Please click on the above links to print, display and distribute and collect signatures!
Cheers Clive Cumbrian Patriots and James
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
Sunday, 6 June 2010
MORGAN, WHERE ARE YOU?
Morgan, where are you?
We have not heard for you for two weeks.
Are you OK.
If you are can you contact me urgently.
Charles.
We have not heard for you for two weeks.
Are you OK.
If you are can you contact me urgently.
Charles.
Yvonne Fovargue - New labour MP for Makerfield.
On Fri 4th June Makerfields New New labour (Have they dropped the New yet?) held her first constituency surgery.
A few questions were asked in regards to Makerfield and Wigan as a whole.
Ms ? Fovargue was asked what the voters of Wigan should expect in regards to the massive cuts due to New labours TREACHERY. The reply was typical and not unexpected, 'We have not been told by the other partys what cuts and how deep are coming, so nothing to do with me guv, 'onest'
(paraphrased).
If the MPs of the party, now the Official Opposition, that have BANKRUPTED US will not even hazard a guess, nor make an attempt to throw a bit of mud at the CONDEMS over the massive cuts expected to come, then maybe she's too scared to reveal anything about the state of our finances that her TRAITORUS PARTY caused or she's burying her head in the sand ?
Have the Official opposition not been asking questions about how deep the cuts are going to be due to their DELIBERATE ACTS OF TREASON ?
Do they not know nor care about what they have done to our Country ?
Well guess what WE WANT TO KNOW AND WE CARE !
Another quick question was about PR or Proportional Representation.
Would she support PR in Local Government if it was what the people wanted ?
Answer NO!
Do you support DEMOCRACY for the voters of Wigan ?
Answer Yes.
So why would you not support PR in Wigan ?
Answer Because it's "NOT MY TYPE OF DEMOCRACY" ! (Paraphrased)
Now ..
What type of Democracy is their ?
She did say that she supports AV or Alternative Voting, which is not PR but another way of the ruling elite to keep it's grubby bloodstained hands on the levers of power.
And that she prefers the Ward system ?
We can still have wards under PR.
And she likes constituencies.
Though that's only because of the ability to gerrymander for political ends.
So to try and expose our Ignorance of who our MEP was after being elected through PR she asked who our MEP was.
And was told it was Nick Griffin.
Only to be told in no uncertain terms that "Nick Griffin is an MEP for Yorkshire."
Wow, New Labour got good at boundary changes and gerrymandering but I didn't think they could move whole counties ?
Then the penny dropped for her.
At which she and her aide arose and went to leave the room. (We shall see in the future if she is willing to treat all her constituents as equals and with impartiality).
So, in general terms, on National issues what will affect her constituents and constituency ='Dunno' ?
In terms of changing the broken electoral system and restoring Democracy to the voters of Wigan = Only if it's thier (New TREASONUS Labours) kind of Democracy and not the Democracy the people want. (Paraphrased)
THEY WORK FOR US AND WE WANT ANSWERS !
A few questions were asked in regards to Makerfield and Wigan as a whole.
Ms ? Fovargue was asked what the voters of Wigan should expect in regards to the massive cuts due to New labours TREACHERY. The reply was typical and not unexpected, 'We have not been told by the other partys what cuts and how deep are coming, so nothing to do with me guv, 'onest'
(paraphrased).
If the MPs of the party, now the Official Opposition, that have BANKRUPTED US will not even hazard a guess, nor make an attempt to throw a bit of mud at the CONDEMS over the massive cuts expected to come, then maybe she's too scared to reveal anything about the state of our finances that her TRAITORUS PARTY caused or she's burying her head in the sand ?
Have the Official opposition not been asking questions about how deep the cuts are going to be due to their DELIBERATE ACTS OF TREASON ?
Do they not know nor care about what they have done to our Country ?
Well guess what WE WANT TO KNOW AND WE CARE !
Another quick question was about PR or Proportional Representation.
Would she support PR in Local Government if it was what the people wanted ?
Answer NO!
Do you support DEMOCRACY for the voters of Wigan ?
Answer Yes.
So why would you not support PR in Wigan ?
Answer Because it's "NOT MY TYPE OF DEMOCRACY" ! (Paraphrased)
Now ..
What type of Democracy is their ?
She did say that she supports AV or Alternative Voting, which is not PR but another way of the ruling elite to keep it's grubby bloodstained hands on the levers of power.
And that she prefers the Ward system ?
We can still have wards under PR.
And she likes constituencies.
Though that's only because of the ability to gerrymander for political ends.
So to try and expose our Ignorance of who our MEP was after being elected through PR she asked who our MEP was.
And was told it was Nick Griffin.
Only to be told in no uncertain terms that "Nick Griffin is an MEP for Yorkshire."
Wow, New Labour got good at boundary changes and gerrymandering but I didn't think they could move whole counties ?
Then the penny dropped for her.
At which she and her aide arose and went to leave the room. (We shall see in the future if she is willing to treat all her constituents as equals and with impartiality).
So, in general terms, on National issues what will affect her constituents and constituency ='Dunno' ?
In terms of changing the broken electoral system and restoring Democracy to the voters of Wigan = Only if it's thier (New TREASONUS Labours) kind of Democracy and not the Democracy the people want. (Paraphrased)
THEY WORK FOR US AND WE WANT ANSWERS !
Friday, 4 June 2010
NANNY (NICE) KNOWS BEST
I see "NICE" the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, in between restricting drugs which are available to cancer sufferers abroad, from patients here on the grounds they are not "cost effective" has found anothert hobby horse.
I did not realise that the more money you have the better you can take your alcohol, but that is the case if NICE is to be believed.
It wants a minimum price for alcohol, possibly doubling the cost in order to stop drunkenness and associated health problems caused by excessive drinking. They obviously come to this conclusion as a result of controlled surveys which demonstrate their thesis.
Wealthier middle and upper classes would not be affected by the rise in alcohol price and would be able to continue their pleasures as before knowing that their livers are made of sterner stuff.
The poorer parts of society having weaker livers would be hard hit, but then when did their simple pleasures bother this self styled elite. I'm sure Prince Harry or Fergie will not have to cut down their drinking (but then they've got stronger livers as well as deeper pockets).
I agree that binge drinking is a problem but why penalise all because of the behaviour of the few.
Far better to punish those who cause trouble in the street while drunk. Alcopops and strong lager sales in supermarkets could be controlled while normal weaker beer bought on pubs could be taxed less, and thus help to preserve a national institution.
Of course this is not just about excessive drinking it is about control of the people with pseudo independent organisations such as NICE in the vanguard of these Stazi like proposals.
In a free society people should do as they wish without government sponsored busybodies trying to think up new rules to impose on us. So long as they do not affect anybody else and face the consequencies of their behaviour it's got b***er all to do with NICE or the State.
I did not realise that the more money you have the better you can take your alcohol, but that is the case if NICE is to be believed.
It wants a minimum price for alcohol, possibly doubling the cost in order to stop drunkenness and associated health problems caused by excessive drinking. They obviously come to this conclusion as a result of controlled surveys which demonstrate their thesis.
Wealthier middle and upper classes would not be affected by the rise in alcohol price and would be able to continue their pleasures as before knowing that their livers are made of sterner stuff.
The poorer parts of society having weaker livers would be hard hit, but then when did their simple pleasures bother this self styled elite. I'm sure Prince Harry or Fergie will not have to cut down their drinking (but then they've got stronger livers as well as deeper pockets).
I agree that binge drinking is a problem but why penalise all because of the behaviour of the few.
Far better to punish those who cause trouble in the street while drunk. Alcopops and strong lager sales in supermarkets could be controlled while normal weaker beer bought on pubs could be taxed less, and thus help to preserve a national institution.
Of course this is not just about excessive drinking it is about control of the people with pseudo independent organisations such as NICE in the vanguard of these Stazi like proposals.
In a free society people should do as they wish without government sponsored busybodies trying to think up new rules to impose on us. So long as they do not affect anybody else and face the consequencies of their behaviour it's got b***er all to do with NICE or the State.
Thursday, 3 June 2010
RAINBOW DIVERSITY, BLACK NO WHITE
On the news tonight we saw the welcome given to the English football team by the "Rainbow Nation"
For such an example of racial harmony I would have expected a more "diverse" welcoming party.
There was not a single white person in the group. Do the white population have no input into this charade?, or are they too busy running the country or have they left?
Of course this would have not have been allowed here as it would not have reflected our pride in our multiculturalism and possibly ethnic quotas would have been imposed to ensure that enough ethnic minorities (non English) were present in the welcoming party. Maybe even a larger proportion of non English participants than in the general population would have been included to demonstrate our (or our totalitarian government's) commitment to diversity. I'm sure this would happen. Most of the commentators on TV are ethnic minority even now.
Possibly "diversity"does not matter in South Africa, or possibly all non Africans have taken the sensible option of leaving that country for civilised countries such as Australia after seeing the anti European racist violence visited on their neighbours in Zimbabwe and the consequences of that policy.
Just a comment. I don't care either way, about the football or the country.
For such an example of racial harmony I would have expected a more "diverse" welcoming party.
There was not a single white person in the group. Do the white population have no input into this charade?, or are they too busy running the country or have they left?
Of course this would have not have been allowed here as it would not have reflected our pride in our multiculturalism and possibly ethnic quotas would have been imposed to ensure that enough ethnic minorities (non English) were present in the welcoming party. Maybe even a larger proportion of non English participants than in the general population would have been included to demonstrate our (or our totalitarian government's) commitment to diversity. I'm sure this would happen. Most of the commentators on TV are ethnic minority even now.
Possibly "diversity"does not matter in South Africa, or possibly all non Africans have taken the sensible option of leaving that country for civilised countries such as Australia after seeing the anti European racist violence visited on their neighbours in Zimbabwe and the consequences of that policy.
Just a comment. I don't care either way, about the football or the country.
PLEASE SIR, CAN I HAVE SOME MORE ?
OFFICIAL: FOUR MORE MONTHS LIKE APRIL, AND THE UK IS BANKRUPT
____________________________
Question-marks over huge public-sector outgoings in May
Financial and economic realism collided with a sickening thud in this morning's ONS statistics about UK reserves....following the trade-gap figures of three weeks ago.
The value of the country's reserves at the end of May 2010 was just £34 billion net.
During that time, the £ fell 8 cents against the Dollar - thus increasing our cost of imports and raw materials.
The month before that, our trade gap was £9.7 billion.
Simple maths deduces that if we don't better that trend, all the reserves will have gone by September. But we show few if any signs of bettering it: despite the Pound being cheaper than the Buck now than at any time for years, UK exports continue to flounder...and now the £ is rising again.
Now look at that net reserve figure of £34 billion and compare it to our fiscal deficit projections of £150 billion for this year alone.
Now see the reserves dwarfed by the total size of our National Debt - £890 billion.
I'll offer you an analogy: imagine you have a business projected to lose £108,000 per annum. Your one asset - the house - is worth £34,000, and falling....but your mortgage on it is £890,000. How easy do you think it would be to borrow more money? And at what point do you think repossession might be on the agenda? Do you think your accountant would say you were close to trading insolvently? Or do you think he might just recommend you default and go bankrupt?
After all the clever-clever relativism and putting of the good spin on things, it's not very nice now to see the facts in black and white. But in the end, facts are facts.
In the face of these facts, however, somehow - in one month, May - the outgoing Government managed to whack up the public sector outlay by £208 million.
"The oldest trick in the book" said Alistair Darling ten days ago, "is for the incoming Government to say the outgoing one went on a spending spree".
Well Ali, based on the official figures, its even easier to say that....when that's precisely what the outgoing Government did."
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=1053405856464872035&postID=8631569436122791220
I wonder what Wigans New Labour MPs have to say about this ?
After all was it not New Labour who DELIBERATELY BETRAYED US ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)