You must all be aware of the fuss over Geert Wilders.
Strange isn't it: the Government claims that because of European Union rules it can't exclude Latvian farm workers, Italian, Portuguese or Polish construction workers, Romanian Pikey pickpockets etc from the UK. It cannot deport Albanian pimps or assorted murderers and rapists.
However, along comes a squeaky clean Dutch elected member of parliament who says things the Mohammedans and multi-cultis don't like, and all of a sudden ... no sweat.
Morg
.
Thursday, 12 February 2009
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
THE CHURCH HAS LOST ITS WAY
News in today that the Church of England is to ban clergy from being members of the BNP.
Not much Christian charity there then, although the ban does not stop clergy voting for us.
In their anxiety to be inclusive and accomodating to everybody they have lost sight of what they exist to do, namely promote Christianity.
While membership of the BNP is prohibited, homosexual clergy are tolerated. The Archbishop of Canterbury advocates Sharia Law and C of E schools have separate muslim assemblies.
The church has lost all meaning and purpose. No wonder the churches are becoming increasingly empty and many are closing and turned into mosques when their elderly congregations die.
Muslims stick to their faith and do not dilute it to suit modern society.
The Church of England should do the same if it still believes in Christianity which sometimes I doubt.
We of the BNP should not worry too much about this as the C of E has become an irrelevance and nobody takes much notice of what it says.
An indication of what it should be fighting against (taken from Simon Darby's blog), the beliefs of "The Religion of Peace".
Good news however, we are getting much more publicity in the media and even Prescott and Balls are worried about our progress. They talk about us far more than they do about the Lib Dems.
We are getting there!
Not much Christian charity there then, although the ban does not stop clergy voting for us.
In their anxiety to be inclusive and accomodating to everybody they have lost sight of what they exist to do, namely promote Christianity.
While membership of the BNP is prohibited, homosexual clergy are tolerated. The Archbishop of Canterbury advocates Sharia Law and C of E schools have separate muslim assemblies.
The church has lost all meaning and purpose. No wonder the churches are becoming increasingly empty and many are closing and turned into mosques when their elderly congregations die.
Muslims stick to their faith and do not dilute it to suit modern society.
The Church of England should do the same if it still believes in Christianity which sometimes I doubt.
We of the BNP should not worry too much about this as the C of E has become an irrelevance and nobody takes much notice of what it says.
An indication of what it should be fighting against (taken from Simon Darby's blog), the beliefs of "The Religion of Peace".
Good news however, we are getting much more publicity in the media and even Prescott and Balls are worried about our progress. They talk about us far more than they do about the Lib Dems.
We are getting there!
ENTRY POLICY AT OUR BORDERS
Last week a film-showing of the film "Fitna" was cancelled in the House of Lords after that repulsive Mohammedan Lewd Achmed threatened to blockade Parliament with 10,000 angry Mohammedans if the showing went ahead.
Later, the members of the House seemed to come to their senses about what they had just submitted to (threat of violence by aliens), and again made arrangements to show the film and a speech from its producer, Geert Wilders.
Now read this (not long):
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2009/02/breaking-wilders-not-allowed-into-uk.html
So, not just the House of Lords (temporarily), but the government itself seems to have submitted to Mohammedan threat of violence, and submitted its (OUR) border admission policies to Mohammedan veto.
WRITE TO TURNER, BURNHAM, AND THE REPULSIVE LITTLE SCOTCH GIT.
UPDATE:
This afternoon Mr. Wilders received a letter from the British ambassador to the Netherlands saying that he is a “persona non grata” in the United Kingdom. The ambassador told Mr. Wilders that he is a threat to public security and public harmony because of the controversy created by Fitna. Mr. Wilders intends to go to London anyway. “Let them arrest me in Heathrow,” he says.
If Mr. Wilders is denied entry to the United Kingdom, it will be the first time that Britain refuses entry to an elected politician from another member state of the European Union. The Dutch government has protested to the British government over the unprecedented barring of an EU parliamentarian by another EU country.
The meeting of Mr. Wilders and members of the British Parliament had originally been planned for 29 January, but was postponed. Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Muslim member of the House of Lords (Labour), had threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the British Parliament. Lord Ahmed boasted in the Pakistani press that the cancellation of Mr. Wilders’ visit was “a victory for the Muslim community.”
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3793
That'll be the doing of that little worm Milliband.
Morg
.
Later, the members of the House seemed to come to their senses about what they had just submitted to (threat of violence by aliens), and again made arrangements to show the film and a speech from its producer, Geert Wilders.
Now read this (not long):
http://kleinverzet.blogspot.com/2009/02/breaking-wilders-not-allowed-into-uk.html
So, not just the House of Lords (temporarily), but the government itself seems to have submitted to Mohammedan threat of violence, and submitted its (OUR) border admission policies to Mohammedan veto.
WRITE TO TURNER, BURNHAM, AND THE REPULSIVE LITTLE SCOTCH GIT.
UPDATE:
This afternoon Mr. Wilders received a letter from the British ambassador to the Netherlands saying that he is a “persona non grata” in the United Kingdom. The ambassador told Mr. Wilders that he is a threat to public security and public harmony because of the controversy created by Fitna. Mr. Wilders intends to go to London anyway. “Let them arrest me in Heathrow,” he says.
If Mr. Wilders is denied entry to the United Kingdom, it will be the first time that Britain refuses entry to an elected politician from another member state of the European Union. The Dutch government has protested to the British government over the unprecedented barring of an EU parliamentarian by another EU country.
The meeting of Mr. Wilders and members of the British Parliament had originally been planned for 29 January, but was postponed. Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Muslim member of the House of Lords (Labour), had threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the British Parliament. Lord Ahmed boasted in the Pakistani press that the cancellation of Mr. Wilders’ visit was “a victory for the Muslim community.”
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3793
That'll be the doing of that little worm Milliband.
Morg
.
Monday, 9 February 2009
GOLLIWOGS AND RACISM
" For the past four decades Europeans have debated whether the Golliwog is a lovable icon or a racist symbol. …
In this climate the Golliwog doll and other Golliwog emblems were seen as symbols of racial insensitivity. Many books containing Golliwogs were withdrawn from public libraries, and the manufacturing of Golliwog dolls dwindled as the demand for Golliwogs decreased. Many items with Golliwog images were destroyed. Despite much criticism, James Robertson & Sons did not discontinue its use of the Golliwog as a mascot. …
The claim that Golliwogs are racist is supported by literary depictions by writers such as Enid Blyton. Unlike Florence Upton's, Blyton's Golliwogs were often rude, mischievous, elfin villains. In Blyton's book, "Here Comes Noddy Again", a Golliwog asks the hero for help, then steals his car. … [ hahahahahahahaha … sorry, couldn’t help myself; generations ahead of her time. Does this make her a Prophet, may she rest in peace ... ?] … Blyton, one of the most prolific European writers, included the Golliwogs in many stories, but she only wrote three books primarily about Golliwogs: The Three Golliwogs (1944), The Proud Golliwog (1951), and The Golliwog Grumbled (1953). Her depictions of Golliwogs are, by contemporary standards, racially insensitive. An excerpt from The Three Golliwogs is illustrative:
‘Once the three bold Golliwogs, Golly, Woggie, and Nigger, decided to go for a walk to Bumble-Bee Common. Golly wasn't quite ready so Woggie and Nigger said they would start off without him, and Golly would catch them up as soon as he could. So off went Woggie and Nigger, arm-in-arm, singing merrily their favourite song - which, as you may guess, was Ten Little Nigger Boys.’
… The Three Golliwogs was reprinted as recently as 1968, and it still contained the above passage. Ten Little Niggers was also the name of a 1939 Agatha Christie novel, whose cover showed a Golliwog lynched, hanging from a noose. "
Why not go over and read it all:
http://www.golliwogg.co.uk/racism.htm
There are some more interesting pages on this site, including a shop, accessed via links on the L/H sidebar.
Morg
Note: Sometimes on the internet I use the name Taffiwog. No, I don’t think this is at all offensive. Is there such a thing as a Paddywog, or a Jockiwog? Are you all Wiggiwogs?
... I was only wondering is all.
Is it criminal to have a sense of humour these days, or is it only considered humour when you are a fully paid-up repulsively obese member of the politically correct brigade suggesting, in front of an audience of millions on the BBC, that people send "poo" through the post to BNP members?
At least we know who ate all the pies.
.
In this climate the Golliwog doll and other Golliwog emblems were seen as symbols of racial insensitivity. Many books containing Golliwogs were withdrawn from public libraries, and the manufacturing of Golliwog dolls dwindled as the demand for Golliwogs decreased. Many items with Golliwog images were destroyed. Despite much criticism, James Robertson & Sons did not discontinue its use of the Golliwog as a mascot. …
The claim that Golliwogs are racist is supported by literary depictions by writers such as Enid Blyton. Unlike Florence Upton's, Blyton's Golliwogs were often rude, mischievous, elfin villains. In Blyton's book, "Here Comes Noddy Again", a Golliwog asks the hero for help, then steals his car. … [ hahahahahahahaha … sorry, couldn’t help myself; generations ahead of her time. Does this make her a Prophet, may she rest in peace ... ?] … Blyton, one of the most prolific European writers, included the Golliwogs in many stories, but she only wrote three books primarily about Golliwogs: The Three Golliwogs (1944), The Proud Golliwog (1951), and The Golliwog Grumbled (1953). Her depictions of Golliwogs are, by contemporary standards, racially insensitive. An excerpt from The Three Golliwogs is illustrative:
‘Once the three bold Golliwogs, Golly, Woggie, and Nigger, decided to go for a walk to Bumble-Bee Common. Golly wasn't quite ready so Woggie and Nigger said they would start off without him, and Golly would catch them up as soon as he could. So off went Woggie and Nigger, arm-in-arm, singing merrily their favourite song - which, as you may guess, was Ten Little Nigger Boys.’
… The Three Golliwogs was reprinted as recently as 1968, and it still contained the above passage. Ten Little Niggers was also the name of a 1939 Agatha Christie novel, whose cover showed a Golliwog lynched, hanging from a noose. "
Why not go over and read it all:
http://www.golliwogg.co.uk/racism.htm
There are some more interesting pages on this site, including a shop, accessed via links on the L/H sidebar.
Morg
Note: Sometimes on the internet I use the name Taffiwog. No, I don’t think this is at all offensive. Is there such a thing as a Paddywog, or a Jockiwog? Are you all Wiggiwogs?
... I was only wondering is all.
Is it criminal to have a sense of humour these days, or is it only considered humour when you are a fully paid-up repulsively obese member of the politically correct brigade suggesting, in front of an audience of millions on the BBC, that people send "poo" through the post to BNP members?
At least we know who ate all the pies.
.
Friday, 6 February 2009
SUCCESS IN LEIGH AND HYDE
Our Wigan and Leigh group held another successful meeting last night in Leigh.
The meeting was opened by Gary Chadwick followed by the break with hot pot provided by the landlord after which I gave a talk on the lines of "Where We Stand" basically to explain our policies to new attendees and counter the falsehoods spread by the media. This was followed by a question and answer session.
Judging by the reception of the audience and its size, it seems that Leigh is a fertile area for our party and we will seek to expand there in the coming months.
I can understand people who do not know us being influenced by our many enemies in the media and I tried to redress this. I remember being somewhat nervous at attending my first meeting and being very favourably impressed by the members and the moderation of the Party's policies.
The three main parties are united in their opposition to us in spite of being nominally opposed to each other. Their onslaught against us over the last weeks in Hyde showed that there is no difference between them, and they want to preserve their cosy consensus and policies which have led to our financial and social disaster.
They must have had a limited effect and boosted the Labour vote at the expense of the Tories, Lib Dems, Greens and most of all UKIP who only got 33 votes as against our 889.
In spite of their efforts we boosted our share by 2% to nearly 30%,coming second and with more votes than the combined votes of the other four non Labour parties.
WELL DONE HYDE!
Our party, a small party derided as having no future or "no place" in British politics seems to be causing them much concern. The threat of our advance was mentioned on Question Time, This Week and today on Channel 2.
WE REALLY DO PUNCH ABOVE OUR WEIGHT!
Sunday, 1 February 2009
HYPOCRITES
The union bosses claim that the BNP has highjacked the protests at refineries and power stations round Britain. They claim they act in the interests of their members and British workers.
HYPOCRITES.
The link below shows that they were actively encouraging foreign workers to come here and helping them with language lessons.
They must have known that these workers would compete directly with their own members and a looming recession would make jobs harder to find.
If they did not see the danger of unemployment for their members they must be thick. I don't think they are. I think they are bent on the destruction of Britain, in other words traitors who betrayed the members whose union contributions keep them in the lap of luxury.
http://www.amicustheunion.org/Default.aspx?page=9695
We have not hijacked anything, nor joined a bandwagon. We forecast this trouble years ago but were called extremists for saying so. We forecast a depression years ago.
The unions didn't.
The Government didn't,
The Tories didn't,
And sad to say "You aint seen nothing yet".
Although in these hard times it seems wrong to say "We told you so", it will perhaps show that we have better answers than the others.
PEOPLE OF WIGAN
"Concerns about the REC [Racial Equality Council] first came to light in September of last year when Stoke Council, which has 9 BNP councillors, raised the matter of the lack of audited accounts. It was the BNP’s councillor group leader Alby Walker who initially pressed for an investigation into the affair.
A team of officers examined the REC’s books and earlier this month the council told the trustees that the charity would not be able to continue.
The REC’s senior officer, director Vince Simpson, was apparently unavailable for comment. "
In Stoke, the cleanup started when they elected nine BNP councillors.
Want to start a cleanup of this borough? Want to know exactly what goes on? Want people in there digging away to find out where the money goes and what is done with it when it gets there? If you want change ...
Then you know exactly what to do.
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/02/racial-equality-council-collapses-leaving-4-million-of-public-money-missing/
Morg
.
A team of officers examined the REC’s books and earlier this month the council told the trustees that the charity would not be able to continue.
The REC’s senior officer, director Vince Simpson, was apparently unavailable for comment. "
In Stoke, the cleanup started when they elected nine BNP councillors.
Want to start a cleanup of this borough? Want to know exactly what goes on? Want people in there digging away to find out where the money goes and what is done with it when it gets there? If you want change ...
Then you know exactly what to do.
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/02/racial-equality-council-collapses-leaving-4-million-of-public-money-missing/
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)