FIRST MAKE US MAD

The horrific murders and hostage taking and carnage in Bombay yesterday highlight the danger faced by us all in this country.

British, Americans and Jews were especially targetted by muslim terrorists.

Unfortunately for them India has over 100 million muslims in it's country, about twice the percentage that we have. However our numbers are growing and their influence is becoming stronger, hence the completely over the top police reaction to our supporters in Liverpool and Burnley last week, the former arrested for delivering leaflets containing government statistics.

They obviously did not want people to know.

I do accept muslims have a particular grievance against our government over their invasion of Afganistan and Iraq, and its continued support for Israeli suppression of Palestinian rights.

However to allow ever increasing numbers of muslims into this country, many of whom are against us and potential if not actual terrorists and, to promote into positions of power and influence people from these groups is madness.

It is equivalent in the last war of allowing 2 million Germans in, giving them influence and saying they were a nation of peace. Of course some would have been peaceful but others wouldn't and how to tell them apart?

The only way the future of our country can be assured is to STOP muslim immigration, and encourage (not force) those here to return to their muslim lands.

As Enoch said "Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad"

21st CENTURY BRITAIN

Or is it the 1930s/40s.

Who voted for this? Conscience troubling you? It should be.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gjVQ8GVqDxI&NR=1

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=96tDBpxouKg

SOME MORE INTERESTING WIGAN NUMBERS

Total annual Wigan Council spending on publicity in the financial year 1996-1997 – the year immediately before our current government of oppressive Labour tyrants came to power:

£816,000

Total annual Wigan Council spending on publicity in the financial year 2006-2007 – after ten years of the spinmeisters in power:

£1,345,000

An increase in publicity spending per year of:

64.8%

You didn’t think spin came for free did you? YOU paid for that.

The total local authority annual publicity bill (2006-2007) is £450 million There is one local authority, Birmingham City Council, that spends more than £10 million on publicity.

There are 8 local authorities spending more than £5 million on publicity.

There are 73 local authorities spending more than £2 million on publicity.

There are 141 local authorities spending more than £1 million on publicity.

The total spend on publicity is not broken down in a uniform way in the various local authority accounts. It is possible, however, to identify 44 councils that spend at least £1 million and 4 councils spending at least £2 million on staff recruitment advertising – despite the increased use of websites. If all local authority accounts provided a full breakdown of publicity spending, the number of councils spending at least £1 million on staff advertising would almost certainly increase.

The doubling of average publicity spending per local authority in the last decade is extremely disappointing. There are, however, a number of councils that are actually spending less on publicity than ten years ago. For example:

- Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council spent £669,000 on publicity in 2006-07, down 11 per cent from the £751,000 spent in 1996-97.

- In 2005-06, however, the council spent £1,030,000 on publicity, meaning that the 1-year fall in spending was 35 per cent.

- If Hammersmith and Fulham can reduce publicity spending by 35 per cent in one year …… make other efficiency savings and reduce council tax by 3 per cent, then it must be possible for other councils to follow suit.

http://tpa.typepad.com/waste/2007/12/council-spendin.html

Morg

PROUD TO SHAKE THEIR HANDS

Just got back from the long awaited meeting in St Helens where Arthur Kemp was to speak.
His speech was somewhat similar to the one he made in Wigan which I have recorded to disc.

The main reason I went was to shake the hands of the patriots who were wrongly arrested for distributing the leaflets which were perfectly legal. They contained government statistics only but which illustrated the vastly disproportionate amount of anti white violence when population numbers are taken into consideration.

The government it seems objects to their own figures being widely disseminated.
The police were there having gained the information from the phones and computers of the arrested members. Their houses were searched and wives in some cases frightened.

The Fascist Bastard chief of police is really out to get us, but he will only increase our support.
What they expected to find God only knows! What they found was the usual civilised meeting at a top St Helens restaurant.

We shall be having a BIG rally on Saturday. The meeting point has not been arranged as yet.
Please, as many members as possible come and support us.
We can not afford to lose this fight for our free speech.

There is a possibility of arrests being made of our peaceful protest.
I'M QUITE HAPPY TO BE ARRESTED. WHAT A STORY, "BILLINGE DOCTOR ARRESTED"all over the papers. What publicity! I CAN'T WAIT.

I will of course do nothing unlawful or inconvenience anyone, just UPHOLD MY DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.

On to the budget.

This morning people were interviewed and asked what they wanted most a VAT cut or job security made more secure by cuts in National Insurance. They all, workers and management said job security and insurance cuts.
Cutting VAT will have little effect on job prospects or living standards and only lead to more imports of cheap foreign goods.


What do they get?--

2.5% off VAT, an increase in National Insurance and a 5% rise in income tax for those on over £150,000. Aww, poor dears. As most of the people on this kind of salary are the people who caused this trouble in the first place why did they not start it at say £100,000. I'm sure with effort they could have managed to make ends meet.

Why such a small increase? Because these are the government's friends, the bankers and top civil servants.
Meanwhile people will still lose their houses.

WHAT A SHOWER OF INCOMPETANTS!

SOME INTERESTING WIGAN NUMBERS

All figures are from January 21st 2008. Any pay increases during 2008 are in addition.

Susan Lowe. Director of Legal and Property Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £107,007 (Includes election fees £313)

Bob Saunders. Executive Director (Interim). 2006-2007 Salary - £110,174 (Includes election fees £150)

Martin Kimber. Director of Environmental Services. 2006-2007 Salary - £117,019

Ged Rowney. Director of Children and Young Peoples Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,877). 2006-2007 Salary - £126,995. (Pay rise = 6.8%)

Bernard Walker. Director of Adult Services. (2005-2006 Salary - £127,723). 2006-2007 Salary - £131,488. (Pay rise = 2.9%)

David Smith. Director of Finance and IT. (2005-2006 Salary - £122,615). 2006-2007 Salary - £132,871. (Pay rise = 8.4%) (Includes election fees £184; remuneration as Treasurer to Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified – So that’s £132,871 for a part-timer. He has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here)

Frank Costello. Deputy Chief Executive. (2005-2006 Salary - £118,863). 2006-2007 Salary - £135,643. (Pay rise = 14.1%) (Includes election fees £313)

Joyce Redfearn. Chief Executive (2005-2006 Salary - £157,918). 2006-2007 Salary - £191,557. (Pay rise = 21.3%) (Includes election fees £6,409; remuneration as Clerk to the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority £unspecified. - So that’s £191,557 for a part-timer. She has two jobs, and has salary in addition to that noted here. And … well…£6,409 in election fees. Speechless!!! I wonder how much the person with REAL responsibility for ensuring the correct and smooth running of elections – Anne Loftus - gets in election fees? A small fraction of that, I would hazard to guess. Yet it’s Anne Loftus’s head that will roll if an election goes pear-shaped).

I’ve lived in Wigan for four and a half years. In that time I’ve never once had cause to complain about my rubbish collection; so in my experiece our dustbinmen do a good job. I wonder how much they get paid and what percentage pay rise they got between 2005-2006 and 2006-2007? Let me hazard another guess here: it was nowhere near £191,557 part-time, and nowhere near a 21.3% pay rise.

And bear in mind that even 100% of next to nothing is still only next to nothing, whereas 10% of two-hundred grand is a considerable salary all on its own.

http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/council_spending_uncovered_4_town_hall_rich_list_2008.pdf

Morg

WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!

The arrest this afternoon of eleven of our activists for distributing our perfectly legal pamphlet "Racism cuts both ways" shows what a Stalinist society we are becoming.

The "Stasi" police controlled by this Labour government in persecuting us in this way, think they can prevent our message of truth to be disseminated.

THEY COULD NOT BE MORE WRONG!

Like everything Labour does IT WILL NOT WORK!

WE SHALL CONTINUE to spread our message of truth whatever they do.

THEY CAN'T EVEN CONTROL THE DRUNKEN YOBS ON A SATURDAY NIGHT AND CAN ONLY SOLVE CRIMES IF THEY ARE ADMITTED.

THEY THINK THEY CAN STOP US. Ha ha ha! WE ARE MADE OF STERNER STUFF!

This undemocratic action WILL INVIGORATE US and MAKE US MORE DETERMINED to grasp the baton of freedom handed to us by our forefathers and bought by their blood.

this is a battle we can not afford to lose so--

WE FIGHT ON, AND WE WILL WIN.

A BADGE OF HONOUR.

People have had mixed reactions to being named on our membership list. The vast majority have taken it as a BADGE OF HONOUR to be "outed" as a patriot.

Some have been somewhat disconcerted after having abusive phone calls and e mails.
The remedy for this is to log all phone calls and report any to the police. E mails should be kept and the police informed. They can then send an expert to look at the e mail (and not any private information on your computer) who can then trace the source of the call. If there is any "race hate" in the message they are bound to investigate it.

IT IS ILLEGAL under the DATA PROTECTION ACT to use stolen information in this way.

DON'T BE INTIMIDATED. I say you are only a real member if you have had one.

One member e mailed me and asked if the list could be put up again in case anybody had missed it because---
IT HAD DONE HIS BUSINESS GOOD ,
and he had got more work as a result of his membership being known.

THERE IS A LOT OF SYMPATHY OUT THERE AT THIS PERSECUTION.
People see it as an unjust attack on democracy.

WOULD LABOUR MPS, OF A GOVERNMENT WHICH IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY LIKE THEIR DETAILS WIDELY KNOWN?

YOU BET THEY WOULDN'T they have much to be ashamed about.

WE HAVE NOTHING TO BE ASHAMED OF--

BE PROUD!