TAKE A BREAK AND PREPARE FOR EARLY ELECTION...

Lets take this opportunity to relax, reflect and recharge:

2010 promises to be a very, very busy year and a lot of hard work will be required!

Wishing you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

I raise a glass to you all - Thank you.

Cheers!

p.s. Lest We Forget.....

ANTHRAX-LACED HEROIN

.
You have to wonder about some - supposedly educated - people's grasp on reality:

Syed Ahmed, consultant in public health medicine, said: “I urge all drug-injecting heroin users to be extremely alert... "

All the best with that one sunshine ...


... and for once, such idiotic thinking is nothing to do with being a Muslim.


http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/breaking-news/deadly-anthrax-laced-heroin/story-e6freuyi-1225813538076

Morg
.

HAPPY CHRISTMAS

This last year has been very eventful and successful and we have made great progress by gaining a county councillor and an MEP in the North West and I like to think we in Wigan have played a part in this.

My thanks to all who have supported us by leafletting, letters, coming to meetings , spreading the word generally and of course visiting this blog.

We are MUCH stronger than we were a year ago and have many enquiries to follow up after New Year.

The leaflet shown on last night's blog will help us up our game and was a direct result of us having an MEP which allowed funds to be used to publicise the good work Nick is doing in the North West.

We go forward to capitalise on our success and bring our policies of sanity to the notice of an electorate increasingly disillusioned with the incompetence of the politics and corrupt politicians of the other parties.

We are the only hope for our country and are increasingly geting our message through in spite of the foreign big business controlled media and the snake like "Common Purpose" organisation which seeks to destroy us.

We are winning against all the odds and will continue to do so.

HAPPY CHRISTMAS TO YOU ALL.

WILL WE OR WON'T WE STAND?

It has been asked on this blog whether we will be standing candidates in the next General Election.
My opinion is that it is better to keep our opponents in the dark over our plans, even though our supporters may wish to know.
We may not stand at all or we may stand in all three constituencies. If we don't we will have given our opponents a lot of work countering a non existant threat from us. If we say we will stand we would give them more time to attack us and any possible candidates.

FOR NOW THEY MUST STAY IN THE DARK.


What I do know is that our party will have a strong presence in the North West.
We have had over 300,000 of the leaflets pictured below delivered to a cental depot for distribution round the North West. These will go out soon after the Christmas holidays and I think carry a strong and relevant message especially in a former mining and fishing region (and people who bemoan the demise of the British pub)

Nick Griffin takes his constituents seriously and follows up local concerns.
How many other NW MEPs can you name? How many have such a leaflet?

When this iniqitous ruling forbidding us to take on new members is lifted next month and we gain another 3000 members nationally our campaign will really take off.

We may have seemed a bit quiet in this area recently (for a variety of reasons) but we are still here getting stronger every day as the other parties show their true colours and people see the truth of our policies.

Next year we hit the ground running but whether we will be standing locally I will tell you later.

In the meantime show your friends the leaflet on this blog and see if they agree with our policies.

WHAT DO WE THIINK ? ...

... of this bollux?

Click on the link here: US SWINE FLU SPRAY PLANE SHOT DOWN IN CHINA

Absolutely anything that is anti-American will do for some people.

I'm a former servicaman who has had plenty to do with Americans. The only criticism I have of them is that they are too keen to please we Brits ...

Morg
..
.

RUCKUS AHOY - SEZ THE CAP'N

About Lanky's point about the planned televised debates between the three mainstream parties - the Liblabcon.

There's a site out there called 'Cranmer'. It is well and politely written and deals with the nexus between politics and religion - and believe it or not, I read it every day without fail. Here's Cranmer's take on the televised debates, and a very interesting take too:

Televised election debates will open the floodgates of litigation

There are pros and cons to this development, all of which are now a heated topic of fierce debate on all the political blogs.

But Cranmer is a little bemused.

In the United Kingdom, we have a party of government and an official opposition. The leader of one of these parties will be the next prime minister.

Nick Clegg may have produced the best Christmas card, but he does not have a cat in hell's chance of being the next prime minister.

So why is he granted three debates along with the Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition?

And since he has been granted such, why not the leaders of the DUP, the UUP, the SDLP, Plaid Cymru and the SNP?

Or Sinn Féin?

For they too will be contesting seats in their respective corners of the Kingdom.

And if these, why not UKIP, since they came a very respectable second in the recent Euro-elections?

And if UKIP, why not the Greens, since they also have councillors and assembly members?

And if the Greens, why not the BNP?

Or Respect?

And don't the English Democrats now have a mayor?

And what about the Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern?

And are not José Manuel Barroso or His Excellency Herman Van Rompuy of rather more political significance than any of these minnows at the next general election?

What exactly are the broadcasting criteria for deciding which political leaders are granted the (bountiful) gift of airtime to espouse their policies to the electorate? There is no precedent; there are no statutory guidelines.

By including Nick Clegg, the broadcasters have now left themselves vulnerable to a series of legal challenges. And a protracted and diversionary judicial review of televised political debate in the UK is the last thing our democracy needs.

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/

Morg
.

WHY NO GRITTING?

Ok, for what it's worth, here's my best guess.

Councillors, Chief Executives etc do NOT like spending your money if it isn't on immigrants. So they've been listening to all the "Global Warming" tripe with enormous gratitude. The Met. Office says warm winter and they all sigh with relief - no need to spend that money preparing for winter. Same with the railways, airports everything.

However, I suspect that if a Paki complains he can't drive to the mosque, all hell will break loose. There'll be a daily dawn patrol of gritters keeping the roads passable ... well, the roads leading to the mosque anyway. That's the proper thing to spend YOUR money on.

How much of a bet does anyone want to lay that if questions are laid in the council chamber, the Met. Office forecasts are the excuse that will be used.

Morg
.