Cameron gets even worse.
On his visit to Pakistan (as always with his token Paki, the unelected "baroness" ? arsi) he gives them £650 million for education and help with the technology to diffuse roadside bombs.
In addition he says that many of the troubles of the world are down "to the British" in an effort to curry (a good word in that context)favour with his continually begging hosts.
So let's look at this in detail from modern and historic aspects. This year it has been announced that there will be cuts to our education budgets owing the need to make savings and student fees have been increased.
It seems therefore that there is no money to educate our own but sufficient to educate Pakistani children, no doubt by islamic extremists. There is money to help them combat bombs as well even though our own forces are being reduced as unaffordable and servicemen given their P 45s.
In other words we are paying for protection of Pakistani people while neglecting our own security.
I don't really care how many people are blown up by roadside bombs in Pakistan. It is of no concern to us and there is no way that failed country will stop terrorism, after all it is a muslim state and terrorism and islam go together.
My second gripe about the action of this idiot we have for a Prime Minister is when he blames Britain for many of the world's ills. He was perhaps talking about Kashmir but again that was not the fault of "the British" but muslim/ Hindu rivalry which occured after we had left.
Who does he mean by Britain? Surely not the British people. Our people have not been responsible for most of the ills perpetrated in our name. It has always been the ruling elite, no doubt in order to line their greedy pockets who have been responsible. To go back nearly 100 years it was our rulers who agreed to set up the state of Israel to gain favours and money from the Zionists in our country, ignoring that Palestine had been inhabited for humdreds of years by muslims.
These tribes although primitive and of a medieval faith did not take kindly to being dispossessed of their land and the hatred still remains, bolstered by ours and America's continued support for that illegal state.
Yes the British government has connived against the Arabs and other muslims ever since causing them to retaliate in atrocities such as 9/11. This led to a kneejerk "war on terrorism" by invading Iraq and Afghanistan against the will of the people Now they are interfering in Libya again against our will, even as our armed forces are depleted and we are as a nation in debt.
The government tries to spin its actions as humanitarian but a look at where they take place shows that these "humanitarian" actions are very selective. No action in Syria, Bahrein or Ivory Coast, or in the past Darfur or Rwanda. Why the difference? NO IT IS NOT OIL. We could do as China does and keep out of these conflicts and buy the resources. IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY, the money controlled by the elite of this country, the politicians and their friends in the City.
No Mr Cameron, we the people do not agree with your warlike actions and your interference in other's business for your own globalist financial agenda and
WE ARE NOT TAKING THE BLAME.
YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS IN THE CITY CAUSED MUCH OF THE TROUBLE.
WE, THE POOR BLOODY INFANTRY PAID AND DIED FOR YOUR MISTAKES AND GREED.
And you allow people who you have caused to hate us almost free entry into our country to cause dissent and mayhem here while prosecuting and vilifying those who object.
It is obvious you and your Common Purpose Globalist friends are intent on destroying our country FOR YOUR OWN ENDS.
THAT IS YOUR ULTIMATE AGENDA.
OUR JOB IS TO PREVENT IT BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.
Thursday, 7 April 2011
Ashley Mote deconstructs the UK Census – brilliant and chilling
Ashley Mote deconstructs the UK Census – brilliant and chilling
When the US Census asked me my ethnicity, I answered, American. On reflection, it would have been better not to answer the Census at all.
I’m sure my co-editor agrees with me that Ashley Mote’s deconstruction of the UK Census is brilliant and chilling -
12 March 2011
Problem with the 2011 UK Census?
In view of widespread and understandable concerns about the intrusive nature of the census we in the UK are asked to complete on 27 March, may I offer a few observations and a few relevant facts.
What Does the Law Demand?
Census Act 1920
SCHEDULE
Matters in respect of which particulars may be required
1 Names, sex, age.
2 Occupation, profession, trade or employment.
3 Nationality, birthplace, race, language.
4 Place of abode and character of dwelling.
5 Condition as to marriage, relation to head of family, issue born in marriage.
6 Any other matters with respect to which it is desirable to obtain statistical information with a view to ascertaining the social or civil condition of the population.
How Safe is Our Information?
Unlike in Northern Ireland and Scotland, the absolute confidentiality of personal information is no longer guaranteed by law in England and Wales. This was abolished by Nu-Labour in the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, section 39.
Census data collected in England will be treated as ‘restricted’, not ‘confidential’. Our forms will be processed by some 1300 temporary employees at an 800,000 square foot warehouse in Manchester. The Coalition government has provided no convincing assurances about the vetting of these temporary staff, nor the security being imposed on them and the data they handle, neither during nor after the process.
Data gathering in 2011 has been contracted to a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin – the US arms conglomerate. Eighty percent of LM’s work is for the US defence department. It assists more than two dozen American government agencies and is involved in surveillance and data processing for the CIA and FBI. It has provided private-contract interrogators to the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and Guantánamo Bay in Cuba.
All US-based companies are subject to the Patriot Act, which allows the US government to have access to any data in the company’s possession. In other words, the US government will have legal access to detailed and highly personal data on the UK’s entire population.
The Census website boldly states, without qualification, that “completing the census online is straightforward, convenient and secure”. Each census form has a 20-digit “personal” internet access code. Describing it as “personal” when it is addressed to “The Occupier”, and accessible to anyone who happens to see the form lying around, is absurdly irresponsible.
How could bureaucrats with a long history of failing to keep data secure contemplate any such thing? If amateur hackers can break into the Pentagon’s computers, there can be no credible guarantee that the British government could guarantee better security – especially given their appalling track-record.
The losses of personal data by the British government and its civil servants have been enormous in recent years. Remember the 400 laptops and memory sticks ‘lost’ by the Ministry of Defence? And that was just one incident.
Worse, there have been no government guarantees that criminals will be prevented from gaining access to raw census data. How can it, when all our personal data will be available to the police, the intelligence agencies, immigration authorities, tax inspectors, DWP investigators, foreign governments, the EU, and to private sector and academic ‘approved researchers’?
The Office for National Statistics’ claim that this data will be safe is worthless. Far too often the UK government has failed to secure and protect personal records in digital format. We have no credible reason to believe them this time.
Intrusive Role of the European Union
In 2008 the European Parliament approved a Census Regulation requiring the harmonization of outputs from member states’ censuses of population and housing. It is now law in the UK. The regulation requires that information collected in the UK is passed to Eurostat, the EU’s statistics institution, which was totally discredited for fraud and corruption amongst its own senior staff in a major scandal over many years.
. . .Statewatch, the civil liberties body that monitors the EU, has discovered that Brussels wants law enforcement agencies in member countries to build lists of political activists as part of a ‘systematic data collection’.
Civil servants in the member countries charged with this duty have been told to collate information on what the EU chooses to call ‘agents of radicalisation’. They have been sent a list of 70 questions to answer about each ‘suspect’. They want to know about family members, psychological traits, religious affiliation, activities, economic status and, significantly, ‘oral comments’ – presumably via phone taps – on political issues. The extent of this EU trawl for potential political opponents was confirmed in The Guardian on 8th June 2010.
No doubt the 2011 census will provide a good starting point.
Invasive Questions and Wrong Assumptions
Who is expected to respond? The census is addressed to “the occupier” – singular. Yet there is space for answers relating to six people, and visitors. The preamble makes it plain that “the occupier” is legally liable for the accuracy of answers relating to all the others.
The government ‘justifies’ the need for the census by claiming that, amongst other things, it is required to plan the provision of education, health, transport, policing, housing and so on. Apparently we are expected to believe that these services are today being managed on the basis of the census taken ten years ago. It’s demonstrably ridiculous.
Such services are demand led, and rightly so. The use of census statistics to plan and deliver them is at best highly marginal and rapidly out of date.
Unlike previous censuses, people are expected to state their employer’s name, their main activity, their address, and the full postal address of the location where that individual works. This applies to everyone, whether they work for Tesco or the intelligence services. Even people who are supposedly in a witness protection scheme after giving evidence at a criminal trial must provide this information.
The first question on employment provides nowhere for a retired person to state that fact. The assumption is that he or she should have been looking for work in the previous week, if not actually working. The chance to declare that they are retired comes later. Volunteers who work for nothing have nowhere to say so.
There are far more intrusive questions on ethnic origins than 10 years ago, unsurprising after the torrent of foreign nationals allowed to live here over the last decade. Answers are mandatory. Questions on religion are not. However, despite there being over 390,000 self-declared Jedi recorded in the 2001 census (more than there were Sikhs or Jews) there is no tick box for Jedi.
Even the reasonable voice of Charles Moore, former editor of The Daily Telegraph, complains (12 March) that the intrusive questions on ethnicity will be used by government and others to exploit the race and culture wars which bedevil us. They reinforce divisions.
So, I might add, does the expensive provision of census forms in over 50 other languages. How better to reinforce the divisions in today’s fractured British society? Those of us meeting the cost of such indulgence might reasonably ask foreigners who have chosen to live in the UK to adopt our language, culture and way of life, at least outwardly.
Legal and Constitutional Protection
In 2001 over 1.5 million households failed to complete the census, but only 38 were prosecuted. But that was 10 years ago.
The Human Rights Act and the Data Protection Act provide us with protection against an overbearing state. Well, that’s the theory anyway.
Several other aspects British and international law are also relevant.
Both Magna Carta, 1215, and the Declaration of Rights, 1688, were contracts made directly between the Crown and the people. Both were and still are beyond the powers of parliament. Any repeal of statutes leaves the original contracts untouched. (References: Speaker Betty Boothroyd, Hansard 21 July 1993, and a letter from the House of Lords Archives Office to me in September 2000.)
Magna Carta recognises the rights of subjects of the Crown to hold government to account. This is sometimes described as the right to ‘lawful rebellion’, and was specifically confirmed in the oath sworn by Henry III at his coronation on 28 October 1216.
The Bill of Rights went further. It explicitly forbids the recognition of power over what is now the UK by any “foreign person, prelate, state or potentate”. In other words our joining what was then the Common Market was unlawful, and our membership of the EU remains unlawful. Most certainly passing information to Brussels to assist their governance of the UK is illegal.
Our constitution is fragmented but clear. It provides that the state answers to the people. We, the people, do not answer to the state. There is no such legal entity as a British state.
We are a sovereign people and we elect individuals for a maximum of five years to look after our best interests. And any future parliament has an absolute right to repeal any Acts passed by previous governments. Thus, they answer to us.
Several clauses in the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights defend our right to privacy.
3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
So Where Does That Leave Us?
A census is only possible with the general consent of the population. In some countries this no longer exists. Germany has not taken a full census since that planned for 1983 was postponed until 1987. The Netherlands has not had a census since 1971, following a high level of refusal previously. Both these countries, and Denmark, now use alternative data sources based mostly on housing registers and sample surveys.
The UK government has made no secret of its irritation at having to carry out the 2011 census, which was put in train by Nu-Labour before the election last year. It will cost almost half a billion pounds.
The Coalition has initiated work on data-collection alternatives, so that the 2011 census proves to be the last of its kind.
Meanwhile, what to do?
All the basic information about each of us is in the public domain already. That is – name, address, age, sex and marital status.
If you plan to complete it at all, you might consider. . .
(a) providing the legally specific information required only, and
(b) posting it.
The Royal Mail admits to several million letters a year not reaching their intended destination.
Think on. . .
Thank you, Mr Mote.
RACIST ASIAN PACKS ATTACK LONE BRITISH MALES
WEST MIDLANDS POLICE
WALSALL LOCAL POLICING UNIT
The incident took place between 8-8.20pm Saturday 2 April in Palfrey Park, Dale Street, Walsall.
One of the victims, a 44 year old man, was walking his dogs in the park, when he was assaulted by a group of Asian males. They punched him and then used his own walking stick to hit him on the head, causing a cut.
During the incident, two witnesses came to his rescue, one of them, a 32 year old man, was also struck over the head with the walking stick.He was taken to hospital with head injuries, where his condition is described as stable.
Officers have arrested two men in connection with this incident and they are currently helping with enquiries.
Police from the local neighbourhood team will be carrying out reassurance patrols in the park and surrounding areas.
DI Phil Asquith from Force CID said:"Officers are currently investigating the attacks on both the man walking his dogs and on the man who came to his aid. We are appealing for anyone who was in Palfrey Park on Saturday evening and who may have witnessed the incidents or may have information to contact Force CID at Bloxwich on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.
WALSALL LOCAL POLICING UNIT
TWO MEN ATTACKED IN PALFREY OVER THE WEEKEND
4 April 2011
Walsall police are appealing for witnesses following an assault on two men in the early hours of Sunday 3 April in Palfrey.
The men, aged 27 and 29 were walking in Milton Street, when they were attacked by three Asian males.
The 29 year old man suffered cuts and grazes to his head, knees and elbows following the attack. The 27 year old suffered a broken nose and swelling to his head.
Descriptions of the attackers are three Asian males aged in their twenties.
Police have crimed the incident as a racially aggravated assault due to the fact the victims were wearing Indian cricket shirts following the cricket match.
Anyone with information or any witnesses to the incident early Sunday morning, should contact Walsall CID on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.Police call for witnesses – Palfrey Park
Walsall police are appealing for witnesses following an attack in Palfrey Park at the weekend, which left one man with serious head injuries.The incident took place between 8-8.20pm Saturday 2 April in Palfrey Park, Dale Street, Walsall.
One of the victims, a 44 year old man, was walking his dogs in the park, when he was assaulted by a group of Asian males. They punched him and then used his own walking stick to hit him on the head, causing a cut.
During the incident, two witnesses came to his rescue, one of them, a 32 year old man, was also struck over the head with the walking stick.He was taken to hospital with head injuries, where his condition is described as stable.
Officers have arrested two men in connection with this incident and they are currently helping with enquiries.
Police from the local neighbourhood team will be carrying out reassurance patrols in the park and surrounding areas.
DI Phil Asquith from Force CID said:"Officers are currently investigating the attacks on both the man walking his dogs and on the man who came to his aid. We are appealing for anyone who was in Palfrey Park on Saturday evening and who may have witnessed the incidents or may have information to contact Force CID at Bloxwich on 0345 113 5000 or call Crimestoppers confidentially on 0800 555 111.
----------------------------
Is it time for the Indigenous Population to create vigilante groups to protect OUR PEOPLE ?
If they are unable to stop such RACIST ATTACKS ON THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH should they start to RETALIATE in kind.
Any ASIAN RACIST ATTACK, which is usually carried out by a gang of COWARDLY ASIANS on LONE INDIGENOUS MALES be they young or old, should be met with RETALIATION ?
We cannot have faith in the LAW or the POLICE to protect us in OUR TOWNS and CITIES.
This is not something I say lightly but we are seeing more and more RACIST ATTACKS by ASIANS on the WHITE INDIGENOUS BRITISH POPULATION.
AN EYE FOR AN EYE ? A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH ?
It is no longer safe for the WHITE INDIGENOUS POPULATION to walk the streets and parks of their home towns with a large ASIAN POPULATION.
THIS NEEDS TO STOP NOW.
If they are unable to stop such RACIST ATTACKS ON THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH should they start to RETALIATE in kind.
Any ASIAN RACIST ATTACK, which is usually carried out by a gang of COWARDLY ASIANS on LONE INDIGENOUS MALES be they young or old, should be met with RETALIATION ?
We cannot have faith in the LAW or the POLICE to protect us in OUR TOWNS and CITIES.
This is not something I say lightly but we are seeing more and more RACIST ATTACKS by ASIANS on the WHITE INDIGENOUS BRITISH POPULATION.
AN EYE FOR AN EYE ? A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH ?
It is no longer safe for the WHITE INDIGENOUS POPULATION to walk the streets and parks of their home towns with a large ASIAN POPULATION.
THIS NEEDS TO STOP NOW.
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
LUNACY
I need you all to lend me a hand here. I THINK I understand the situation, but it keeps sending my mind into 'emergency shutdown' mode because of the weirdness of the entire thing. Let me explain, then maybe you can tell me where I'm going wrong:
1. A bloke in some remote other part of the world (Florida) burns a piece of paper
2.Some other bloke (several, actually) from some other other remote part of the world (Afghanistan) decides to "avenge" this by murdering a woman from some other other part of the world (Norway) and:
3.murdering yet another bloke (beheading) from some other other other remote part of the world (Nepal).
All the murder victims here are strangers to each other, and to the murderers, and to the bloke who burned the piece of paper.
And yet, and yet (and this is the bit that keeps driving me into shutdown mode because I just don't seem to be able to grasp this without risk of losing my sanity) ... IT'S ALL THE FIRST BLOKE'S FAULT FOR BURNING THAT PIECE OF PAPER!!!! BEEP BEEP RING RING RING EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN.
Can any of you help me make a bit of progress on this? It just seems so batshit insane to me ... where does chopping someone's head off come on the scale of retaliation for the offence of some other bloke - a stranger - harmlessly burning a piece of paper thousands of miles away?
We try and pretend we are dealing with rational human beings ... but we're not are we. They're Mohammedans, and there's nothing rational about people who think it's appropriate to murder strangers without warning over the offence of yet another stranger burning a piece of paper
Oh - and there were a load more murder victims than just the two.
Wonder what the animals would have done if there had been a baby on site? Ah no - ok - Palestinian Mohammedans gave us the answer to that a few weeks back when they murdered a three-month old Jewish baby by cutting her throat so severely that it nearly turned into a beheading.
Morg
.
1. A bloke in some remote other part of the world (Florida) burns a piece of paper
2.Some other bloke (several, actually) from some other other remote part of the world (Afghanistan) decides to "avenge" this by murdering a woman from some other other part of the world (Norway) and:
3.murdering yet another bloke (beheading) from some other other other remote part of the world (Nepal).
All the murder victims here are strangers to each other, and to the murderers, and to the bloke who burned the piece of paper.
And yet, and yet (and this is the bit that keeps driving me into shutdown mode because I just don't seem to be able to grasp this without risk of losing my sanity) ... IT'S ALL THE FIRST BLOKE'S FAULT FOR BURNING THAT PIECE OF PAPER!!!! BEEP BEEP RING RING RING EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN SHUT DOWN.
Can any of you help me make a bit of progress on this? It just seems so batshit insane to me ... where does chopping someone's head off come on the scale of retaliation for the offence of some other bloke - a stranger - harmlessly burning a piece of paper thousands of miles away?
We try and pretend we are dealing with rational human beings ... but we're not are we. They're Mohammedans, and there's nothing rational about people who think it's appropriate to murder strangers without warning over the offence of yet another stranger burning a piece of paper
Oh - and there were a load more murder victims than just the two.
Wonder what the animals would have done if there had been a baby on site? Ah no - ok - Palestinian Mohammedans gave us the answer to that a few weeks back when they murdered a three-month old Jewish baby by cutting her throat so severely that it nearly turned into a beheading.
Morg
.
Monday, 4 April 2011
6O MILLION NON-MOSLEMS
I know that not all Muslims are involved in this lunacy. However, they are all going to take the backlash of it. All Muslims will be blamed for the actions of the UAF [old friends of ours] and of the Taliban. All Muslims will become the target, not of the EDL who have very precise aims, but of the ordinary people whipped into a frenzy by the likes of the Daily Mail.
Muslims, listen to a smoker. You are in the process of being denormalised. It's not quite the same approach because smokers, drinkers, fat people and even Christians will not rise up and fight back. We are all being denormalised by gradual steps which we can, mostly, just slide around.
You, Muslims, are different. You shout and scream and threaten death and destruction and you blow things up and you demand 'rights' and you retaliate.
The authorities have a hard time with smokers. Tell us we can't smoke in a pub and we simply stop going to pubs and make alternative arrangements. We don't fight, we slide past the rules. We can hide in plain sight and we can appear and disappear at will. Christians simply don't wear a cross or keep it in their pocket, they don't really need it anyway. The authorities can't fight us if we don't fight them. They especially can't fight us if they can't find us.
Muslims, you have made yourselves easy targets for the denormalisation process. Burning poppies, blowing people up, cutting heads off, marching with demands such as 'free speech go to hell' and 'Sharia law for the UK' and the UAF and the Muslim Parliament that nobody voted for - you are walking straight into another version of the holocaust you pretend didn't happen. You fight, and that means they know what to do with you. They will set the people against you and that boast of 'two million Muslims in the UK'?
There are sixty million non-Muslims right next to you.
So sit back a while and think. You've been useful but they don't need you any more. Your rage is going to get a response and it is, indeed, a response that has been planned and calculated.
But not by you.
Muslims, listen to a smoker. You are in the process of being denormalised. It's not quite the same approach because smokers, drinkers, fat people and even Christians will not rise up and fight back. We are all being denormalised by gradual steps which we can, mostly, just slide around.
You, Muslims, are different. You shout and scream and threaten death and destruction and you blow things up and you demand 'rights' and you retaliate.
The authorities have a hard time with smokers. Tell us we can't smoke in a pub and we simply stop going to pubs and make alternative arrangements. We don't fight, we slide past the rules. We can hide in plain sight and we can appear and disappear at will. Christians simply don't wear a cross or keep it in their pocket, they don't really need it anyway. The authorities can't fight us if we don't fight them. They especially can't fight us if they can't find us.
Muslims, you have made yourselves easy targets for the denormalisation process. Burning poppies, blowing people up, cutting heads off, marching with demands such as 'free speech go to hell' and 'Sharia law for the UK' and the UAF and the Muslim Parliament that nobody voted for - you are walking straight into another version of the holocaust you pretend didn't happen. You fight, and that means they know what to do with you. They will set the people against you and that boast of 'two million Muslims in the UK'?
There are sixty million non-Muslims right next to you.
So sit back a while and think. You've been useful but they don't need you any more. Your rage is going to get a response and it is, indeed, a response that has been planned and calculated.
But not by you.
Sunday, 3 April 2011
Multiculturalists could learn a lot from Ivory Coast
Multiculturalists could learn a lot from Ivory Coast
What lessons can the leftist multiculturalists take from this? Well, two actually. One, that opposition to multiculturalism has absolutely nothing to do with longings for empire or a sense of white superiority. Ivory Coast has never had an empire, nor are white supremacists that popular there. But they do see the problem with immigration; its economic and cultural impact - the loss of jobs and the sense of radical social change - has left them with little option but to turn to extremism. Does that sound familiar? Two, that immigrant communities do not ‘mingle’ with the native population and share ideas and values. They are attracted to areas already inhabited by the familiar, those of the same ethnic or cultural group. Now, I’m not seriously suggesting that multiculturalism in the UK will cause a war any time in the foreseeable future. What I am saying is that there are useful comparisons to be made, that the Ivory Coast represents the worst possible outcome of the failure of multiculturalism, and that those who continue to stress the importance of multicultural theory take a look at how their noble ideas turn out in practice. You cannot put unlimited numbers of people of different allegiances into an area with limited resources and expect them to share.
http://europeandisunion.blogspot.com/2011/04/multiculturalists-could-learn-lot-from.html?showComment=1301861225316#c2510495878030549599
http://europeandisunion.blogspot.com/2011/04/multiculturalists-could-learn-lot-from.html?showComment=1301861225316#c2510495878030549599
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)