.
Morg
Tuesday, 15 December 2009
Monday, 14 December 2009
A HARD ONE THIS - FOR ME PERSONALLY, BUT ...
.
... these two brothers do not belong in jail (two-page report) ...:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6956044.ece
... even if they are Muslims.
I've lived in High Wycombe, and there are far too many there. But it's wrong to stitch them up like this. We'd whinge plenty if it was a couple of ours.
Morg
.
... these two brothers do not belong in jail (two-page report) ...:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6956044.ece
... even if they are Muslims.
I've lived in High Wycombe, and there are far too many there. But it's wrong to stitch them up like this. We'd whinge plenty if it was a couple of ours.
Morg
.
Sunday, 13 December 2009
THE BETRAYAL OF OUR CHILDREN
The government has said that it will ring fence education spending in spite of the growing deficit.
No one could disagree with the importance of education but at present most of this money is being thrown away.
Why? Incompetent and lazy teachers.
I have two grandchildren at secondary school, one in the North and one down South.
The one down South has been encouraged to take "soft" subjects like catering as opposed to languages. His maths teaching has been woeful.
When my daughter complained last year about the poor maths teaching she was promised an improvement this year with a qualified maths teacher. This has not materialised and he is still poorly taught if taught at all.
The other one near here has been disadvantaged by her teacher in one subject being off sick for several weeks but not too sick to go out shopping etc and another teacher unable to control her class and breaking down in tears most lessons. Yet another is teaching a different subject to her own and I'm doubtful whether she is a qualified teacher at all or just an assistant.
Again improvement has been promised next year, but that will be too late.
Our children are being denied a future because of incompetent or lazy teachers who will possibly retire on a good pension with "stress" while the kids are left to make their way in the world with little education(the teachers at some schools even have a day off for Christmas shopping. Do they not have enough holidays as it is?)
The governments answer to this is to make the exams easier and to build new schools under PFI at great expense. Buildings do not make for better education, it is competent teachers who have their pupil's interests at heart.
The sensible answer is a four letter word. SACK for incompetents who can't teach. Alright the NUT would possibly call a strike. Let them, the kids are learning nothing in any case.
It is ironic that parents are prosecuted for failing to send their children to school but when these children go to school they are not taught.
We buy our kids education dearly through our taxes and are entitled to have them educated.
If we buy something from a shop we can get redress by law for faulty goods. The same should apply to education as it is much more important than mere goods.
Of course this does not trouble the "elite" as their kids don't have to suffer this neglect being privately educated. Our children will face an increasingly competitive world. Are they being educated as well as the Chinese? I think not. They deserve better.
Schools would also be better if they concentrated on TEACHING and not the various politically correct matters they are brainwashed with such as sex education, racism, homophobia and Islamophobia not to mention what to eat.
Consider this stupidity.
A teacher can be sacked for being a member of the BNP a legal party even if they do not mention it but can carry on blighting the children's futures at school until their (early) retirement even though THEY CAN'T TEACH.
No one could disagree with the importance of education but at present most of this money is being thrown away.
Why? Incompetent and lazy teachers.
I have two grandchildren at secondary school, one in the North and one down South.
The one down South has been encouraged to take "soft" subjects like catering as opposed to languages. His maths teaching has been woeful.
When my daughter complained last year about the poor maths teaching she was promised an improvement this year with a qualified maths teacher. This has not materialised and he is still poorly taught if taught at all.
The other one near here has been disadvantaged by her teacher in one subject being off sick for several weeks but not too sick to go out shopping etc and another teacher unable to control her class and breaking down in tears most lessons. Yet another is teaching a different subject to her own and I'm doubtful whether she is a qualified teacher at all or just an assistant.
Again improvement has been promised next year, but that will be too late.
Our children are being denied a future because of incompetent or lazy teachers who will possibly retire on a good pension with "stress" while the kids are left to make their way in the world with little education(the teachers at some schools even have a day off for Christmas shopping. Do they not have enough holidays as it is?)
The governments answer to this is to make the exams easier and to build new schools under PFI at great expense. Buildings do not make for better education, it is competent teachers who have their pupil's interests at heart.
The sensible answer is a four letter word. SACK for incompetents who can't teach. Alright the NUT would possibly call a strike. Let them, the kids are learning nothing in any case.
It is ironic that parents are prosecuted for failing to send their children to school but when these children go to school they are not taught.
We buy our kids education dearly through our taxes and are entitled to have them educated.
If we buy something from a shop we can get redress by law for faulty goods. The same should apply to education as it is much more important than mere goods.
Of course this does not trouble the "elite" as their kids don't have to suffer this neglect being privately educated. Our children will face an increasingly competitive world. Are they being educated as well as the Chinese? I think not. They deserve better.
Schools would also be better if they concentrated on TEACHING and not the various politically correct matters they are brainwashed with such as sex education, racism, homophobia and Islamophobia not to mention what to eat.
Consider this stupidity.
A teacher can be sacked for being a member of the BNP a legal party even if they do not mention it but can carry on blighting the children's futures at school until their (early) retirement even though THEY CAN'T TEACH.
Friday, 11 December 2009
THE NOBEL "PEACE" PRIZE
I like Barak Obama. He seems the best (of a bad bunch) of recent American presidents.
However to award him the Nobel peace prize within weeks of his inauguration and before he had time to do anything was like awarding somebody the winner's trophy in a race before the race had started.
No he was awarded the peace prize for being Black, nothing more.
Since then he has shown his peace credentials by sending 30,000 more troops to the illegal war in Afganistan.
Other recipients of this prestigious prize include the peaceful terrorist Nelson Mandela,(not just any peaceful terrorist but a BLACK peaceful terrorist)
Martin Luther King, not exactly whiter than white (excuse the pun) also received one as did the gun toting Yasser Arafat.
I wonder how long Tiger Woods will wait for his award for his work in uniting peoples of different races. Going on past experience not long.
Let's face it these "peace awards" are a farce, unlike the Nobel science awards. These latter seem largely deficient in black recipients. I wonder why.
Could it be that science is colour blind and Nobel prizes for this recognise brilliant original intellectual work rather than all this PC nonsense? Perhaps but wait until someone in the climate change lobby receives an award (they may already have done I don't know).
Then the once prestigious accolade will be really be devalued and shown to be like most awards nowadays, PC nonsence.
(Sir) Paul Mc Cartney anybody?
However to award him the Nobel peace prize within weeks of his inauguration and before he had time to do anything was like awarding somebody the winner's trophy in a race before the race had started.
No he was awarded the peace prize for being Black, nothing more.
Since then he has shown his peace credentials by sending 30,000 more troops to the illegal war in Afganistan.
Other recipients of this prestigious prize include the peaceful terrorist Nelson Mandela,(not just any peaceful terrorist but a BLACK peaceful terrorist)
Martin Luther King, not exactly whiter than white (excuse the pun) also received one as did the gun toting Yasser Arafat.
I wonder how long Tiger Woods will wait for his award for his work in uniting peoples of different races. Going on past experience not long.
Let's face it these "peace awards" are a farce, unlike the Nobel science awards. These latter seem largely deficient in black recipients. I wonder why.
Could it be that science is colour blind and Nobel prizes for this recognise brilliant original intellectual work rather than all this PC nonsense? Perhaps but wait until someone in the climate change lobby receives an award (they may already have done I don't know).
Then the once prestigious accolade will be really be devalued and shown to be like most awards nowadays, PC nonsence.
(Sir) Paul Mc Cartney anybody?
Thursday, 10 December 2009
A FOOL OF A CHANCELLOR
If you tossed a coin there is a 50% chance of getting either heads or tails.
If the Labour government takes a decision there is a 100% chance of them getting it wrong.
The Chancellors budget statement yesterday was typical. Although we are borrowing more than at any time in our history he has done nothing to repair the finances.
To "ring fence" overseas aid when we have to borrow the money we donate is plain stupid.
To propose the majority of the cuts which will be necessary to be on capital expenditure such as roads and infrastructure and housing when these would give a return in the future on that expenditure is short sighted.
One suggestion is selling what is left of the "family silver" such as the Dartford crossing which has paid the debt off and is making a profit for the taxpayer is idiotic.
To propose cuts in the defense budget when his government is fighting illegal wars and our soldiers are ill equipped is criminal.
To increase National Insurance is a tax on jobs and will just keep unemployment high.
National Insurance for manufacturing industry should be cut drastically to encourage firms to take on labour.
A good candidate for savage cuts is the Equalities industry which has persecuted our party at great public expense.
The prosecution of two Christians for saying anti muslim things to an old fool who had converted and which was thrown out by the judge cost thousands. They tried to convict Nick Griffin a few years ago forthe same thing. It must cost £millions per year to attack free speech and appease muslims.
If we returned all the illegal immigrants immediately with no appeal and foreign criminals and their wives and families who had been given (wrongly) citizenship we would be a lot better off.
After all I had not noticed a national need for corner shop, kebab shop, Indian restaurant workers or taxi drivers, let alone the hundreds of thousands of mulim asylum seekers with large families who are milking the system.
Having done this we could reduce the cost of anti terrorism measures and empty many jail places.
If we did this, brought our soldiers home from illegal wars and left the EU we could pay all our bills and have a future as a stable country.
The future under this government (and the Tories would do the same) does not bear thinking about.
If the Labour government takes a decision there is a 100% chance of them getting it wrong.
The Chancellors budget statement yesterday was typical. Although we are borrowing more than at any time in our history he has done nothing to repair the finances.
To "ring fence" overseas aid when we have to borrow the money we donate is plain stupid.
To propose the majority of the cuts which will be necessary to be on capital expenditure such as roads and infrastructure and housing when these would give a return in the future on that expenditure is short sighted.
One suggestion is selling what is left of the "family silver" such as the Dartford crossing which has paid the debt off and is making a profit for the taxpayer is idiotic.
To propose cuts in the defense budget when his government is fighting illegal wars and our soldiers are ill equipped is criminal.
To increase National Insurance is a tax on jobs and will just keep unemployment high.
National Insurance for manufacturing industry should be cut drastically to encourage firms to take on labour.
A good candidate for savage cuts is the Equalities industry which has persecuted our party at great public expense.
The prosecution of two Christians for saying anti muslim things to an old fool who had converted and which was thrown out by the judge cost thousands. They tried to convict Nick Griffin a few years ago forthe same thing. It must cost £millions per year to attack free speech and appease muslims.
If we returned all the illegal immigrants immediately with no appeal and foreign criminals and their wives and families who had been given (wrongly) citizenship we would be a lot better off.
After all I had not noticed a national need for corner shop, kebab shop, Indian restaurant workers or taxi drivers, let alone the hundreds of thousands of mulim asylum seekers with large families who are milking the system.
Having done this we could reduce the cost of anti terrorism measures and empty many jail places.
If we did this, brought our soldiers home from illegal wars and left the EU we could pay all our bills and have a future as a stable country.
The future under this government (and the Tories would do the same) does not bear thinking about.
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
HARRY BROWN
Just watched the film Harry Brown.
You can watch it on-line here:
http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/harry_brown/
Recommended, and the first button works just fine, on that link. You don't have to download it.
Morg
.
You can watch it on-line here:
http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/harry_brown/
Recommended, and the first button works just fine, on that link. You don't have to download it.
Morg
.
Sunday, 6 December 2009
HI DENNIS
Dennis doing his bit.
I hope Nick Griffin closes this claptout organisation as his number one priority.
Although i must admit it has a catchy P,C title. Who said some are more equal than others.
- dennis shambley, wigan England, 5/12/2009 7:15
And here's the article he was responding to:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233356/Equality-Human-Rights-Commission-Labour-stooges.html#ixzz0YoHNrmlS
Morg
.
I hope Nick Griffin closes this claptout organisation as his number one priority.
Although i must admit it has a catchy P,C title. Who said some are more equal than others.
- dennis shambley, wigan England, 5/12/2009 7:15
And here's the article he was responding to:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233356/Equality-Human-Rights-Commission-Labour-stooges.html#ixzz0YoHNrmlS
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)