NEWS FROM THE COAL FACE

I'm becoming somewhat elated. I am by nature a pessimist and always have a tendency to the "what if" outlook but daily the drip drip of good news keeps coming in.

Formerly (about 4 years ago) we had little meetings in the corner of pubs, very hush hush, mustn't let anybody know we were in the BNP where we tried to find ways to further our cause. We feared being banned by the pubs or being attacked by the thugs of the left.

The latter is still a concern to us as these people who preach tolerance only reserve it for those who agree with them. Now however our numbers have grown to the extent that really these anti democrats are only a minor irritant.

As regards venues, people are asking us to go to them and are disappointed when we are unable to use their premises.

We have been invited to speak at a community centre to see what we can do to help the desperate unemployment situation. We will of course explain that as yet we are a small party and have no political power.

What we do have as shown this week in the media is the power to scare the hell out of the other parties (and I include UKIP) who all have been shown to be self serving careerists. A big BNP vote even if we do not gain many seats will make them sit up and listen to the much abused and ignored people.

Also the fact that they all say don't vote BNP must be more reason to do just that as they have shown themselves collectively to be a corrupt incompetent clique who have brought our country to bankruptsy, ruined our industry, sold our assets, given power to the EU (without our consent) and almost destroyed our social cohesion.

The panic of the "elite" is beginning to show in the hostile articles in the press where they dredge the past to try to find anything to discredit us. They print lies which I know to be untrue having attended the same meetings. They are starting to talk up UKIP as they did last time(just shows they are all the same).

They say we have only 2% of the vote in polls which is strange when we have never polled so low in any election, all rubbish and bo***cks.

We really do need a breath of CLEAN fresh air and we will provide it.

NEWS FROM THE CAMPAIGN.

Our leafletters were out in Earlstown where they had a very good reception with people asking for leaflets they could distribute themselves and one of our members was given a cheque for £100 by a member of the public.

Another member asked the postman who delivered his labour leaflet what he voted and got the reply UKIP to which he replied "I vote BNP".
The postie then replied he was voting BNP but dare not say it and many of his fellow posties were also voting BNP but dare not say it.

This I can understand as we are the only party which campaigns against the privatisation of the Post Office and its sale to foreign owners.

Roll on June 4th I think we will give them a shock!

HERE'S ONE FOR OUR GOOD FRIEND RED. ENJOY.

Here’s a short comment I picked up off the web today. I thought Red might like to read it.

Chalcedon said...

Got my leaflets today. My postie did deliver a BNP leaflet, a Labour one and Cons et al. He's a concientious guy who does his job, unclouded by personal politics it seems. The Labour leaflet was insipid dross. Now, my dear wife, who was a Labour voter, actually read the BNP leaflet and is thinking about it. My mother, pretty much a commie for years actually voted BNP at an election in Wigan prior to moving down here,she was so disenchanted by Labour. This is serious shit for Noo Labour I reckon. OK, not statistically significant. Even my state educated 18 year old isn't going to vote Labour. So she says.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha … oh dear.

UPDATE

A poll published today on the website PoliticsHome.com, and previewed exclusively by the Observer, shows that the scandal has driven more than a quarter of voters to change the party they support. The main beneficiary is Ukip, followed by the British National party and the Greens.

The Observer has spoken to 10 prominent donors and only one said that he would maintain financial support for Labour. The party, according to its last accounts, is £18.9m in debt.

Morg
.

A STRIKE FROM THE GUTTER

It's started, the Searchlies electoral campaign against the BNP. I was given this leaflet by a member of the public (not a BNP member) who was so disgusted by what he knew to be lies that he travelled 4 miles to bring it to me. Just look at the people whose advice we are supposed to take on June 4th when our country has been bankrupted by the present government, taken into illegal wars, lost its industry, millions on the dole and our culture in danger of being anhilated by political correctness, mass immigration and EU dictats, none of which the British people as a whole voted for or condoned.

In addition no mention in this paper of the corrupt sleazy political parties who are mostly concerned with feathering their nests using rules they put in place. Many of these sleazebags have made the excuse that they "were not good accountants" or they "forgot" or that it was "the system" at fault.

These are supposedly competent and "honourable" people and are running the country for God's sake.
They couldn't run a p**s up in a brewery.

If an ordinary person had tried to say these things to the taxmen he would be in jail, so they are not very honourable either.

Getting back to the leaflet, none of these major issues are tackled. No mention of crime, education, jobs or finances etc. No only short statements from nonentities in the entertainment field.

Take transvestite Eddie Izzard. What does he know apart from dressing up in womens clothes and making a few jokes. Not exactly a political heavyweight is he?

Or Beverley Knight some minor singer I believe (never heard of her). She states we should celebrate our differences, but we can't. We are not allowed to celebrate our Englishness, that is the problem, and I don't need advice from a young singer how to vote. How condescending this young woman is.

Amir Kahn, who said he held the flag for England. Yes he did BUT ONLY AFTER HOLDING THE FLAG FOR PAKISTAN UNTIL HE WAS TOLD ABOUT IT.
We have not forgotten that demonstration of his committment to Britain.

Andy Whyment (never heard of him either) but he says he has a Jamaican wife so he wouldn't like our party would he.

Nick Hewer of the apprentice (never heard of him either) I can only assume he's made some money somehow but it does not make his opinion on voting any more valid than that of anyone else.
None of their opinions has the slightest bearing on the future of our country.

That is the trouble with these P C pro multicultural lefties and their friends in the parliamentary trough.
THEY HAVE THE CHEEK TO TELL PEOPLE WHO TO VOTE AGAINST.

WE DON'T and we are a political party. We try to convince people to vote for us but we do not TELL them to vote for us.

Their arrogance knows no bounds.

I would not be so conceited as to tell you what to do but only to ask you to look at policies over a wide range of issues make your own mind up and hopefully vote for us rather than be swayed by the selfish opinions of media nonentities.

LAUNCH OF THE NORTH WEST CAMPAIGN

The launch of our election campaign in the North West took place this afternoon in a hotel in North Manchester.
A "full house" of members and supporters saw our candidates presented to the press.

This was followed by a shortish speech by Nick Griffin which laid out the gist of our policies, after which he held a question and answer session for the press followed by throwing it open to the audience.

The press seemed somewhat reluctant to ask questions. Possibly the experienced reporters were a bit intimidated by a man who could answer honestly any question put to him.

The questions from the BBC all concerned our policies to immigrants and our repatriation policies. Nick explained that a repatriation policy had been in place for nearly 40 years under both Labour and Tories but had been rarely used.

Our policy in any case is voluntary and anyone who did not want to leave could stay, but they would compete on merit and not be given preference as at present. The ones who did take up the offer would have capital to take to their native countries which would help the local economies, and be far more beneficial to those countries than the present policies of doling out aid to despots.
There would be no positive discrimination or ethnic quotas as at present.
The main concern is to shut the door to further immigration.

On being questioned on our "Green" policies he said that we were greener than the Green Party who advocated continued immigration to our overcrowded island, transferring millions of people from a low energy lifestyle to a high energy lifestyle thus using more energy and covering our countryside with acres of concrete, hardly the greenest of policies.

Asked by a BBC reporter if we would lose talent in the North West if immigrants left, Nick asked whether she meant muslims or Afro Carribean. She replied we could lose such talents as Amir Kahn.
Now Nick was a boxer but he had to admit that the loss of one boxer would not be a great detriment to the North West.

On the journey home we spoke about this strange question and why this boxer was especially asked about, especially in view of the well known fact that his allegiances are with Pakistan as shown by his sporting of the Pakistani flag when he first won a trophy at the Olympics, until he was told about it and subsequently draped himself in the Union Flag.

Many will have forgotten about this but we have not.

With all the questions easily batted away a photo of some of the Euro candidates was taken (see below) and we made our way outside.

Here we were greeted by Derek Adam's skip containing impressions of the "Honourable Members" and we all had our photos taken before leaving for home.

Wigan and St Helens members behind the truck with the Prime Minister looking from the back.

Liverpool and Salford members by the skip.

Gary Aronsson having a word with the Prime Minister.

BRAINWASHING AT WINSTANLEY COLLEGE

On St George's Day a "debate" took place at Winstanley College the topic of which was,

"On the importance of defeating the British National Party and reclaiming patriotism from the racists on St George's Day".

Speaking in favour of the motion was the vicar of St John's Pemberton who after speaking on the subject left the topic altogether by droning on about his support for gay marriage.

The title alone gives a flavour of what was to follow and the term "debate" is a misnomer as little debate was allowed, and instead the students were subjected to one of the most blatant brainwashing events I have heard of.

The few brave unbrainwashed students who attempted to engage in debate with were not allowed to fully put their questions. Of course this is par for the course with the left and especially the clergy who are used to preaching to the converted in church where challenges to their authoritan wisdom are not allowed.

This unloved and unrespected leader of a declining congregation recently refused to baptise a Downs Syndrome child in case she disrupted the service. Not much Christianity there then.

He freely admitted to being at the riot when one of our activists was attacked with a hammer but he blamed "the socialists",(nothing to do with me mister), and said his protest was peaceful.

This begs the question of why he felt justified in protesting against a private meeting, just because he did not agree with the views of those inside.
How would he react if the situation was reversed and an anti Christian group protested outside his church?

He should support the values of his declining church instead of "peacefully" protesting against a legitimate political party holding a private meeting.

He will not share a platform with us but is prepared to be associated with claw hammer wielding thugs.
This brainwashing "man of the cloth" was assisted by Mr M Kavanagh a politics and law lecturer who said that as he had an Irish name the BNP would deport him to Ireland (I must warn our super activists Tommy Kavanagh and Eddie O' Sullivan the danger they are in and so should the student who informed me of this farce who is also of Irish descent).

That statement is a downright lie and as a politics lecturer he should know it. If he does not he has no right teaching politics.
Either a liar or ignorant, or both he is not fit to be a teacher.

One of the people quoted in their moralistic arguments was Hazel Blears OUCH.

This farce of a debate shows the pernicious brainwashing taking place in our schools at our expense and the low calibre of the teachers and clergy.

The good news is that the more intelligent students are increasingly seeing the flaws in their arguments and are turning to us, as are the voters in spite of all the villification we have to endure and pay for.

BACK TO WORK

Back from holidays on Saturday to a load of work. So many new enquiries, 28 since I went and all must be contacted. I have never in the 4 years I have been organiser seen anything like it. We must be getting at least ten times the number we previously got. Very satisfying, our work is bearing fruit.

It just shows how fed up people are about the incompetence and betrayal by the other parties who are more concerned in keeping their noses in the trough than serving the interests of British people.

The revelations about the scams of the MPs and members of the House of Lords show that with a few exceptions they are all at it.

I see the smug bastard Farage is trying to capitalise on this disgust by saying that those wishing to kick the other parties for their corruption should vote for the one trick UKIP.
It just shows how out of touch he is. He is on the gravy train in Brussels but there is no way he can be investigated.

The Greens in their broadcast say they are all for protecting jobs as well as the planet. They never mention the threat of immigration to our country nor the massive population increase caused by the large families of the third world people and immigrants to this country.

They never mention the increase in fuel costs they would impose nor the loss of manufacturing jobs.

MPs have been shown to be in the job for the money and selfish reasons.
That can not be levelled against BNP activists or councillors.
It COSTS us money to work for our party. Many have been persecuted at work, lost their jobs or been attacked and had their property vandalised.

Many MPs (some of them from not far from here) would never get a job outside Parliament, it is just a well paid job for them

No, the only party in which members work for the country and not personal gain is the BNP.
Our party's future is linked to the future of our country and our country's to ours.

If we gain the country gains, and our children's future will be secured.

BUT the counter attack by those with their noses in the trough has started and that includes the media in who are in the pocket of big business.

We must expect more smears and lies in their desperation, but people are beginning to see through them and are turning to us as my post shows.
We will not be deflected and keep working to save our country. We are not there yet but with a bit more effort we will succeed and be liberated on June 4th.

P S. Well done to all those who worked so hard while I was away and congratulations to the Leigh members over their success in promoting the saving of the Marsh Fields from the greedy fingers of the Labour group of Wigan Metro and their big business friends.

SUGGESTIONS WELCOME TO PROGRESS THIS ENQUIRY

I am emailing to respond to your FOI request. I will repeat your questions with the answers underneath each one.

1 (a) How many Officers and/or other staff of WMBC are authorised to use the powers granted under this Act (RIPA); and who issues such authorisation?

16 are authorised; the Chief Executive issues the authorisation

(b) What are the grades of the staff concerned? By this I mean - how many senior executives; how many senior managers; how many junior managers; how many non-managerial grades; how many temporary contractors; etc. Numbers alone are all that I require, not names or particular job titles.

16 in total - 3 directors, 13 senior managers

(c) On what date was the first individual from WMBC authorised to use the powers granted by RIPA given that authorisation?

October 2002

(d) Are such individuals authorised to delegate any necessary powers to others - whether WMBC employees or otherwise - to actually carry out aspects of investigations (such as physical surveillance, or installing/operating cameras or listening devices, for example)?

Yes

(e) Is there a committee, or individual, tasked to exercise oversight on the use of RIPA to ensure it is being used appropriately?

Yes - an officer in the Legal and Democratic Services Department

(f) On what date was the oversight put in place?

October 2002

2. How many investigations, in total, have been carried out by staff or contractors from or for WMBC?

401 since October 2002

3 (a) How many of these investigations were 'Terrorism' related?

None

(b) Of those investigations not terrorism related, please supply a list of the reasons for each investigation.

All investigations were carried out for either anti-social behaviour or licensing purposes

4 How many investigations have resulted in:

(i) Prosecution through a court of law?

(ii) Issue of a formal caution?

(iii) Issue of a fixed penalty notice?

Under Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act, I am refusing to provide this information on the basis that to do so would breach the appropriate limit set down in the FOI Fees Regulations. The Fees Regulations stipulate that the cost limit for dealing with an FOI request is £450, calculated at a total of £25 an hour (i.e. a time limit of 18 hours). In order to provide the information on how many investigations have resulted in one of the above outcomes, we would need to consult information on 401 separate investigations. I estimate that it would take at least 5 minutes to obtain the file for each case and then find out what the outcome of the investigation was. At five minutes per investigation, it would therefore take 33 hours to collate the outcomes of every investigation taken forward since October 2002. On this basis, I am refusing to provide the information.

5 What has been the cost of these investigations ( include the cost of prosecutions in with total cost), and how much has been recovered from prosecutions and fixed penalty notices?

We do not hold this information.

If you are unhappy with any aspect of this response, an independent senior officer will review this decision. Please let me know if you would like to arrange this.

You can also complain to the Information Commissioner, who is the regulator for Freedom of Information. His website is www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk, and his helpline number is 01625 545745. His staff may ask you to exhaust our internal complaints procedure if you choose to complain to his office now.

I've phoned the office of the Information Commissioner, and the refusal is technically within the rules. So how to progress this to find out how many investigations resulted in prosecutions, cautions and/or fixed penalty notices?

You see - 401 investigations can not have been cheap, and surely they cannot all have come to nothing because what a monumental waste of money that would be. I was surprised at the sheer volume of investigations carried out. I suspect officialdom sees everyone as a criminal.

And I do not for a minute accept that the costs of these cases is not recorded somewhere. That's a lot of money to just lose in the general accounts.

Perhaps a councillor could progress this enquiry? Maybe Charles would know what to do - after all, he used to be a councillor here. But that was a long time ago. Peter - you were a councillor a lot more recently; have you any suggestions on how to complete this enquiry? I know you don't like us, but I suspect you dislike them a lot more.

Suggestions from anyone welcome. Write them in as comments to this post.

401 RIPA investigations and not one about terrorism ... which was the reason these laws were brought in, in the first place. Well, so the government said anyway. Those 16 authorised council personnel have more powers now than Chief Constables had ten years ago. They can hire people to watch you; they can pay to have secret cameras set up to watch you; pay to have listening devices installed wherever they think necessary; they can bug your phone calls; monitor your emails; track your internet use. Ten years ago a Chief Constable couldn't even order some of that, and even those things he could order he needed to get a judicial warrant for.

Are we happy that these people can do these things to us - secretly? I'm not.

Morg

.