MISUSE OF OUR LANGUAGE AND INSULTS OF PATRIOTS

Misuse of word meanings has been a common instrument of propaganda in politics for hundreds of years.

In the 20th century Stalin used the epithet "Enemy of the People" to persecute and often execute Russians whose only "crime" was to be perceived as a threat to the regime. Others were exiled to slave labour for this alleged crime, even though many had been working loyally in it.

Later Soviet satellites were set up with the title including the word "Democratic" as in DDR or the German Democratic Republic and that word is still used to a degree in Africa as in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

One thing you can be certain of is that if the title of a country has "Democratic" in it, it means the opposite.

When analysed these terms indicate that opposition to or questioning of the regime is not tolerated.

In smaller organisations similar tactics of word distortion are used, and indeed we have it in our party.

TRAITOR has been used to describe anyone in the party who disagrees with the leadership and that is one of the milder insults.

Other words such as "Searchlight Spies", "Reds" or "UAF infiltrators" are also unjustly used, basically as a means to ensure obedience or exclusion of anyone who has a problem with the hierarchy.

Democracy is another word abused by the leadership.
Excessive powers for the chairman and hastily convened meetings with resolutions passed with the help of dubious "proxy votes" are not democratic and another abuse of our language.

The leadership must realise that our loyalty is to our country, people and the party is just the vehicle for that, and the leader of the party has to show he is promoting these ideals.
To criticise the leader for any failures he has is not treachery it is a duty.
He is not the party. WE ARE.

A list of the people now supporting a change in leadership (and many of those expelled) reads like a roll call of the best in the party who by their actions in recent years have been responsible for our gaining two MEPs.

HARDLY TRAITORS OR SEARCHLIGHT SPIES!

THEY BY THEIR ACTIONS HAVE PROVED THEIR LOYALTY TO THE CAUSE.

Yes, we will have embedded people who wish to cause our party damage but they will be found among more recent members who exercise powers disproportunate to their length of membership.

WE MUST FIND AND RESIST THESE INFILTRATORS but--

DO NOT INSULT THE REAL PATRIOTS both in the party and expelled who have in the past built the party up.

AND DO NOT ABUSE OUR LANGUAGE.

CORRECTION TO DEMOCRACY FORUM

It seems our fame is spreading to the Democracy Forum where our blogs have been quoted.

I would like to comment on this forum and was previously able to so do, but recently I have been obliged to register each day, I don't know why and I can't be bothered with the hassle and now just read the posts, especially as my computer skills are somewhat limited.

One post I saw on the forum yesterday said that we did not allow non members to help us leaflet. COMPLETELY UNTRUE.

We have always been grateful for any help we could get and wives, girlfriends and children of members and many other non members from as far away as Ormskirk have helped us.

It is just a case of Griffin supporters lies or more likely trouble causers who post in order to cause dissent.

It is a pity that we can not have open debate without all this bile and hatred.

We are all SUPPOSED to be nationalists

NO CONFIDENCE IN OUR POSITION?

Well it seems our little blog is having an effect and is getting up the noses of the "official" faction in the party.
GOOD.

Members supporting the present chairman have been advised to avoid our blog and that of the St Helens Patriot as we are apparently very biased in Andrew Bron's favour.
A "member" (Mike Whitby?) it seem has made a "complaint"

Well I do support Andrew, but it is an indication of their desire to avoid people seeing an alternative view that this warning has been issued.

They obviously do not have much confidence in their own arguments.

Foe myself, I am quite happy to visit sites with views which may be different form mine but in the end make my own mind up.
However up to now I have seen nothing to convince me that we do not need a new leader.

For instance.

Yesterday we learnt that Nick Griffin DOES owe in excess of £45,000 for printing which he previously denied and he has lost a court case regarding this.

I do not necessarily condemn him for the debt but I DO condemn him for denying that judgement had been awarded against him.

I KNOW there are several others in the pipeline which Nick denies.He is thus guilty of blatant dishonesty and I have lost my ability to believe anything he says.

Yes he has done much for the Party in the past but shady deals and lies stick in my craw and show him to be no better than the leaders of other parties.

I joined the BNP partly because I considered it to be honest (as well as patriotic).

I think the vast majority of members are, but when those at the top become tarnished by corruption and deceit my duty is to help promote the election of a new leader whose reputation is unsullied by such antics.

THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ADVISED TO AVOID THIS BLOG (AND ST HELENS) SHOWS WE ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH FOR THEIR LIKING.

TO THOSE WHO PUT THIS ADVICE OUT--THANKYOU FOR YOUR ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRUTH OF MY ARGUMENTS.

MY ARGUMENTS WILL STAND SCRUTINY, YOURS WON'T

THAT IS WHY YOU ARE HOT UNDER THE COLLAR!

A Totalitarian State at the Heart of Europe

MOTIVATION.WHY PEOPLE DO AS THEY DO

What motivates people to do things, to work play or engage in altruistic activities?

Well people work (and sometimes cheat)to obtain money to make a living. Some work for the pleasure of their work or hobby when money can be a secondary consideration.

And many put effort in and work in altruistic ways because they want to make the world a better place for themselves AND OTHERS.

This latter category includes the hard working activists in our party who put time and money for the sake of our country's future.

ANDREW BRONS IS SUCH A MAN!

He has reached the stage in his life where I am sure he would be happy to sit at home with his feet up.
He has I'm sure a reasonable teachers pension and at present his EU salary so he does not need the money.

Knowing the task he was asked to take on in challenging for the party leadership he was naturally reluctant, being aware of the bile the party machine would throw at him.
That is why he at first hesitated.

BUT THEN HIS DUTY TO OUR COUNTRY PERSUADED HIM.

He was asked by members, concerned at the downward spiral of our fortunes to attempt to rescue us.
His advantage over any other challenger is that he is well known and liked in nationalist circles and that that he is not in it for personal benefit.

Our present leader's advantage is that he is better known than any possible contender and he has used this advantage ruthlessly in past elections through the party website (not to mention expelling anyone who might pose a threat).

ANDREW'S MOTIVATION IS THAT HE WISHES TO FURTHER OUR PARTY AND ITS NATIONALIST PRINCIPLES,and nothing else.

NOW WE COME TO NICK GRIFFIN. What's his motivation?

What motivated him to renage on his promise to stand down in 2014 and force through a resolution insisting on a four year term of office by dubious methods and counter to what was agreed at Codnor 3 years ago?

IN A WORD MONEY.

I do not necessarily blame him for that. He has to live and he has worked hard for the party over the years with some success but now his star is on the wane and he is still relatively young.

It is believed that the party's finances are in a mess although without up to date audited accounts we do not know the extent. We do know that the party was over half a million pounds in debt last year. Membership has since fallen as have donations but we are told that much of the debt has been paid off.

HOW? JUST TELL US.

Another motivation for Nick is that his daughter and son in law depend on the party for their income.

The party has become a family business. Nick Griffin Ltd.

The party belongs to its members and if it had been run well our chairman could have had another term in Brussels. I think he realises that goal is out of his reach, hence his change of mind.

He has to salvage something for the future himself and his family, and I don't blame him for that,
BUT NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE NATIONALIST CAUSE.

He has worked hard but we can not continue supporting him for ever when we are going downhill.

Nick's sycophantic acolytes also owe their position and salaries to him and his continued tenure of the position of leader.

BUT THE ACTIVIST BASE HAS BEEN DESTROYED.

Look at the pictures in the leaflet we received today.
The same small group of people campaigning all over the country. Why do the local branches do this?

Because they are few and far between, having been destroyed in various ways by the hierarchy.

So there we have it.

Both contenders began MOTIVATED AS NATIONALISTS to work for our country but one has been contaminated by the lucre of his position.

That is why Andrew is the best choice. Even though his family would I'm sure prefer to see him more HE HAS PUT THE COUNTRY FIRST.

Nick's family need him to continue to bring home the bacon AND OF NECESSITY COMPEL HIM TO HANG ON to the remnants of his former glories.

THAT IS WHY PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN OUR CAUSE SHOULD-

VOTE ANDREW BRONS

WORKING TO NO AVAIL

I yield to nobody in my admiration of the hard work, dedication and patriotism of Salford BNP.
However today they have been instigating a massive spamming exercise on the Democracy Forum, fulsom in praise of Nick Griffin.

All the lads (and lasses) there are good people but I believe misguided in their unqualified support for our present leader and their ignoring of his deficiencies.
Why this sudden barrage of support for their embattled leader?
Why does the branch or person speaking for it purport to speak for all its members?

Our blog is independent and thus able to say things as we see them.
We may not always agree but at least we speak freely.

It seems Salford have become a mouthpiece for the Griffinite poodle Mike Whitby who seems to spend his time spamming in support of Griffin.

When I receive these letters I answer them and spread them to those in my address book and in doing so have persuaded several undecided people to back Andrew Brons for leadership

It will be interesting if after this to see if I receive any more of Mike Whitby's drivel.

If I do I shall rebut his statements.

If I don't and others do I will broadcast the fact that he has ceased to communicate with me for fear of me winning the argument.(again)

I know this may not seem to be fair as I can beat him any time but the stakes are high, not only for our party but our people and we must rid ourselves of our present incompetent leadership and get a new clean image.
Our present leadership is dragging us down.

How do I come to that conclusion?

Because in one ward in Salford our (good ) candidate was unfortunately beaten by the English Democrats at the last local elections from a standing start.

That should have told them something but alas it did not and they are still following the proven failed leader in a downward spiral.

They have so much energy and dedication think what they could achieve if we had a better leader who was respected by the electorate and whom they were prepared to vote for.

The people are crying out for a clean honest nationalist alternative to the present major parties and we are missing this support.

I hope they will soon remove the blinkers from their eyes and see the light.

It is sad that so much work is to no avail.

MANIPULATION OF THE MEDIA

The frenzy over the media hacking scandle goes on and is the hot topic at present taking precedence over our serious debt problems and unjust wars.

Why is this?

The reason is that the major parties have at last an opportunity to collectively attack Rupert Murdoch and his over powerful media group.
Previously they feared to cross him lest he used his considerable media clout to back an opposing party.


That is why Blair and now Cameron were in so much contact with this over powerful man.

No doubt other papers are guilty of the same misdemeanours but not on such a large or blatant scale.
The fact remains that the media barons are too powerful and should, all of them be cut down to size.

That is why we invariably get as a party a bad press as our policies are against the global capitalism which sustains these tycoons and makes them wealthy.


THEY ARE A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.

It is also why free thinking people must use such blogs as this to promote alternative views.

The media monopoly of news has its equivalent threat to democracy in our party with the present leadership bending the truth and on occasion spreading outright lies about their opponents within the party.

The rules of the current election have been deliberately constructed to give the present leader an advantage and then broken to consolidate that advantage. The hierarchy of the party depend on the present leader for their jobs and thus obey his every instruction, however misguided that is.

Insults and character assasinations have been their stock in trade while valid questions have received no answer.

I am not accusing any of the hierarchy of phone hacking, but some of their underhand methods are as shameful as those employed by News International.

I and others received a letter (possibly against the electoral rules made up by Nick)from the poodle Mike Whitby with a raft of allegations against the challenger which are patently untrue.

The allegations are not accompanied by answers to the many questions which have been put to head office and can easily be refuted.

The fact that there is something wrong with the present party is shown by those who support the challenger, Sharon Wilkinson, Dave Shapcott, Martin and Tina Wingfield, Arthur Kemp, Mike Howson, Richard Edmonds,John Walker, and John Bean former editor of "Identity" and even Briam Mahoney head of financial scrutiny.

These are long standing nationalists who have worked hard for our cause unlike many of the officials now in control, and if people of this quality believe that change is needed their views should be listened to.

They know what is going on or has gone on and they are obviously not satisfied.

As I am not an official I have a right and possibly a duty to the party to bring these matters into the open.

In the party at present we do not have a free press and are thus little better than Murdoch in the twisting and distortion of the truth.

We must combat the threat to national democracy in the national press, but we can only do that if we have democracy in the party.

We do not have that at present.

We must be squeaky clean, and set an example.

WE ARE NOT NOW.

THAT IS WHY WE NEED CHANGE SO THAT WE CAN RESCUE THE PARTY AND THE NATIONALIST CAUSE FROM ITS DOWNWARD SPIRAL.

One man's interests must not take precedence over our cause.

MORE THAN EVER OUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE NEED A THRIVING NATIONALIST PARTY.

WE MUST NOT AND WILL NOT LET THEM DOWN