DO THEY FEEL INFERIOR?

Further to the previous article on racism there have been a multitude of so called racist incidents usually involving footballers, who, sensitive souls object and on on occasion be reduced to tears on account of being subject to an insult containing the word "black"

Aw diddums. These people are supposed to be sportsmen but are reduced to tears at the mention of their skin colour.

You can use any insult you like a fat thick ugly lazy bastard and although the insult is there unless you use the word "black" it is not a hate crime.
It seems these touchy people are only offended by mention of their skin colour.
They obviously have a massive chip about this aspect of their being.

If insults were thrown in my direction, and they have been, I would be more offended about the insult rather than any mention of my complexion., but in any case I would have to endure them.

I would have no redress in law.

You can mention Scouse gits, Cockney s**ts, tight fisted Yorkshire people or even Wigan woolly backs and fiery redheads without penalty. You can use the most insulting words in the language and it seems it is not a "hate crime" even though these insults are not used to those you like, but use the word "black" and you will have a visit from the police.

Thus to call an ethnic African black is the worst insult of all.

Why is this? Do they have an inferiority complex?

I suspect they do. They have much to feel inferior about.
Although at many sports blacks excel, in the intellectual stakes they are at the bottom of the pile in all nations.

In spite of its promotion there is no black history. There have been no sub Saharan civilisations whereas in all other continents there are the remains of great civilisations.

There are and never have been successful African states, let alone democracies.
Human knowledge has not been added to by Africans. Look at any scientific programme on television and note the Asians, Chinese, Japs and whites and the absence of blacks.
How many black professors are there?

Alone among races they demand "respect" but give us little to respect.

Diane Abbott blames colonialism for the state of Africa and its nations, but forgets that India and South East Asia were also colonised as was much of China.
They pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and are out competing us in many instances while Africa remains a cesspit of incompetence and corruption.

These race laws are being used by our evil state to disempower the British people by putting us at a disadvantage and suppressing our free speech, but whatever they do the majority of Brits do not welcome this invasion which has been encouraged in order to destroy our national identity even though we have to keep our mouths shut.

The blacks are being used as a stick to beat us with and they themselves are using the unfair advantages conferred by the race laws to gain a standard of living better than they are able to build in their countries of origin.

If the Britain we know and love is buried by this influx of peoples we do not want --

WHERE DO WE GO TO ESCAPE?

IT SEEMS WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HATE IT, SO DO WE JUST ROLL OVER?

I THINK NOT.

RACIST LABOUR MP DIANE ABBOT FREE TO BE RACIALLY ABUSIVE TO THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH

We knew this would happen as BLACK people can't be racist can they ?

"Miss Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, was at the centre of a racism row after claiming on Twitter that white people "love to divide and rule".

She also said black people should not “wash dirty linen in public”.

The comments were made as part of an online exchange with freelance journalist Bim Adewunmi as they discussed the use of the term "black community" during the coverage of the Stephen Lawrence murder trial.

As well as calls for her resignation, members of the public also contacted the Metropolitan Police about the tweet.

Despite reports that 40 people had complained about the tweet, police could not confirm how many complaints they had received.

There were suggestions that she should face racial harassment charges.

But police confirmed today that they would not be investigating."

Read the rest and be disgusted here -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9001757/Diane-Abbott-will-not-face-police-action-over-racist-tweet.html

One law for US (The INDIGENOUS WHITE POPULATION) one law for them (BLACK/ASIAN RACISTS).

TONY BLAIR NEW LABOUR SOCIALIST

For a Political party such as New Labour, a supposedly Socialist party with the welfare of the people at it's heart can be revealed to be nothing more than a bunch of CORRUPT, SELF SERVING, MONEY SEEKING TRAITORS.

"Official accounts show a company set up by Mr Blair to manage his business affairs paid just £315,000 in tax last year on an income of more than £12 million. In that time, he employed 26 staff and paid them total wages of almost £2.3 million.

The accounts provide the strongest evidence yet of the huge sums generated by Mr Blair through his various activities since quitting Downing Street in June 2007.

He runs a business consultancy - Tony Blair Associates - which has deals with the governments of Kuwait and Kazakhstan among others and is a paid adviser to JP Morgan, an American investment bank, and to Zurich International, a global insurance company based in Switzerland. Mr Blair makes a further £100,000 a time from speeches and lectures while also presiding over a number of charities including a faith foundation.

Mr Blair has previously been criticised for cashing in on contacts made in Downing Street and these accounts will likely add to those concerns.

The documents also reveal that in the two years until March 31 last year, Mr Blair’s management company had a total turnover of more than £20 million and paid tax of about £470,000.

...................

The scale of Mr Blair’s finances are shown in accounts lodged by Windrush Ventures Limited, just one of a myriad of companies and partnerships set up by the former prime minister. Windrush Ventures Ltd’s “principal activity” is the “provision of management services” to Mr Blair’s various other interests."

Read the rest here

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/8999890/Tony-Blair-and-the-8million-tax-mystery.html

Now you know we truly have been BETRAYED.

Isn't it about time BLIAR, BROWN, MANDELBUM(MER), ABBOT and the rest of the TRAITORS started paying, IN BLOOD, for their CRIMES AGAINST THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION ?

PETITION TO BAN RITUAL (halal) SLAUGHTER

Please click on the link and sign the petition to ban non stun, ritual slaughter such as HALAL.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/808

DIANE ABBOTT ARCH BLACK RACIAL SUPREMACIST AT IT AGAIN

*'White people love playing divide and rule'

So the ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT is caught again using *derogatory remarks about WHITE PEOPLE on the social networking site TWITTER.

In her defence the ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT claims that her Tweet was taken out of context and that she was referring to 19th Century Colonialism. Now I wonder where the previous quotes to 19th Century Colonialism, to put this in "context", went ?

Also it doesn't say White people "LOVED" playing divide and rule. Could she put this into context for us ?

REPORT THE ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT FOR RACISM TO THE POLICE NOW !

STEPHEN LAWRENCE CASE. JUSTICE?

With the jailing of Dobson and Norris in the Lawrence case I had hoped this PC circus would have ended, but now it does not seem to be the case as the police will continue their "work" to convict even more of those originally accused.

I have to ask how many people does it take to stab someone?

I accept that the two convicted were two unsavoury thugs and the murder was horrific, but it does seem that if the victim had been white little would have been heard about it after the first innocent verdict.

Certainly seven hundred years of English law would not have been cast aside as happened with the new "double jeapordy" provision and £millions would not have been spent in police and legal expense if there had not been a political motive.

That motive has been to appease the PC multiculti brigade and help put at a disadvantage those of us (the majority I believe) who oppose this uninvited invasion.

Indeed the Mc Pherson report that the police are "institutionally racist" has been used as a stick against people of British stock.

He is right , the police are institutionally racist, or at least the police chiefs are, they are racist against us.

It is considered that racism can only be perpetrated by whites on blacks, and this is shown by the phrase "reverse racism", an oxymoron if ever there was one. It is interesting to contrast the prominence given to this victim with memorial buildings and plaques with that given to other victims, which demonstrates the politicising of certain crimes especially if the victim is black.

Racism is and always will be endemic when different races mix, it is a natural human reaction to the outsider however reprehensible.

BUT IT DOES CUT BOTH WAYS.

Stephen Lawrence was no angel, a bully, petty drug dealer by all accounts and a "Black Power" activist, hardly a portrayal of peace or wishing to live in harmony with the society in which his parents had inserted their family, to the disadvantage of the original inhabitants.

Murder is murder whoever the perpetrator or victim is and is equally to be deplored and race does not come in to it.

Making a white on black murder more of a crime will stoke resentment because of its unfairness.

And justice must be done impartially and seen to be done so.

I believe the authorities were determined to get a conviction and am sure the jury was selected carefully as a "wrong" verdict would have caused the usual riots and arson that people of African origin are prone to indulge in.

The verdict may have been correct, I don't know but the case was politicised from the start and because of that--

IT WAS NOT BRITISH JUSTICE.

LEAVE THE GUN LAWS ALONE

The tragedy of the multiple shootings have brought out the inevitable kneejerk calls for tougher gun laws.

That people holding gun licences should be checked is common sense, but what about the more dangerous illegal guns used in far more murders such as that of the Indian student in Salford?
More draconian gun laws would have no effect and we are rapidly getting to the situation even now where the only people who have access to guns are the criminals.

And what about knives?

In our village 40 years ago a man killed his wife and children with a knife and strangled his mistress with a rope.
There was no call for a ban on knives or ropes, and indeed the majority of murders are committed with a knife or rope, should we ban these as well?

The talk in the papers illustrates how little media people know about the requirements needed to obtain a gun licence.

I know how the system works as I sign many gun and firearm certificates, unlike the "experts" in the media

A full medical history is needed for a firearm certificate (rifle) and any suicidal or other signs of mental instability and even marital disharmony preclude the issuance of such a certificate.
It is my job to unearth any dangers before signing them fit to have a rifle.

The killer in Peterlee had a firearms certificate (and shouldn't) but the weapon used was a shotgun, not a rifle, for which the rules are less draconian and a certificate easier to gain.

Long range,(up to a mile) rifles are far more dangerous than shotguns and they are rightly heavily controlled, but shotguns are safe at 150 yards but devastatingly lethal at short range.

Shotguns are an essential part of country life, without them farm crops would be devastated by crows and pigeons and many of the people who control these pests are welcomed by farmers on to their land.
Yes they get pleasure but they do a lot of good, but they are generally stable and law abiding or they wouldn't have got a certificate in the first place.

Unfortunately people sometimes do flip and tragedies occur but to ban all guns would deprive the vast majority of owners of pleasure and incur great losses in agricultural production.

And the criminals would still kill with their unlicenced guns and knives.

Leave the gun laws as they are, if mad men do not use them they will kill in other ways and those killed would be--

JUST AS DEAD.