A WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING

Cllr. Nigel Ash

A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing!

"This Council views with grave concern the implications of the amount of people in the Borough that voted BNP in the European Parliamentary elections that took place on Thursday June 4 2009."

Taken from Cllr. Nigel Ash's latest post on his personal Blog regarding last week's council meeting!

"We, as a Council and individual Councillors, must pledge to the people of this Borough that we will work harder to understand their concerns and support policies that promote jobs, better housing and fairness for all."

"If this is to work successfully all party leaders that support these values must pledge to put their differences to one side and fight those who may act like a wolf in sheep's clothing in working against these values!"

http://www.nigelash.blogspot.com/

MANDELSONIA

I'm so outraged by this little story that I'm quite blatantly nicking it in its entirety, from here:

http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/07/mandelsonia-revealed.html

Mandelson, our new Richelieu sits on thirty five out of the 43 Cabinet Committees, listed below

National Economic Council NEC
Better Regulation NEC (BR)
Democratic Renewal Council DRC
Domestic Policy Council DPC (which he deputy chairs)
Domestic Affairs DA
Borders and Migration DA (BM)
Communities and Equalities DA (CE)
Food DA
Families, Children and Young People DA (FCY)
Health and Wellbeing DA (HW)
Justice and Crime DA (JC)
Local Government and the Regions DA (LGR) (which he chairs)
Public Engagement and the Delivery of Services DA (PED)
Life Chances LC
Talent and Enterprise LC (TE)
Economic Development ED
Environment and Energy ED (EE)
Housing, Planning and Regeneration ED (HPR)
Olympic and Paralympic Games ED (OPG)
Productivity, Skills and Employment ED (PSE)
Constitution CN
National Security, International Relations and Development NSID
Europe NSID (EU)
Overseas and Defence NSID (OU)
Africa NSID (OUA)
Afghanistan and Pakistan NSID (A&P)
Trade NSID (T)
Protective Security and Resilience NSID (PSR)
Public Services and Public Expenditure PSX
Public Sector Pay and Pensions PSX (P)
Pandemic Influenza Planning MISC 32
Post Office Network MISC 33 (which he chairs)
Flood planning MISC 36
PM’s ad hoc Committee on International Climate Change
PM’s ad hoc International Climate Change Negotiations

He is the most powerful 'pink' person in the country, he is unelected, he will remain at the centre of power, even after the corrupt edifice of Nu Labour is swept away. He will remain in the Lords until somebody places a stake through his dark heart.

One 'man' rules this country unelected, unaccountable, unpalatable, the result of the fear and cowardice of Nu Labour.

Surely I'm not the only one who finds this disturbing? And the " Families, Children and Young People" Cabinet committee? Mandelbum? And what about this one? - " Borders and Migration "? Special interest in "Young People" from Brazil, do we suppose?

Morg
.

POSTING THE WRONG LETTER

According to reports our illustrious Home Secretary Alan Johnson "is not losing any sleep" over the prospects of our population rising to 70 million.
That is equivalent to 10 Birminghams extra or 15%.
He likes multiculturalism. OK fine if he does.
BUT MILLIONS OF US DON'T.

Where does he think all these extra people are going to live? What will the do to earn their living? Where is the land, water and food going to come from?
We are already the most overcrowded country in Europe. We want some places for peace and quiet. We want a British way of life.

The influx of all these people is like gatecrashers to a party. They were not invited by the hosts.
We, like the hosts of a party do NOT welcome uninvited guests.

Mr Johnson is not entitled by his brief stay at the Home Ofice to irreversibly alter the population and character of our country.He is not the host in control of our country and he has no right to set himself up as such.
It was not in the Labour manifesto and he has no right to impose his wishes on the British people.

As an ex postman let him post his ideas for a future Britain through people's letter boxes and see how many votes he gets.

Perhaps that is why he ceased to be a postman, posting the wrong letters.
He should go back to his former job, but before he does he should realise--

WE DO NOT WELCOME IMMIGRANTS NOR A CHANGE TO OUR SOCIETY.

The problems that this policy, if continued, WOULD CAUSE HIM MORE THAN LOSS OF SLEEP.

NICK GRIFFIN'S SPEECH

The above is the link to Nick Griffin's maiden speech in the European Parliament.
It was fantastic, short and to the point.

My wife often asks me do I write his speeches. It seems like it but I dont but he says exactly what I said on a blog a few days ago.
His bringing into the short time allotted to him the fascistic attacks on democracy by hammer wielding thugs sponsored by the Tories and Labour Parties brings in to the open in Europe the democracy deficiency in Britain.

His warning about the West's belligerence to the admittedly undemocratic country of Iran is timely, and his wish that we are not drawn into unwinnable wars against muslim countries is sensible.
Only today we read in the papers of Israeli missile bearing submarines transiting the Suez canal ready to attack Iran.

Now I don't like the regime in Iran but I don't want our country to be drawn into any conflict between Israel and that country.
The odds are that Israel will attack the nuclear facilities in Iran as they have done in Iraq and Syria, but we should not be drawn into it.

Nick is right. We are not the world's policeman and should keep out of any conflict. As he said if the politicians think fighting is a good thing they should send their family
He also in his speech gives the lie to those who say our party is against muslims.

We are NOT but they have their countries and way of life and we have ours. They don't want our ways and we don't want theirs.
We should both keep our noses out of other countries business

MORE GOVERNMENT STUPIDITY

A PERSPECTIVE ON SCHOOLS.

The announcement of a proposed PFI funded school in Lowton gives a perspective of what is wrong with this governments attitude to education (and everything else)
They seem to think that buildings are at the heart of education and everything else, paid for by PFI of course thus sadddling the taxpayers with debts for years to come.

A LITTLE STORY OF MY EDUCATION.

I started school in 1944 and learnt to write on a slate. We had to make a piece of chalk last a week and then we could have a book (cut in half) and a pencil. There was no school secretary or phone but if we misbehaved we were caned, as I was. We sat facing the teacher and had to pay attention.

There was a small playground but we had a football field by the council tip, the "mucky alley" as we called it. Health and safety would have had a fit nowadays but we came to no harm.

By the age of 7 we all knew our tables and by nine knew fractions and decimals. Everybody could read.
Technical drawing was taught at age eleven and started quite a few on their career as draughtsmen and engineers.
I later went to Grammar School and had lessons in (horror) asbestos huts which were so cold that we wore our coats in lessons. It was only later that we moved to new premises.

If buildings had a significant effect all my fellow pupils at primary school and grammar school would have been failures.

Instead they progressed to jobs as tradesmen,engineers, the professions and several becoming university lecturers.
In spite of the admittedly poor classrooms all made the best of themselves, and kept on the right side of the law.

I often meet fellow pupils who benefited from these methods in these spartan conditions and they are well rounded successful retired people.

My experiences have left me believing that it is not the buildings, but the teachers and the school system which are important, and that modern teaching methods are to blame for the shocking deterioration of educational standards.

The only solution this government has is to throw money at the problem and allow private firms to make a huge profit, to be paid back by mortgaging our children's future. The same goes for the NHS.
So in my opinion new "Super Schools" are not the answer. Proper teaching and discipline is.

BTW I was not a model pupil and was often punished for my transgressions and was once told by the Head that "your trouble is that you are agin the government"

I STILL AM.

THE SUPPORTERS OF FASCISM

I have taken this picture from Martin Wingfield's blog. Sorry Martin. I know I have used Tony Ward's picture on a previous blog but this illustrates the point better. As you see the people named at the side are all supporters of the so called Unite against Fascism (UAF) who perpetrated this hammer attack on a person for the only reason that he had a different point of view.

Peter Hain is well known to be a crook and lied over his expenses as well as supporting violence against his opponents in the past.

Keith Vaz is well known as a shady character and friendly with people of dubious repute.

Diane Abbott, the well known Lefty socialist had no hesitation in sending her son to private school in spite of campaigning against private education for others (hypocrit)

David Cameron, surprisingly supports this communist led violent pressure group whose aims bear no relation to his Tory Party of privelidge.
I have e mailed the local senior Tory Cllr Mike Winstanley to get his party to disassociate himself from this violent Trotskyite group but have as yet had no reply.

So there you have it. A group of MPs of little integrity giving support to a group which violently attacks people with whom they disagree.

AND THEY CALL US FASCISTS!

Come on Dave. You are the least odious of this squalid group.

SAY IT PUBLICLY that you are against these thugs OR WE WILL USE IT AGAINST YOU AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.

We don't expect the others to do so, they are too deep in the sleazy mire,but we hope you will show a little integrity.

THE GLOVES ARE OFF

THE SACRIFICE OF OUR YOUNG LADS

The shambles in Afganistan continues with more of our young lads being killed each day. I can't bear to watch it on TV.
The government says it is important and protecting us from terrorism and we have to expect some casualties in a war.

WE SHOULD NOT BE THERE.
If they think it so important they should send their own sons to risk their lives with inadequate equipment. The amount spent on MPs expenses, if spent on equipment would have saved many lives.

There is no strategy of what to do in future. The Afgan government is corrupt and probably in league with Al Qaida. When we leave chaos will return.
WHAT A WASTE OF GOOD YOUNG LIVES.

The Afgans do not want us in their country. I don't blame them. We would not want a foreign army in our country.
Any terrorist threat to us is caused by two things.

Our presence in their country and Muslims in this country.
The obvious answer. Bring our troops home and send all muslim extremists back.

If there were no muslims here there would be no muslim terrorists. Surely that is obvious.
So for a failed multicultural experiment which was foisted on our people our soldiers die, we are put in danger of terrorism here and innocent Afgans die.

Will these politicians never learn.

BNP policy.

If we were in power all our soldiers would be brought home as soon as possible,(starting tomorrow) and we would cease to interfere with other countries systems of government.

WE ARE NOT THE WORLD'S POLICEMAN!