THE MORALITY OF TAKING CARE OF YOUR OWN

For every reference in this article to America and American leaders, just substitute Britain and British leaders.

You wont find much to disagree with. I certainly don’t.

“The moral obligation of an American leader is to look after the well-being of the people of the United States. The moral obligation of a Russian leader is to look after the well-being of the people of Russia. A leader of either country who fails to do these things is acting immorally.

President Bush has acted immorally towards his own people.It is arguable that Vladimir Putin has acted in a more moral fashion with respect to his own people than George W. Bush or Bill Clinton has with respect to Americans. This is because the forty-second and forty-third presidents of the United States placed “international law” ahead of the welfare of Americans.

Not to see this is to be obtuse.

It doesn’t mean that Vladimir Putin is a good person. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t acted cynically (and against American interests) in Iran and other places. It doesn’t mean that he hasn’t been brutal.

It means that he has taken care of his own.”

Go read it all:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-russia.html

I can think of only one British political party whose leadership will be sure to take care of its own (people).

What say we all?

Morg

BOYCOTT UNPATRIOTIC SAINSBURYS

People may have seen in the papers or on the BNP website that the boss of Sainsburys has said that buying British food is "simplistic".
I have always noticed that Sainsbury's food adverts have for a long time promoted foreign produce and have avoided them for that reason.
During the farmers protests a few years ago against poor prices paid by the supermarkets we were treated with sympathy and courtesy by other firms. Sainsbury's depot at Haydock however had police in full riot gear with a spotter helicopter and several farmers were lucky not to be run over by a lorry driven by the manager. This was a complete over reaction against protesting farmers who neither did nor threatened violence.

Contrast this with the pussy footing by the police when controlling the anarchist mob outside the RWB in August.
I think this excessive police presence was because Lord Sainsbury was a big Labour donor.
We need a viable food industry in this overpopulated country and firms such as Sainsburys are doing their best to destroy it.
Because of the experience mentioned above I vowed never to shop at their stores again .
I have always suspected that they had a policy of purchasing foreign produce in preference to British and now it has been confirmed.
The boss says purchasing British produce is "simplistic"

I say shopping at Sainsbury's is unpatriotic and definitely simplistic as their prices are much dearer than other supermarkets.

So do your patriotic duty---BOYCOTT SAINSBURY'S, and save money at the same time.

OBAMA WINS.

Barak Obama's win in America is obviously the start of a new era in the "States" and the world.

To my mind he was the best candidate of the two on offer. Mc Cain was offering more of the same with a more aggressive warlike foreign policy and he was tainted by the legacy of the idiot George Bush with his disasterous legacy on the financial front and his stupidity in trying to use force to sort Middle East problems. (I have to admit Sarah Palin was a bit of alright in spite of her funny views but not as Vice President)

At least Obama has a chance of portraying a new more tolerant face to America's erstwhile enemies and may do some good abroad.

His problems at home will be more difficult to solve as the expectations of the blacks will be hard to fulfil. I hope he does manage to succeed.

However in spite of what the media says the USA is anything but united. Each of the many ethnic groups has its own agenda which are in many ways irreconcilable and he will be hard pressed to satisfy them all. The thing that united them this election was to get rid of the party to which Bush belonged at any price whatever ethnic group they were.

Of course the BBC gloat that this is not a racist result. So 97% black people voting for Obama is not racial voting? Of course it is.

I don't blame the blacks for voting for a black but the media should admit it for what it is-racist voting. If it was the other way round they would be the first to moan.

I wish him well but a racially mixed society has never worked up to now. Perhaps it will this time but if he fails the consequences could be dire.

A MYSTERY SOLVED, ELLIOT DOES EXIST

Our two intrepid group detectives, Ken and Chris have at last solved the mystery of the elusive Elliot Brown, our local" Hate Crimes Officer".Unexpectedley they found him to be a young white man (presumably indoctrinated by political correctness so that he could land his cushy non job).

They tackled him about the scurrilous racist remarks as above which were sent to You Tube.

He reluctantly contacted the police who then contacted Ken.

The officer concerned agreed that if we had put such a racist comment on a message we would probably have been arrested, thus accepting the double standards applying in these cases. He tried to bring Nick Griffin's remarks into it but it was pointed out that Nick had been aquitted at his trial. He also mentioned my reply for some reason which is not racist in tone at all. Have a look for yourself on the link below.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qIx4gwRgf6I

He says he will get it taken off the You Tube messages.

Well done Ken!

THEY NOW KNOW WE ARE WATCHING THEM and can use the rules which were originally brought in to persecute us against them.

As they say "RACISM CUTS BOTH WAYS"

.

Message from Morg

My posting will be light for a while.

My keyboard and touchpad are not working properly, and about the best I can do until I've fixed them is post links (I can copy/paste easily enough since I plugged in a mouse to bypass the touchpad). Takes me ages to get the letters to 'take' when I'm trying to write.

I think it's a software problem and I'm trying to find it. I know I could use a separate keyboard to bypass this one, but dammit, I want to fix this one.

A bonus of trying to track down this problem is that while I was at it I found a Data-miner in my machine. It's dead now. Wonder who it is that knows everything I've got on my machine and everywhere I go? Good job I've got no nonce stuff in here eh?

Morg

BOYCOTT "CHILDREN IN NEED"

In two weeks the annual BBC farce "Children in Need" takes place. It purports to support children but closer examination of causes to which it donates indicate that a large proportion (after large administration costs) goes to helping the children of immigrants, travellers and many in foreign countries. Much of the small part going to British children goes to the NSPCC, notorious for taking children from parents on the slightest pretext, at the instigation of politically correct immature social workers. This causes great injustice and there is no appeal against their decision (remember Cleveland and Rochdale) Cases of genuine abuse are missed.

I used to be a strong supporter of the NSPCC but since the former notorious cases have ceased to fund them. They often do more harm than good.

Charity begins at home!

If you want to give, support the Poppy Day appeal or the local Hospice or any local charity where the money goes direct and cuts out those who make a living out of others generosity---but

DON'T SUPPORT CHILDREN IN NEED,- it's not your British kids who benefit!

POLITICALLY CORRECT SPORT

Last week a sporting event was held to help black and ethnic minorities participate in sport, at what cost I ask. The excuse given is that ethnic minorities have difficulties regarding cost and transport in sport and that some regard sport as "not for them". The fact that there are many black sportsmen, some of them very well paid seems to have escaped the authorities. However there are not many asian athletes owing to them being physically less capable at sports such as football, rugby and track events showing that skin colour has no effect on sporting prowess but racial type.
All races are not equal in ability regardless of colour.
The costs of sport impinges on many English kids and the statement that Wigan Metro wants to integrate communities shows how it divides the races up. There should be only one community here and that is the community of Wiganers. Extra subsidies for the black and ethnic minorities (who were not invited here) is an insult to council taxpayers many of whom have difficulty in paying their bills.

Politically correct rubbish and again we pay!