Oops - I actually wrote 'Webley' first - Freudian slip?
Morg
.
Monday, 2 November 2009
THE POLITICIAN/PEOPLE DISCONNECT
.
A tale of two issues
Just fifteen percent of people in Britain worry about climate change and how the world responds to the problem - down from 26 percent last year. It scores less than Gordon Brown
By contrast, in a Guardian/ICM poll in May, 22 percent indicated that "Europe" was the chief concern.
In other words, despite the global hype and their best efforts to ramp up the fear, stretching back two decades, the warmists and the politicians have failed to covert us to their bullshit religion.
How interesting then it is that the politicians tell us that the EU is not an issue, because it consistently features low in the list of voters concerns. And that is with them after doing their best to keep it on the back-burner. Yet, despite the low ranking of global warming, they rush around like headless chickens, ordering us to change our life-styles, give them lots of money, fill our gardens and streets with recycling bins ... etc., etc.
This has to tell you something about politicians. And we are not alone. Worldwide, the number of people "worrying" about global warming has fallen by eight percent to just over a third in the last year. The figure in the US is only 18 percent. In Australia it is 22 percent.
For the UK though, nothing better illustrates the disconnect between the people and the politicians. Their concerns are not our concerns. Our concerns are not their concern. And that is why so many people are not concerned about them.
Soon enough, that lack of concern will express itself as something more tangible than a low turnout in elections. The political system is living on borrowed time.
With such a massive gap between the British people's concerns, and the major political parties' concerns, the reasons for the steady progress of the BNP are easily explained: the BNP DOES address the people's concerns. Why does the the liblabcon party and the media wonder about it? Are they thick or something? Join the future: join the BNP.
As I said Chris, your view on AGW is in the minority; indeed, a one in six minority, as it turns out. For all links to support the assertions in this piece, go to the original article as linked above.
The weblog is EU Referendum - something I read several times every day in order to keep up with the two topics it specialises in - The EU, and the Afghan war and other defence issues. I do recommend it as necessary reading to everyone interested in these things.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/
Morg
.
A tale of two issues
Just fifteen percent of people in Britain worry about climate change and how the world responds to the problem - down from 26 percent last year. It scores less than Gordon Brown
By contrast, in a Guardian/ICM poll in May, 22 percent indicated that "Europe" was the chief concern.
In other words, despite the global hype and their best efforts to ramp up the fear, stretching back two decades, the warmists and the politicians have failed to covert us to their bullshit religion.
How interesting then it is that the politicians tell us that the EU is not an issue, because it consistently features low in the list of voters concerns. And that is with them after doing their best to keep it on the back-burner. Yet, despite the low ranking of global warming, they rush around like headless chickens, ordering us to change our life-styles, give them lots of money, fill our gardens and streets with recycling bins ... etc., etc.
This has to tell you something about politicians. And we are not alone. Worldwide, the number of people "worrying" about global warming has fallen by eight percent to just over a third in the last year. The figure in the US is only 18 percent. In Australia it is 22 percent.
For the UK though, nothing better illustrates the disconnect between the people and the politicians. Their concerns are not our concerns. Our concerns are not their concern. And that is why so many people are not concerned about them.
Soon enough, that lack of concern will express itself as something more tangible than a low turnout in elections. The political system is living on borrowed time.
With such a massive gap between the British people's concerns, and the major political parties' concerns, the reasons for the steady progress of the BNP are easily explained: the BNP DOES address the people's concerns. Why does the the liblabcon party and the media wonder about it? Are they thick or something? Join the future: join the BNP.
As I said Chris, your view on AGW is in the minority; indeed, a one in six minority, as it turns out. For all links to support the assertions in this piece, go to the original article as linked above.
The weblog is EU Referendum - something I read several times every day in order to keep up with the two topics it specialises in - The EU, and the Afghan war and other defence issues. I do recommend it as necessary reading to everyone interested in these things.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/
Morg
.
Sunday, 1 November 2009
WIGAN AND LEIGH MEETING
Apologies for the absence of a photo of the well attended meeting of the Wigan and Leigh group last Thursday.I know a photo can say more than a thousand words bgut I am at present unable to get a photo on my blog.
Suffice it to say we had a very good meeting with several people new to our party who were inspired by one of our top speakers Jonathan Bowden who with his mockery of the other parties and statements of what is wrong with our country and its lost patriotism made it an very enjoyable meeting.
After the speech I spoke to some of the "new" visitors.
It is interesting that some of them had previously called themselves "far Left" while others were former Tories.
That is what unites us as a party, A BELIEF IN BRITAIN.
When it comes down to it there is little difference between us whatever our previous policies were, because we have an ideology in common, OUR COUNTRY and its people.
This faith in our people is unique among political parties nowadays and that is why people are flocking to us in such numbers.
The Leftist students I believe have debated whether we are Left or Right wing.
For once they have got it right.
Our party's ethos combines our unity as a people and love for our country with our belief in social justice for all British people, (the best parts of the traditional political beliefs)
No other party has these attributes. No other party has got an ETHOS, or belief. They just do anything to keep or gain power wheras we will never sell our principles for short term gain.
We do not seek to divide our people but unite them and indeed are uniting them under the BNP banner.
That is why the destroyers and theives of the other parties are so against us.
We have shone a light on their misdeeds and people are beginning to realise it.
WE ARE THE "PEASANTS REVOLT" but this time we will not be crushed.
P S I was at a party last night and although I did not bring the Party up several people spoke of their support.
That would not have happened two years ago.
Apologied to all those I promised DVDs to. I am unable to send them until the postal strike is finished. I have your names and as soon as I can I will send them.
Suffice it to say we had a very good meeting with several people new to our party who were inspired by one of our top speakers Jonathan Bowden who with his mockery of the other parties and statements of what is wrong with our country and its lost patriotism made it an very enjoyable meeting.
After the speech I spoke to some of the "new" visitors.
It is interesting that some of them had previously called themselves "far Left" while others were former Tories.
That is what unites us as a party, A BELIEF IN BRITAIN.
When it comes down to it there is little difference between us whatever our previous policies were, because we have an ideology in common, OUR COUNTRY and its people.
This faith in our people is unique among political parties nowadays and that is why people are flocking to us in such numbers.
The Leftist students I believe have debated whether we are Left or Right wing.
For once they have got it right.
Our party's ethos combines our unity as a people and love for our country with our belief in social justice for all British people, (the best parts of the traditional political beliefs)
No other party has these attributes. No other party has got an ETHOS, or belief. They just do anything to keep or gain power wheras we will never sell our principles for short term gain.
We do not seek to divide our people but unite them and indeed are uniting them under the BNP banner.
That is why the destroyers and theives of the other parties are so against us.
We have shone a light on their misdeeds and people are beginning to realise it.
WE ARE THE "PEASANTS REVOLT" but this time we will not be crushed.
P S I was at a party last night and although I did not bring the Party up several people spoke of their support.
That would not have happened two years ago.
Apologied to all those I promised DVDs to. I am unable to send them until the postal strike is finished. I have your names and as soon as I can I will send them.
ST HELENS GOES FROM STRENGTH TO STENGTH
Apologies for the delay in posting my blog reports of our recent meetings.
My time has been taken up in making DVDs of the two meetings we attended last week.
The first was the St Helens meeting where our chairman Nick Griffin gave a wonderful speech (DVDs available).
He had started the day in Glasgow and survived an egg throwing mob of anti democracy thugs. Following that he spoke in Blackburn and later in the evening came to St Helens.
How he manages to do so much in one day and remain fresh and articulate I don't know.
An audience of perhaps 90 saw him. There was standing room only a big difference from one year ago.
He has more energy and policy than the leaders of the other parties put together,(remember Gordon Brown needed 24 hours to decide which biscuits he preferred and he is OUR PM)
The St Helens group is really thriving and yesterday had a table top display in the town when they found that they soon ran out of the locally prepared leaflet.
500 soon went and people were still asking for them when our team packed up.
For the last few months as people see that the other parties have no answers to our country's problems and indeed have deliberately engineered them the enthusiasm for our party as the only one for the British people has grown.
It is hard to comprehend the difference in such a short time.
Well done St Helens.
My time has been taken up in making DVDs of the two meetings we attended last week.
The first was the St Helens meeting where our chairman Nick Griffin gave a wonderful speech (DVDs available).
He had started the day in Glasgow and survived an egg throwing mob of anti democracy thugs. Following that he spoke in Blackburn and later in the evening came to St Helens.
How he manages to do so much in one day and remain fresh and articulate I don't know.
An audience of perhaps 90 saw him. There was standing room only a big difference from one year ago.
He has more energy and policy than the leaders of the other parties put together,(remember Gordon Brown needed 24 hours to decide which biscuits he preferred and he is OUR PM)
The St Helens group is really thriving and yesterday had a table top display in the town when they found that they soon ran out of the locally prepared leaflet.
500 soon went and people were still asking for them when our team packed up.
For the last few months as people see that the other parties have no answers to our country's problems and indeed have deliberately engineered them the enthusiasm for our party as the only one for the British people has grown.
It is hard to comprehend the difference in such a short time.
Well done St Helens.
Saturday, 31 October 2009
THE TORIES ARE NOT EXONERATED
.
Can the recent success of the British National party be explained by the misguided immigration policy of the government? That was the killer question from the floor during the notorious episode of Question Time 10 days ago. Four times it was put to Jack Straw, the justice secretary, and four times he avoided answering it. Until that evening I had thought Straw was a fairly decent sort of bloke, for a politician. No longer. In a man so central to the new Labour project, who has served in cabinet under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who has been home secretary and foreign secretary, evasion on such an important subject is shocking.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6898174.ece
In an astonishingly insouciant article Andrew Neather — a former adviser to Straw, Blair and David Blunkett — revealed that Labour ministers had a hidden agenda in allowing immigrants to flood into the country.
Ministers longed for an immigration boom but wouldn’t talk about it, he wrote. “They probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.”
The revelations get worse. “There was a reluctance ... in government,” he wrote, “to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote.” The social outcomes that ministers cared about were those affecting the immigrants.
To frame a radical social policy, with wide-reaching consequences, just to embarrass and marginalise the opposition party, is grotesquely immature and irresponsible; it is the behaviour of spiteful children mucking about with our destinies just to settle imaginary scores.
Under these circumstances, Labour’s obvious gerrymandering by mass immigration — black and ethnic minority people are very likely to vote Labour — is perhaps the least of its crimes.
Read it all(at the above link).
That's a couple of good pieces I've read recently from Minette Marrin. I think I'll be following her work a little more closely in future.
Morg
.
Can the recent success of the British National party be explained by the misguided immigration policy of the government? That was the killer question from the floor during the notorious episode of Question Time 10 days ago. Four times it was put to Jack Straw, the justice secretary, and four times he avoided answering it. Until that evening I had thought Straw was a fairly decent sort of bloke, for a politician. No longer. In a man so central to the new Labour project, who has served in cabinet under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who has been home secretary and foreign secretary, evasion on such an important subject is shocking.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6898174.ece
In an astonishingly insouciant article Andrew Neather — a former adviser to Straw, Blair and David Blunkett — revealed that Labour ministers had a hidden agenda in allowing immigrants to flood into the country.
Ministers longed for an immigration boom but wouldn’t talk about it, he wrote. “They probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.”
The revelations get worse. “There was a reluctance ... in government,” he wrote, “to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote.” The social outcomes that ministers cared about were those affecting the immigrants.
To frame a radical social policy, with wide-reaching consequences, just to embarrass and marginalise the opposition party, is grotesquely immature and irresponsible; it is the behaviour of spiteful children mucking about with our destinies just to settle imaginary scores.
Under these circumstances, Labour’s obvious gerrymandering by mass immigration — black and ethnic minority people are very likely to vote Labour — is perhaps the least of its crimes.
Read it all(at the above link).
That's a couple of good pieces I've read recently from Minette Marrin. I think I'll be following her work a little more closely in future.
Morg
.
ARE WE AT ALL ...
.
... SURPRISED?
I wonder how many such offences take place each year (no, I'm not talking about the absconding)? And I further wonder what percentage of the offenders are real British? And what percentage of the total population is British (real British)? I wouldn't mind betting there's one hell of a disproportion of such offences commited by immigrants.
If they prosecute me for saying that, my lawyer will demand the figures - and I already know from this post I worked out and created that more Muslims = more sex crimes:
Have you a daughter?
(A very early venture into writing on the net, as you may guess by my style of writing)
And we've already seen the figures for blacks and gang rape.
When you think about it though, that's not really relevant because every offence committed by an immigrant against a native Brit is an offence that wouldn't have occurred if the immigrant wasn't here. One more young woman whose life wouldn't from now on be troubled. Hammer attacks, gang rapes, nonce rapes (very young girls) Muslims and blacks - they are troubling aren't they. I notice that this sort of thing is extremely rare from Hindus, Sikhs, and Christian-Asian immigrants (my wife was one of those); and the Chinese keep their troubles amongst themselves - very rarely intruding in the lives of natives. Always muslims and blacks - and my guess is that they're mostly African blacks, not West Indians. Just a guess, I must admit; if you know better, please let me know. And the EU is currently in the process of importing a targetted 50 million more Africans.
Not white Rhodesians or white South Africans, I suspect. What do you reckon?
An increasingly weary of all this ...
Morg
.
... SURPRISED?
I wonder how many such offences take place each year (no, I'm not talking about the absconding)? And I further wonder what percentage of the offenders are real British? And what percentage of the total population is British (real British)? I wouldn't mind betting there's one hell of a disproportion of such offences commited by immigrants.
If they prosecute me for saying that, my lawyer will demand the figures - and I already know from this post I worked out and created that more Muslims = more sex crimes:
Have you a daughter?
(A very early venture into writing on the net, as you may guess by my style of writing)
And we've already seen the figures for blacks and gang rape.
When you think about it though, that's not really relevant because every offence committed by an immigrant against a native Brit is an offence that wouldn't have occurred if the immigrant wasn't here. One more young woman whose life wouldn't from now on be troubled. Hammer attacks, gang rapes, nonce rapes (very young girls) Muslims and blacks - they are troubling aren't they. I notice that this sort of thing is extremely rare from Hindus, Sikhs, and Christian-Asian immigrants (my wife was one of those); and the Chinese keep their troubles amongst themselves - very rarely intruding in the lives of natives. Always muslims and blacks - and my guess is that they're mostly African blacks, not West Indians. Just a guess, I must admit; if you know better, please let me know. And the EU is currently in the process of importing a targetted 50 million more Africans.
Not white Rhodesians or white South Africans, I suspect. What do you reckon?
An increasingly weary of all this ...
Morg
.
TONY WARD'S HAMMER ATTACKER CHARGES DROPPED - COULD THIS BE WHY?
.
The hammer-attacker was black.
Makes you wonder, doesn't it ...
No, not necessarily Scotland, the minister - but some unknown, and possibly illegal, clerk in the bowels of the Justice ministry. Think about it. She does seem to have developed a habit of hiring illegal immigrants.
Also the passport checkers at Heathrow - have a look how many are British next time you come through there. And I don't mean British on paper only - I mean REALLY British.
We've been stitched up like kippers. And we were told why and how by a Labour insider last weekend (see above post - "Tories are not exonerate").. He denies it now, of course .... but he would, wouldn't he.
Morg
.
The hammer-attacker was black.
Makes you wonder, doesn't it ...
No, not necessarily Scotland, the minister - but some unknown, and possibly illegal, clerk in the bowels of the Justice ministry. Think about it. She does seem to have developed a habit of hiring illegal immigrants.
Also the passport checkers at Heathrow - have a look how many are British next time you come through there. And I don't mean British on paper only - I mean REALLY British.
We've been stitched up like kippers. And we were told why and how by a Labour insider last weekend (see above post - "Tories are not exonerate").. He denies it now, of course .... but he would, wouldn't he.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)