Tuesday, 14 June 2011
Saturday, 11 June 2011
A TALE OF TWO CULTURES
I do not read the Wigan Evening Post daily as there is not usually too much news in it.
No blame,I sympathise with the reporters thankless job of creating stories when there is little to report, in spite of that paper's attitude to our party which is basically down to the Common Purpose "elite" running it.
Wigan is generally a hard working law abiding community and as the saying goes "no news is good news".
I was however enraged to read an article that the police were not to supervise our local church walking days.
When I was a child these were the highlight of our summer and indeed holidays were booked in order not to miss with them.
I have many happy memories of these occasions with the little girls at the front in their new dresses and we older lads walking behind them, after having practiced beforehand what we should do.
After we had what was called in Billinge the "Scooster", the games or sports day when the children competed in the races.
Afterwards in our family there was always a party.
The day after was known in our village as "Sermon Sunday" when a farm trailer was parked at the crossroads (Church Brow) with the vicar addressing the throng from it.
Yes I know we had a somewhat divided village with the C of E where I was in a bit of competition with the Catholics of Birchley but in the end we were all Billingers and nominally Christian, and apart from a bit of banter we knew we were part of the same community and culture.
WE WERE IN OUR OWN VILLAGE. OUR NATIVE ENVIRONMENT.
As a young man I took part in another local tradition on that day. All day drinking in the pubs. It was really a carnival atmosphere and the local police were warned that it was our tradition and not to intervene and they obeyed this local instruction.
One time I was working away with two muslims and invited them to see our traditional activities and they enjoyed sitting with us in the pub getting quietly sloshed, and enjoying OUR culture.
These were of course decent muslims, there are some but it is now difficult do tell the good from the bad. These muslims, one a Syrian and one from Pakistan accepted that they had come here to learn their trade and then return which they did.
Anyhow, back to the story.
These walks are a part of our inheritance and traditions. The churchgoers are taxpayers and are entitled to have their events policed and even more than alien residents in our country or people of other sexuality.
I am a lapsed churchgoer (an agnostic) but support the traditions in which I was brought up and which moulded my life.
We should not need police to be present, apart from putting temporary diversions, and I accept that some traffic disruption will occur as it does at "Gay Pride" celebrations.
We have to accept disruption when they "celebrate" what they do in bed (should I celebrate my bedroom antics? I don't think anybody would be interested in them at my age. Not much to see, just noises out of various orifices, that's just me and not the wife she says).
BUT the sinister part of this is that last year kids in a walking day procession were SPAT on by alien kids who OUR PEOPLE had never invited here.
THAT IS WHY THEY NEED A POLICE PRESENCE.
THEY SHOULD HAVE IT.
THESE CHURCHGOERS PAY THEIR WAGES.
THE IMMIGRANTS DON'T
No blame,I sympathise with the reporters thankless job of creating stories when there is little to report, in spite of that paper's attitude to our party which is basically down to the Common Purpose "elite" running it.
Wigan is generally a hard working law abiding community and as the saying goes "no news is good news".
I was however enraged to read an article that the police were not to supervise our local church walking days.
When I was a child these were the highlight of our summer and indeed holidays were booked in order not to miss with them.
I have many happy memories of these occasions with the little girls at the front in their new dresses and we older lads walking behind them, after having practiced beforehand what we should do.
After we had what was called in Billinge the "Scooster", the games or sports day when the children competed in the races.
Afterwards in our family there was always a party.
The day after was known in our village as "Sermon Sunday" when a farm trailer was parked at the crossroads (Church Brow) with the vicar addressing the throng from it.
Yes I know we had a somewhat divided village with the C of E where I was in a bit of competition with the Catholics of Birchley but in the end we were all Billingers and nominally Christian, and apart from a bit of banter we knew we were part of the same community and culture.
WE WERE IN OUR OWN VILLAGE. OUR NATIVE ENVIRONMENT.
As a young man I took part in another local tradition on that day. All day drinking in the pubs. It was really a carnival atmosphere and the local police were warned that it was our tradition and not to intervene and they obeyed this local instruction.
One time I was working away with two muslims and invited them to see our traditional activities and they enjoyed sitting with us in the pub getting quietly sloshed, and enjoying OUR culture.
These were of course decent muslims, there are some but it is now difficult do tell the good from the bad. These muslims, one a Syrian and one from Pakistan accepted that they had come here to learn their trade and then return which they did.
Anyhow, back to the story.
These walks are a part of our inheritance and traditions. The churchgoers are taxpayers and are entitled to have their events policed and even more than alien residents in our country or people of other sexuality.
I am a lapsed churchgoer (an agnostic) but support the traditions in which I was brought up and which moulded my life.
We should not need police to be present, apart from putting temporary diversions, and I accept that some traffic disruption will occur as it does at "Gay Pride" celebrations.
We have to accept disruption when they "celebrate" what they do in bed (should I celebrate my bedroom antics? I don't think anybody would be interested in them at my age. Not much to see, just noises out of various orifices, that's just me and not the wife she says).
BUT the sinister part of this is that last year kids in a walking day procession were SPAT on by alien kids who OUR PEOPLE had never invited here.
THAT IS WHY THEY NEED A POLICE PRESENCE.
THEY SHOULD HAVE IT.
THESE CHURCHGOERS PAY THEIR WAGES.
THE IMMIGRANTS DON'T
Friday, 10 June 2011
A HISTORIC MEETING
Last night we had a meeting which will go down in the annals of nationalist history locally and even possibly nationally.
Our bulletin, put out by our new organiser had in it the information that there would possibly be a leadership challenge this summer. The bulletin was written ten days ago and we had no idea of the events it would provoke.
In it our organiser stated that Richard Edmonds, a long standing patriot would stand for leadership for a year in order to institute a constitution more acceptable to members and an organisation which had more prospects of success than the one we now have.
I and my fellow members did not realise the consternation our little bulletin would have given the Party hierarchy.
Possibly when the North West organiser invited himself to speak at our meeting we should have been forewarned.
On arrival we were rather taken aback by the presence of the National Treasurer and Nominating officer together with two other "high ups" in the party.
The subject for discussion was what we could do to progress the Party and how to build on past successes and that some of us thought a new leader would improve our chances.
This idea/ concept it seems was a red rag to a bull and we were unprepared for the passion at the meeting.
Some of the senior officials were annoyed that ex senior activists and party workers who had been expelled for voicing opinions which differed from the official view were present.
These people had for years been on our "invites list" and remained there in spite of their expulsion. We have had a long history working along side them and saw no reason not to invite them because of their differences with the Party bosses.
We invite many people who are not members and ask them to bring friends (it's no use to always preach to the converted) and we need new and old blood together if we are to progress.
Our organiser gave a short speech after which I had my little input.
I was concerned to highlight where I thought we were going wrong and to seek a way to progress.
Everybody there was a true nationalist but factionalism over the past year has caused a split in nationalism and my aim was to bring these strands together, heal the wounds and form a united front against the dangers facing our country.
If we could achieve this we would be a really strong force in the salvation of our country.
Unfortunately, as I suspected when I saw the presence of senior officials I realised the meeting could become somewhat volatile. The senior party members seem to think they have the monopoly on the truth and although decent people, appear to want to run the Party in a dictatorial manner.
WE IN WIGAN & LEIGH HAVE A HISTORY OF STANDING UP FOR OUR RIGHTS, and we see no reason to change now.
We will not be dictated to and vague threats make us all the more determined.
After all we are in the BNP because we are free thinking people and nobody tells us what to do.
Our crime was, I think the suggestion that we need a new leader and it seems this is frowned upon and can even result in suspension or expulsion.
I can assure those who dislike us that nationalism is alive, well and thriving in our area but I have to admit we have our differences (like family members or those on football teams).
These are only temporary and we will get over them and my job as I see it is to try to unite the various strands of patriotic opinion into a formidable fighting force.
We all believe in the same basic principles and can and must stick together against those who seek to destroy our country (the major parties, media, bankers etc) and we will.
I was proud to be the first in the country(I think ) to announce our new preferred candidate for leader, Andrew Brons.
Andrew is a gentleman, cultured, polite, well read but perhaps not so good an orator as our present leader.
He will I think connect with the voting public better and will institute a more open and democratic party structure.
My announcement was not expected from the senior party members and of course they will oppose Andrew, as is to be expected from those who have hitched their waggon to Nick Griffin and will possibly lose their position if he is replaced.
I don't think they were exactly overjoyed by my revelation, but then that's democracy.
Whether Andrew can get in is another matter in view of the biased party structure which favours the leader and the vested interests that depend on his remaining leader.
This is not to decry Nick Griffin, just that I/we think Andrew Brons will make us more electable and a stronger force in British politics.
Personalities are unimportant, it is influence and ultimately power that counts and to that end we shall continually strive as we must if we are to rescue our country from the thieves and incompetents which now run it.
WE WILL PREVAIL AS A MOVEMENT WHATEVER HAPPENS.
Our bulletin, put out by our new organiser had in it the information that there would possibly be a leadership challenge this summer. The bulletin was written ten days ago and we had no idea of the events it would provoke.
In it our organiser stated that Richard Edmonds, a long standing patriot would stand for leadership for a year in order to institute a constitution more acceptable to members and an organisation which had more prospects of success than the one we now have.
I and my fellow members did not realise the consternation our little bulletin would have given the Party hierarchy.
Possibly when the North West organiser invited himself to speak at our meeting we should have been forewarned.
On arrival we were rather taken aback by the presence of the National Treasurer and Nominating officer together with two other "high ups" in the party.
The subject for discussion was what we could do to progress the Party and how to build on past successes and that some of us thought a new leader would improve our chances.
This idea/ concept it seems was a red rag to a bull and we were unprepared for the passion at the meeting.
Some of the senior officials were annoyed that ex senior activists and party workers who had been expelled for voicing opinions which differed from the official view were present.
These people had for years been on our "invites list" and remained there in spite of their expulsion. We have had a long history working along side them and saw no reason not to invite them because of their differences with the Party bosses.
We invite many people who are not members and ask them to bring friends (it's no use to always preach to the converted) and we need new and old blood together if we are to progress.
Our organiser gave a short speech after which I had my little input.
I was concerned to highlight where I thought we were going wrong and to seek a way to progress.
Everybody there was a true nationalist but factionalism over the past year has caused a split in nationalism and my aim was to bring these strands together, heal the wounds and form a united front against the dangers facing our country.
If we could achieve this we would be a really strong force in the salvation of our country.
Unfortunately, as I suspected when I saw the presence of senior officials I realised the meeting could become somewhat volatile. The senior party members seem to think they have the monopoly on the truth and although decent people, appear to want to run the Party in a dictatorial manner.
WE IN WIGAN & LEIGH HAVE A HISTORY OF STANDING UP FOR OUR RIGHTS, and we see no reason to change now.
We will not be dictated to and vague threats make us all the more determined.
After all we are in the BNP because we are free thinking people and nobody tells us what to do.
Our crime was, I think the suggestion that we need a new leader and it seems this is frowned upon and can even result in suspension or expulsion.
I can assure those who dislike us that nationalism is alive, well and thriving in our area but I have to admit we have our differences (like family members or those on football teams).
These are only temporary and we will get over them and my job as I see it is to try to unite the various strands of patriotic opinion into a formidable fighting force.
We all believe in the same basic principles and can and must stick together against those who seek to destroy our country (the major parties, media, bankers etc) and we will.
I was proud to be the first in the country(I think ) to announce our new preferred candidate for leader, Andrew Brons.
Andrew is a gentleman, cultured, polite, well read but perhaps not so good an orator as our present leader.
He will I think connect with the voting public better and will institute a more open and democratic party structure.
My announcement was not expected from the senior party members and of course they will oppose Andrew, as is to be expected from those who have hitched their waggon to Nick Griffin and will possibly lose their position if he is replaced.
I don't think they were exactly overjoyed by my revelation, but then that's democracy.
Whether Andrew can get in is another matter in view of the biased party structure which favours the leader and the vested interests that depend on his remaining leader.
This is not to decry Nick Griffin, just that I/we think Andrew Brons will make us more electable and a stronger force in British politics.
Personalities are unimportant, it is influence and ultimately power that counts and to that end we shall continually strive as we must if we are to rescue our country from the thieves and incompetents which now run it.
WE WILL PREVAIL AS A MOVEMENT WHATEVER HAPPENS.
Sorry to be a Jeremiah::
In 2009, the highest number of citizenships granted in the EU was by the United Kingdom (204 000 persons)
There is much in the media these days about immigration and many of the articles discuss just how concerned our government is about this, we see headlines stating that the government is going to crack down hard and that immigration will be reduced drastically..Here are just a few links -
Migration settlement cuts plannedAll good stuff you may well say, well one statistic amongst many that are not overly publicized is the following.
Eurostat news release 10/6/11
In 2009, the highest number of citizenships were granted by the United Kingdom (204 000 persons),
France (136 000) and Germany (96 000), which together accounted for more than half of all citizenships granted by the EU27 Member States.
And that's not the whole story:-The number of citizenship's granted can be related to the number of resident foreigners i.e. non-nationals resident in the Member State. The highest rates were registered in Portugal (5.8 citizenships granted per 100 resident foreigners), Sweden (5.3), Poland and the United Kingdom (both 4.8), and the lowest rates in the Czech Republic (0.3), Lithuania and Slovakia (both 0.5). On average, 2.4 citizenships were granted per 100 resident foreigners in the EU27.
The United Kingdom is in the top end of the league again - what a surprise.Here is the rest of the table :-
Acquisition of citizenship in the EU27, 2009
| ||||||||||||
EU27 | 698.6 | 776.1 | 2.4 | 1.6 | ||||||||
Belgium | 37.7 | 32.8 | 3.2 | 3.0 | ||||||||
Bulgaria | 7.1 | 9.2 | : | 1.2 | ||||||||
Czech Republic | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Denmark | 6.0 | 6.9 | 2.1 | 1.2 | ||||||||
Germany | 94.5 | 96.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | ||||||||
Estonia | 2.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 | ||||||||
Ireland | 3.2 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Greece | 16.9 | 17.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | ||||||||
Spain | 84.2 | 79.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | ||||||||
France | 137.3 | 135.8 | 3.6 | 2.1 | ||||||||
Italy | 53.7 | 59.4 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Cyprus | 3.5 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 5.1 | ||||||||
Latvia | 4.2 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 | ||||||||
Lithuania | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Luxembourg | 1.2 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 8.1 | ||||||||
Hungary | 8.1 | 5.8 | 3.1 | 0.6 | ||||||||
Malta | 0.6 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 2.0 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 28.2 | 29.8 | 4.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||
Austria | 10.3 | 8.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Poland | 1.8 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Portugal | 22.4 | 25.6 | 5.8 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Romania | 5.6 | 9.4 | : | 0.4 | ||||||||
Slovenia | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.9 | ||||||||
Slovakia | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | ||||||||
Finland | 6.7 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||
Sweden | 30.5 | 29.5 | 5.3 | 3.2 | ||||||||
United Kingdom | 129.3 | 203.6 | 4.8 | 3.3 | ||||||||
Iceland | 0.9 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 2.3 | ||||||||
Liechtenstein | 0.3 | 0.1 | : | 2.9 | ||||||||
Norway | 10.3 | 11.4 | 3.8 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Switzerland | 44.4 | 43.4 | 2.6 | 5.6 | ||||||||
Croatia | 7.6 | 5.3 | : | 1.2 | ||||||||
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | 1.1 | 0.8 | : | 0.4 | ||||||||
Turkey | 6.0 | 8.1 | : | 0.1 | ||||||||
* Data on foreign population are not available or fully comparable for Bulgaria, Romania, Liechtenstein, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey.
: Data not available
Largest groups acquiring citizenship in the EU27 Member States, 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EU27* | Morocco | 7.7 | Turkey | 6.7 | India | 4.0 | Ecuador | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
BE | Morocco | 24.2 | Turkey | 8.4 | Italy | 5.6 | Dem. Republic of Congo | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||
BG | Former Yug. Rep. of Macedonia | 47.9 | Moldova | 29.1 | Serbia | 5.9 | Israel | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||
CZ | Ukraine | 43.7 | Slovakia | 12.0 | Russia | 5.9 | Poland | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||
DK | Iraq | 17.6 | Afghanistan | 11.6 | Turkey | 7.6 | Stateless* | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||
DE | Turkey | 25.6 | Iraq | 5.3 | Serbia | 4.3 | Poland | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
EE | Recognised non-citizen3 | 93.2 | Russia | 5.2 | Ukraine | 1.2 | Lithuania | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||
IE | Nigeria | 10.0 | Philippines | 9.1 | India | 7.4 | South Africa | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||
EL | Albania | 83.9 | Georgia | 3.2 | Russia | 2.4 | Turkey | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||
ES | Ecuador | 32.3 | Colombia | 20.7 | Morocco | 8.4 | Peru | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||
FR | Morocco | 19.2 | Algeria | 15.2 | Tunisia | 6.8 | Turkey | 6.8 | ||||||||||||||||
IT | Albania | 16.0 | Morocco | 15.3 | Romania | 4.6 | Tunisia | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
CY | Greece | 9.1 | Russia | 7.9 | Ukraine | 5.7 | United Kingdom | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||
LV | Recognised non-citizen3 | 95.6 | Russia | 1.7 | Ukraine | 1.3 | Stateless* | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||
LT | Stateless* | 52.2 | Russia | 28.6 | Ukraine | 11.8 | Belarus | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||||
LU | Portugal | 30.9 | Italy | 9.0 | Germany | 8.0 | France | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||
HU | Romania | 65.6 | Serbia and Montenegro** | 11.6 | Ukraine | 9.6 | Belarus | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||
MT | Australia | 38.2 | United Kingdom | 12.6 | Canada | 5.1 | South Africa | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||
NL | Morocco | 18.5 | Turkey | 14.0 | Suriname | 3.8 | Iraq | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||
AT | Serbia | 20.5 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 18.3 | Turkey | 15.6 | Croatia | 5.5 | ||||||||||||||||
PL | Ukraine | 35.0 | Belarus | 14.3 | Russia | 6.5 | Armenia | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
PT | Cape Verde | 19.4 | Brazil | 14.5 | Moldova | 10.7 | Guinea Bissau | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||
RO | Moldova | 67.2 | Stateless* | 22.0 | Ukraine | 1.4 | Israel | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||
SI | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 27.2 | Serbia | 15.2 | Croatia | 11.0 | Italy | 10.5 | ||||||||||||||||
SK | Ukraine | 29.4 | Czech Republic | 18.3 | Serbia | 16.4 | Hungary | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||
FI | Russia | 30.1 | Somalia | 8.5 | Iraq | 6.1 | Afghanistan | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||||
SE | Iraq | 10.8 | Finland | 8.2 | Thailand | 4.5 | Turkey | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||
UK | India | 13.0 | Pakistan | 10.3 | Bangladesh | 5.9 | Philippines | 5.8 | ||||||||||||||||
IS | Poland | 21.0 | Philippines | 14.6 | Serbia | 10.4 | Vietnam | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||
LI | Turkey | 32.0 | Switzerland | 27.2 | Austria | 9.7 | Serbia and Montenegro** | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||
NO | Somalia | 15.2 | Iraq | 11.1 | Afghanistan | 7.5 | Iran | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||
CH | Serbia and Montenegro** | 20.4 | Italy | 11.1 | Germany | 9.3 | Turkey | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||
HR | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 48.4 | Serbia | 9.7 | Australia | 6.7 | Chile | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||
MK | Serbia | 39.6 | Albania | 22.8 | Austria | 5.6 | Turkey | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
* A stateless person is someone who is not recognized as a citizen of any State
** Data refer to Serbia & Montenegro, which existed between 2003 and 2006
- Citizenship is the legal bond between an individual and a state, acquired by birth, naturalisation or other means according to national legislation. Naturalisation is the process by which a state grants its citizenship through a formal act on the application of the individual concerned. Other ways of granting citizenship may include spouses of nationals, minors adopted by nationals and descendants of nationals born abroad returning to the country of origin of their ancestors.
Immigrants are still flooding in and despite all the rhetoric it would appear that the government is not going to do much about it at all - there is no evidence that they are implementing any measures that are effective in reducing or stopping the thousands coming into the UK each week.
We must also remember that the above table shows the numbers that are granted citizenship, the numbers entering the country either legally or illegally will be in addition to those being granted citizenship
This paragraph is very interesting
The number of citizenship's granted can be related to the number of resident foreigners i.e. non-nationals resident in the Member State. The highest rates were registered in Portugal (5.8 citizenships granted per 100 resident foreigners), Sweden (5.3), Poland and the United Kingdom (both 4.8), and the lowest rates in the Czech Republic (0.3), Lithuania and Slovakia (both 0.5). On average, 2.4 citizenships were granted per 100 resident foreigners in the EU27.
Therefore the UK has granted 4.8 citizenship,s per 100 immigrants - the UK has granted a total of 204 ,000, hence 204,000 is 4.8% of the total number of immigrants in the UK which makes the total number of immigrants approximately 5,000,000 roughly double what the government figures say
The above calculation is very basic and I would suggest that the 5 million mark is low
Blatantly nicked from here
http://uppompeii1.uppompeii.com/
Morg
.
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
I LIKE IT
Story of the Day! UK Man stuffs ham into all the shoes of Muslim worshippers
Posted: June 6, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam | Filed under: Islamic Britain | 34 Comments »J
amie Knowlson, 30, also draped slices of meaton railings outside the mosque as his victims prayed inside. He was then caught on CCTV hurling abuse at worshippers after they confronted him over his ‘foolish’ prank.
UK Telegraph - Knowlson initially told police the stunt was a drunken joke but later admitted that he was fully aware of the offence his actions would cause. He pleaded guilty to causing racially or religiously aggravated harassment and could have been jailed for up to two years. (That’s right, let Muslim terrorists out of your jails but lock up a shoe stuffer who’s a Christian)
But he walked free from Bristol Crown Court with a suspended six-month prison sentence because he had returned to the mosque to apologise for his actions. (Wussie)
Sentencing, Her Honour Judge Carol Hagen said: ”It is difficult to imagine a more offensive incident. (Oh please, would you like to see some beheadings by Muslims?) ”Not only the fixing of meat to railings but aggravated, in my view, that
members of the mosque were inside praying at the time.” (There would be no shoes outside if they weren’t praying, you moron)
David Hunter, prosecuting at Bristol Crown Court, said it had been a premeditated attack specifically targeted at the Muslim community. Ian Halliday, defending, said: ”This was a brutal, misconceived, drunken prank. He returned to the mosque and offered his apologies in person.”
Knowlson sat in tears as he was handed a six-month suspended sentence and 150 hours of unpaid work. (Oh Boo fricken hoo, he should have been laughing his head off)
After sentencing, Mubarak Mohamud, one of the three imams at the Al-Baseera mosque, claimed the inflammatory act had upset the Muslim community.(Awwwww, everything upsets the Muslim community, the religion of perpetual outrage.)
He said: ”There wasn’t anger, people were more upset and shocked.”We don’t eat pork and we are banned by our faith from eating it, as it makes us impure when we are going to our prayers. (Yes, you wouldn’t want to be impure when you are praying that all us infidels submit to your filthy faith) ”We don’t hate the man – we just suppose he doesn’t know us.’‘ (Oh, he knows you all right)
Sentencing, Her Honour Judge Carol Hagen said: ”It is difficult to imagine a more offensive incident. (Oh please, would you like to see some beheadings by Muslims?) ”Not only the fixing of meat to railings but aggravated, in my view, that
members of the mosque were inside praying at the time.” (There would be no shoes outside if they weren’t praying, you moron)The court heard that Knowlson, from Kingswood, Bristol, targeted the Al-Baseera mosque in the St Judes area of the city which is used by more than 2,000 Somali Muslims every week. He crept to the mosque from nearby Redwood House homeless shelter on January 9 this year – putting ham in footwear and on railings outside the building as worshippers prayed.
CCTV footage showed him returning to the shelter, where he was confronted by the mosque’s caretaker Abdi Djmaa. As Mr Djmaa returned to the mosque he heard shouts of ”the next visit will be harder”, ”bad meat” and ”girls” coming from the direction of the building.
David Hunter, prosecuting at Bristol Crown Court, said it had been a premeditated attack specifically targeted at the Muslim community. Ian Halliday, defending, said: ”This was a brutal, misconceived, drunken prank. He returned to the mosque and offered his apologies in person.”Knowlson sat in tears as he was handed a six-month suspended sentence and 150 hours of unpaid work. (Oh Boo fricken hoo, he should have been laughing his head off)
After sentencing, Mubarak Mohamud, one of the three imams at the Al-Baseera mosque, claimed the inflammatory act had upset the Muslim community.(Awwwww, everything upsets the Muslim community, the religion of perpetual outrage.)
He said: ”There wasn’t anger, people were more upset and shocked.”We don’t eat pork and we are banned by our faith from eating it, as it makes us impure when we are going to our prayers. (Yes, you wouldn’t want to be impure when you are praying that all us infidels submit to your filthy faith) ”We don’t hate the man – we just suppose he doesn’t know us.’‘ (Oh, he knows you all right)
Monday, 6 June 2011
THE NEIGHBOUR FROM HELL.
How would you like to live next door to this ... thing? Read the comments too.
Last updated at 8:18 AM on 6th June 2011
Award-winning Neighbourhood Watch co-ordinator Pauline Palmer took her role seriously.
When she wasn’t on the lookout for criminal goings-on in her neighbourhood, the 71-year-old was keeping an eagle eye on what neighbour Brian Collins, 51, was up to.
She watched him from the day he moved in, a court was told.
For three years, Mrs Palmer kept a detailed diary on his activities – including sessions in his garden hot tub with women, and when he had sex in his bedroom.
In one of her notes, she wrote: ‘I saw Mr Collins in his hot tub with two women. He said “get your t**s out, b****”.’
In her diary, she also recorded when women stayed overnight with Mr Collins. And she noted the comings and goings of male visitors, some of whom ‘wore baseball caps’.
Mrs Palmer took down vehicle registration numbers, noted conversations and admitted putting her ear to the adjoining wall of their Victorian terraced homes – hers at No 12 St Julian Grove, Colchester, his at No 14.
Chelmsford Crown Court heard that she amassed sufficient information to persuade Colchester Council to serve a noise abatement order on Mr Collins, even though his neighbour on the other side said she had never heard any noise.
Mr Collins, who is on incapacity benefit, was fined £100 for breaching the noise abatement order, and faces a further bill of £365 in legal costs after failing in an appeal.
Mr Collins said Mrs Palmer was ‘obsessive’, and claimed she was invading his privacy and stalking him. He said: ‘She’s nosy, interfering, been on her own for at least 30 years. Her attitude is obsessive, it’s almost damned near frightening.
‘I have never had anyone perv over me before, write down that they’ve heard me having sex in my bedroom or watch me in a hot tub with a couple of women.’ Mr Collins, who said he had never spoken to Mrs Palmer, added: ‘She’s a complete pain. This is obsessive behaviour. She’s complained to everybody, it’s what she does.’
When questioned about her ‘extraordinarily detailed diaries’ from December 2006 to September 2009, Mrs Palmer said: ‘It was my role as Neighbourhood Watch.’
In January she was awarded Neighbourhood Watch Co-ordinator of the Year by Essex Police. Environmental control officer Guy Milham visited Mrs Palmer’s home in September 2009 and said the music from next door was a statutory nuisance.
‘I could hear Mr Collins in his hot tub,’ he said. ‘The music changed to panpipes to which Mr Collins was occasionally shouting “Oh yes, oh yes”.’ But Mr Collins’s other neighbour, Nicola Bailey, told the court she never heard him play loud music.
Last night Mrs Palmer, a divorced mother of two, told the Mail: ‘He made my life a misery. Sometimes the noise got so bad I had to go and stay with a relative for a few days.
‘It’s been one of my most unusual cases but it does show how important it is to keep a record of what’s happened.’
'Nosey' Neighbourhood Watch co-ordinator, 70, helps convict Lothario next door after spying on his hot tub romps for 3 years
By Daily Mail ReporterLast updated at 8:18 AM on 6th June 2011
- 'Get your t**s out,' he said to two frolicking women
- With pan pipe music playing he yelled: 'Oh yes, oh yes'
- 51-year-old fined £100 for noise abatement
- 'I've never had anyone perv over me before,' he said
Award-winner: Pauline Palmer with her certificate proving how revered she is as a Neighbourhood Watch co-ordinator
When she wasn’t on the lookout for criminal goings-on in her neighbourhood, the 71-year-old was keeping an eagle eye on what neighbour Brian Collins, 51, was up to.
She watched him from the day he moved in, a court was told.
For three years, Mrs Palmer kept a detailed diary on his activities – including sessions in his garden hot tub with women, and when he had sex in his bedroom.
In one of her notes, she wrote: ‘I saw Mr Collins in his hot tub with two women. He said “get your t**s out, b****”.’
In her diary, she also recorded when women stayed overnight with Mr Collins. And she noted the comings and goings of male visitors, some of whom ‘wore baseball caps’.
Mrs Palmer took down vehicle registration numbers, noted conversations and admitted putting her ear to the adjoining wall of their Victorian terraced homes – hers at No 12 St Julian Grove, Colchester, his at No 14.
Chelmsford Crown Court heard that she amassed sufficient information to persuade Colchester Council to serve a noise abatement order on Mr Collins, even though his neighbour on the other side said she had never heard any noise.
Mr Collins, who is on incapacity benefit, was fined £100 for breaching the noise abatement order, and faces a further bill of £365 in legal costs after failing in an appeal.
Mr Collins said Mrs Palmer was ‘obsessive’, and claimed she was invading his privacy and stalking him. He said: ‘She’s nosy, interfering, been on her own for at least 30 years. Her attitude is obsessive, it’s almost damned near frightening.
‘I have never had anyone perv over me before, write down that they’ve heard me having sex in my bedroom or watch me in a hot tub with a couple of women.’ Mr Collins, who said he had never spoken to Mrs Palmer, added: ‘She’s a complete pain. This is obsessive behaviour. She’s complained to everybody, it’s what she does.’
Too close for comfort: The neighbouring homes of Pauline Palmer and Brian Collins
In January she was awarded Neighbourhood Watch Co-ordinator of the Year by Essex Police. Environmental control officer Guy Milham visited Mrs Palmer’s home in September 2009 and said the music from next door was a statutory nuisance.
‘I could hear Mr Collins in his hot tub,’ he said. ‘The music changed to panpipes to which Mr Collins was occasionally shouting “Oh yes, oh yes”.’ But Mr Collins’s other neighbour, Nicola Bailey, told the court she never heard him play loud music.
Last night Mrs Palmer, a divorced mother of two, told the Mail: ‘He made my life a misery. Sometimes the noise got so bad I had to go and stay with a relative for a few days.
‘It’s been one of my most unusual cases but it does show how important it is to keep a record of what’s happened.’
Friday, 3 June 2011
Lisa Nandy Wigan MP - EXPENSES UPDATE:
I just thought I'd drop you a post on how the buxom Wigan MP and kiddies charity and asylum seeker tsar Lisa Nandy is doing with your hard earned cash ladies and gentlemen in the way of her parliamentary expenses? If you click on the link below it will give you a comprehensive and itemised view of her claims to date. Considering this empathetic lady has only been in the job for just over 12 months, it seems she's has no moral or charitable conscience about lining her own pocket.
Click here:
Lisa Nandy Wigan MP - Parliamentary Expenses.
Update: It does look like the expenses site for MP's now has a 'time out' but please do have a look and select for yourselves as you will.
Source: Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MP Lisa Nandy has joined forces with Rathbone to encourage Wiganers to make their town their (sic) first in the country to promise to stop demonising teens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)