http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8171689.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8171865.stm
GORDON Brown is pinning Labour's re-election hopes on a strategy of dragging injured soldiers through the courts and trying to steal their money.
The prime minster has instructed the Ministry of Defence to make wounded servicemen beg for compensation in a move that he believes will wrong-foot the Tories and secure millions of votes across middle England.
A Labour spokesman said: "If there is one thing this country is absolutely sick of it is lazy, horribly injured soldiers lying around doing nothing all day except suffering constant pain and terrifying flashbacks.
"I think most people will be shocked to learn we have given them any money, let alone just enough for them to begin rebuilding their shattered lives.
"This is money that could be used to provide high-class prostitutes and Wii games for those unfortunate teenage boys who found themselves in a young offenders' institute after being forced to break into your house."
He added: "Everyone knows that when you join the army you can either choose to go to war or you can choose to stay at home and provide back-up in case of a fire brigade strike.
"And even if you do go to war you are under no legal requirement to follow orders, especially if they are really stupid and badly thought out."
The Labour manifesto is likely to propose a programme of ritual humiliation for injured soldiers in what opposition parties condemned as 'naked populism of the worst kind'.
The spokesman said: "We'll give you a couple of grand for a severed leg, but you are going to have to bring the leg with you, re-enact the explosion and be judged by a panel of celebrities before we write the cheque."
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/labour-manifesto-to-focus-on-bullying-injured-soldiers-200907281936/
Morg
.
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Monday, 27 July 2009
WHAT DO YOUR ENEMIES THINK?
THE general verdict among the German generals I interrogated in 1945 was that Field-Marshal von Manstein had proved the ablest commander in their Army, and the man they had most desired to become its Commander-in-Chief.
Captain B. H. Liddel Hart
So … that would make Manstein the best general of the entire war then? Now then, what did this man, probably the most formidable individual general this country's army has faced since Napoleon, think about the character of the British?
O.K.H. was bound to regard this sceptically from the outset, partly because of the British national character, which made it fairly improbable that Great Britain would come to terms …
If Hitler really believed he had already won the war after the defeat of France and that it was now merely a matter of bringing this home to Britain, he could not have been more wrong. The icy indifference of the British to his peace offer - which was anyway an extremely vague one - showed that neither the Government nor the nation were open to persuasion. And so Hitler and O.K.W. found themselves wondering 'What next?'
Certainly no war goes off according to a firm programme set by one side or the other. But
since Hitler accepted the risks of war with France and Britain in September 1939, it was his duty to consider beforehand how he should cope with these powers in various contingencies. It is quite obvious that prior to - or even during - the offensive in France, Germany's supreme command had no kind of 'war plan' to determine what measures should be taken once the victories it hoped for had been won. Hitler's hope was that Britain would give in. …
… the German Supreme Command had two facts to contend with: First, the existence of an unbeaten Britain which was palpably unwilling to come to terms.
… On the other hand, though, it may be that the British national character, so impressively incorporated in the person of Winston Churchill, prevented Britain from entertaining any serious thought of a rational settlement at that or indeed any later stage of the war. There was that admirable tenacity of the British which impels them to go through with any struggle they have once embarked on, however threatening the situation of the moment may be.
… In addition to all this, Churchill was probably too much of a fighter. His mind was too exclusively concerned with battle and ultimate victory to see beyond this military goal into the political future.
… Painful though the loss of Gibraltar, Malta and her positions in Egypt and the Near East might well have been for Britain, it would certainly not have been fatal. Indeed, the British being as they are, it would presumably have served only to stiffen their national will. The British nation would have refused to accept these losses as final and would have gone on fighting all the more bitterly. In all probability it would have given the lie to the slogan about the Mediterranean being the life-line of the Empire. It is also most unlikely that the Dominions would have withdrawn their support.
I wonder what today’s scumbaggy enemies think of us … given that we can’t even deport foreign nonces and murderers ?
Sad isn’t it, what successive governments have been doing to the British character.
A fascinating account of one man’s war, and he wrote it for easy reading. Read it all, or just pick out the bits that interest you. Whatever – you’ll read a new perspective written by our then enemy, and it really will make you seriously consider what you thought happened, in places. Hold your friends close; hold your enemies closer.
Captain B. H. Liddel Hart
So … that would make Manstein the best general of the entire war then? Now then, what did this man, probably the most formidable individual general this country's army has faced since Napoleon, think about the character of the British?
O.K.H. was bound to regard this sceptically from the outset, partly because of the British national character, which made it fairly improbable that Great Britain would come to terms …
If Hitler really believed he had already won the war after the defeat of France and that it was now merely a matter of bringing this home to Britain, he could not have been more wrong. The icy indifference of the British to his peace offer - which was anyway an extremely vague one - showed that neither the Government nor the nation were open to persuasion. And so Hitler and O.K.W. found themselves wondering 'What next?'
Certainly no war goes off according to a firm programme set by one side or the other. But
since Hitler accepted the risks of war with France and Britain in September 1939, it was his duty to consider beforehand how he should cope with these powers in various contingencies. It is quite obvious that prior to - or even during - the offensive in France, Germany's supreme command had no kind of 'war plan' to determine what measures should be taken once the victories it hoped for had been won. Hitler's hope was that Britain would give in. …
… the German Supreme Command had two facts to contend with: First, the existence of an unbeaten Britain which was palpably unwilling to come to terms.
… On the other hand, though, it may be that the British national character, so impressively incorporated in the person of Winston Churchill, prevented Britain from entertaining any serious thought of a rational settlement at that or indeed any later stage of the war. There was that admirable tenacity of the British which impels them to go through with any struggle they have once embarked on, however threatening the situation of the moment may be.
… In addition to all this, Churchill was probably too much of a fighter. His mind was too exclusively concerned with battle and ultimate victory to see beyond this military goal into the political future.
… Painful though the loss of Gibraltar, Malta and her positions in Egypt and the Near East might well have been for Britain, it would certainly not have been fatal. Indeed, the British being as they are, it would presumably have served only to stiffen their national will. The British nation would have refused to accept these losses as final and would have gone on fighting all the more bitterly. In all probability it would have given the lie to the slogan about the Mediterranean being the life-line of the Empire. It is also most unlikely that the Dominions would have withdrawn their support.
I wonder what today’s scumbaggy enemies think of us … given that we can’t even deport foreign nonces and murderers ?
Sad isn’t it, what successive governments have been doing to the British character.
A fascinating account of one man’s war, and he wrote it for easy reading. Read it all, or just pick out the bits that interest you. Whatever – you’ll read a new perspective written by our then enemy, and it really will make you seriously consider what you thought happened, in places. Hold your friends close; hold your enemies closer.
Check the comment for how to get the book for free.
Morg
.
Morg
.
Sunday, 26 July 2009
FIGHTING WIGAN'S CORNER?
Our illustrious Wigan MP pictured above, (I bet you have never heard of anything he has done for Wigan) is doing his best to combat global warming by flying to the South Pacific on a £ 3,400 business class trip to "exotic spots around the region"
The purpose of the trip it is stated is to "promote the advancement of Parliamentary democracy and understanding of democratic governance".
They will fly to Fiji from where they will take connecting flights to Kiribati (no I have never heard of it either) and then on to Tonga where older people remember at the Queen's coronation they sent their pleasant queen to the ceremonies. I believe they are a happy race, possibly a bit overweight owing to their love of pig meat, in many ways a suitable refuelling stop for our MP.
From there on to Tuvalu and then to Vanuatu before returning to London.
I would have thought that these exotic island communities would have worked out a political system suitable to their needs without advice from people such as Mr Turner, a member of a party which refuses to condemn hammer attacks against political opponents. They have surely nothing to learn from the anti democratic Labour Party which has all but abolished the right to free speech in this country.
I am sure the people of Wigan, stuck in traffic jams,unable to get housing owing to immigrants being given preference, or waiting in Brocol House for their dole, having been made unemployed by the policies of his government, appreciate Mr Turner's efforts on their behalf.
BTW the picture above was taken from the website "They work for you",
It's good to know Mr Turner is always "working for Wiganers".
We are indeed fortunate in having an MP who works for us 12 months a year,(and it's all "within the rules").
THANK GOD FOR BRITISH DEMOCRACY AND PROBITY.
Saturday, 25 July 2009
FASCIST POLICE IN CODNOR
I am flaming neawt.
Amber Valley council has put a ban on caravans for our RWB festival this year.
This is a spiteful vindictive rule put in place especially for us to try and stop our festival.
It seems OK for steam rallies or motorbike rallies or even the drug fuelled Glastonbury festival with hundreds of thousands of people, druggies, thieves and of course middle class hippies including hundreds of wealthy lefties of the BBC to clog the roads in Somerset, but perhaps 50 caravans for two nights in Codnor is unacceptable.
We are not allowed to have a drinks licence and last year were threatened with prosecution for having an unlicensed Punch and Judy show.
A man playing his own music (so no breach of copyright there) was stopped playing and a photo of the microphone was taken. I saw this happen.
The police are against our festival because hundreds of anti British rabble want to cause trouble to the local inhabitants so they complain about the disruption.
This trades union and Labour supported rabble cost the local police force £250,000. (perhaps it would have been better to let them in and we would have sorted them out for nothing)
I dont blame these inhabitants but why don't the police stop all the coaches in Codnor bringing this rabble and let us get on with our festival.
If these people were not bent on disruption there would be no need for any police presence.
Our festival is well run and antisocial behaviour is not tolerated. We don't need the police.
BUT the politically correct police put any possible obsticle in our way in an effort to stop us. It is just like the Stazi in former East Germany.
WHY ARE THERE NO RESTRICTIONS ON TORY OR LABOUR RALLIES?
It is obvious the state is trying to prevent our lawful gatherings on private land.
BUT WE WILL NOT BE STOPPED. THERE WILL BE MORE AT THE FESTIVAL THIS YEAR THAN EVER.
I have plans, within this unjust law of thwarting them, details later.
BTW we have Romany Gypsies among our members. What are you going to do about their "Human Rights"? and in any case what about ours?
STAZI COPS, YOU WILL NEVER DEFEAT US. REMEMBER WHEN THE COUNTRY FINALLY DOES GO PEAR SHAPED, which it will even with the Tories in power---WE MAY BE YOUR BOSSES. WHAT THEN?
I ask all true patriots to make the effort to go to the RWB and show these fascists that as free people in a supposedly free country WE ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE OUR GET TOGETHER.
IF WE ARE DEFEATED IN THIS IT WILL BE ANOTHER NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF BRITISH FREEDOM.
Amber Valley council has put a ban on caravans for our RWB festival this year.
This is a spiteful vindictive rule put in place especially for us to try and stop our festival.
It seems OK for steam rallies or motorbike rallies or even the drug fuelled Glastonbury festival with hundreds of thousands of people, druggies, thieves and of course middle class hippies including hundreds of wealthy lefties of the BBC to clog the roads in Somerset, but perhaps 50 caravans for two nights in Codnor is unacceptable.
We are not allowed to have a drinks licence and last year were threatened with prosecution for having an unlicensed Punch and Judy show.
A man playing his own music (so no breach of copyright there) was stopped playing and a photo of the microphone was taken. I saw this happen.
The police are against our festival because hundreds of anti British rabble want to cause trouble to the local inhabitants so they complain about the disruption.
This trades union and Labour supported rabble cost the local police force £250,000. (perhaps it would have been better to let them in and we would have sorted them out for nothing)
I dont blame these inhabitants but why don't the police stop all the coaches in Codnor bringing this rabble and let us get on with our festival.
If these people were not bent on disruption there would be no need for any police presence.
Our festival is well run and antisocial behaviour is not tolerated. We don't need the police.
BUT the politically correct police put any possible obsticle in our way in an effort to stop us. It is just like the Stazi in former East Germany.
WHY ARE THERE NO RESTRICTIONS ON TORY OR LABOUR RALLIES?
It is obvious the state is trying to prevent our lawful gatherings on private land.
BUT WE WILL NOT BE STOPPED. THERE WILL BE MORE AT THE FESTIVAL THIS YEAR THAN EVER.
I have plans, within this unjust law of thwarting them, details later.
BTW we have Romany Gypsies among our members. What are you going to do about their "Human Rights"? and in any case what about ours?
STAZI COPS, YOU WILL NEVER DEFEAT US. REMEMBER WHEN THE COUNTRY FINALLY DOES GO PEAR SHAPED, which it will even with the Tories in power---WE MAY BE YOUR BOSSES. WHAT THEN?
I ask all true patriots to make the effort to go to the RWB and show these fascists that as free people in a supposedly free country WE ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE OUR GET TOGETHER.
IF WE ARE DEFEATED IN THIS IT WILL BE ANOTHER NAIL IN THE COFFIN OF BRITISH FREEDOM.
Thursday, 23 July 2009
THE WORLD RECOGNITION STAKES
San Francisco bringing up the rear at 71
Sydney a nose ahead at 82
Paris moving rapidly up on the inside with 326
But at least two lengths clear, in the lead is that leviathan of the World Recognition Stakes, Wigan. So a big cheer for Wigan and its score of 440 ...
... surveillance cameras.
Sydney a nose ahead at 82
Paris moving rapidly up on the inside with 326
But at least two lengths clear, in the lead is that leviathan of the World Recognition Stakes, Wigan. So a big cheer for Wigan and its score of 440 ...
... surveillance cameras.
Market Place, Wigan
Looks like Big Brother NuLabour just doesn’t trust the people of a town that can produce more than 7,000 BNP voters.
Big Brother Nulabour is your local council, and also your national government. Do you like having your lives monitored and regulated by people who obviously don’t trust you?
So what are you going to do about it eh? Go on – what are you going to do?
There will be a general election and a major local authority election within ten months. So what are you going to do about it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8159141.stm
Big Brother Nulabour is your local council, and also your national government. Do you like having your lives monitored and regulated by people who obviously don’t trust you?
So what are you going to do about it eh? Go on – what are you going to do?
There will be a general election and a major local authority election within ten months. So what are you going to do about it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8159141.stm
Morg
.
.
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
A WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING
Cllr. Nigel Ash
A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing!
Taken from Cllr. Nigel Ash's latest post on his personal Blog regarding last week's council meeting!
"We, as a Council and individual Councillors, must pledge to the people of this Borough that we will work harder to understand their concerns and support policies that promote jobs, better housing and fairness for all."
"If this is to work successfully all party leaders that support these values must pledge to put their differences to one side and fight those who may act like a wolf in sheep's clothing in working against these values!"
http://www.nigelash.blogspot.com/MANDELSONIA
I'm so outraged by this little story that I'm quite blatantly nicking it in its entirety, from here:
http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/07/mandelsonia-revealed.html
Mandelson, our new Richelieu sits on thirty five out of the 43 Cabinet Committees, listed below
National Economic Council NEC
Better Regulation NEC (BR)
Democratic Renewal Council DRC
Domestic Policy Council DPC (which he deputy chairs)
Domestic Affairs DA
Borders and Migration DA (BM)
Communities and Equalities DA (CE)
Food DA
Families, Children and Young People DA (FCY)
Health and Wellbeing DA (HW)
Justice and Crime DA (JC)
Local Government and the Regions DA (LGR) (which he chairs)
Public Engagement and the Delivery of Services DA (PED)
Life Chances LC
Talent and Enterprise LC (TE)
Economic Development ED
Environment and Energy ED (EE)
Housing, Planning and Regeneration ED (HPR)
Olympic and Paralympic Games ED (OPG)
Productivity, Skills and Employment ED (PSE)
Constitution CN
National Security, International Relations and Development NSID
Europe NSID (EU)
Overseas and Defence NSID (OU)
Africa NSID (OUA)
Afghanistan and Pakistan NSID (A&P)
Trade NSID (T)
Protective Security and Resilience NSID (PSR)
Public Services and Public Expenditure PSX
Public Sector Pay and Pensions PSX (P)
Pandemic Influenza Planning MISC 32
Post Office Network MISC 33 (which he chairs)
Flood planning MISC 36
PM’s ad hoc Committee on International Climate Change
PM’s ad hoc International Climate Change Negotiations
He is the most powerful 'pink' person in the country, he is unelected, he will remain at the centre of power, even after the corrupt edifice of Nu Labour is swept away. He will remain in the Lords until somebody places a stake through his dark heart.
One 'man' rules this country unelected, unaccountable, unpalatable, the result of the fear and cowardice of Nu Labour.
Surely I'm not the only one who finds this disturbing? And the " Families, Children and Young People" Cabinet committee? Mandelbum? And what about this one? - " Borders and Migration "? Special interest in "Young People" from Brazil, do we suppose?
Morg
.
http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/07/mandelsonia-revealed.html
Mandelson, our new Richelieu sits on thirty five out of the 43 Cabinet Committees, listed below
National Economic Council NEC
Better Regulation NEC (BR)
Democratic Renewal Council DRC
Domestic Policy Council DPC (which he deputy chairs)
Domestic Affairs DA
Borders and Migration DA (BM)
Communities and Equalities DA (CE)
Food DA
Families, Children and Young People DA (FCY)
Health and Wellbeing DA (HW)
Justice and Crime DA (JC)
Local Government and the Regions DA (LGR) (which he chairs)
Public Engagement and the Delivery of Services DA (PED)
Life Chances LC
Talent and Enterprise LC (TE)
Economic Development ED
Environment and Energy ED (EE)
Housing, Planning and Regeneration ED (HPR)
Olympic and Paralympic Games ED (OPG)
Productivity, Skills and Employment ED (PSE)
Constitution CN
National Security, International Relations and Development NSID
Europe NSID (EU)
Overseas and Defence NSID (OU)
Africa NSID (OUA)
Afghanistan and Pakistan NSID (A&P)
Trade NSID (T)
Protective Security and Resilience NSID (PSR)
Public Services and Public Expenditure PSX
Public Sector Pay and Pensions PSX (P)
Pandemic Influenza Planning MISC 32
Post Office Network MISC 33 (which he chairs)
Flood planning MISC 36
PM’s ad hoc Committee on International Climate Change
PM’s ad hoc International Climate Change Negotiations
He is the most powerful 'pink' person in the country, he is unelected, he will remain at the centre of power, even after the corrupt edifice of Nu Labour is swept away. He will remain in the Lords until somebody places a stake through his dark heart.
One 'man' rules this country unelected, unaccountable, unpalatable, the result of the fear and cowardice of Nu Labour.
Surely I'm not the only one who finds this disturbing? And the " Families, Children and Young People" Cabinet committee? Mandelbum? And what about this one? - " Borders and Migration "? Special interest in "Young People" from Brazil, do we suppose?
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)