NICK ON THE ANDREW MARR SHOW

Nick Griffin's first interview on the Andrew Marr show was excellent.
Nick answered the questions easily and refuted many of the lies which are endlessly repeated in the media. He was more than a match for Marr as he is for any interviewer. You can not get behind a man who speaks the truth, a rarety among politicians.

Nick's answers were slick and a bit hurried but accurate. We only found the answer later.
I watch the Andrew Marr show every Sunday and enjoy the newspaper reviews. This time they seemed to go on endlessly discussing important topics such as Michael Jackson, lasting twice as long as usual.
It was only this afternoon I found out why.

The BBC felt bound to give Nick a platform but did not want it to last too long which would have enabled him to state more of our policies which would have resonated with viewers and gained us support.
Thus the BBC adhered to its word in name but shortened it to reduce its impact.
Nevertheless the interview will enrage the thugs of the far left. It was worth it just for that.
More importantly it will have shown Nick as an intelligent man of integrity and will have gained us many friends in spite of the shortness of the interview.

For those who missed it the link is below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvtqk2E_LwE

JUDGE A MAN BY HIS FRIENDS

The picture of Gordon Brown shaking hands with Colonel Gadaffi, a man formerly labelled by the British Government as supporting terrorism shows what a hypocrit Brown is. makes you feel like throwing up, doesn't it?

Remember Gadaffi was implicated in the murder of PC Yvonne Fletcher in London in the Eighties and also the Lockerbie bombings.
Brown's other "friends" include IRA terrorists Gerry Adams and Martin Mc Guinness as well as the ruler of China who imposes his will on innocent Tibetans.

It seems he will shake hands and talk with anyone however evil with one exception--an elected member of the BNP.

Labour Tories etc will not even speak to BNP elected members. Not very democratic is it? Do our votes not count ? The people we elected have a right and duty to represent our views.
Why is this denied?

It shows how far the governing classes have strayed from democratic principles when they refuse to debate with us. They MUST be hiding something. They speak to tyrants and murderers.

But then they, the two main parties are complicit in the murder of innocent Iraqis and Afgans as well as our soldiers involved in this illegal war. They then villify us for saying we don't want people displaced by their warlike actions coming here as we are full up, and will not speak to us.

They are no better than the Mafia with their "Omerta" code of silence.
Wealthy controlling murderers controlling our land.
We are out to expose them and bring them to justice, AND THAT IS WHAT THEY FEAR.
AND--

WE WILL. THEY WILL NEVER STOP US.
WE WILL PREVAIL.

ASHTON-IN-MAKERFIELD COUNCILLOR NIGEL ASH SPITS HIS DUMMY OUT

"Not in my name"
Cllr. Nigel Ash


It seems that this local councillor for Ashton-in-Makerfield has a real bee in his bonnet when it comes to the British National Party.

I stumbled across his blog just after the European elections when he was throwing a real strop with the return of two British National Party MEP's. After chucking away his rattle and spitting out his dummy he wrote "not in my name" they're not! (Check out his earlier posts.)

Well he's posted another spat at the British National Party with his latest post on his lame Blog.

It is quite obvious that this chap is a strong supporter of the hammer wielding fascist criminals at HopeNotHate.

Why not pop over to his blog http://nigelash.blogspot.com/ and have a look at what he has to say!

NORTH WEST REGIONAL MEETING IN WIGAN

Officials and members from the NW region gathered last night for the first organisers meeting since the Euro Elections. The mood was of course boyant especially when our Chairman Nick Griffin walked in. I was surprised to see him.

How he does it I do not know, in Brussels in the morning and at our meeting in Wigan in the evening. He has tremendous energy and it shows his devotion to our region that he managed to make the meeting.

The picture below was taken from Martin Wingfield's blog (sorry Martin) and it shows a small section of those present with not everybody being able to find room at the large circle of tables round the room. Nick explained some of his experiences in Brussels and this was followed by the appointment of new officers for the party (including my wife) who was appointed as NW regional fundholder.
This meant that I had to take a back seat while she sat at the main table. I hope she will talk to me in future.

Seriously I think she will be good after a few lessons of what is expected, as she is a stickler for detail.
Organisers were appointed for new areas as we still have areas which are not adequately covered.

Arrangements were made for closer co operation between groups and branches as we are now in a much larger league and we have to move fast to catch up.

We have great plans for the General Election and candidates are being sought and picked.
The other parties will not know what has hit them come the election.
The meeting lasted 3 hours including a short break and many continued discussing details until nearly midnight.

What a difference a couple of years makes when a small back room in a pub would have been sufficient, we really are growing fast, much of it due to Clive Jefferson whose dedication and push as helped us so much, in spite of the worst that our enemies can throw at us.

These get togethers always leave me elated. It's nice to keep in touch with old friends, exchange experiences and become motivated to overcome the hurdles the undemocratic antics of those against us.

WE ARE GOING PLACES!

MORE USELESS SPIN FROM LABOUR

I see our illustrious Andy Burnham and McCartney are involved in a homeless initiative in Wigan to tackle these issues in Wigan.

They say they will work with "Asylum seekers, travellers, Eastern European migrants and drug users" and advise them on health issues and drug abuse.
Once again they get the wrong end of the stick, perhaps why their policies have been so disastrous in the past.

First of all there is no such person as an asylum seeker as they have all travelled over several safe countries to get here, and are bound by the Geneva Convention to remain in the first safe country they get to.
Secondly "Travellers" are by defintition are on the move, hence the name and should thus have their own travelling accomodation. They are certainly not Wigan's problem.

Eastern European migrants are the same. Why should Wiganers sleep on the street while they live in houses.
Druggies are a product of inadequate policing and penalties for pushers and should be taken in for "Cold Turkey".

Hundreds of decent Wiganers, hard working taxpayers can not get accomodation because of marital breakup and draconian laws.
Our duty as a community should give priority in housing to these our brothers.
The others have nothing to do with us and should not have priority while one genuine Wiganer is homeless.

One matter these paragons of virtue our MPs do not mention, houses. They talk about "health" and "alcoholism" and "drugs".
What good is that if there are no houses?

TYPICAL LABOUR, ALL TALK AND NO MEANINGFUL ACTION but no doubt great expense. Put the money into social housing and less on "initiatives"

But then there would be enough houses in the town if all these people who do not belong were not here.

We are encouraged to welcome these outsiders EVEN WHEN OUR OWN CAN NOT GET HOUSES.

TYPICAL LABOUR BETRAYAL OF ITS CORE SUPPORTERS.

WE'LL SEE YOU AT ELECTION TIME!

NO PASARAN - "NONE SHALL PASS"

Just saying the words isn't enough, is it Red. It didn't work in Spain, and it's not working now.

You take our Chairman to court twice on the same charges - we chop an arm off (pull in more voters); You attack one of our activists with hammers - we take the other arm off (pull in more voters - it's not a coincidence that Wigan produced more BNP votes than any other town or city in the Northwest. Even Lowles describes it as "an unmitigated disaster"); you throw eggs at our Chairman, by now an elected MEP - we chop one of your legs off (pull in yet more support, even a little from the media). Before you know it Red we'll have the other leg too.

What are you going to do then Red - threaten to bite our legs off as we progress on to Downing Street, leaving you behind?

Look, you may be effective up against huge clumsy monolithic organisations (or not?), but when you come up against a sharp and flexible operator like the BNP you're thoroughly outclassed.

Every time you come up against us, we pass you, and we'll keep on doing so all the way to government. Perhaps you ought to change your name from the UAF to The Black Knight.

Morg
.

THE FUNCTION OF THE MONARCH

Not really local but I'm waxing philosophical this afternoon.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE MONARCHY?

Now I am a monarchist, partially because I was brought up to be one but having considered the alternatives I still think it is the preferred method of having a Head of State. It is also a link with tradition and makes millions in tourist money.

Of course that does not include any of the hangers on who are not in a direct line to the throne. They should get a job, as befitting their talents, so not much cost there then.

BUT,
Consider the alternatives.

Tony Blair as President, or Gordon Brown or Cameron or any other politician on the make.

Our Queen is above politics, basically she rubber stamps laws made by the incompetents in Parliament, as is her function as a constitutional monarch.

BUT SHE IS OUR SOVEREIGN.

She embodies the people of our country and its sovereignty or independence.

SO SHE SHOULD PROTECT US and refuse to sign any laws which bring us closer to being dominated by the EU which diminish our independence or sovereignty.

It could be argued that as a constitutional monarch she has no power--but she has.
If she did not sign these laws would not pass.
Would she sign a law abolishing the monarchy? I doubt it.

She would do more for the monarchy if she refused to sign any law which brought closer union with the EU, and publicised the reasons why.
She would win the gratitude of the majority of the British people and assert her true role in protecting our rights.

That's my opinion. What do you think?