Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Monday, 23 January 2012
Racist Murders: Who are the Real Victims?
The recent conviction of the killers of black youth Stephen Lawrence trial has seen an outburst of anti-white hate by the controlled media—but the statistics show that the vast majority of victims of racial murders are white, and the attackers non-white.
A new video produced by former leading BNPtv producers (who no longer work for the party, for the usual reason) has highlighted the obvious anti-white racism of the controlled media and its establishment attack dogs.
A new video produced by former leading BNPtv producers (who no longer work for the party, for the usual reason) has highlighted the obvious anti-white racism of the controlled media and its establishment attack dogs.
The video, which can be seen below, deserves to go viral.
Saturday, 21 January 2012
FACEBOOK - DATA USED BY CIA
But there is a dark side to the success story that's been spreading across the blogosphere. A complex but riveting Big Brother-type conspiracy theory which links Facebook to the CIA and the US Department of Defence.
The CIA is, though, using a Facebook group to recruit staff for its very sexy sounding National Clandestine Service.
Checking out the job ads
does require a Facebook login, so if you haven't joined the site - or are worried that CIA spooks will start following you home from work -check them out on the agency's own site.
The story starts once Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg had launched, after the dorm room drama that's led to the current court case.
It was when a journalist lifted the lid on the DARPA's Information Awareness Office that the public began to show concern at its information mining projects.
Wikipedia's IAO page says: "the IAO has the stated mission to gather as much information as possible about everyone, in a centralised location, for easy perusal by the United States government, including (though not limited to) internet activity, credit card purchase histories, airline ticket purchases, car rentals, medical records, educational transcripts, driver's licenses, utility bills, tax returns, and any other available data.".
Now the internet conspiracy theorists are citing Facebook as the IAO's new mask.
Facebook's own Terms of use state: "by posting Member Content to any part of the Web site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, reformat, translate, excerpt and distribute such information and content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorpoate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorise sublicenses of the foregoing.
And in its equally interesting privacy policy: "Facebook may also collect information about you from other sources, such as newspapers, blogs, instant messaging services, and other users of the Facebook service through the operation of the service (eg. photo tags) in order to provide you with more useful information and a more personalised experience. By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States."
Global Research Articles by Matt GreenopDo you still want to use Facebook now ?
Friday, 20 January 2012
Behind Big News: Propaganda and the CFR- (Full Length Documentary )
I know this is about American MSM but it applies to our MSM too.
We already know that British MSM are deceitful and the BBC is not averse to fabricating the Truth as the BBC works for the powers that be, whether they be Politicians or MSM Editors and Journalists.
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
NO JUSTICE IN BRITAIN
I read today of the Romanian woman on benefits being allowed housing benefit after saying that selling "The Big Issue" is a legitimate job.
This parasite who needed an interpreter in court in spite of having lived here for four years, as well as the lawyers all at our expense is already getting £25,500 in benefits for her four children, one of whom it seems is disabled.
Now it seems to that will be added her £2,600 housing benefit so over £28,000 in all plus what she makes selling the magazine bringing a grand total of £33,000 per year.
She has a child of two, but no mention of a partner.
She must have had one at one point and probably still has.
How many hard working British families struggle to survive on much less while doing useful jobs which contribute to our economy? There must be millions.
I don't see why she should have any benefits here. If she wants to breed like a rabbit, let her do it in her own country.
I don't even want to see her types in my country, whether they parasitise from us or not.
She and her brood should be sent home and the nice house she has acquired (it seems without speaking English) could be let to some DESERVING BRITISH FAMILY.
The governernment says that although it disagrees with the ruling it is bound by the international law.
I do not accept that. It is a cop out.
I believe the judiciary deliberately undermine our society, some for political reasons and some in order to make more money for their corrupt proffession.
The government the people foolishly elected should show their metal and dismiss these stupid judges who ride roughshod over the wishes of the people.
But in this case what can we do apart from protest.
STOP BUYING THE BIG ISSUE,and give directly tro local charities if you have any money to spare.
That way you can be sure you are helping YOUR OWN.
Another article in the paper reports that squatters from Moldova have moved into a house in London which was empty and about to be sold.
The police of course can not help as it is a "civil matter".
So breaking in someone's house is a civil matter is it?
They'd find out whether it was if I found squatters in my house. They wouldn't last five minutes.
And yet another report on the ugly muslim terrorist who can not be deported to face charges of terrorism because of his human rights.
Abu Qatada or whatever his name has been prevented from being deported by the ECHR to answer charges even though that country has guaranteed a fair trial and treatment.
Of course Gary McKinnon can be extradited to the USA as well as the other lad accuses of helping music downloads.
And American jails are not nice places like our holiday camps but it seems they must go even though McKinnon will probably not survive.
I know this rant will perhaps make some believe that I am some kind of conspiracy nut, but the above travesties of justice and common sense can have no other explanation that is
The judiciary and the rulers of our country are intent on destroying us and our society and it is our duty to
OPPOSE THEM AT EVERY TURN.
Will we get our country back without civil war?
I'm beginning to think we wont.
This parasite who needed an interpreter in court in spite of having lived here for four years, as well as the lawyers all at our expense is already getting £25,500 in benefits for her four children, one of whom it seems is disabled.
Now it seems to that will be added her £2,600 housing benefit so over £28,000 in all plus what she makes selling the magazine bringing a grand total of £33,000 per year.
She has a child of two, but no mention of a partner.
She must have had one at one point and probably still has.
How many hard working British families struggle to survive on much less while doing useful jobs which contribute to our economy? There must be millions.
I don't see why she should have any benefits here. If she wants to breed like a rabbit, let her do it in her own country.
I don't even want to see her types in my country, whether they parasitise from us or not.
She and her brood should be sent home and the nice house she has acquired (it seems without speaking English) could be let to some DESERVING BRITISH FAMILY.
The governernment says that although it disagrees with the ruling it is bound by the international law.
I do not accept that. It is a cop out.
I believe the judiciary deliberately undermine our society, some for political reasons and some in order to make more money for their corrupt proffession.
The government the people foolishly elected should show their metal and dismiss these stupid judges who ride roughshod over the wishes of the people.
But in this case what can we do apart from protest.
STOP BUYING THE BIG ISSUE,and give directly tro local charities if you have any money to spare.
That way you can be sure you are helping YOUR OWN.
Another article in the paper reports that squatters from Moldova have moved into a house in London which was empty and about to be sold.
The police of course can not help as it is a "civil matter".
So breaking in someone's house is a civil matter is it?
They'd find out whether it was if I found squatters in my house. They wouldn't last five minutes.
And yet another report on the ugly muslim terrorist who can not be deported to face charges of terrorism because of his human rights.
Abu Qatada or whatever his name has been prevented from being deported by the ECHR to answer charges even though that country has guaranteed a fair trial and treatment.
Of course Gary McKinnon can be extradited to the USA as well as the other lad accuses of helping music downloads.
And American jails are not nice places like our holiday camps but it seems they must go even though McKinnon will probably not survive.
I know this rant will perhaps make some believe that I am some kind of conspiracy nut, but the above travesties of justice and common sense can have no other explanation that is
The judiciary and the rulers of our country are intent on destroying us and our society and it is our duty to
OPPOSE THEM AT EVERY TURN.
Will we get our country back without civil war?
I'm beginning to think we wont.
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
KEEP OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST.
The turmoil in the Middle East is continuing and even hotting up with Iran threatenung to close the Straits of Hormuz which will lead to a rise in gas prices here it is said (another indication of the folly of selling our own gas supplies off cheap, and the "dash to gas" while sidelining indigenous coal supplies), and maybe because of the boycott of Iran an increase in oil prices.
Assasinations of nuclear scientists in Iran by Israel continue with little condemnation by our government or media. One wonders if the situation were reversed whether these atrocities would be so played down.
Iran has been accused of disobeying UN resolutions and it has. But so, many times over the past fifty years has Israel without condemnation.
Foolishly Iran stated that it wishes to destroy Israel, while Israel goes about destroying Palestine by stealth, condoned by the West.
Israel does not say what its intentions are even though they betray them through their actions
I hold no brief for Iran nor any muslim regime, but to understand the present situation one must study the history of the Middle East in the 20th century which has been bedevilled by Wwestern and British interference.
Starting during WW1 the arrogance of the Balfour Declaration which gave land which did not belong to us to the Zionists has had a catastrophic effect on that region, intensified by our and the USA's continuing meddling and interference there.
In the Fifties we removed a democratically elected leader and installed the Shah, a ruthless and cruel leader whose crimes were hushed up in the West but suffered by the Iranian people.
In the Eighties we backed Saddam Hussein in a war against Iran in which he used poison gas and only fell out with him when he pointed a gun at Israel, and then got in a war justified on false evidence.
Meanwhile the consolidation of Israel continued with more local people displaced into squalid camps, and those remaining having second class status.
Lebanon has been invaded and parts of Syria occupied by Israel.
And we are surprised by the hatred to us shown by Arabs and other Middle Eastern countries?
They see us as unfair and against them and retaliate as evidenced by the 9/11 horrors and London bombings.
Why do we continue on this path of strife which will inevitably end in nuclear war?
Because of the Zionist lobby in the USA and Britain with its political influence and money.
We should attempt to see things from the Arab point of view and come to a "non interference" arrangement with them.
We should allow matters in the Middle East to be settled by the people living there and if they want to fight keep out of it. Thus any arms held by states there would be of no threat to us.
It is said that Israel is a bulwark for democracy in the Middle East. No it is not, it is a festering bone of contention set among people with no desire for democracy and certainly no desire to be dominated by Zionist money and influence.
Israel has cost the "West" billions and many lives.
Our fuel supplies are threatened by its presence as is our safety.
If we could disengage from all influence there and negotiate the return of muslims here we would preserve our country from further danger from this unstable region.
We have meddled for 100 years.
Let's learn our lesson--
AND STOP IT NOW.
Assasinations of nuclear scientists in Iran by Israel continue with little condemnation by our government or media. One wonders if the situation were reversed whether these atrocities would be so played down.
Iran has been accused of disobeying UN resolutions and it has. But so, many times over the past fifty years has Israel without condemnation.
Foolishly Iran stated that it wishes to destroy Israel, while Israel goes about destroying Palestine by stealth, condoned by the West.
Israel does not say what its intentions are even though they betray them through their actions
I hold no brief for Iran nor any muslim regime, but to understand the present situation one must study the history of the Middle East in the 20th century which has been bedevilled by Wwestern and British interference.
Starting during WW1 the arrogance of the Balfour Declaration which gave land which did not belong to us to the Zionists has had a catastrophic effect on that region, intensified by our and the USA's continuing meddling and interference there.
In the Fifties we removed a democratically elected leader and installed the Shah, a ruthless and cruel leader whose crimes were hushed up in the West but suffered by the Iranian people.
In the Eighties we backed Saddam Hussein in a war against Iran in which he used poison gas and only fell out with him when he pointed a gun at Israel, and then got in a war justified on false evidence.
Meanwhile the consolidation of Israel continued with more local people displaced into squalid camps, and those remaining having second class status.
Lebanon has been invaded and parts of Syria occupied by Israel.
And we are surprised by the hatred to us shown by Arabs and other Middle Eastern countries?
They see us as unfair and against them and retaliate as evidenced by the 9/11 horrors and London bombings.
Why do we continue on this path of strife which will inevitably end in nuclear war?
Because of the Zionist lobby in the USA and Britain with its political influence and money.
We should attempt to see things from the Arab point of view and come to a "non interference" arrangement with them.
We should allow matters in the Middle East to be settled by the people living there and if they want to fight keep out of it. Thus any arms held by states there would be of no threat to us.
It is said that Israel is a bulwark for democracy in the Middle East. No it is not, it is a festering bone of contention set among people with no desire for democracy and certainly no desire to be dominated by Zionist money and influence.
Israel has cost the "West" billions and many lives.
Our fuel supplies are threatened by its presence as is our safety.
If we could disengage from all influence there and negotiate the return of muslims here we would preserve our country from further danger from this unstable region.
We have meddled for 100 years.
Let's learn our lesson--
AND STOP IT NOW.
Monday, 16 January 2012
AN ASSAULT ON OUR FREEDOMS
If anybody still doubts the increasingly undemocratic assault on our rights an anouncement today in the papers would surely disabuse them of these doubts.
We have become inured to the stealthy attacks on our free speech, which I as a child was told was the cornerstone of our freedoms. But we have now to be careful what we say in case we offend people who we did not invite here and should not in my opinion be here in case we are accused of "racism". This latter is the most serious crime of all.
In effect stating that you have more affinity with those of your own ethnicity and object to the colonisation of our land has to be said very carefully or you could end up in court
A court you may say would give you justice.
The evidence weighed by 12 true men, your peers would guarantee justice, wouldn't it?
Well up to now it would, but now it is proposed to do away with juries in many cases and have the verdict decided by a a solitary magistrate or "learned"(don't make me laugh) lawyer.
Why?
To save money they say.
Well if that were the case perhaps the legal proffession should cut theur fees.
You can be sure that those chosen to adjudicate will be chosen to ensure the correct PC views and thus the correct verdict.
But what about those who do not hold views considered by the government as correct or "acceptible". They would be found guilty and punished.
We have had the jury system for hundreds of years and it has provided a degree of protection for the ordinary man, his freedoms of action and speech. Admittedly not all verdicts passed by juries are correct, but not all judgements made by judges are correct, hence the number of cases when at appeal cases were overturned and the judgement deemed to be faulty (I note judges can not be sued for incompetence as can other proffessionals).
Yes speed up the legal process by all means. Make it cheaper by cutting legal and judges fees, but not at the expense of justice.
I do not trust the state to be impartial in all cases as history has shown this leads to dictatorship.
We can only have confidence in the law and justice system when we are judged by our peers. That is our guarantor and we must hold on to this.
Or do we allow ourselves to be conned into Mandelson's "POST DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY"
It is worth spenting £30 million to avoid this.
MANY GAVE A LOT MORE 70 YEARS AGO.
We have become inured to the stealthy attacks on our free speech, which I as a child was told was the cornerstone of our freedoms. But we have now to be careful what we say in case we offend people who we did not invite here and should not in my opinion be here in case we are accused of "racism". This latter is the most serious crime of all.
In effect stating that you have more affinity with those of your own ethnicity and object to the colonisation of our land has to be said very carefully or you could end up in court
A court you may say would give you justice.
The evidence weighed by 12 true men, your peers would guarantee justice, wouldn't it?
Well up to now it would, but now it is proposed to do away with juries in many cases and have the verdict decided by a a solitary magistrate or "learned"(don't make me laugh) lawyer.
Why?
To save money they say.
Well if that were the case perhaps the legal proffession should cut theur fees.
You can be sure that those chosen to adjudicate will be chosen to ensure the correct PC views and thus the correct verdict.
But what about those who do not hold views considered by the government as correct or "acceptible". They would be found guilty and punished.
We have had the jury system for hundreds of years and it has provided a degree of protection for the ordinary man, his freedoms of action and speech. Admittedly not all verdicts passed by juries are correct, but not all judgements made by judges are correct, hence the number of cases when at appeal cases were overturned and the judgement deemed to be faulty (I note judges can not be sued for incompetence as can other proffessionals).
Yes speed up the legal process by all means. Make it cheaper by cutting legal and judges fees, but not at the expense of justice.
I do not trust the state to be impartial in all cases as history has shown this leads to dictatorship.
We can only have confidence in the law and justice system when we are judged by our peers. That is our guarantor and we must hold on to this.
Or do we allow ourselves to be conned into Mandelson's "POST DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY"
It is worth spenting £30 million to avoid this.
MANY GAVE A LOT MORE 70 YEARS AGO.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)