In these times of severe economic hardship, with much worse to come, there are hundreds of thousands of people in our country who have to choose between eating or heating. Many of these people are our pensioners, amongst whom the death rate soars in cold weather.
What could we do if we had an extra £1.073 BILLION per week to put towards helping out our people in this difficult eat or heat situation? Where would we get this massive amount of extra money? That £1.073 billion PER WEEK is the cost of our membership of the European Union. I think I can leave you to work through your own logic calculations about our EU membership.
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2009/1/11/4053717.html
Let's take a look at the "heat" part of the calculation. How is the European Union helping us out with that? Well, it isn't ... and it's planning on making things a lot worse. Have a read (ripe language warning for the more sensitive amongst us):
http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2009/01/eure-gas.html
All of these difficulties are, of course, exarcerbated by current (and upcoming) economic problems. What do Brown and Darling have in the pipeline for us? Have another read - and language warnings are pretty standard for that blog:
http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2009/01/wheel-out-photocopiers-darling.html
Coming soon, a la Weimar and Scumbage's Rhodesia: 1 billion pound /1 Australian dollar.
I wish I had better news to tell you. And here's a little something to throw into the Global Warming debate:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/012278.html
The owner of that blog is not a nationalist, but he does have a friendly inclination towards the British Nationalist Party.
And here's a final word (for this post) on the Global Warming debate. Anyone remember back to the 1970s when the great climate fear was a new Ice Age? The world has a history of 100,000 year ice ages interspersed with 12,000 year warm periods. The current warm period is well over 12,000 years old, so historically, we're due an ice age. What do you think an ice age is? Well, to give you a hint: if you are reading this from anywhere in Britain, then where you are sitting right now was under an ice layer at least a mile deep. Global warming Britain can survive - indeed, we'd be able to produce much more food if our climate was a few degrees warmer ... but an ice age will be the death of Britain and the rest of northern Europe, northern Russia, all of Canada and a big part of the U.S.A. Warming isn't a worry, cooling is. Read it all
http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/106922-0/
Just being my usual cheerful little self. Sweet dreams.
Morg
.
Monday, 12 January 2009
PRINCE HARRY'S "OFFENSIVE" COMMENTS
Yes, although Prince Harry was joking and larking about in his PRIVATE home video he did make an offensive comment.
In his mock phone call to his Grandma the Queen he ended by saying "God save you".
In former years this would have meant the block for treason but even though in jest there was a hint of mockery at our national anthem.
I am a lukewarm royalist (I would be more supportive of the monarchy if the Queen refused to sign away our British rights to Europe),but this is not mockery of his grandma. It mocks the National Anthem which to me represents our country AND IT'S PEOPLE and thus should not be mocked while it is in use.
I would prefer "I Vow To Thee My Country" but as yet this is not our anthem and we should show respect to the existing one.
All the hoo ha has been about calling in a friendly way a person from Pakistan my "Paki friend", note the last word friend.
These people seem to go about being offended about so many things, English people are afraid to speak in case they are prosecuted.
They should stop being offended. We in our party are often been called offensive names but that seems OK. Only Afro Asians and "gays" must not be offended.
I would like to say WHAT OFFENDS ME--
THE TAKING OVER OF MY COUNTRY BY FOREIGNERS WITHOUT OUR CONSENT.
These people who dislike our way of life are quick to take advantage of it by claiming houses, benefits and suing anyone who "offends" them under the anti British race laws
They are not offended enough to return to or remain in their own countries where they will be shielded from this "offending speech".
NOBODY ASKS WHAT OFFENDS US, well I'm getting sick of it.
What offends you?
In his mock phone call to his Grandma the Queen he ended by saying "God save you".
In former years this would have meant the block for treason but even though in jest there was a hint of mockery at our national anthem.
I am a lukewarm royalist (I would be more supportive of the monarchy if the Queen refused to sign away our British rights to Europe),but this is not mockery of his grandma. It mocks the National Anthem which to me represents our country AND IT'S PEOPLE and thus should not be mocked while it is in use.
I would prefer "I Vow To Thee My Country" but as yet this is not our anthem and we should show respect to the existing one.
All the hoo ha has been about calling in a friendly way a person from Pakistan my "Paki friend", note the last word friend.
These people seem to go about being offended about so many things, English people are afraid to speak in case they are prosecuted.
They should stop being offended. We in our party are often been called offensive names but that seems OK. Only Afro Asians and "gays" must not be offended.
I would like to say WHAT OFFENDS ME--
THE TAKING OVER OF MY COUNTRY BY FOREIGNERS WITHOUT OUR CONSENT.
These people who dislike our way of life are quick to take advantage of it by claiming houses, benefits and suing anyone who "offends" them under the anti British race laws
They are not offended enough to return to or remain in their own countries where they will be shielded from this "offending speech".
NOBODY ASKS WHAT OFFENDS US, well I'm getting sick of it.
What offends you?
NEW HEADER
I'm trying to improve the look of our blog and make it more user friendly but as an oldie have not mastered all the tricks available.
I await my grand daughters expertise in this.
The header is of a pit wheel which I have in my yard which I thinks represents the people of Wigan and respects the toil and often death of our forebears who bequeathed our town to US.
It is not a big wheel, only 6 foot in diameter but was used on the headgear of a small local pit 100 years ago and latterly at Windy Arbour Colliery. It was I believe originally in the headgear of "Low Brooks Colliery" about which a book was written under the title "The Unfortunate Pit" in view of the many deaths from explosions underground.
I painted the colours in black and gold to represent the wealth (for some) gained from Wigan's famous coal industry (and my sadness at its demise) and my pride in what the working men of Wigan achieved.
I await my grand daughters expertise in this.
The header is of a pit wheel which I have in my yard which I thinks represents the people of Wigan and respects the toil and often death of our forebears who bequeathed our town to US.
It is not a big wheel, only 6 foot in diameter but was used on the headgear of a small local pit 100 years ago and latterly at Windy Arbour Colliery. It was I believe originally in the headgear of "Low Brooks Colliery" about which a book was written under the title "The Unfortunate Pit" in view of the many deaths from explosions underground.
I painted the colours in black and gold to represent the wealth (for some) gained from Wigan's famous coal industry (and my sadness at its demise) and my pride in what the working men of Wigan achieved.
Thursday, 8 January 2009
WIGAN IGNORED
So Gordon Brown visits the North West at great cost to find out what concerns people of our region. He took questions from "a selected audience" and gave his usual anodyne answers to the planted questions.
Note the audience and thus the questions were "selected". Hardly an opportunity for him to meet real people and hear or answer their questions. He wouldn't dare.
He brought other cabinet ministers who fanned out over South Lancashire (the real original Lancashire) to see and talk to other selected people.
Studying a map of these visits reminded me of a Polo mint with a big hole in the middle.
Liverpool, Manchester, Warrington, Bury, Bolton and Leyland. The large central area which included Wigan and Leigh was left out, this in spite of Leigh being the constituency of Andy Burnham.
Why was this? Could it be because this central area has the safest Labour seats and they can be safely ignored? Or are we not "diverse" enough to warrant any encouragement?
We have become used to being ignored and our road system is among the worst in the country. A third of a million people seemingly do not count. However judging by their financial incompetence and inability to avoid disaster it will make no difference but it shows the low regard this area is shown by these "top people"
WE DESERVE BETTER! We were at the heart of Britains industrial revolution and wealth which our forefathers toiled and sometimes died to create.
It is up to us to upset this complacency and promote our policies which would breath new life into our area and this we are determined to do.
We believe in our area and its people because we are of it and them.
We will not use the people of this area as a milch cow to give us a cushy job followed by well paid "industrial consultancies" gained by not what you know but who.
We stand for and with the people, OUR PEOPLE! and will promote THEIR INTERESTS ABOVE ALL ELSE!
Note the audience and thus the questions were "selected". Hardly an opportunity for him to meet real people and hear or answer their questions. He wouldn't dare.
He brought other cabinet ministers who fanned out over South Lancashire (the real original Lancashire) to see and talk to other selected people.
Studying a map of these visits reminded me of a Polo mint with a big hole in the middle.
Liverpool, Manchester, Warrington, Bury, Bolton and Leyland. The large central area which included Wigan and Leigh was left out, this in spite of Leigh being the constituency of Andy Burnham.
Why was this? Could it be because this central area has the safest Labour seats and they can be safely ignored? Or are we not "diverse" enough to warrant any encouragement?
We have become used to being ignored and our road system is among the worst in the country. A third of a million people seemingly do not count. However judging by their financial incompetence and inability to avoid disaster it will make no difference but it shows the low regard this area is shown by these "top people"
WE DESERVE BETTER! We were at the heart of Britains industrial revolution and wealth which our forefathers toiled and sometimes died to create.
It is up to us to upset this complacency and promote our policies which would breath new life into our area and this we are determined to do.
We believe in our area and its people because we are of it and them.
We will not use the people of this area as a milch cow to give us a cushy job followed by well paid "industrial consultancies" gained by not what you know but who.
We stand for and with the people, OUR PEOPLE! and will promote THEIR INTERESTS ABOVE ALL ELSE!
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
HEALTH CONCERNS OR MIND CONTROL?
A disaster which is destroying our local communities is taking place by stealth aided and abetted by government legislation, namely the closure of many of our best loved pubs.
30 years ago all our villages had Labour clubs, working mens clubs, British Legions and many more pubs than they have now.
30 years ago all our villages had Labour clubs, working mens clubs, British Legions and many more pubs than they have now.
The Hare and Hounds pub pictured above is one of the latest casualties and there are another two former prosperous pubs in Billinge alone which are up for sale. Many all over Wigan are under threat.
Pubs are one of the institutions for which Britain is famous and which will soon cease to be part of our landscape which will be immeasurably poorer for their demise.
Local MPs weep crocodile tears over this loss but they are the cause of this.
High business taxes, rates and alcohol duty have all contributed but the final nail in the coffin has been the blanket ban on smoking in pubs, brought in on spurious health grounds.
If MPs were so concerned about the detrimental effects of smoking why is it that the only bar in the country in which smoking is allowed is in the House of Commons? Do you honestly think MPs care about our health more than they do their own? Smoking is also allowed in the European Parliament in Brussels.
As a retired doctor and ex smoker I am perfectly aware of the danger of smoking as I am aware of the dangers of some sports and alcohol in excess.
However I, as an Englishman believe in freedom so long as people know the risks of their actions.
There should be smoking pubs and non smoking pubs, but that would lead, as I have experienced to empty non smoking and full smoking pubs. I, given the choice would avoid the non smoking pubs if only to avoid the boring self righteous people in them.
The government knows this. It wants to destroy pubs and working mens clubs. Why? Because when working people meet over a pint they often voice politically incorrect opinions and could in some cases voice, Heaven forbid views similar to those of the BNP and that would never do would it?
Many political movements and unions had their birth in pubs and thus they are seen as a threat to the governing elite of Europe and its British poodle.
PUBS AND CLUBS ARE A DANGER TO THE EXISTING POLITICAL ORDER SO THEY MUST BE QUIETLY KILLED.
Meanwhile people can sit at home with their cheap lager and be brainwashed by the government controlled gogglebox. THEY will not start rocking the government's cosy boat.
Also the profits made from this cheap undrinkable crap will go to companies who fund the major parties.
1984 IS HERE NOW AND ONLY THE BNP CAN SEE IT.
So stop pretending to save our pubs, you hypocritical MPs.
You have destroyed them but THE BNPcan see through you!
WE WILL RESTORE THEM!
Monday, 5 January 2009
THE CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT ON THE GAZA INCIDENT
We have said nothing, quite simply, because it’s nothing to do with Britain, and therefore nothing to do with the British National Party. That is the simple answer to the number of newer readers who have emailed recently to ask why this website has said nothing about the current number one international news topic - Israel’s targeted but massive air and ground response to indiscriminate but relatively feeble Hamas missile strikes on Israeli civilians.
The fighting in Gaza is not a proper concern for a British political party - especially at a time when the Bankers’ Bust threatens the livelihoods of millions and what little remains of the social cohesion of our own country. One of the core tenets of our nationalist philosophy is that Britain should keep completely out of other people’s quarrels and wars unless there are clear issues of our own national interest to give us the right, and our government the duty, to interfere.
Beyond that, as nationalists and not imperialists, we recognise the right of every other people under the sun to seek to secure self-determination on a patch of earth that is their historic and spiritual homeland, and the duty of every government of such a nation-state to protect its citizens from terrorism or oppression.
That includes both the Israelis and the Palestinians, but while we instinctively would suggest that a land-for-peace, two-state solution is the most likely way to square their very differing ambitions, in the end it is entirely up to them whether they make peace or continue fighting from now until Judgement Day. It really isn’t any of our business.
A superficially logical argument has been made by several of our readers to the effect that the endless television coverage of dead or injured Palestinian children (the anti-Israeli bias of the leftist BBC is particularly marked) will inflame Islamist extremists against not only Israel but also against other Western states, including the UK and our soldiers currently stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The reality, however, is not only that our troops should not be there in any case (and never should have been, for thy are two patches of howling desert that have nothing to do with Britain) but that Islamist ‘extremists’ need no ‘inflaming’. The massively influential Wahhabi and Deobandi sects behind most Sunni ‘extremism’ were alive and kicking, against the West in general and Britain in particular, decades or indeed a century before the state of Israel came into existence.
Indeed, the destruction of Israel (which is the generally stated aim of all the far-left and Muslim demonstrators screaming and on occasion rioting outside the Israeli Embassy in London, and the generally unstated aim of the far smaller number of neo-Nazi cranks siding with them on the Internet) would most definitely not placate a single hardline Muslim.
One of the fundamental lessons of the West’s long and at times desperate defence against Islam’s institutionalised aggression, sexual predation and imperialism, is that every victory for Islamic fighters reinforces the hysterical certainty in the word of the Prophet and in Islam’s self-proclaimed destiny to conquer the entire world.
The destruction of Israel would not send Islam back into a peaceful slumber, but would merely inspire and radicalise a whole new generation of Jihadist fanatics with the idea that the hour of their final triumph against the ‘Crusaders’ had been signalled by the collapse of the latter’s ‘Zionist outpost’ on the eastern edge of the Mediterranean. This would lead as a direct and immediate consequence to:
1) Renewed acts of ethno-religious cleansing against the non-Muslim remnants of the earlier populations of the Dar al Islam (lands which have already submitted to Allah);
2) A fresh confidence in the plan to re-partition India and establish a contiguous ‘Moghulstan’ taking in Pakistan, the Kashmir, huge swathes of northern India and Bangladesh;
3) A stepping up of the pressure through demographics and violence to reconquer further swathes of the Balkans and the southern edges of Russia;
4) Even more strenuous efforts to hasten the conquest - by demography, immigration, conversion, subversion and, when the time is right, force - of Western Europe and, a generation or so later, North America.
While Israel’s no-holds barred self-defence undoubtedly gives Islamist recruiters good material with which to radicalise some of their less motivated brethren, Israel’s extinction would provide them with even stronger arguments in favour of Jihad. The most elementary study of their rhetoric shows that they do not regard Israel as the great enemy, merely as the catspaw of Christendom. They may be right or they may be wrong, but that is what they believe; the destruction of Israel would therefore make them even bolder and more aggressive. Thus while we would oppose any move to entangle Britain in war on behalf of Israel, it is in our clear national interest that it should survive.
Whether that survival is made any more or less likely by responding on such a scale to the cynical provocations by Hamas is another matter, but that judgement is for Israelis to make at the ballot box, and not for us.
Westerners should concentrate on the key matter that concerns us. Our people must understand that Islam is not a mutated version of Christianity with a pacifist core in which the Meek will inherit the earth; it’s a creed of War and the Sword. It is inflamed by victory, and encouraged by successive advances. Once they start fighting, the only thing its followers understand is defeat. The centuries in which Islam has slumbered have all followed massive defeats which shattered the conceit that its date with Destiny and world domination was just around the corner.
Tours, Lepanto, Vienna, and even in its lesser way Omdurman, all show that Islam defeated is Islam tamed. The burning of the ancient Library of Alexandria, the obliteration of Christian North Africa, the Islamist genocides in India, the destruction of Byzantium, the repeated rape of the Balkans, the ceaseless efforts to take Europe - all show that when Islam takes a foot it wants a hundred miles.
That is the nature of the great Beast of our times. It can be defeated and put back to sleep. Its modern prestige and especially the power of the Sunni and Shi-ite fundamentalists in Saudi Arabia and Iran is based on one thing. It certainly isn’t military prowess, as the American, British and Israeli machines have all shown over and over again. Nor is it about guerrilla warfare successes of the kind seen in Afghanistan and Lebanon, which may yet emerge in Gaza.
The real motor of Jihad is oil money. The move to a post-oil world will be difficult even for the West, but once it is properly underway the resulting crash in the income of the fundamentalist paymasters of Islamic expansionism and terror will force them to stop worrying about conquering the world and to concentrate on looking after their own people or risk ending up riddled with bullets.
It can’t happen too soon, and developing the technologies and economic model needed to wean ourselves off oil, and the perpetual growth superstition it has fostered, is the very best way to deal with the instability of a Middle East that should have nothing to do with us. In the meantime, we will go back to ignoring Gaza and concentrate on the things that matter to our people.
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/01/%E2%80%9Cisrael%E2%80%99s-gaza-affair%E2%80%9D-by-bnp-leader-nick-griffin/
The fighting in Gaza is not a proper concern for a British political party - especially at a time when the Bankers’ Bust threatens the livelihoods of millions and what little remains of the social cohesion of our own country. One of the core tenets of our nationalist philosophy is that Britain should keep completely out of other people’s quarrels and wars unless there are clear issues of our own national interest to give us the right, and our government the duty, to interfere.
Beyond that, as nationalists and not imperialists, we recognise the right of every other people under the sun to seek to secure self-determination on a patch of earth that is their historic and spiritual homeland, and the duty of every government of such a nation-state to protect its citizens from terrorism or oppression.
That includes both the Israelis and the Palestinians, but while we instinctively would suggest that a land-for-peace, two-state solution is the most likely way to square their very differing ambitions, in the end it is entirely up to them whether they make peace or continue fighting from now until Judgement Day. It really isn’t any of our business.
A superficially logical argument has been made by several of our readers to the effect that the endless television coverage of dead or injured Palestinian children (the anti-Israeli bias of the leftist BBC is particularly marked) will inflame Islamist extremists against not only Israel but also against other Western states, including the UK and our soldiers currently stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The reality, however, is not only that our troops should not be there in any case (and never should have been, for thy are two patches of howling desert that have nothing to do with Britain) but that Islamist ‘extremists’ need no ‘inflaming’. The massively influential Wahhabi and Deobandi sects behind most Sunni ‘extremism’ were alive and kicking, against the West in general and Britain in particular, decades or indeed a century before the state of Israel came into existence.
Indeed, the destruction of Israel (which is the generally stated aim of all the far-left and Muslim demonstrators screaming and on occasion rioting outside the Israeli Embassy in London, and the generally unstated aim of the far smaller number of neo-Nazi cranks siding with them on the Internet) would most definitely not placate a single hardline Muslim.
One of the fundamental lessons of the West’s long and at times desperate defence against Islam’s institutionalised aggression, sexual predation and imperialism, is that every victory for Islamic fighters reinforces the hysterical certainty in the word of the Prophet and in Islam’s self-proclaimed destiny to conquer the entire world.
The destruction of Israel would not send Islam back into a peaceful slumber, but would merely inspire and radicalise a whole new generation of Jihadist fanatics with the idea that the hour of their final triumph against the ‘Crusaders’ had been signalled by the collapse of the latter’s ‘Zionist outpost’ on the eastern edge of the Mediterranean. This would lead as a direct and immediate consequence to:
1) Renewed acts of ethno-religious cleansing against the non-Muslim remnants of the earlier populations of the Dar al Islam (lands which have already submitted to Allah);
2) A fresh confidence in the plan to re-partition India and establish a contiguous ‘Moghulstan’ taking in Pakistan, the Kashmir, huge swathes of northern India and Bangladesh;
3) A stepping up of the pressure through demographics and violence to reconquer further swathes of the Balkans and the southern edges of Russia;
4) Even more strenuous efforts to hasten the conquest - by demography, immigration, conversion, subversion and, when the time is right, force - of Western Europe and, a generation or so later, North America.
While Israel’s no-holds barred self-defence undoubtedly gives Islamist recruiters good material with which to radicalise some of their less motivated brethren, Israel’s extinction would provide them with even stronger arguments in favour of Jihad. The most elementary study of their rhetoric shows that they do not regard Israel as the great enemy, merely as the catspaw of Christendom. They may be right or they may be wrong, but that is what they believe; the destruction of Israel would therefore make them even bolder and more aggressive. Thus while we would oppose any move to entangle Britain in war on behalf of Israel, it is in our clear national interest that it should survive.
Whether that survival is made any more or less likely by responding on such a scale to the cynical provocations by Hamas is another matter, but that judgement is for Israelis to make at the ballot box, and not for us.
Westerners should concentrate on the key matter that concerns us. Our people must understand that Islam is not a mutated version of Christianity with a pacifist core in which the Meek will inherit the earth; it’s a creed of War and the Sword. It is inflamed by victory, and encouraged by successive advances. Once they start fighting, the only thing its followers understand is defeat. The centuries in which Islam has slumbered have all followed massive defeats which shattered the conceit that its date with Destiny and world domination was just around the corner.
Tours, Lepanto, Vienna, and even in its lesser way Omdurman, all show that Islam defeated is Islam tamed. The burning of the ancient Library of Alexandria, the obliteration of Christian North Africa, the Islamist genocides in India, the destruction of Byzantium, the repeated rape of the Balkans, the ceaseless efforts to take Europe - all show that when Islam takes a foot it wants a hundred miles.
That is the nature of the great Beast of our times. It can be defeated and put back to sleep. Its modern prestige and especially the power of the Sunni and Shi-ite fundamentalists in Saudi Arabia and Iran is based on one thing. It certainly isn’t military prowess, as the American, British and Israeli machines have all shown over and over again. Nor is it about guerrilla warfare successes of the kind seen in Afghanistan and Lebanon, which may yet emerge in Gaza.
The real motor of Jihad is oil money. The move to a post-oil world will be difficult even for the West, but once it is properly underway the resulting crash in the income of the fundamentalist paymasters of Islamic expansionism and terror will force them to stop worrying about conquering the world and to concentrate on looking after their own people or risk ending up riddled with bullets.
It can’t happen too soon, and developing the technologies and economic model needed to wean ourselves off oil, and the perpetual growth superstition it has fostered, is the very best way to deal with the instability of a Middle East that should have nothing to do with us. In the meantime, we will go back to ignoring Gaza and concentrate on the things that matter to our people.
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/01/%E2%80%9Cisrael%E2%80%99s-gaza-affair%E2%80%9D-by-bnp-leader-nick-griffin/
THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT US AGAIN
And about our friend Hazel PD Blears.
There are some interesting arguments developing in the comments. This one will run and run - do register and get involved if you have anything to say about it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/05/bnp-far-right-immigrationpolicy
I do think it's fair to say that the more they talk about us, the more our progress must be worrying them. Think about how much they've been talking BNP this past year, and compare to how much they talked about us five years ago. I reckon it's a good measure of the steady progress we're making. I look forward to the EU election in June. The bit that interests me is our total vote count nationwide - as in these elections everyone in the country will have an opportunity to vote BNP, not just selected constituencies where we put up a candidate. The anticipated increase on the last EU election will be a very interesting number.
Then they'll be talking about nothing but us. I hope our main BNP web site is already making plans to cope with another huge increase in visitor numbers.
Morg
.
There are some interesting arguments developing in the comments. This one will run and run - do register and get involved if you have anything to say about it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/05/bnp-far-right-immigrationpolicy
I do think it's fair to say that the more they talk about us, the more our progress must be worrying them. Think about how much they've been talking BNP this past year, and compare to how much they talked about us five years ago. I reckon it's a good measure of the steady progress we're making. I look forward to the EU election in June. The bit that interests me is our total vote count nationwide - as in these elections everyone in the country will have an opportunity to vote BNP, not just selected constituencies where we put up a candidate. The anticipated increase on the last EU election will be a very interesting number.
Then they'll be talking about nothing but us. I hope our main BNP web site is already making plans to cope with another huge increase in visitor numbers.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)