The recent elections have been instructive for anybody interested in politics.
The Lib Dems have collapsed but the Tories have generally held their ground in England. Could this be because of their supposedly slightly more hard line over immigration ? Possibly, I do not know but to a slight degree they do talk the talk. Whether they will walk the walk and do anything about it I doubt but i'm sure it must have had an influence on a few voters and it does not take many to swing an election.
Some interesting facts about the attitude of the other parties to failure also emerged.
The leader of the Scottish Conservatives has resigned as a result of their failure in Scotland to inspire people to vote for them.
Tonight we learn that the leader of Plaid Cymru is also resigning because his party did not do as well as expected, and even in England Clegg's position is not secure.
Bad election results in all the other parties inevitably mean the resignation of the leader or at least a challenge.
So what you may say.
In our party such a resignation seems unthinkable and a challenge will result of expulsion from the Party. Not very democratic is it? or even a method to gain power or influence which after all is our objective.
Nick Griffin is a wonderful and inspiring speaker but when you think about it he is usually speaking to the already converted. Any challenger or heckler at a meeting where he speaks would be speedily ejected.
Preaching to the converted is not enough, it is motivating the average voter to turn out and vote for us that matters.
I have been told many times by voters that they ageree with our policies but will not vote for us while Nick is leader.
This may be unjust but it is a fact and we and he must recognise it and he must resign as the above party leaders have done.
He has been party leader longer than any other party leader in Britain and before long will have equalled Gadaffi in his leadership.
I am not getting at him by saying this. It is not me who needs to be convinced. It is the British voters and we will get nowhere with him at the helm.
So I plead with him. PLEASE RESIGN NOW.
We could hardly do worse. We have an open goal and we are missing it.
Nick. If you really believe in the cause do the decent thing.
I doubt if you will read this or do what I ask but I can but try as I believe in our cause and now you are becoming a drag on it in spite of what you have done for it in the past.
One final question.
Why is your daughter the NW treasurer now? and why are people asked to help her as she does not know how to do it?
Is there nobody else you can trust? or is it just another form of the usual BNP nepotism.
Friday, 13 May 2011
Thursday, 12 May 2011
MUHAMMAD ALI SUPPORTS RACIAL PROTECTION OF OUR OWN KIND
Even those who have suffered RACISM because of the colour of their skin prefer their own kind and would rather keep their RACIAL IDENTITY rather than lose it through Miscegenation.
Ali says what we think yet no one dare call him a racist.
Hat tip - Nationalism Today
http://www.nationalismtoday.com/?p=837
THIS'LL DO YOUR HEADS IN.
The darkie who offended the whole country by burning the poppy on Remembrance day: fined £50.
The whitey who tried to stop him: fined £315.
The whitey who burned a koran -: 70 days in jail.
I'm sure there must be something wrong with that picture.
http://www.4liberty.org.uk/2011/05/12/compare-and-contrast/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=compare-and-contrast
Morg
.
The whitey who tried to stop him: fined £315.
The whitey who burned a koran -: 70 days in jail.
I'm sure there must be something wrong with that picture.
http://www.4liberty.org.uk/2011/05/12/compare-and-contrast/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=compare-and-contrast
Morg
.
Wednesday, 11 May 2011
MARC DOUTROUX
Go on, admit it - you'd forgotten about him hadn't you. So why wasn't his gene line immediately terminated? Who would have noticed the difference, apart from him that is? And who cares about his opinion?
(CBS/AP) BRUSSELS - The former wife and convicted accomplice of a Belgian pedophile murderer is expected to be released from prison early, since the prosecutor's office did not lodge an appeal against the move.
Michel Martin was sentenced to 30 years behind bars for her role in the death of two 8-year-old girls held by her then-husband Marc Dutroux in the mid-1990s.
Under Belgian law, Martin could be released within weeks after serving 15 years of her sentence, and as a condition of parole, will move to a convent in France, said the prosecutor general of the southern city of Mons, Brussels.
The parents of the victims protested the plans that Martin could be freed early.
Dutroux, meanwhile, is serving a life term for abducting, imprisoning and raping six girls. He was found guilty of murdering two girls and allowing two others in his custody to starve to death.
Hell ... we could even make it SOUND a bit PCish - "Sentenced to termination of gene line"... bit like they don't use the word 'abortion' these days, preferring 'termination'. So if it's ok to 'terminate' an unborn baby, it should be ok for a nonce and kiddie-murderer too.
I do concede that 'execute' is a very ugly word ... maybe that's all we need for it to satisfy PC rules: a new word for it. PC is mostly about words. Seems the PTB (Powers That Be) already like 'terminate' better than 'abortion' - so give it a go; maybe the PTB find it a prettier word than 'execute', and we can all get back to doing what sometimes just has to be done?
'Termination of gene line' needn't even refer to a human. It does sound better than ' Take him around the back and kill him'.
Morg
(CBS/AP) BRUSSELS - The former wife and convicted accomplice of a Belgian pedophile murderer is expected to be released from prison early, since the prosecutor's office did not lodge an appeal against the move.
Michel Martin was sentenced to 30 years behind bars for her role in the death of two 8-year-old girls held by her then-husband Marc Dutroux in the mid-1990s.
Under Belgian law, Martin could be released within weeks after serving 15 years of her sentence, and as a condition of parole, will move to a convent in France, said the prosecutor general of the southern city of Mons, Brussels.
The parents of the victims protested the plans that Martin could be freed early.
Dutroux, meanwhile, is serving a life term for abducting, imprisoning and raping six girls. He was found guilty of murdering two girls and allowing two others in his custody to starve to death.
Hell ... we could even make it SOUND a bit PCish - "Sentenced to termination of gene line"... bit like they don't use the word 'abortion' these days, preferring 'termination'. So if it's ok to 'terminate' an unborn baby, it should be ok for a nonce and kiddie-murderer too.
I do concede that 'execute' is a very ugly word ... maybe that's all we need for it to satisfy PC rules: a new word for it. PC is mostly about words. Seems the PTB (Powers That Be) already like 'terminate' better than 'abortion' - so give it a go; maybe the PTB find it a prettier word than 'execute', and we can all get back to doing what sometimes just has to be done?
'Termination of gene line' needn't even refer to a human. It does sound better than ' Take him around the back and kill him'.
Morg
Monday, 9 May 2011
ANSWERS TO COMMENTS ON MY LAST BLOG
I would like to thank those who commented on my last blog, but feel it better to reply to the many valid points on another blog rather than through the answers faciility.
All the commentators are obviously true nationalists and have the cause at heart but have different opinions as to how our cause can be advanced.
To be honest I am not sure how, but I know there is a great hunger for a party which puts the interests of the British people first unlike the other main parties.
A major problem we have at present is the public's perception of our party and especially Nick Griffin.
As I stated in my previous blog I have every respect for his intellect and work to further our cause but we have to accept the fact that especially after his performance on Question Time and other gaffes he has become toxic to our cause.
I know he was under immense pressure at Question time and did land some punches but as a proffessional he should have anticipated the questions and any competent politician could have got out of them. Even I could have answered them and I am no politician.
There are things you do not say even if you agree with them.
There are things I have not said myself both as a BNP member and a Labour councillor which I knew would be political suicide.
How do I know?
People on the doorstep have told me so.
Whether we agree with them or not these are the people with whom we must connect and motivate to vote for us. However good our leader is if he puts people off voting for us he should be replaced and must be if we are to progress.
Secondly as one commentator said there is no efficient structure to inform members and supporters what is going on (nor indeed openness about financial matters).
This does not help to motivate people to join or contribute.
Thirdly, I know UKIP did badly but they are one trick party and irrelevent to local politics.
We have many economic policies which would help hard pressed citizens and which are relevent to local elections, but they were not pushed.
We should stress the economic arguments which resonate with people and all else will fall into place. Everybody knows our opinions about immigration and Muslim terrorism so why mention them. Concentrate on people's pockets and the taxes they must pay and the benefits they lose.
UKIP is Farage and in spite of his multiple appearances in the media it scores badly at local elections. Who else is in UKIP? Not many know.
That gives the lie that a well known leader with the gift of the gab will sway local voters.
Fourthly, I have been involved in the Party for nearly nine years and have seen its weaknesses in structure, finances and personnel and have pleaded for these to be rectified to no avail.
I have put in money to help our progress but my efforts have been ignored, not out of malice but inefficiency.
We are up against parties, well funded often by foreign interests and the media and thus have to be super efficient and squeaky clean. Thus anyone with any baggage which could hinder our cause has to be sidelined from public view or they will be set upon by the media.
I have not advocated any person as a new leader. I just believe we need a new one backed up by an efficient and lean administration which responds quickly to enquiries, pays its bills and is stable so that people know who to contact.
Last years leadership elections were not by any stretch democratic (although I voted for Nick Griffin), but now I think we need an open and fair contest this time to elect a new leader with campaigning by the candidates across the country as Nick Griffin has an inbuilt advantage, being well known.
I accept this year's local elections may not be a true reflection of our appeal given the rivalry between the main parties but we could and should have done better.
I look at this from the perspective of a former organiser who has tried to keep people's spirits and motivation up following the Euro elections when it seemed possible we would make a historic breakthrough but in spite of my best efforts after last year's elections enthusiasm waned.
Generally, some have left and some have joined other parties (mistakenly in my view)but the end result has been fraction and dilution of the nationalist cause.
This I deeply regret and my association with "reformists" does not mean I agree with all they say,or even like them all, just that something must be done to heal our wounds.
I have resigned from the post of local organiser but still want to play a part in our cause and if I can do ANYTHING to help heal our wounds and join together the various splinter groups which have emerged I will do so.
We must let by gones be by gones, cease recrimiations and reunite and pull together for the sake of our cause and country.
OUR COUNTRY NEEDS US.
We don't have to like everybody (it helps if we do) but WE MUST UNITE, or the outlook for our country and children is indeed bleak.
All the commentators are obviously true nationalists and have the cause at heart but have different opinions as to how our cause can be advanced.
To be honest I am not sure how, but I know there is a great hunger for a party which puts the interests of the British people first unlike the other main parties.
A major problem we have at present is the public's perception of our party and especially Nick Griffin.
As I stated in my previous blog I have every respect for his intellect and work to further our cause but we have to accept the fact that especially after his performance on Question Time and other gaffes he has become toxic to our cause.
I know he was under immense pressure at Question time and did land some punches but as a proffessional he should have anticipated the questions and any competent politician could have got out of them. Even I could have answered them and I am no politician.
There are things you do not say even if you agree with them.
There are things I have not said myself both as a BNP member and a Labour councillor which I knew would be political suicide.
How do I know?
People on the doorstep have told me so.
Whether we agree with them or not these are the people with whom we must connect and motivate to vote for us. However good our leader is if he puts people off voting for us he should be replaced and must be if we are to progress.
Secondly as one commentator said there is no efficient structure to inform members and supporters what is going on (nor indeed openness about financial matters).
This does not help to motivate people to join or contribute.
Thirdly, I know UKIP did badly but they are one trick party and irrelevent to local politics.
We have many economic policies which would help hard pressed citizens and which are relevent to local elections, but they were not pushed.
We should stress the economic arguments which resonate with people and all else will fall into place. Everybody knows our opinions about immigration and Muslim terrorism so why mention them. Concentrate on people's pockets and the taxes they must pay and the benefits they lose.
UKIP is Farage and in spite of his multiple appearances in the media it scores badly at local elections. Who else is in UKIP? Not many know.
That gives the lie that a well known leader with the gift of the gab will sway local voters.
Fourthly, I have been involved in the Party for nearly nine years and have seen its weaknesses in structure, finances and personnel and have pleaded for these to be rectified to no avail.
I have put in money to help our progress but my efforts have been ignored, not out of malice but inefficiency.
We are up against parties, well funded often by foreign interests and the media and thus have to be super efficient and squeaky clean. Thus anyone with any baggage which could hinder our cause has to be sidelined from public view or they will be set upon by the media.
I have not advocated any person as a new leader. I just believe we need a new one backed up by an efficient and lean administration which responds quickly to enquiries, pays its bills and is stable so that people know who to contact.
Last years leadership elections were not by any stretch democratic (although I voted for Nick Griffin), but now I think we need an open and fair contest this time to elect a new leader with campaigning by the candidates across the country as Nick Griffin has an inbuilt advantage, being well known.
I accept this year's local elections may not be a true reflection of our appeal given the rivalry between the main parties but we could and should have done better.
I look at this from the perspective of a former organiser who has tried to keep people's spirits and motivation up following the Euro elections when it seemed possible we would make a historic breakthrough but in spite of my best efforts after last year's elections enthusiasm waned.
Generally, some have left and some have joined other parties (mistakenly in my view)but the end result has been fraction and dilution of the nationalist cause.
This I deeply regret and my association with "reformists" does not mean I agree with all they say,or even like them all, just that something must be done to heal our wounds.
I have resigned from the post of local organiser but still want to play a part in our cause and if I can do ANYTHING to help heal our wounds and join together the various splinter groups which have emerged I will do so.
We must let by gones be by gones, cease recrimiations and reunite and pull together for the sake of our cause and country.
OUR COUNTRY NEEDS US.
We don't have to like everybody (it helps if we do) but WE MUST UNITE, or the outlook for our country and children is indeed bleak.
Sunday, 8 May 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)