ILLEGAL FINES BY MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL

Have you been illegally fined? Check it out.

Morg
.

WHY CAN'T I STOP LAUGHING?

HEAD RAG TAX

Counter Jihad:

Now watch the Mohammedan infil-traitors run amok and throw hissy fits:

The Dutch Freedom Party leader proposes creation of a new ‘Head Scarf Tax.” During a debate on the state budget on wednesday, Wilders proposed an  initial 1000 euro annual Head Scarf tax.

“Those who want to wear a hijab, must first get a permit,” said Wilders.
The Freedom Party leader called the tax a “Head Rag Tax” (kopvoddentax). “Should we get it introduced, we would finally get some money back from Islam,” he said.  “The Mosques, headscarves, and long Muslim dresses pollute the streets of Netherlands.”
At last something that makes sense!

Why can’t I stop laughing?

IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Authorities have been criticised for pursuing a case against two teenagers who were cleared of planning a bombing at their school in Greater Manchester.
A jury took 45 minutes to acquit Ross McKnight, 16, and Matthew Swift, 18, of planning to murder teachers and pupils at Audenshaw High School.

…

Asst Ch Con Terry Sweeney, of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), said senior officers and the CPS felt it was in the public interest to take the case to court.
"In this case the jury took the decision not to convict and we respect their decision," she said.
The head teacher of Audenshaw school, Stephen Turner, said he could not speculate on the decision taken by the CPS.
"Clearly the police investigated thoroughly and presented information to the CPS and that decision was taken by them and we respect that decision," said Mr Turner.
"Our experience of both of them was that they were perfectly normal, ordinary boys, clearly both of them achieved well at their exams."

Right, we’re all familiar with this story having heard a great deal about it over the past week or so. I want to focus on a small part of the above report:

 … senior officers and the CPS felt it was in the public interest to take the case to court.

In what way was it in the public interest to lock these two boys up for the last six months – one in youth custody, the other in Strangeways prison? To spend all that money prosecuting? Only for the jury to acquit in 45 minutes (The equivalent of a jury saying “stop wasting our time on nonsense”)

So they had held conversations on the internet and let their imaginations run away with them? Good lordy lordy, by that standard my brother and I must be lined up for execution a la Menendez if anyone’s been monitoring our internet conversations …

“In the public interest” is an interesting phrase. You are not the public referred to, and neither am I. It’s some amorphous thing that represents no more than their own wishes when they can’t think of a decent excuse for those wishes. Why are we importing millions of foreigners? Because it’s “in the public interest”. Why aren’t you prosecuting that man who took a hammer to Tony Ward’s head? Because it’s “in the public interest”. Why did you put these two over-imaginative boys through that ordeal? Because it’s “in the public interest”. Why aren’t you thoroughly investigating the lead-up to the Iraq war? Because that wouldn’t be “in the public interest”. What they mean when they use that phrase is their own interests. So what is “the public interest” in prosecuting these two boys?

Well, we know that not all Muslims are terrorists but, certainly in this country, all terrorists are Muslims. Be nice for officialdom if it could turn around and say “ … but look at those two teenagers – that was terrorism. So you see, there’s nothing particularly risky about letting Muslims in because white British people are doing it too”.

And that’s why those two boys spent six months under lock and key, and were then put on trial on charges that would have ruined their entire lives if found guilty. Who cares – they’re only white trash anyway, not like our good decent PEACEFUL  Labour-voting  Muslim incomers.

Morg
.

A MOTLEY MEETING OF FASCISTS

I watched part of the TUC conference on television today where they spent most of the morning attacking our Party. A strange priority for a union meeting I think.

I WAS PLEASED to see their concern about our Party. It shows how much we must be worrying them, and that they can see the threat to their well funded cabal posed by us. They would not have discussed us in such detail 5 years ago.

I WAS ANNOYED by many of the delegates speaking in foreign accents who had the gall to try and dictate which party British workers could join.


I WAS SHOCKED by their condemnation of the slogan "British Jobs For Brotish Workers" when in the past that was the main function of unions.


I WAS AMAZED that these people still blame us for violence and hooliganism when it all comes from their side, as shown by the plea from one delegate for help to disrupt our conference.

I WAS ASTONISHED at their claim to be fighting Fascism by advocating a Fascist method of denying our Party a platform and our members the right to work.

I WAS REASSURED by the low calibre of the delegates and the fact that we could beat any one of them in an argument (that is why they will not debate with us).

I WAS OVERJOYED by the worry of the NUJ delegate about the loss of jobs of these liars. Perhaps if they were more truthful they would sell more papers. Nobody believes them any more.

I WAS AMUSED by their faith that the Labour Government has time to destroy us before being kicked out and their belief that they have the support of most workers.

I WAS INVIGORATED in my determination to fight these dinosaurs (politically, not with claw hammers).

and I WAS REASSURED that these sheep knew so little of our plans.

We are better than them and they can huff and puff as much as they like but we will retake our country.
They are the past and we are the future AND I THINK SOME OF THEM KNOW IT!

How far the Trades Union Movement has sunk!

WE ALWAYS GET THE BLAME

The recent disturbances in Birmingham and also in Harrow show the frustration of people at the continual islamification of our country which is taking place.
Of course the BNP have been brought into it and UAF have stuck their provocative noses in with their banners blaming us as of course has the media.


We have nothing to do with these disturbances but the muslims and the reds blame us in spite of our Party disowning the British protestors. It is said that their protests were provocative.
Much as I condemn the action of the protestors it was a peaceful demonstration until the muslims and UAF kicked off.
The islamification of Britain is provocative to British people. Where can we make our concerns noted if not in the areas affected?


Significant is the violence shown to the protestors who only seek to voice an opinion.
We, as a party seek to save our country by democratic means through the ballot box, but yet the government tries to destroy us by any means they can find.


The disquiet at our being displaced in our own country will not go away in the unlikely case that we are banned. It will only fester and severe violence will ensue. The will of the people will prevail but we want to do it peacefully and democratically.
The fact that we are dragged into this shows the State fears us more than the demonstrators and that the democratic way is more effective.

However if our rights are taken away we would have nothing to lose and the gloves would be off.

Destroy our party and there will be civil war.We don't want it and always avoid conflict but whatever they do we WILL defend our people and country.

The government say they are going to have a programme to show white working class people that they are not being discriminated against in jobs and housing. So it seems it takes a riot to make them listen.


Once again they use the wrong tactics, persecute those who campaign democratically and reward violence (a bit like the criminal law where the innocent have fewer rights than the criminals.
This to me seems a dangerous course of action and a powder keg is being created.

How do they justify then all ethnic employment policies?
Today in Burnley I was shown a brochure by a firm called "Plumlife" which is putting subsidised 4 and 5 bedroom houses up all with muslim toilets.obviously not for Brits.


Is this not discrimination? On the brochure was featured an Asian family.
So much for equality!

So there you have it, we are blamed when we have nothing to do with it. We can't win against this media bias but in the end WE WILL TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK, hopefully by peaceful means but take it we will.

BIG DEAL IN HOUSING PROVISION NOT.

Good news. Wigan Metro is building 14 council houses much to the delight of "Lord" Smith, at a cost of £128000 each. Some of this is funded by the government and some by the Metro. BIG DEAL!



When I was chairman of housing on Billinge UDC we had 602 council housed for a population of less than ten thousand. So 14 houses in 20 years for 380 thousand people in the Wigan Metro area is nothing.


Why, when we are supposedly richer than we were in the Fifties are we able to only build such a paltry amount when there is so much local need?. 50 years ago each little UDC built far more than 14 houses each year.


There is a large waiting list made much worse by the huge numbers of immigrants secretly housed in the area. If these uninvited people were not here we would not be so short of houses.


The policy of not building council houses was brought in by the Tories and has been continued under new Labour while both parties have allowed a massive increase in immigrant numbers and given them priority over locals whose families have been paying into the system for years.



The price of these houses is extraordinary at £128,000. Presumably the council own the land and a good house can be built a lot cheaper.
But who are these houses for. Will they be for large muslim families and will the toilets have to face Mecca (or away I'm not quite sure)


I'll bet Wiganers will not get any priority in spite of having to pay a portion of the cost through council taxes.



If they got rid of the dead wood in the Metro (that's people like you Elliot and you Lord Smith) and the uninvited immigrants they would be able to afford to house Wiganers decently. Lord Smith's allowances for 2 years would pay for one house so you can see the problem.
The combined allowances for Councillors would have paid for 8 of these overpriced house each year.

Tory and Labour governments and councils are respnsible for this shambles and it just indicates how far we as a country have fallen.

A QUESTION OF PRIORITIES

An indication of the Governments and MPs concern about the troops in Afganistan is shown below, taken from "Private Eye" You will note the composition of troops seen by the MPs in the effort to demonstrate "diversity".
These ethnic minorities and women have to do extra duties to demonstrate that worthy cause.



Also note Bill Rammell playing with an expensive toy in his safe playpen Camp Bastion while less secure vehicles are used in active combat.
What takes the biscuit in this foreign foray is the anger of the MPs at being delayed by the need to transport wounded soldiers. Do these army people not realise how important it is to get these valuable people back to their taxpayer funded second homes.



Soldiers are expendable, just cannon fodder but MPs must not be delayed. They have important work to do in the bars of the Houses of Parliament and it was really asking too much to ask them to interrupt their busy rounds of junketing to go to Afganistan.


The esteem in which the government holds our soldiers is shown by the MoDs sending a bill of £395 to the Army Benevolent Fund for a licence and two hours use of a lawn.


Of course in these times of recession costs have to be kept to a minimum and after bank bail outs, bankers bonuses, second homes, moat cleaning, duck houses, porn videos there is little to spare.


Tough choices must be made and it seems the army is being made to take them.