If so there must be much more lieing under the carpet.
Let's put all this deceit and corruption behind us and work for a clean honest Nationalist grouping which unites all true Brits.
WE OWE IT TO OUR COUNTRY.
THE GLORIOUS ARAB SPRING.
As Winter approaches we look back to the barbecue summer due to global warming which confounded the "experts" by not turning up.
We can also celebrate "The Arab Spring" when the peoples of North Africa gained their freedom and could live in harmony, also predicted by the experts and supported by our government at a cost of billions in Libya.
It is wonderful to see the newly freed people of Tunisia enjoying their freedom by attempting to escape to Europe.
The harmony in Libya in those areas liberated fron Gadaffi gladdens ones heart and it must make Cameron proud that the captured soldiers are at last seeing the benefits of democracy.
Oh sorry there must have been a mistake. The sub Saharan Africans who fought for Gadaffi are not facing trial but murder by being shot if they are lucky and by torture and mutilation if they are not.
This is not racist of course, only whites can be racist.
Egypt, freed of Mubarak has settled down to peace and should have free elections where all races and religions are treated equally, provided they are muslims.
How lucky the Coptic Christians are to live in a predominently muslim society, the religion of peace whose adherents kill them and burn their churches with the connivance of the democratic military dictators.
I realise that Coptic Christianity was the original religion long before the armies of the religion of peace arrived, but turning the other cheek has really helped them and hastened their eradication. It shows their religion is "not fit for purpose" and must therefore be suppressed.
As he basks in the sucess of a well thought out policy Cameron would do well to observe the turmoil in other Middle East countries, favoured by islamic inhabitants and see how that knowledge could affect our country.
His party and the previous Labour Party have seeded our towns with rapidly growing areas, mini caliphates who represent the religion of peace and wish only to take over the rest of the country by peaceful means such as breeding.
If Cameron and his cronies just allow this to happen all will be peaceful and harmonious. He will of course have to silence those "bigots" who wish to retain their non peaceful democratic way of life by leafletting and doing table tops.
Perhaps these misguided people who foolishly resist will have to be peacefully deported or even executed.
But that is the penalty for resisting these peaceful follwers of the prophet what's his name? who can not be depicted in pictorial fashion.
He was brought up among camels in the desert and thus knew everything about camels and sand but little else, just the man to peacefully start a new religion by slaughtering others and just the man for God to talk to and make rules for us all.
The prophet and God have spoken and it is our duty to obey.
PEACE.
We can also celebrate "The Arab Spring" when the peoples of North Africa gained their freedom and could live in harmony, also predicted by the experts and supported by our government at a cost of billions in Libya.
It is wonderful to see the newly freed people of Tunisia enjoying their freedom by attempting to escape to Europe.
The harmony in Libya in those areas liberated fron Gadaffi gladdens ones heart and it must make Cameron proud that the captured soldiers are at last seeing the benefits of democracy.
Oh sorry there must have been a mistake. The sub Saharan Africans who fought for Gadaffi are not facing trial but murder by being shot if they are lucky and by torture and mutilation if they are not.
This is not racist of course, only whites can be racist.
Egypt, freed of Mubarak has settled down to peace and should have free elections where all races and religions are treated equally, provided they are muslims.
How lucky the Coptic Christians are to live in a predominently muslim society, the religion of peace whose adherents kill them and burn their churches with the connivance of the democratic military dictators.
I realise that Coptic Christianity was the original religion long before the armies of the religion of peace arrived, but turning the other cheek has really helped them and hastened their eradication. It shows their religion is "not fit for purpose" and must therefore be suppressed.
As he basks in the sucess of a well thought out policy Cameron would do well to observe the turmoil in other Middle East countries, favoured by islamic inhabitants and see how that knowledge could affect our country.
His party and the previous Labour Party have seeded our towns with rapidly growing areas, mini caliphates who represent the religion of peace and wish only to take over the rest of the country by peaceful means such as breeding.
If Cameron and his cronies just allow this to happen all will be peaceful and harmonious. He will of course have to silence those "bigots" who wish to retain their non peaceful democratic way of life by leafletting and doing table tops.
Perhaps these misguided people who foolishly resist will have to be peacefully deported or even executed.
But that is the penalty for resisting these peaceful follwers of the prophet what's his name? who can not be depicted in pictorial fashion.
He was brought up among camels in the desert and thus knew everything about camels and sand but little else, just the man to peacefully start a new religion by slaughtering others and just the man for God to talk to and make rules for us all.
The prophet and God have spoken and it is our duty to obey.
PEACE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)